Innovation Learning with POE: Improve Understanding Student to Equality Square

Reki Fernande; Varadarajan   Sridharan; Watjanarat  Kuandee

doi:10.37251/jetlc.v2i1.977

Reki Fernande State High School 16 Makassar
Varadarajan Sridharan Nettur Technical Training Foundation
Watjanarat Kuandee Surindra Rajabhat University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v2i1.977

Keywords: Equality Square, Learning, POE, Worksheets

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using Predict, Observe, Explain (POE) worksheets in improving students' understanding of quadratic equations.

Methodology: The study employed a mixed-method approach, specifically the sequential explanatory type. It involved quantitative data collection through pre- and post-tests, as well as qualitative data from structured interviews with teachers and students. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent sample t-tests

Main Findings: This study presents several significant main findings. Firstly, the experimental group exhibited a notable improvement in cognitive function compared to the control group. Secondly, there was a positive correlation between the level of physical activity and cognitive performance. Lastly, regular physical exercise was associated with a lower risk of cognitive decline in older adults. These findings underscore the importance of physical activity in maintaining cognitive health and provide valuable insights for cognitive health maintenance among older adults.

Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces evidence supporting the link between physical activity and cognitive function in older adults, providing insights into effective strategies for mitigating cognitive decline through exercise interventions. The findings contribute to existing knowledge by emphasizing the importance of lifestyle factors in preserving cognitive health.

References

D. R. A. U. Khasanah, H. Pramudibyanto, and B. Widuroyekti, “Pendidikan dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Sinestesia, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2020.

O. Alpindo and D. Dahnuss, “Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Mahasiswa Berbantuan Games Pada Matakuliah Fisika Dasar Di Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi,” J. Kiprah, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–124, 2019, doi: 10.31629/kiprah.v7i2.1531.

F. P. Sinaga, Jurhana, Yusrita, and M. Hidayat, “Analisis Penggunaan Metode Mengajar (Metode Demonstrasi, Metode Eksperimen, Metode Inquiry, Dan Metode Discovery Di Sma Negeri 11 Kota Jambi),” Relativ. J. Ris. Inov. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.29103/relativitas.v5i2.7830.

I. Fadilah and Kartini, “Identifikasi Sikap Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Fisika Di Man 1 Batanghari,” Sukma J. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 217–231, 2019, doi: 10.32533/03205.2019.

Y. Anra and A. M. Sadzali, “Kajian Kepuasan Pengunjung Obyek Wisata Warisan Budaya Kawasan Candi Muara Jambi Sebagai Cagar Budaya Nasional Dan Kandidat Warisan Dunia Yusdi,” Kaji. Kepuasan Pengunjung Obyek Wisata Waris. Budaya Kaw. Candi Muara Jambi Sebagai Cagar Budaya Nas. Dan Kandidat Waris. Dunia, vol. 1, no. 2, 2017.

Supriyanto, A. N. Fatirul, and D. A. Walujo, “Pengaruh Strategi Problem Based Learning Dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis,” J. Kumparan Fis., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2022, doi: 10.33369/jkf.5.1.43-54.

M. Listyawati, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Ipa Terpadu Di Smp,” J. Innov. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2012.

A. Ramdani and I. P. Artayasa, “Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA Menggunakan Model Inkuiri Terbuka,” J. Pendidik. Sains Indones., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020, doi: 10.24815/jpsi.v8i1.15394.

H. M. . Nahak, “Upaya Melestarikan Budaya Indonesia Di Era Globalisasi,” J. Sosiol. Nusant., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 2019, doi: 10.33369/jsn.5.1.65-76.

Wildan, “Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Aspek Pengetahuan, Sikap Dan Keterampilan Di Sekolah Atau Madrasah,” J. Tatsqif, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 131–153, 2017, doi: 10.20414/jtq.v15i2.3.

H. N. Dinni, “HOTS ( High Order Thinking Skills ) dan Kaitannya dengan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika,” Prisma, vol. 1, pp. 170–176, 2018.

A. G. Wicaksono, “Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran Ipa Berbasis Pendekatan Stem Dalam Menyongsong Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,” LENSA (Lentera Sains) J. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2020, doi: 10.24929/lensa.v10i1.98.

F. M. Maharuli and Z. Zulherman, “Analisis Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Dalam Muatan Pelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Educ. FKIP UNMA, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 265–271, 2021, doi: 10.31949/educatio.v7i2.966.

A. Rulyansah and L. A. Wardana, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Kompetensi 4K Anies Baswedan dan Multiple Intelligences,” J. Basicedu, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1236–1245, 2020, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.539.

D. Saputra and M. Yusro, “Perencanaan Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Kompetensi Kejuruan Teknik Elektronika Dasar Pada Kompetensi Dasar Menerapkan Macam-Macam Gerbang Dasar Rangkaian Logika Dengan Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick,” J. Pendidik. VOKASIONAL Tek. Elektron., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: 10.21009/jvote.v3i1.18159.

N. A. Suryandaru and E. W. Setyaningtyas, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Website Pada Muatan Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas IV,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 6040–6048, 2021, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1803.

S. Wahyuni, E. Rahmadhani, and L. Mandasari, “Pelatihan Pembuatan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif dengan Menggunakan Powerpoint,” J. Abdidas, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 597–602, 2020, doi: 10.31004/abdidas.v1i6.131.

M. Baginda, “Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Berbasis Karakter pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah,” J. Ilm. Iqra’, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2018, doi: 10.30984/jii.v10i2.593.

N. R. H. Meduri, R. Firdaus, and H. Fitriawan, “Efektifitas Aplikasi Website Dalam Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Peserta Didik,” J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 283–294, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.34005/akademika.v11i02.2272.

H. T. Laia and D. Harefa, “Hubungan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dengan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa,” Aksara J. Ilmu Pendidik. Nonform., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 463–474, 2021, doi: 10.37905/aksara.7.2.463-474.2021.

Y. Sahuri, H. Habibullah, and C. Dewi, “Korelasi Input Siswa Tahun Pertama Jurusan Teknik Listrik SMK Dengan Capaian KKM Tahun Pertama,” JTEV (Jurnal Tek. Elektro dan Vokasional), vol. 6, no. 2, p. 219, 2020, doi: 10.24036/jtev.v6i2.107914.

M. Aristidou, “Is mathematical logic really necessary in teaching mathematical proofs?,” Athens J. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 99–122, 2020, doi: 10.30958/aje.7-1-5.

F. Pebrianti, L. Nurfitri, and N. Roza, “The Use of Mathematical Logic in Determining Deliberation Decisions Models,” Int. J. Technol. Model., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–35, 2022.

D. Kollosche, “Styles of reasoning for mathematics education,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 471–486, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10649-021-10046-z.

R. Cassibba, D. Ferrarello, M. F. Mammana, P. Musso, M. Pennisi, and E. Taranto, “Teaching mathematics at distance: A challenge for universities,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2021, doi: 10.3390/EDUCSCI11010001.

Z. K. Szabo, P. Körtesi, J. Guncaga, D. Szabo, and R. Neag, “Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 1–28, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su122310113.

L. Verschaffel, S. Schukajlow, J. Star, and W. Van Dooren, “Word problems in mathematics education: a survey,” ZDM - Math. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4.

M. G. Didiş Kabar, “A Thematic Review of Quadratic Equation Studies in The Field of Mathematics Education,” Particip. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 29–48, 2023, doi: 10.17275/per.23.58.10.4.

B. Reid O’Connor and S. Norton, “Exploring the challenges of learning quadratic equations and reflecting upon curriculum structure and implementation,” Math. Educ. Res. J., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 151–176, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13394-022-00434-w.

Q. Hu, J. W. Son, and L. Hodge, “Algebra Teachers’ Interpretation and Responses to Student Errors in Solving Quadratic Equations,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 637–657, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10763-021-10166-1.

C. Foster, T. Francome, D. Hewitt, and C. Shore, “Principles for the design of a fully-resourced, coherent, research-informed school mathematics curriculum,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 621–641, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00220272.2021.1902569.

I. F. Alfiyanti, B. Jatmiko, and Wasis, “The Effectiveness of Predict Observe Explain ( POE ) Model with PhET to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Senior High School Students,” Stud. Learn. Teach., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 76–85, 2020, doi: 10.46627/silet.v1i2.34.

F. Nisa, U. Fatimah, J. Siswanto, H. Nuroso, and M. S. Hayat, “Implementation of the education for sustainable development ( ESD ) based predict , observe , and explain ( POE ) learning module to improve critical thinking skills,” Pract. Sci. Teach. J. J. Prakt. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 52–63, 2023, doi: 10.58362/hafecspost.v2i2.32.

N. Çırakoğlu, S. E. Toksoy, and İ. Reisoğlu, “Designing, Developing, and Evaluating an Interactive E-Book Based on the Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) Method,” J. Form. Des. Learn., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 95–112, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s41686-022-00071-3.

C. Granberg, T. Palm, and B. Palmberg, “A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 68, no. November 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955.

A. T. Tredennick, G. Hooker, S. P. Ellner, and P. B. Adler, “A practical guide to selecting models for exploration, inference, and prediction in ecology,” Ecology, vol. 102, no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.1002/ecy.3336.

I. Sarifah and E. M. Kurnianti, “Developing Geometry Students Worksheet Based on Realistic Mathematics for Learning in Elementary School,” in 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019), 2020, pp. 495–503. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200129.062.

E. N. Setiyani, Z. Hazmi, Z. Baharin, and S. N. Jesse, “Development of POE-Based Student Worksheets ( Predict , Observe , And Explain ) for Students ’ Mathematical Representation Abilities,” J. Educ. Technol. Learn. Creat., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jetlc.v1i2.792.

F. Coştu and H. Bayram, “The Effectiveness of Predict-Explain-Observe-Discuss-Explain (PEODE) Based Laboratory Work Activities on Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Science Process Skills,” Mimb. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21–40, 2021, doi: 10.53400/mimbar-sd.v8i1.30897.

D. A. Nugroho and R. R. N. Setyowati, “The Development Of Learning Documents Based On Predict, Observe, Explain (Poe) Models In Improving Understanding Concepts,” J. Educ. …, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 674–680, 2020, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.6093.

T. Nalkiran and S. Karamustafaoglu, “Prediction-Observation-Explanation (POE) Method and Its Efficiency in Teaching ‘Work, Energy, Power’ Concepts,” Int. J. Assess. Tools Educ., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 497–521, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.727399Publishedathttps://ijate.net/https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijate

D. H. Mansur, E. Surahman, and Y. S. Makiyah, “Pengaruh E-LKS berbasis Model POE2WE terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Gerak Lurus,” J. Penelit. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 209–221, 2023, doi: 10.26877/jp2f.v14i2.16675.

S. Arif and C. A. Sahara, “Development of student worksheet based on POE (predict, observe, and explain) with science literature approach,” Edu Sains J. Pendidik. Sains Mat., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 44–60, 2022, doi: 10.23971/eds.v10i1.3098.

D. P. Nengsih, I. Koto, A. Defianti, Nirwana, and H. Johan, “The Effect of Static Fluid Pressure Learning with Predict- Observe-Explain (POE)-Oriented Student Worksheets on Science Process Skills,” J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 297–312, 2023, doi: 10.26618/jpf.v11i3.11842.

F. M. Tahir, N. M. Nasri, and L. Halim, “The Effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain-Animation (POE-A) Strategy to Overcome Students’ Misconceptions about Electric Circuits Concepts,” Learn. Sci. Math., vol. 0832, no. 15, pp. 1–15, 2020.

R. Vebrianto, M. Thahir, Z. Putriani, I. Mahartika, A. Ilhami, and Diniya, “Mixed Methods Research: Trends and Issues in Research Methodology,” Bedelau J. Educ. Learn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 63–73, 2020, doi: 10.55748/bjel.v1i2.35.

D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. Triani, “The effect of Science Process Skills of Students Argumentation Skills,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 78–88, 2022, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v8i1.49224.

N. Gericke, P. Högström, and J. Wallin, “A systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary school,” Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 245–285, 2023, doi: 10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125.

S. Marzuki and B. M. Sabillah, “The Implementation of POE (Predict, Observe, Explain) Learning Model to Improve Students’ Achievement at Class XI Students of SMA Negeri 10 Makassar,” ELS J. Interdiscip. Stud. Humanit., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 552–559, 2020, doi: 10.34050/elsjish.v3i4.11891.

A. F. Noor, R. Yunus, S. Suyidno, and F. Fahmi, “Development of Predict-Observe-Explain (Poe) Based Authentic Problems’ Instructional Package To Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills,” J. Pendidik. Mat. dan IPA, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 69, 2023, doi: 10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.53932.

D. T. Astiti, M. Ibrahim, and E. Hariyono, “Application of POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) Learning Strategies to Reduce Students’ Misconceptions in Science Subjects in Elementary School,” Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 437–445, 2020, doi: 10.38124/ijisrt20jul478.