Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal


Parental Parenting Patterns and Social Media Use: Students’ Social Attitudes Building

Share
  • Purpose of the study: The rapid expansion of digital technology has fundamentally reshaped adolescents’ social interactions, raising concerns regarding the formation of social attitudes within educational settings. This study aims to examine the interplay between parenting styles and the intensity of social media use in shaping students’ social attitudes at the junior secondary school level.

    Methodology: Employing a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with students and parents, systematic classroom observations, and documentation analysis, and were validated using data triangulation techniques.

    Main Findings: The findings reveal that authoritative (democratic) parenting, characterized by a balanced combination of behavioral demands and emotional responsiveness, plays a crucial role in fostering positive social attitudes, including self-regulation, empathy, and collaborative skills. Students raised within a democratic family climate demonstrate internalized moral reasoning, enabling them to maintain socially appropriate behavior without reliance on external supervision. In contrast, excessive social media use is associated with social withdrawal, fragmented attention, and diminished quality of face-to-face interactions in school contexts. High levels of digital engagement were found to displace opportunities for direct interpersonal communication, leading to what can be described as social atrophy and alienation.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the protective function of authoritative parenting in mitigating the negative social effects of intensive digital media use. The results underscore that the family remains a critical socialization arena in the digital era, capable of strengthening adolescents’ social resilience when supported by effective communication and guided autonomy.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Parental Parenting Patterns and Social Media Use: Students’ Social Attitudes Building”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 306–315, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jee.v7i1.2657.
  • 225
    Abstract views
    313
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. R. Ramedlon, M. Sirajuddin, A. Adisel, N. Nurhidayat, and M. A. R. Hakim, “Internalization of religion-based character values through school culture at madrasah aliyah Negeri of South Bengkulu,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 6182-6194, 2023, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.4461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.4461
    2. S. Y. Astari, A. Y. Putra, and A. Rahman, “Model of internalization of honest character education and student’s discipline in improving the quality of elementary schools,” JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1198-1210, 2024, doi: 10.31851/jmksp.v9i2.16481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v9i2.16481
    3. R. Riyanto, M. Siregar, and A. D. Hasyim, “The influence of internalization of character education (religious values, teacher's example, honesty and discipline) against social piety,” Muaddib: Studi Kependidikan dan Keislaman, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 119-132, 2024, doi: 10.24269/muaddib.v14i2.10458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24269/muaddib.v14i2.10458
    4. Y. Purnama, and A. Asdlori, “The role of social media in students’ social perception and interaction: Implications for learning and education,” Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 45-55, 2023, doi: 10.61100/tacit.v1i2.50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61100/tacit.v1i2.50
    5. S. R. Sirin, S. Z. Brauer, and R. C. Tugberk, “Reframing adolescent identity: A global perspective for the digital age,” Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, vol. 6, 2024, doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-010923-101059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-010923-101059
    6. I. W. Hasdiansa, “Social problems of margarided generations: Identity crisis and the direction of youth in the digital era,” International Journal of Humanity Advance, Business & Sciences (IJHABS), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 409-420, 2025, doi: 10.59971/ijhabs.v3i2.782.
    7. H. Mogambi, “My mobile phone and i: Youth culture, identity and lifestyle in Kenya,” JCommsci-Journal Of Media and Communication Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jcommsci.v8i1.504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jcommsci.v8i1.504
    8. R. Zaelani, M. R. Taufikurohman, S. Y. Astuti, and E. Setiawan, “Transformation of digital consumption patterns of millennials and generation z: Sustainable creative economy growth in the age of technology,” International Journal of Advanced Technology and Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1351-1366, 2025, doi: 10.59890/ijatss.v3i10.117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59890/ijatss.v3i10.117
    9. S. McNaughton, T. Zhu, N. Rosedale, R. Jesson, J. Oldehaver, and R. Williamson, “In school and out of school digital use and the development of children’s self‐regulation and social skills,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 236-257, 2022, doi: 10.1111/bjep.12447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12447
    10. M. Shahzalal, and H. M. Adnan, “Attitude, self-control, and prosocial norm to predict intention to use social media responsibly: From scale to model fit towards a modified theory of planned behavior,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 16, pp. 9822, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14169822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169822
    11. A. S. George, and T. Shaji, “Overcoming the collective action problem: enacting norms to address adolescent technology addiction,” Partners Universal International Research Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 57-75, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11800020.
    12. N. Irmayanti, and T. Chusniyah, “Empathy in the digital age: The role of self-control and social control in addressing cyberviolence,” Bisma The Journal of Counseling, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 144-152, 2024, doi: 10.23887/bisma.v8i2.86154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/bisma.v8i2.86154
    13. A. P. Putri, N. Purnama, P. F. Andini, and Y. E. Riany, “Mastering digital ethic: Uncovering the influence of self-control, peer attachment, and emotional intelligence on netiquette through adolescent social media exposure,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 71-82, 2024, doi: 10.23887/jish.v13i1.71218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v13i1.71218
    14. S. Guo, J. Zhang, A. Wang, T. Zhang, Y. Liu, and S. Zhang, “The chain mediating effect of self-respect and self-control on peer relationship and early adolescent phone dependence,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 11825, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96476-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96476-8
    15. M. Rus, M. F. Călin, M. L. Sandu, M. Ștefănoaia, C. M. Baiceanu, M. Pescaru, and R. Băluțescu, “The impact of addictive behaviors and online behaviors on adolescents’ conflict management ability: A psychosocial and legal perspective,” Societies, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 141, 2025, doi: 10.3390/soc15050141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050141
    16. N. Rehman, S. Saleem, and Y. A. Jaffri, “An examination of the impact of social media anonymity and intensity of online conflict and aggressive behavior,” Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 279-290, 2025, doi: 10.47067/ramss.v8i1.457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v8i1.457
    17. J. Marolla-Gajardo, and M. Y. L. Mas, “Anti-bullying in the digital age: how cyberhate travels from social media to classroom climate in pre-service teacher programmes,” Societies, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 284, 2025, doi: 10.3390/soc15100284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15100284
    18. B. Budiansyah, I. A. Susanto, and E. Aidillah, “Navigating social skills in elementary school: Children’s peer interactions in the digital age,” Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 184-201, 2025, doi: 10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v15i2.18287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v15i2.18287
    19. L. Banić, and T. Orehovački, “A comparison of parenting strategies in a digital environment: A systematic literature review,” Multimodal technologies and interaction, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 32, 2024, doi: 10.3390/mti8040032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8040032
    20. A. Cohen, A. Bendelow, T. Smith, C. Cicchetti, M. M. Davis, and M. Heffernan, “Parental attitudes on social media monitoring for youth: cross-sectional survey study,” JMIR pediatrics and parenting, vol. 6, pp. 46365, 2023, doi: 10.2196/46365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/46365
    21. J. I. Choi, G. M. Kim, J. A. Kim, and E. J. Jeong, “Parenting attitudes and pathological gaming: multifaceted influences of harsh-negative parenting on adolescent pathological gaming,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 16, pp. 1521013, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521013
    22. Y. Fan, and S. Gong, “Blame the player, not the game? how perceived institutional inequality predicts displaced aggression,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1662, 2025, doi: 10.3390/bs15121662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15121662
    23. L. Quancai, C. Meng, and C. Kunjie, “Social control and self-control: Factors linking exposure to domestic violence and adolescents’ Internet gaming addiction,” Frontiers in psychiatry, vol. 14, pp. 1245563, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1245563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1245563
    24. R. Sun, Q. Gao, and Y. Xiang, “Perceived parental monitoring of smartphones and problematic smartphone use in adolescents: Mediating roles of self-efficacy and self-control,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 784-792, 2022, doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0040
    25. T. Bağatarhan, D. M. Siyez, and A. T. Vazsonyi, “Parenting and internet addiction among youth: the mediating role of adolescent self-control,” Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 2710-2720, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10826-022-02341-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02341-x
    26. Q. Yang, Y. Xu, and K. V. D. Bos, “Social network site use and materialistic values: the roles of self-control and self-acceptance,” BMC psychology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01546-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01546-7
    27. I. M. Mueller, F. M. Spinath, M. Friese, and E. Hahn, “Genetics, parenting, and family functioning—What drives the development of self‐control from adolescence to adulthood?,” Journal of Personality, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 332-353, 2023, doi: 10.1111/jopy.12723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12723
    28. O. K. T. Kilag, M. F. S. Calledo, F. T. Uy, Y. T. D. Cerna, N. A. A. Angtud, and K. M. Villanueva, “Quality performance of teachers: Work environment, work attitude, and principal supervision: qualitative investigation,” Basic and Applied Education Research Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2023, doi: 10.11594/baerj.04.01.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/baerj.04.01.01
    29. E. Wolf, and S. Brenning, “Unlocking the power of mentoring: A comprehensive guide to evaluating the impact of STEM mentorship programs for women,” Social Sciences, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 508, 2023, doi: 10.3390/socsci12090508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090508
    30. E. Zvereva, “Digital ethics in higher education: Modernizing moral values for effective communication in cyberspace,” Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 202319, 2023, doi: 10.30935/ojcmt/13033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13033
    31. S. Cholifah, “Educational environment in the implementation of character education,” Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 816-825, 2024, doi: 10.58526/jsret.v3i2.418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v3i2.418
    32. A. Krauss, L. Danús, and M. Sales-Pardo, “Early-career factors largely determine the future impact of prominent researchers: Evidence across eight scientific fields,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 18794, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46050-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46050-x
    33. A. Ö. Gürsoy, “Individual spontaneity and the possibility of community in mead’s social psychology,” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1092-1111, 2024, doi: 10.16953/deusosbil.1470933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1470933
    34. A. J. D. R. Vitorino, and P. S. A. Pires, “GH Mead and the value of his theory for education,” Revista Brasileira de Educação, vol. 27, pp. 270009, 2022, doi: 10.1590/s1413-247820222700010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-247820222700010
    35. T. Rahman, “Human behavior and society: An introduction to social science,” Policy Journal of Social Science Review, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 17-27, 2024, doi: 10.63075/pjssr.v2i3.42.
    36. C. A. Shafira, T. P. Naurah, and G. N. Malikah, “The Relationship Between Democratic Parenting Patterns and the Independence of School-Age Children,” Acta Psychologia, vol. 3, no. 4 , pp. 191-199, 2025, doi: 10.35335/psychologia.v3i4.73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/psychologia.v3i4.73
    37. M. S. R. Fitrianto, Z. A. Hakim, and A. Marwing, “The impact of democratic, permissive and authoritarian parenting styles on adolescent self-confidence: Evidence from senior high school students in Indonesia,” Nusantara Journal of Behavioral and Social Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43-50, 2025, doi: 10.47679/njbss.202577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47679/njbss.202577
    38. R. Ningsih, I. Degeng, and M. Ramli, “Learning motivation, democratic parenting, and peer relations predict academic self-concept,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1629-1641, 2022, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1629
    39. M. H. Nguyen, J. Gruber, W. Marler, A. Hunsaker, J. Fuchs, and E. Hargittai, “Staying connected while physically apart: Digital communication when face-to-face interactions are limited,” New Media & Society, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 2046-2067, 2022, doi: 10.1177/1461444820985442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820985442
    40. I. Mendonça, F. Coelho, B. Rando, and A. M. Abreu, “A Comparative Study of Short-Term Social Media Use with Face-to-Face Interaction in Adolescence,” Children, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 460, 2025, doi: 10.3390/children12040460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children12040460
    41. L. Gasser, Y. Dammert, and P. K. Murphy, “How do children socially learn from narrative fiction: Getting the lesson, simulating social worlds, or dialogic inquiry?,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1445-1475, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10648-022-09667-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09667-4
    42. S. Li, Y. Tang, and Y. Zheng, “How the home learning environment contributes to children’s social–emotional competence: A moderated mediation model,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, pp. 1065978, 2023, doi: 0.3389/fpsyg.2023.1065978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1065978
    43. J. Ara, “Machine-learning models for predicting blood pressure and cardiac function using wearable sensor data,” International Journal of Scientific Interdisciplinary Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 102-142, 2025, doi: 10.63125/h7rbyt25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63125/h7rbyt25
    44. W. Beyers, B. Soenens, and M. Vansteenkiste, “Autonomy in adolescence: a conceptual, developmental and cross-cultural perspective,” European Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 121-141, 2025, doi: 10.1080/17405629.2024.2330734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2024.2330734
    45. J. Lopez-Belmonte, J. A. Marin-Marin, A. Segura-Robles, and A. J. Moreno-Guerrero, “Flipped learning for promoting self-regulation, social competence, and decision-making in pandemic conditions,” Sage Open, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 21582440231208772, 2023, doi: 10.1177/21582440231208772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231208772
    46. O. Çelik, “Academic motivation in adolescents: The role of parental autonomy support, psychological needs satisfaction and self-control,” Frontiers in psychology, vol. 15, pp. 1384695, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384695
    47. T. Tanti, W. Utami, D. Deliza, and M. Jahanifar, “Investigation in vocation high school for attitude and motivation students in learning physics subject,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479-490, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452
    48. M. Rahmah, and S. Sanyata, “Phubbing and its impact on student communication and relationship: a qualitative study on coping strategies and social implications,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 4876-4889, 2024, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5801
    49. C. Tufan, K. Köksal, M. D. Griffiths, R. Erturgut, and I. S. Mert, “Effects of fear of missing out, smartphone addiction, phubbing, and being phubbed on friendship satisfaction,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 44, no. 14, pp. 3592-3608, 2025, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2434893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2434893
    50. D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, T. Tanti, and S. Maryani, “Innovative learning: Gender perception of e-module linear equations in mathematics and physics,” Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 92-106, 2022, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610
    51. Q. Minhui, “Research on the influencing factors and implementation strategies to promote students’ self-regulation in the future,” Applied & Educational Psychology, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 62-69, 2023, doi: 10.23977/appep.2023.041010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23977/appep.2023.041010
    52. V. Adeyemi, “The impact of digital technology on a child’s cognitive and social development: Implications for education,” Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 100006, 2025, doi: 10.70389/PJP.100006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70389/PJP.100006
    53. S. S. Kar, R. Dube, B. K. M. Goud, Q. S. Gibrata, A. A. El-Balbissi, T. A. Al Salim, and R. N. M. A. K. Fatayerji, “Impact of screen time on development of children,” Children, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1297, 2025, doi: 10.3390/children12101297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children12101297
    54. A. Nirwana, and M. Muthoifin, “Parenting problems in the digital age and their solution development in the frame of value education,” Multidisciplinary Reviews, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 2024163-2024163, 2024, doi: 10.31893/multirev.2024163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024163
    55. E. Sjølie, T. C. Espenes, and R. Buø, “Social interaction and agency in self-organizing student teams during their transition from face-to-face to online learning,” Computers & Education, vol. 189, pp. 104580, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104580
    56. Y. Shan, Y. Sun, J. Xie, T. Li, and K. Chen, “Latent profile analysis of internet combination use among Chinese college students and longitudinal association with problem behaviors: A two-wave longitudinal study,” Current Psychology, vol. 44, no. 23, pp. 17962-17973, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s12144-025-08437-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08437-z
    57. T. Nazir, “Phubbing in the digital age: Understanding and mitigating the impact on social interactions and relationships,” Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 273-292, 2025, doi: 10.34056/aujef.1672999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1672999
    58. S. Hagen, A. Burat, and H. Kahale, “Psychological dynamics of social interaction in face-to-face and digital communication,” Journal Social Civilecial, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11-21, 2024, doi: 10.71435/610485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71435/610485
    59. E. E. Smith, and H. Storrs, “Digital literacies, social media, and undergraduate learning: what do students think they need to know?,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00398-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00398-2