Analysis of the Application of the Group Investigation Learning Model and Its Influence on Students' Critical Thinking Abilities on Chemical Elements in Eastern Europe

  • Dorin Herlo Aurel vlaicu university of arad
  • Elia Ambrosio University of Tartu
  • Petinka Galcheva Shumen University
Keywords: Group investigation learning model, Critical thinking skills, Elemental chemistry

Abstract

Research objective: Research on the analysis of the application of the group investigation learning model on chemical elements and its influence on students' critical thinking abilities, which aims to see the effect of implementing this model on students' critical thinking abilities in eastern European countries.

Methodology: This research is a descriptive correlational research with a concurrent embedded mix method design . The sample was determined using a purposive sampling technique with expert consideration. Data analysis was carried out to see the effect of implementing the GI model on students' critical thinking abilities using the Bivariate Pearson test and significance testing using the t test.

Main findings: the results of the correlation test between the implementation of the GI model by students and students' critical thinking abilities were obtained r xy = 0.710. The results of the normality and homogeneity tests show normal and homogeneous data. The results of the significance test obtained t = 5.878 and t table = 2.032 with dk = 34 and α = 0.05. The results of the research prove that the implementation of the group investigation learning model is going well and there is an influence between the implementation of the group investigation learning model and students' critical thinking skills in chemical elements in eastern European countries.

Recent research: This research strengthens the significant influence of the GI model on students' critical thinking abilities , especially in chemistry lessons.

References

[1] M. Mulyati, F. I. Putri, and D. Deswalman, “Efforts to Improve Student Activities and Outcomes in Physics Learning Using the Two Stay Two Stray Technical Cooperative Learning Model at Senior High School,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i1.294.
[2] F. I. Putri, F. Masda, M. Maison, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Analisis Hubungan Karakter Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa Terhadap Minat Belajar Fisika di SMAN 11 Kota Jambi,” J. Phi J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Fis. Terap., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 19, 2022, doi: 10.22373/p-jpft.v3i2.13226.
[3] A. Arjusi and R. Alfiana, “The Relationship of Religious Character to Student Learning Outcomes in Elementary School,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 70–73, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jber.v4i2.422.
[4] F. Faiz, Pengantar Menuju Berfikir Kritis. Yogyakarta: Suka Press, 2012.
[5] A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, and S. E. Septi, “Overview the inquiry learning model: Attitudes, student characters, and student responses what’s the impact?,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2023, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v17i1.20530.
[6] D. Ariska, “The Effect of Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum on the Professional Competence of Islamic Religious Education Teachers,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam Indones., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 33–38, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v4i2.659.
[7] D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, F. I. Putri, R. Perdana, and F. Fuldiaratman, “Student’s need analysis in using ordinary differential equation e-module of Mathematical Physics II,” Momentum Phys. Educ. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 107–115, 2023, doi: 10.21067/mpej.v7i1.7092.
[8] Kamid, R. Theis, Sufri, S. E. Septi, and F. I. Putri, “Comparison of Two Learning Models on Students’ Process Skills in Elementary School,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 446–457, 2022.
[9] A. S. Isnain, B. Arko, and A. Galani, “The Effect of Two Stay-Two Stray Cooperative Learning Methods and Think Pair Share on Student Learning Outcomes of Geography,” vol. 4, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jske.v4i3.695.
[10] B. Takwin, Hubungan antara Berpikir Kritis dengan Nilai dan Situasi Acountable. Depok: Fakultas Psikologi UI, 1997.
[11] Alfauzan Amin, A. Alimni, D. A. Kurniawan, E. Triani, and S. E. Septi, “INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS ON STUDENT DISCIPLINE: ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS LEARNING,” Lentera Pendidik. J. Ilmu Tarb. dan Kegur., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 135–152, 2023.
[12] M. Maulidinah and A. Ekasari, “Application of E-Module to Identify Students’ Science Process Skills in the Practicum of Refraction on Prisms,” Schrödinger J. Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 30–35, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i2.502.
[13] A. F. Aziz, F. I. Putri, and M.Yudis, “Perbandingan Minat Belajat IPA Fisika Siswa pada Dua Kelas di Pondok Pesantren,” Didakt. J. Kependidikan, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 26–37, 2021.
[14] F. I. Putri, “Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswi Kelas VII C Dan VII D terhadap Mata Pelajaran IPA Fisika,” Qalam J. Ilmu Kependidikan, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.33506/jq.v.
[15] N. Nadila, L. C. Coetzee, and B. Arwenyo, “Analysis of the Application of the Discovery Learning Model to Students ’ Creative Thinking Ability in Reaction Rate Material,” vol. 4, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v4i4.704.
[16] K. Kamid, S. Sutrisno, D. A. Kurniawan, K. . Anwar, E. . Triani, and S. E. Septi, “ZPD Technological Learning Environment in Learning Computational Thinking Skill-Based Mathematics,” J. Pedagog. Dan Pembelajaran, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JP2/article/view/57920.
[17] S. E. Septi, A. Astalini, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Analisis Aksi Reaksi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Sikap dan Karakter Peserta Didik,” Fakt. J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 56, 2023, doi: 10.30998/fjik.v10i2.16019.
[18] L. Kartina, I. Abamba, and A. J. Aswad, “Ability Analysis of Providing Explanations and Strategies in Learning Science,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 88–94, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i3.699.
[19] Astalini, Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, S. E. Septi, and R. Perdana, “Effect of Using Inquiry Learning Model on Creative Character and Hard Work Character in High School,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 6321–6329, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3043.
[20] R. S. Budiarti, D. A. Kurniawan, Y. D. Citra, F. I. Putri, and S. E. Septi, “Study of Students’ Interests and Attitudes in Science: SMP and Madrasah Tsanawiyah,” Mimb. Ilmu, vol. 28, no. 2, 2023.
[21] E. F. S. Rini and F. T. Aldila, “Practicum Activity: Analysis of Science Process Skills and Students’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–61, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.322.
[22] B. Ulum, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif tipe group Investigation (GI) Pada Materi Pokok Ikatan Kimia Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berfikir Kritis Siswa kelas X SMA Widya Darma Surabaya,” Jurnal, vol. 4, no. 2, 2015.
[23] Kamid et al., “Comparison and Effect of Persistent Character and Mathematical Process Skills on Fractional Computing Operation Materials in Elementary School,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 438–449, 2023, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v4i3.475.
[24] H. D. Saputro, M. A. Rustaminezhad, A. A. Amosa, and Z. Jamebozorg, “Development of E-Learning Media Using Adobe Flash Program in a Contextual Learning Model to Improve Students ’ Learning Outcomes in Junior High School Geographical Research Steps Materials,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jetlc.v1i1.621.
[25] Z. Aqib, Model-model, Media dan Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Inovatif). Bandung: Yramawidya, 2013.
[26] B. Pamungkas, I. S. Onah, N. Hamzah, and B. Aradi, “Analysis of Critical Thinking Level of Students in Surrounding and Area of Circle Based on Elder and Paul ’ s Critical Thinking Theory in View Of Students ’ Mathematical Ability,” vol. 1, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.37251/ijoma.v1i1.609.
[27] I. Kurniasih, Sukses Mengimplementasikan kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kata Pena, 2014.
[28] F. K. Azadboni and S. E. Septi, “Differences and Relationships on Self-Efficiency and Discipline Character of High School Students,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 233–244, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.27704.
[29] Sudjana, Metode Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito, 2012.
[30] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Cetakan ke-18. Bandung: CV Alfabeta, 2013.
[31] H. A. Haris, Kesiapan Guru TKJ Dalam Pengajaran dan Kesiapan Sarana Prasarana Laboratorium Komputer Pada SMKN 1 dan SMKN 2 di Kabupaten Bima. Yogyakarta: Universitas Yogyakarta, 2015.
[32] Daryanto, Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Gava media, 2014.
[33] W. Miraningsih and U. Azizah, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Pokok Asam Basa Kelas XI MIA SMAN 2 Magetan,” UNESA, vol. 4, no. 2, 2015.
[34] Depdiknas, Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Penugasan Terstruktur dan Tugas Mandiri Tidak Terstruktur. Jakarta, 2008.
Published
2023-10-21
How to Cite
[1]
D. Herlo, E. Ambrosio, and P. Galcheva, “Analysis of the Application of the Group Investigation Learning Model and Its Influence on Students’ Critical Thinking Abilities on Chemical Elements in Eastern Europe”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 144-150, Oct. 2023.
Section
Articles