Application of the Cooperative Integrated Learning Model Reading and Composition to Improve Chemistry Learning Outcomes
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The aim of this research is to improve the chemistry learning outcomes of class X students at Public High School 5 Bandar Lampung through the implementation of the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) cooperative learning model.
Methodology: The subjects in this research were 18 class X Public High School 5 Bandar Lampung students. Meanwhile, the object of this research is the application of the Cooperative type cooperative learning model Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) to improve chemistry learning outcomes for class X Public High School 5 Bandar Lampung.
Main Findings: Based on research results, the application of cooperative learning strategies of the Cooperative Integrated Reading and type Composition (CIRC) in the learning process in class X Public High School 5 Bandar Lampung improves student learning outcomes.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this research is to determine the effectiveness of implementing the cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) type cooperative learning model to improve chemistry learning outcomes. In addition, this research also contributes to the educational literature by presenting empirical data regarding the effectiveness of CIRC in improving understanding and retention of chemistry material.
References
A. Emda, “Kedudukan motivasi belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran,” Lantanida J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 172–182, 2018.
V. Prasetyawati, “Metode Cooperative Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Hasil Belajar Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Epistema, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 90–99, 2021.
T. S. N. Manu and F. T. Nomleni, “Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Karya Kelompok Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dengan Kovariabel Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi,” Sch. J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 167–179, 2018.
M. Nasution, “Memahami Pendekatan keterampilan Proses dalam Pembelajaran,” Logaritma J. Ilmu-ilmu Kependidikan dan Sains, vol. II, no. 01, pp. 65–83, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://repo.iain-padangsidimpuan.ac.id/124/
P. G. Fitchett and T. L. Heafner, “Teacher Quality or Quality Teaching? Eighth Grade Social Studies Teachers’ Professional Characteristics and Classroom Instruction as Predictors of U.S. History Achievement,” RMLE Online, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1–17, 2018, doi: 10.1080/19404476.2018.1514826.
S. Motevalli, A. Perveen, and M. Tresa Anak Michael, “Motivating Students to Learn: An Overview of Literature in Educational Psychology,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 63–74, 2020, doi: 10.6007/ijarped/v9-i3/7779.
S. Mehta and A. K. Kulshrestha, “Implementation of Cooperative Learning in Science: A Developmental-cum-Experimental Study,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2014, pp. 1–7, 2014, doi: 10.1155/2014/431542.
M. Diana and P. Fadillah, “Analysis of the Application of the Group Investigation Learning Model and Its Influence on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Elementary Chemical Materials in Class XII MIA SMAN 5 Jambi City,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 108–113, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i4.286.
R. Bellová, D. Melicherčíková, and P. Tomčík, “Possible reasons for low scientific literacy of Slovak students in some natural science subjects,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., pp. 1–18, 2017, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2017.1367656.
N. M. Rosa and A. Pujiati, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif,” Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 175–183, 2017, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v6i3.990.
S. Inayah, I. W. Dasna, and H. Habiddin, “Implementasi Green Chemistry Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia: Literatur Review,” Hydrog. J. Kependidikan Kim., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 42, 2022, doi: 10.33394/hjkk.v10i1.4611.
I. Farida, R. R. Sunarya, R. Aisyah, and I. Helsy, “Pembelajaran Kimia Sistem Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Bagi Generasi Z,” KTI UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, pp. 1–11, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/30638/
K. S. Taber, “Building the Structural Concepts of Chemistry: Some Considerations From Educational Research,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Eur., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 123–158, 2001, doi: 10.1039/b1rp90014e.
A. Sibomana, C. Karegeya, and J. Sentongo, “Students’ conceptual understanding of organic chemistry and classroom implications in the Rwandan perspectives: A literature review,” African J. Educ. Stud. Math. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 13–32, 2020, doi: 10.4314/ajesms.v16i2.2.
N. M. H. Nik Hassan, O. Talib, and H. F. Lokman, “Class Map: Improving Students’ Skills of Organic Synthesis in Learning Organic Chemistry for Pre-University Students,” Malaysian J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 270–284, 2022, doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v7i1.1231.
C. R. Lotter, S. Thompson, T. S. Dickenson, W. F. Smiley, G. Blue, and M. Rea, “The Impact of a Practice-Teaching Professional Development Model on Teachers’ Inquiry Instruction and Inquiry Efficacy Beliefs,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 255–273, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10763-016-9779-x.
L. Verschaffel, S. Schukajlow, J. Star, and W. Van Dooren, “Word problems in mathematics education: a survey,” ZDM - Math. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4.
A. Halimah, “Metode Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (Circ) dalam Pembelajaran Membaca dan Menulis Di SD/MI,” Auladuna, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2014.
L. T. Tien, V. Roth, and J. A. Kampmeier, “Implementation of a peer-led team learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 606–632, 2002, doi: 10.1002/tea.10038.
R. Z. A. Syam, R. N. Indah, R. S. Sauri, and F. Ruqayah, “Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Model Learning Plan in Improving English Reading Skill,” Lentera Pendidik. J. Ilmu Tarb. dan Kegur., vol. 23, no. 2, p. 222, 2020, doi: 10.24252/lp.2020v23n2i3.
M. Muhali, “Pembelajaran Inovatif Abad Ke-21,” J. Penelit. dan Pengkaj. Ilmu Pendidik. e-Saintika, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 25–50, 2019, doi: 10.36312/e-saintika.v3i2.126.
N. Maruf and A. M. R. Anjely, “Utilizing Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) with mobile Learning to Enhance Students’ Reading Comprehension,” Br. (Jurnal Bhs. dan Sastra Inggris), vol. 9, no. 2, p. 10, 2020, doi: 10.31314/british.9.2.10-19.2020.
L. Tyera, M. Megawati, and M. Rusli, “Penerapan Keterampilan Proses Dasar Berbasis Lingkungan Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Educ. J. Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 112–123, 2022, doi: 10.56248/educativo.v1i1.18.
Masnaini, J. Copriady, and K. Osman, “Cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) with mind mapping strategy and its effects on chemistry achievement and motivation,” Asia-Pacific Forum Sci. Learn. Teach., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2018.
Madhu Gupta and Pooja Pasrija, “Co-Operative Learning : an Efficient Technique To Convert Students Into Active Learners in Classrooms,” MIER J. Educ. Stud. Trends Pract., no. Figure 1, pp. 21–33, 2016, doi: 10.52634/mier/2012/v2/i1/1601.
R. L. Stowe, L. J. Scharlott, V. R. Ralph, N. M. Becker, and M. M. Cooper, “You Are What You Assess: The Case for Emphasizing Chemistry on Chemistry Assessments,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 2490–2495, 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00532.
R. Kozma, E. Chin, J. Russell, and N. Marx, “The Roles of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their Implications for Chemistry Learning Center for Technology in Learning SRI International,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 105–143, 2000.
E. Durukan, “Effects of cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) technique on reading-writing skills,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 102–109, 2011.
M. Astatke, C. Weng, and S. Chen, “A literature review of the effects of social networking sites on secondary school students’ academic achievement,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 2153–2169, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1875002.
Y. Rahmawati, E. Taylor, P. C. Taylor, A. Ridwan, and A. Mardiah, “Students’ Engagement in Education as Sustainability: Implementing an Ethical Dilemma-STEAM Teaching Model in Chemistry Learning,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14063554.
Copyright (c) 2024 Tati Fatimah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
