Utilization of MOOC for Subak Values Extension: Maintaining Balinese Local Wisdom in Modern Education
Abstract
Purpose of the study: To explore the use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) as a medium for delivering Subak cultural values and to evaluate its effectiveness in increasing understanding, satisfaction, and relevance in the context of local wisdom preservation in digital education.
Methodology: This study applied a mixed method with a sequential explanatory design. Quantitative data were collected through Likert-scale surveys from 15 MOOC participants. Qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interviews and literature review. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.
Main Findings: Participants showed a high level of understanding of Subak values (mean score: 4.27) and were satisfied with the course delivery (mean score: 4.33). Interactive media such as videos and simulations supported better comprehension. Flexibility and accessibility were major strengths. Challenges include limited real-world interaction with Subak practices.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study is the first to evaluate the integration of Balinese Subak cultural values into a MOOC framework. It offers a new perspective on how digital platforms can effectively support the preservation of intangible cultural heritage through structured online learning accessible to a global audience.
References
C. Salvaterra, A. Bencivenni, M. Fogagnolo, T. Gheldof, and I. Vagionakis, “ENCODE4OpenU and the preparation and delivery of an international collaborative MOOC: a preliminary analysis of its pedagogical and technical implementation,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13010043.
D. A. Lestari, I. R. Suwarma, and E. Suhendi, “Feasibility analysis of the development of STEM-based physics e-book with self-regulated learning on global warming topics Indonesian journal of teaching in science,” Indones. J. Teach. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2024.
K. Richter and M. Kickmeier-Rust, “Gamification in physics education: play your way to better learning,” Int. J. Serious Games, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 59–81, 2025, doi: 10.17083/ijsg.v12i1.858.
D. Mhlanga, “Digital transformation education, opportunities, and challenges of the application of ChatGPT to emerging economies,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2023, 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/7605075.
A. M. Rahmani, S. Bayramov, and B. Kiani Kalejahi, “Internet of things applications: opportunities and threats,” Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 451–476, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11277-021-08907-0.
N. Voudoukis and G. Pagiatakis, “Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): practices, trends, and challenges for the higher education,” Eur. J. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 288–295, 2022, doi: 10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.3.365.
A. Królak and P. Zając, “Analysis of the accessibility of selected massive open online courses (MOOCs) for users with disabilities,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 191–202, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10209-022-00927-2.
I. S. Zen, S. P. K. Surata, P. W. Titisari, S. A. Ab Rahman, and S. Zen, “Sustaining subak, the balinese traditional ecological knowledge in the contemporary context of Bali,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1306, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1306/1/012034.
P. D. H. Ardana, D. O. Suparwata, A. Sudrajat, S. Chatun, and I. Harsono, “The role of Bali’s traditional Subak Farming System in the Preservation of Natural and Cultural Resources,” West Sci. Nat. Technol., vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 31–38, 2024, doi: 10.58812/wsnt.v2i04.754.
I. Despujol, L. Castañeda, V. I. Marín, and C. Turró, “What do we want to know about MOOCs? Results from a machine learning approach to a systematic literature mapping review,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00359-1.
C. M. Stracke and G. Trisolini, “A systematic literature review on the quality of moocs,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1–26, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13115817.
J. Daniel, “Running distance education at scale: open universities, open schools, and MOOCs,” Handb. Open, Distance Digit. Educ., pp. 475–492, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_26.
S. Bettiol, R. Psereckis, and K. MacIntyre, “A perspective of massive open online courses (MOOCs) and public health,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 10, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1058383.
A. S. Sunar, E. Yükseltürk, and İ. Duru, “Analysis on use of open educational resources during emergency remote education due to Covid-19: a case study in Turkey,” SAGE Open, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1177/21582440221130299.
N. W. Primayanti and V. Puspita, “Local wisdom narrative in environmental campaign,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2022.2090062.
I. Triastari, S. I. A. Dwiningrum, and S. H. Rahmia, “Developing disaster mitigation education with local wisdom: exemplified in Indonesia schools,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 884, no. 1, pp. 0–11, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/884/1/012004.
S. P. K. Surata, I. B. A. Arjaya, and I. G. A. S. R. Jayantini, LEARNING SUSTAINABILITY: Ecopedagogy through Drawing Balinese Subak. Zifatama Jawara, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=HlszEQAAQBAJ
S. Amin, M. I. Uddin, A. A. Alarood, W. K. Mashwani, A. O. Alzahrani, and H. A. Alzahrani, “An adaptable and personalized framework for top-N course recommendations in online learning,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56497-1.
J. K. E. Edumadze and D. W. Govender, “The community of inquiry as a tool for measuring student engagement in blended massive open online courses (MOOCs): a case study of university students in a developing country,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40561-024-00306-9.
A. M. Kaihlanen et al., “Towards digital health equity - a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era,” BMC Health Serv. Res., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07584-4.
L. L. Campanozzi, F. Gibelli, P. Bailo, G. Nittari, A. Sirignano, and G. Ricci, “The role of digital literacy in achieving health equity in the third millennium society: A literature review,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 11, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1109323.
J. Melsom, “Subak syntax: decoding the hydrological socio-agricultural systems of the Bali Subak typology,” in Advanced Research and Design Tools for Architectural Heritage, Routledge, pp. 144–167.
N. Kadek, D. Hariyanti, I. M. O. Widyantara, and G. Sukadarmika, “Ontology-based data framework for the digital preservation cultural heritage : A case of Subak Methodology Ontology Modelling Ontologies have been developed based on various research methodologies in various,” Matrix J. Manaj. Teknol. dan Inform., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 135–145, 2024.
C. Lin, “A review of emotional design in extended reality for the preservation of culture heritage,” npj Herit. Sci., 2025, doi: 10.1038/s40494-025-01625-x.
G. Mercan, Z. V. Selçuk, and M. Ö. Keskin, “The impact of virtual museum on learning achievement: a meta- synthesis study,” J. Hum. Soc. Sci., vol. 2023, no. 2, pp. 520–544, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/johass
A. Löhr et al., “Informing and inspiring worldwide action against marine litter - the impact of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Marine Litter,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 198, no. September 2023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115811.
A. Belinskiy, “Exploring engagement profiling in MOOCs through Learning Analytics: The Open edX Case,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/handle/11250/2762640
S. Aririguzoh, “Communication competencies, culture and SDGs: effective processes to cross-cultural communication,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01109-4.
D. F. O. Onah, E. L. L. Pang, and J. E. Sinclair, An investigation of self-regulated learning in a novel MOOC platform, vol. 36, no. 1. Springer US, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s12528-022-09346-x.
T. Duan, “A new idea for the optimization of MOOC-based teaching,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 3623–3650, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10755-1.
J. Aashish and K. Rohit, “Technologies for quality and sustainable online education in rural India: a comprehensive review,” in 2024 ITU Kaleidoscope: Innovation and Digital Transformation for a Sustainable World (ITU K), 2024, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.23919/ITUK62727.2024.10772876.
S. A. Sakti, S. Endraswara, and A. Rohman, “Revitalizing local wisdom within character education through ethnopedagogy apporach: A case study on a preschool in Yogyakarta,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 10, p. e31370, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31370.
M. Amin and A. D. Ritonga, “Diversity, local wisdom, and unique characteristics of millennials as capital for innovative learning models: evidence from North Sumatra, Indonesia,” Societies, vol. 14, no. 12, 2024, doi: 10.3390/soc14120260.
M. Dibitonto, K. Leszczynska, E. Cruciani, and C. M. Medaglia, “Training Professionals to Bring Digital Transformation into Museums: The Mu.SA Blended Course BT - HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Cognition, Learning and Games,” in Springer, Cham, C. Stephanidis, D. Harris, W.-C. Li, D. D. Schmorrow, C. M. Fidopiastis, P. Zaphiris, A. Ioannou, X. Fang, R. A. Sottilare, and J. Schwarz, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 365–376.
K. A. Cordell, “Cultural Heritage Management Technology and Training BT - Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology,” in Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, C. Smith, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 2982–2987. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30018-0_1209.
I. Crespo, “Introducing the Europeana MOOC ‘Digital Education with Cultural Heritage,’” Europeana Foundation, BE Den Haag, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://pro.europeana.eu/post/introducing-the-europeana-mooc-digital-education-with-cultural-heritage
M. Salajegheh, J. Sandars, A. Mirzazadeh, and R. Gandomkar, “Understanding the capacity development of faculty development programs: a sequential explanatory mixed methods study,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05715-5.
Y. E. Chieng and C. K. Tan, “A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Malaysian science teachers’ survey and perspective,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 235–241, 2021, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1517.
F. Daryanes, D. Darmadi, K. Fikri, I. Sayuti, M. A. Rusandi, and D. D. B. Situmorang, “The development of articulate storyline interactive learning media based on case methods to train student’s problem-solving ability,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 4, p. e15082, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15082.
F. Tuma, “The use of educational technology for interactive teaching in lectures,” Ann. Med. Surg., vol. 62, no. December 2020, pp. 231–235, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.051.
M. S. Anwar, J. Yang, J. Frnda, A. Choi, N. Baghaei, and M. Ali, “Metaverse and XR for cultural heritage education: applications, standards, architecture, and technological insights for enhanced immersive experience,” Virtual Real., vol. 29, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10055-025-01126-z.
K.-Z. Chen and B. Oakley, “Redeveloping a global MOOC to be more locally relevant: design-based research,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 9, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-0178-6.
G. Koutromanos, D. Koukopoulos, Z. Koukopoulos, and C. Mouzakis, “Cultural heritage content development and dissemination through a participatory platform: lessons learned from in-service teachers’ perception,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3513–3536, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11336-6.
F. Kayaalp, Z. B. Namlı, and E. Meral, “My museum: A study of pre-service social studies teachers’ experience in designing virtual museums,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 18, pp. 24047–24085, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12742-8.
J.-P. Restoule, “Where indigenous knowledge lives: bringing indigenous perspectives to online learning environments BT,” in Handbook of Indigenous Education, E. A. McKinley and L. T. Smith, Eds., Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017, pp. 1–23. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1839-8_62-1.
Copyright (c) 2025 Rafika Tri Julianti, Mehmet Sahiner, Nurkaliza Khalid

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.