How to cite

Metrics — Badges

1. A. R. Wahyudi and S. Adipitoyo, “Meningkatkan kemampuan higher order thinking skill siswa kelas x pada materi teks wayang melalui project based learning [Improving the higher order thinking skills of class X students on wayang text material through project based learning],” Khatulistiwa J. Pendidik. dan Sos. Hum., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 93–107, 2025, doi: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v4i4.7469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v4i4.7469
2. N. Nakhliyati, M. Taufik, and R. S. Dewi, “Pengembangan modul berbasis hots pada mata pelajaran ipas kelas v sekolah dasar [Development of HOTS-based modules for the subject of science in grade V of elementary school],” J. Genta Mulia, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 176–183, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.61290/gm.v16i1
3. O. F. Nugroho, “Exploring the challenges faced by students in science learning: Influencing internal and external factors,” Proceeding Int. Conf. Glob. Educ. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 192–197, 2024, doi: 10.62951/icgel.v1i1.111
4. OECD, PISA 2022 Results Volume III : Creative Minds , Creative Schools Indonesia, vol. III. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://oecd.ekon.go.id/assets/dokumen/PISA 2022 Results Indonesia.pdf
5. U. Azizah and H. Nasrudin, “Development of chemistry instructional materials based on Cooperative Group Investigation (CGI) to empower thinking skills,” 2018. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012122
6. D. Maula and T. S. H. Wulandari, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group investigation (gi) dengan media flash card terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP [The influence of the cooperative learning model of the group investigation (GI) type with flash card media on the critical thinking skills of junior high school students],” in Proceeding Biology Education Conference, vol. 15, pp. 317–323, 2018, https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/32450/21532
7. L. Nurfajria, S. M. Leksono, and A. Nestiadi, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe gi untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas vii pada materi polusi air [The effect of the GI type cooperative learning model on improving the critical thinking skills of grade VII students on water pollution material],” Eduproxima J. Ilm. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1143–1154, 2024, doi: 10.29100/.v6i3.4695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/.v6i3.4695
8. A. Aroh, N. S. Sartika, and A. Sujana, “Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group investigation (gi) untuk meningkatkan berpikir kritis pada materi trigonometri [Application of the cooperative learning model of the group investigation (GI) type to improve critical thinking in trigonometry material],” J. MATH-UMB.EDU, vol. 10, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.36085/mathumbedu.v10i1.3646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36085/mathumbedu.v10i1.3646
9. B. Wicaksono, L. Sagita, and W. Nugroho, “model pembelajaran group investigation (gi) dan think pair share (tps) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis,” Aksioma J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2017, doi: 10.26877/aks.v8i2.1876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v8i2.1876
10. R. E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning in Schools, Second Edition., vol. 4. Elsevier, 2015. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92028-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92028-2
11. N. W. Widyapuraya, A. L. Suryana, Suyanta, and I. Wilujeng, “Profile of critical thinking skills of junior high school students,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1368–1374, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.1723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.1723
12. D. T. Campbell and J. C. Stanley, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1963
13. I. W. Creswell, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson, 2012
14. R. Rukminingsih, G. Adnan, and M. A. Latief, Metode Penelitian Pendididkan. Yogyakarta: Erhaka Utama, 2020.
15. J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012
16. R. H. Ennis, “A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills,” Educ. Leadersh., vol. 43, pp. 44–48, 1985.
17. P. E. Petersen, “Guttman scale analysis of dental health attituijes anci knowleijge,” Comtnunity Dent Oral Epidemiol, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 170–173, 1989, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1989.tb00603.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1989.tb00603.x
18. A. Ekantini and I. Wilujeng, “The development of science student worksheet based on education for environmental sustainable development to enhance scientific literacy,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1339–1347, 2018, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2018.060625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060625
19. D. Desnita, R. S. Kartikowati, and M. Makhdalena, “Application of stad type learning models to improve activity and student learning outcomes,” J. Educ. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 119–129, 2021, doi: 10.31258/jes.5.1.p.119-129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.5.1.p.119-129
20. R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 1998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
21. S. Sugiyono, metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan r & d. Bandung: ALFABETA, CV, 2013.
22. N. Nuryadi, T. D. Astuti, E. S. Utami, and Budiantara, Dasar-Dasar Statistik Penelitian. yogyakarta: Sibuku Media, 2017
23. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Second Edition. new york: lawrence erlbaum associates, 1988.
24. H. Ahmad, I. Samad, and Febryanti, “Effectiveness of lipa’ sa’be mandar on the mathematical representation ability of students of SMK Mega Link Majene,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1918, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042087
25. M. A. Liani, Y. Irhasyuarna, and A. Hamid, “Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group investigation terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar siswa pada materi hidrokarbon [Application of the cooperative learning model of the group investigation type to students' critical thinking skills and learning outcomes on hydrocarbon material],” JCAE J. Chem. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 46–51, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.20527/jcae.v4i2.621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jcae.v4i2.621
26. M. Diana and P. Fadillah, “Analysis of the application of the group investigation learning model and its influence on students’ critical thinking ability in elementary chemical materials in class XII MIA SMAN 5 Jambi City,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 108–113, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i4.286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v3i4.286
27. J. Jami, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Kimia Unsur,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 49–54, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i2.224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v3i2.224
28. N. I. Puspitasari, Y. Rinanto, and S. Widoretno, “Peningkatan keterampilan kerjasama peserta didik melalui penerapan model group investigation [Improving students' cooperation skills through the application of the group investigation model],” Bio-Pedagogi: Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-5, 2019, doi: 10.20961/bio-pedagogi.v8i1.35544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bio-pedagogi.v8i1.35544
29. B. Thornhill-miller et al., “Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education,” J. Intell., vol. 11, no. 3, p. 54, 2023, doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
30. H. Haryono, F. Ginanjar, and D. Rosyalita, “The effectiveness of collaborative learning strategies in enhancing critical thinking skills among general education students,” J. Acad. Sci., vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 1911–1920, 2025, doi: 10.59613/tsc9kg32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59613/tsc9kg32
31. A. I. Virliana and L. S. N. Fauziah, “Pengaruh pembelajaran kolaboratif untuk meningkatkan cara berpikir kritis [The influence of collaborative learning on improving critical thinking],” J. JENDELA Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2025, doi: 10.57008/jjp.v5i01.1070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v5i01.1070
32. Y. Yuwana, “Model inovatif pembelajaran kolaboratif dan pengaruhnya terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa [Innovative collaborative learning models and their influence on students' critical thinking skills],” J. Pendidik. Dirgant., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 217–229, 2025, doi: 10.61132/jupendir.v2i4.792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61132/jupendir.v2i4.792
33. N. Fauziah, A. Asrizal, and U. Usmeldi, “Meta analisis effect size pengaruh bahan ajar terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar peserta didik [Meta-analysis of the effect size of the influence of teaching materials on critical thinking skills and student learning outcomes],” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 32103–32109, 2023, doi: 10.31004/jptam.v7i3.12241
34. S. K. W. Chu, R. B. Reynolds, N. J. Tavares, M. Notari, and C. W. Y. Lee, 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning From theory to Practice. Singapur: Springer Nature, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8
35. K. F. Hew and T. Brush, “Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 223–252, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
36. J. Van De Pol, M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen, “Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 271–296, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
37. J. Hattie, Visible Learning for Teachers : Maximising Impact on Learning, 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2012. doi: 10.4324/9780203181522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522
38. K. S. Prayoga and I. K. Gading, “Improving students’ collaboration ability and scientific literacy through the group investigation type cooperative learning model,” Mimb. Ilmu, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 515–522, 2023, doi: 10.23887/mi.v28i3.65168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v28i3.65168
39. L. D. Novita, Sarkadi, and A. Maksum, “Group investigation learning in developing 21 st century skills of elementary school students,” Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 268–278, 2021, doi: 10.18415/ijmmu.v8i6.2751
40. D. Herlo, E. Ambrosio, and P. Galcheva, “Analysis of the application of the group investigation learning model and its influence on students’ critical thinking abilities on chemical elements in Eastern Europe,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 144–150, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i4.785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i4.785
41. J. A. Fredricks, P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, “School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 59–109, 2004, doi: 10.3102/003465430740010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
42. Y. Sharan, “Cooperative learning for academic and social gains: Valued pedagogy, problematic practice,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 300–313, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01430.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01430.x
43. R. H. I. Bauw and S. Sucipto, “Penerapan model pembelajaran group investigation (GI) untuk meningkatkan keaktifan dan prestasi belajar siswa [Implementation of the group investigation (GI) learning model to increase student activity and learning achievement],” Innov. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9070–9080, 2024, doi: 10.31004/innovative.v4i1.8959
44. B. Hermanto and E. Winaryati, “Implementasi model group investigation dalam pembelajaran partikel penyusun materi sebagai upaya peningkatan aktivitas dan prestasi belajar ipa di smp muhammadiyah 1 Semarang [Implementation of the group investigation model in learning about the constituent particles of material as an effort to increase science learning activities and achievements at Muhammadiyah 1 Junior High School, Semarang],” J. Lesson Study Teach. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.51402/jlste.v1i2.84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51402/jlste.v1i2.84
45. M. Rowi, “Model blended learning dikombinasi dengan group investigation berbantukan lms sman six learning system efektif meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar siswa mapel pendidikan agama Islam [The blended learning model combined with group investigation assisted by the SMAN Six Learning System LMS effectively increases the activity and learning outcomes of students in Islamic religious education subjects],” J. Pendidik. Sultan Agung, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 353–369, 2022, doi: 10.30659/jp-sa.v2i3.26616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/jp-sa.v2i3.26616
46. H. Boke et al., “Effects of cooperative learning on students’ learning outcomes in physical education: a meta-analysis,” Front. Psychol., vol. 16, no. 1508808, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508808
47. G. Gyimah, “Effectiveness of group investigation versus lecture-based instruction on students’ concept mastery and transfer in social studies,” J. Soc. Stud. Res., 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jssr.2022.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2022.05.001
48. T. Tadesse, H. Ware, A. Asmare, and R. M. Gillies, “Enhancing student engagement and outcomes: The effects of cooperative learning in an Ethiopian University’s classrooms,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, p. 975, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14090975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090975
49. D. Danial, “Application of the group investigation (GI) cooperative learning model to improve student activity and learning outcomes,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Akunt., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2021
50. E. Lestari, H. Cahyono, and Awaluddin, “Penerapan model pembelajaran group investigation pada materi lingkaran untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis [Application of the group investigation learning model to circle material to improve critical thinking skills],” J. Math Educ. Nusant., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 124–139, 2019, doi: 10.29407/jmen.v5i2.12814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v5i2.12814