Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal


Digital Ethnography of Nongnong Mbaham: Oral Literature Revitalization for Cultural Identity and Contextual Learning Innovation in Papuan Education

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study investigates Nongnong Mbaham as a living oral tradition, examines its transformation within digital environments, and explores its potential as a contextual learning innovation in Papuan educational settings.

    Methodology: A qualitative digital ethnographic approach was employed, involving participant observation, in-depth interviews, performative analysis, and digital-trace analysis across offline and online cultural spaces.

    Main Findings: This study demonstrates that indigenous oral literature can function as a culturally grounded learning resource that supports identity formation, digital literacy, and contextual pedagogy.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This research advances oral-literature studies by integrating digital ethnography with contextual learning innovation, moving beyond documentation toward a sustainable educational revitalization model.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Digital Ethnography of Nongnong Mbaham: Oral Literature Revitalization for Cultural Identity and Contextual Learning Innovation in Papuan Education”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–54, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jee.v7i1.2502.
  • 186
    Abstract views
    114
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. S. Mandal and S. Singh, “‘Writing orality’: Preserving oral tradition and cultural identity in the select writings of Easterine Kire,” Interventions, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1250–1266, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1080/1369801X.2023.2288089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2023.2288089
    2. C. Syam, Y. O. Olendo, J. A. Dewantara, and E. F. Rahmani, “Oral literature and social identity of the Dayak Kanayatn: the extinction of oral literature in the midst of contemporary cultural trends,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2376785, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2376785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2376785
    3. Araba A Z Osei-Tutu, “Developing African oral traditional storytelling as a framework for studying with African peoples,” Qual. Res., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1497–1514, May 2022, doi: 10.1177/14687941221082263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221082263
    4. O. Odularu, E. Sone, and M. Puzi, “Globalisation perspective of libraries as curators of oral tradition and storytelling activities,” J. Cult. Values Educ., vol. 7, no. 2 SE-Articles, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.46303/jcve.2024.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2024.16
    5. S. Firdaus, “Indonesian and World folklore from a critical literacy perspective: A comparative analysis of cultural values and social identity,” Austronesian J. Lang. Sci. Lit., vol. 4, no. 2 SE-Articles, pp. 135–151, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.59011/austronesian.4.2.2025.135-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59011/austronesian.4.2.2025.135-151
    6. C. M. Lopez and Y. C. Benitez, “Strengthening reading and writing in students from the oral tradition of the Mayasquer indigenous reservation,” Sinergias Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.37954/se.v8i2.400.
    7. A. Graness, “The status of oral traditions in the history of philosophy: Methodological considerations,” South African J. Philos., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 181–194, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1080/02580136.2022.2062986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2022.2062986
    8. D. Kumar, and N. Suthar, “Ethical and legal challenges of AI in marketing: an exploration of solutions,” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 124-144, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JICES-05-2023-0068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-05-2023-0068
    9. I. A. V. S. Lefaan, Titir Tumyor & Lakadinding: Identitas Budaya Etnik Mbaham Matta Wuh [Titir Tumyor & Lakadinding: The Cultural Identity of the Mbaham Matta Wuh Ethnic Group]. Yogyakarta:Pustaka Pelajar. ISBN: 978-602-229-556-3. 2023.
    10. R. Finnegan, Oral poetry. Open Book Publishers,. Open Book Publishers, 2025.
    11. D. A. A. Rupiassa, I. Y. M. Lattu, and W. M. A. Therik, “Narratives, symbols, and rituals: oral tradition in indigenous resistance to development structuralism in West Papua, Indonesia,” J. Sosiol. Reflektif, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 27–46, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/z1s1th71
    12. A. Kristiono, H. Harsono, and M. Minsih, “Overcoming the difficulties of learning poetry in Papua through mutual cooperation: A collaborative approach in a local cultural context,” in 10th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference (Profunedu 2024), Atlantis Press, 2025, pp. 74–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-412-9_7
    13. A. Eizadirad, and N. Wane, “The power of oral culture in education: Remembering, documenting, and revitalizing oral teachings,” In The Power of Oral Culture in Education: Theorizing Proverbs, Idioms, and Folklore Tales (pp. 1-15). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-18537-3_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18537-3_1
    14. R. Manara and M. Weber, “Cultural identity in the digital age: Navigating globalization in local communities,” J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3 SE-Articles, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0503.451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0503.451
    15. I. Siliutina, O. Tytar, M. Barbash, N. Petrenko, and L. Yepyk, “Cultural preservation and digital heritage: Challenges and opportunities,” Amaz. Investig., vol. 13, no. 75 SE-, pp. 262–273, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.34069/AI/2024.75.03.22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.75.03.22
    16. A. K. Poddar, “Impact of global digitalization on traditional cultures,” Int. J. Interdiscip. Soc. Community Stud., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 209, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v20i01/209-232
    17. D. P. Ratri, S. Rachmajanti, M. Anugerahwati, E. D. Laksmi, and A. Gozali, “Fostering cultural competence: developing an English syllabus for young learners in the Indonesian EFL context with emphasis on local culture to maintain students’ identity,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2440177, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2440177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2440177
    18. A. C. Budiati, S. I. Liestyasari, D. Astutik, B. N. Parahita, R. S. Siregar, and G. Ghufronudin, “Social practices of literacy and numeracy through culturally responsif teaching (CRT) approach in sociology learning,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 200–207, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i1.1373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i1.1373
    19. R. J. Emigh, “Whither digitality? the relationship between orality, literacy, and digitality, past and present: From spoken traditions to digital media,” Annu. Rev. Sociol., vol. 50, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-033022-035644
    20. A. Oreg and D. Babis, “Digital ethnography in third sector research,” Volunt. Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11266-021-00397-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00397-9
    21. A. Delli Paoli and V. D’Auria, “Digital ethnography: A systematic literature review,” Ital. Sociol. Rev., vol. 11, no. 4S SE-Articles, p. 243, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.13136/isr.v11i4S.434.
    22. C. S. Ritter, “Rethinking digital ethnography: A qualitative approach to understanding interfaces,” Qual. Res., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 916–932, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1177/14687941211000540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211000540
    23. H. Thach, S. Mayworm, D. Delmonaco, and O. Haimson, “(In)visible moderation: A digital ethnography of marginalized users and content moderation on Twitch and Reddit,” New Media Soc., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 4034–4055, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1177/14614448221109804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221109804
    24. A. Shiri, D. Howard, and S. Farnel, “Indigenous digital storytelling: Digital interfaces supporting cultural heritage preservation and access,” Int. Inf. Libr. Rev., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 93–114, May 2022, doi: 10.1080/10572317.2021.1946748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2021.1946748
    25. E. Fedorenko, S. T. Piantadosi, and E. A. F. Gibson, “Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought,” Nature, vol. 630, no. 8017, pp. 575–586, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07522-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07522-w
    26. G. Evolvi, “Religion and the internet: digital religion, (hyper)mediated spaces, and materiality,” Zeitschrift für Relig. Gesellschaft und Polit., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9–25, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s41682-021-00087-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-021-00087-9
    27. M. Choroszewicz, “Addressing youths’ digital agency with internet technologies: Discourses and practices that produce inequalities,” J. Youth Stud., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1071–1088, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1080/13676261.2024.2343698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2024.2343698
    28. C. L. Liew, J. Yeates, and S. C. Lilley, “Digitized indigenous knowledge collections: Impact on cultural knowledge transmission, social connections, and cultural identity,” J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 1575–1592, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24536
    29. G. de Seta, “Chapter 18: Ethnographic approaches to digital folklore,” in Elgaronnline, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024, pp. 240–254. doi: 10.4337/9781800377059.00029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800377059.00029
    30. B. Bekmatov, “The role of folklore in a multicultural world,” Web Teach. Inderscience Res., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 487–492, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://webofjournals.com/index.php/1/article/view/2715
    31. W. Widajati and S. Mahmudah, “Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and digital e-scaffolding for special school teachers,” Stud. Learn. Teach., vol. 4, no. 2 SE, pp. 296–305, 2023, doi: 10.46627/silet.v4i2.268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v4i2.268
    32. R. Zhang, D. Zou, and G. Cheng, “Concepts, affordances, and theoretical frameworks of mixed reality enhanced language learning,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 3624–3637, 2024, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2187421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2187421
    33. Á. Hódi and E. Tóth, “Exploring the opportunities for online assessment of phonological awareness at the beginning of schooling,” Int. J. Early Child., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 169–188, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13158-023-00357-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-023-00357-y
    34. V. L. Dara, and C. Kesavan, “Analyzing the concept of participatory learning: Strategies, trends and future directions in education,” Kybernetes, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 3882-3915, 2024, doi: 10.1108/K-12-2023-2581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2023-2581
    35. I. Compagnoni, and F. Fazzi, “Extremely virtual and incredibly physical: Investigating language students’ mediation strategies through digital storytelling and digital social reading,” AILA Review, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 360-387m 2024, doi: 10.1075/aila.24015.com. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24015.com
    36. Z. Wu, Y. Wang, J. Ye, and L. Kong, “Self-Adaptive In-Context Learning: An information compression perspective for in-context example selection and ordering,” in Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), A. Rogers, J. Boyd-Graber, and N. Okazaki, Eds., Toronto, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics, Jul. 2023, pp. 1423–1436. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.79
    37. S. Aydin-Ceran, “Contextual learning and teaching approach in 21st century science education,” Curr. Stud. Soc. Sci., pp. 160–173, 2021.
    38. N. Wies, Y. Levine, and A. Shashua, “The Learnability of In-Context Learning,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, A. Oh, T. Naumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, and S. Levine, Eds., Curran Associates, Inc., 2023, pp. 36637–36651. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/file/73950f0eb4ac0925dc71ba2406893320-Paper-Conference.pdf
    39. M. S. J. Maftuh, U. S. Lawal, M. Ade, A. V. Lama, and A. F. Adzim, “Understanding learning strategies: a comparison between contextual learning and problem-based learning,” Educazione: Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–65, 2023, doi: 10.61987/educazione.v1i1.496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61987/educazione.v1i1.496
    40. Q. Dong et al., “A survey on In-context learning,” in Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Y. Al-Onaizan, M. Bansal, and Y.-N. Chen, Eds., Miami, Florida, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, Nov. 2024, pp. 1107–1128. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.64
    41. F. L. Barus, S. H. Harahap, S. Naelofaria, M. W. Siregar, and A. Yuhdi, “Development of syntax teaching materials based on contextual teaching and learning (CTL) using the flip pdf professional application for Indonesian language education students,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 750–762, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i3.1644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i3.1644
    42. M.-B. Vigo-Arrazola, “Exploring the influence of the ethnographic researcher’s role in digital teaching practices in disadvantaged schools,” Ethnogr. Educ., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 233–248, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/17457823.2023.2240463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2023.2240463
    43. P. Forberg and K. Schilt, “What is ethnographic about digital ethnography? A sociological perspective,” Front. Sociol., vol. Volume 8-2023, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1156776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1156776
    44. L. X. Jensen, M. Bearman, D. Boud, and F. Konradsen, “Digital ethnography in higher education teaching and learning—a methodological review,” High. Educ., vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1143–1162, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00838-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00838-4
    45. A. Karhapää, R. Hämäläinen, and J. Pöysä-Tarhonen, “Digital work practices that promote informal workplace learning: digital ethnography in a knowledge work context,” Stud. Contin. Educ., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2023.2274596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2023.2274596
    46. J. Seo, J. Moon, G. W. Choi, and J. Do, “A Scoping Review of Three Computational Approaches to Ethnographic Research in Digital Learning Environments,” TechTrends, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 102–111, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11528-021-00689-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00689-3
    47. S. Lemmetty, K. Collin, V. Glăveanu, and S. Paloniemi, “Capturing actions of communities: towards virtual ethnography and digital tools in researching organizations and workplace learning BT-methods for researching professional learning and development: challenges, applications and empirical illustrations,” M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, and C. Damşa, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 397–418. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_18
    48. R. Rachmat, S. Sunarto, and A. Cahyono, “Reassessing moral education: A critical evaluation of gendang bugis as pedagogical practice in the digital era,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 6, no. 3 SE-Articles, pp. 861–873, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i3.1869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i3.1869
    49. L. X. Jensen, M. Bearman, and D. Boud, “Characteristics of productive feedback encounters in online learning,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 69–83, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2023.2213168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2213168
    50. A. Johri, “Lifelong and lifewide learning for the perpetual development of expertise in engineering,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 70–84, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1944064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1944064