Ethno-STEM Innovation in Science Learning: Developing Scientific Literacy Using the Local Context of “Dawet Jabung”
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of a locally contextualized STEM-based learning device, “Dawet Jabung,” in improving students’ scientific literacy at MA Darul Huda.
Methodology: A quasi-experimental posttest non-equivalent control group design was used. The experimental class (n = 16) learned using a STEM-based “Dawet Jabung” learning device, while the control class (n = 16) used traditional materials. Quantitative data were collected through a scientific literacy questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-test, and N-Gain scores with SPSS 21. Qualitative data from interviews supported the quantitative findings.
Main Findings: The experimental class showed higher scientific literacy, with 75% categorized as “good” and 25% as “very good” (M = 68), compared with the control class, which was dominated by the “poor” category (50%) with an average score of 58. The t-test revealed a significant difference (t = 9.297 > t-table = 2.036). The N-gain score of 0.65 indicated moderate effectiveness. Interview results indicated increased engagement, curiosity, and conceptual understanding among students who used the STEM tool.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces a unique Ethno-STEM learning device integrating local wisdom “Dawet Jabung,” bridging scientific concepts with cultural practices. The innovation advances existing STEM literature by demonstrating that integrating cultural context enhances scientific literacy more effectively than conventional STEM alone. This work contributes a new pedagogical model aligned with the Merdeka Belajar curriculum’s emphasis on contextual and culturally responsive learning.
References
D. Mourtzis, J. Angelopoulos, and N. Panopoulos, “A literature review of the challenges and opportunities of the transition from industry 4.0 to Society 5.0,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 17, pp. 6276, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15176276.
M. C. Tavares, G. Azevedo, and R. P. Marques, “The challenges and opportunities of era 5.0 for a more humanistic and sustainable society—a literature review,” Societies, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 149, 2022, doi: 10.3390/soc12060149.
R. Ziatdinov, M. S. Atteraya, and R. Nabiyev, “The fifth industrial revolution as a transformative step towards society 5.0,” Societies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 19, 2024, doi: 10.3390/soc14020019.
S. S. Hamedani, S. Aslam, B. A. M. Oraibi, Y. B. Wah, and S. S. Hamedani, “Transitioning towards tomorrow’s workforce: Education 5.0 in the landscape of society 5.0: A systematic literature review,” Education Sciences, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1041, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14101041.
M. K. Budiarto, A. Rahman, and A. Efendi, “Proposing information and communication Technology (ICT)-Based Learning transformation to create competitive human resources: A theoretical review,” Multidisciplinary Reviews, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2024076-2024076, 2024 doi: 10.31893/multirev.2024076.
S. Rana, S. Verma, M. M. Haque, and G. Ahmed, “Conceptualizing international positioning strategies for Indian higher education institutions,” Review of International Business and Strategy, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 503-519, 2022, doi: 10.1108/RIBS-07-2021-0105.
M. Moshtari, and A. Safarpour, “Challenges and strategies for the internationalization of higher education in low-income East African countries,” Higher Education, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 89-109, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10734-023-00994-1.
D. Fortus, J. Lin, K. Neumann, and T. D. Sadler, “The role of affect in science literacy for all,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 535-555, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384.
M. P. Virtič, “Teaching science & technology: components of scientific literacy and insight into the steps of research,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1916-1931, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2022.2105414.
H. Suwono, N. L. Rofi’Ah, M. Saefi, and R. Fachrunnisa, “Interactive socio-scientific inquiry for promoting scientific literacy, enhancing biological knowledge, and developing critical thinking,” Journal of Biological Education, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 944-959, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00219266.2021.2006270.
V. Kumar, S. K. Choudhary, and R. Singh, “Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 9, pp. 100765, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765.
J. Chang, and D. Liu, “Optimising learning outcomes: A comprehensive approach to virtual simulation experiment teaching in higher education,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 2114-2134, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2024.2314825.
A. R. Fitria, N. Hasnunidah, N. Fadiawati, and A. Suyatna, “Enhancing scientific argumentation through the integration of argument-driven inquiry and STEM in E-Worksheets for secondary science education,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(7), 263-272, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.11603.
B. T. Cahyono, H. Wibawanto, M. K. Budiarto, T. S. Qodr, F. Sukmawati, and R. Prihatin, “Utilizing ICT-Based learning resources to enhance creativity and innovation for pre-service students of vocational education,” Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 282-292, 2025, doi: 10.7160/eriesj.2025.180404.
K. M. I. Rosyida, and B. K. Prahani, “Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills in physics: Exploring problem-based learning and mobile technology integration in rotational dynamics education,” Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1301-1313, 2025, doi: 10.25082/AMLER.2025.01.006.
J. Tang, “The impact of smart learning technologies on students’ cognitive competence: enhancing critical thinking,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 10073-10089, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13250-5.
S. N. Ajid, D. A. Kusumaningtyas, K. Ratih, and S. Lava, “Strategies for integrating problem-based learning, teaching modules, and formative assessments to enhance learning outcomes and critical thinking skills,” Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 218-232, 2025, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v7i2.8612.
R. Capone, “Blended learning and student-centered active learning environment: A case study with STEM undergraduate students,” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 210-236, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42330-022-00195-5.
K. H. D. Tang, “Student-centered approach in teaching and learning: What does it really mean?,” Acta Pedagogia Asiana, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 72-83, 2023, doi: 10.53623/apga.v2i2.218.
A. M. Al-Ansi, and A. Al-Ansi, “Enhancing student-centered learning through introducing module for STEM development and assessment,” International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 22-27, 2023, doi: 10.53889/ijses.v3i1.114.
H. Y. Hong, P. Y. Lin, B. Chen, and N. Chen, “Integrated STEM learning in an idea-centered knowledge-building environment,” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 63-76, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40299-018-0409-y.
W. Shumar, J. Silverman, A. E. Moyer, M. Casino, B. Condon, D. Murasko, and J. S. Stanford, “Use of a professional development course to promote student-centered teaching in large STEM courses,” College teaching, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 145-159, 2025, doi: 10.1080/87567555.2023.2246618.
S. Fajrina, L. Lufri, and Y. Ahda, “Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) as a learning approach to improve 21st century skills: A review,” International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, vol. 15, no. 7, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijoe.v16i07.14101.
R. A. Ali, “Enhancing 21st century skills through integrated STEM education using project-oriented problem-based learning,” Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 421-430, 2024, doi: 10.30892/gtg.53205-1217.
S. M. Stehle, and E. E. Peters-Burton, “Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools,” International Journal of STEM education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1.
S. R. Muzana, I. Wilujeng, B. E. Yanto, and A. A. Mustamin, “E-STEM project-based learning in teaching science to increase ict literacy and problem solving,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1386-1394, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21942.
O. Karamustafaoğlu, and H. M. Pektaş, “Developing students’ creative problem solving skills with inquiry-based STEM activity in an out-of-school learning environment,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 7651-7669, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11496-5.
L. Chen, Y. Taniguchi, A. Shimada, and M. Yamada, “Exploring behavioral and strategic factors affecting secondary students’ learning performance in collaborative problem solving-based STEM lessons,” Sage Open, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 21582440241251641, 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241251641.
M. Maesaroh, E. Kartikawati, M. Elvianasti, I. Irdalisa, and S. Murwitaningsih, “Study of science process skills in lesson plan by prospective biology teachers based on merdeka curriculum,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 2866-2873, 2023, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.2600.
J. S. Hornejas, and J. A. A. Guntalidad, “Project-based learning approach on content mastery and cognitive skills: a pedagogical model for senior high school biology students,” Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.51798/sijis.v5i2.763.
T. Tanti, W. Utami, D. Deliza, and M. Jahanifar, “Investigation in vocation high school for attitude and motivation students in learning physics subject,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479-490, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452.
R. Dumasari, A. Sutisna, P. Hadiyanti, and M. Mawardi, “Evaluating technical guidance in the functional role of learning facilitators: A multidimensional approach to enhancing educational outcomes,” Journal of Nonformal Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 135-146, 2024, doi: 10.15294/jone.v10i1.255.
N. Mansour, “Students’ and facilitators’ experiences with synchronous and asynchronous online dialogic discussions and e-facilitation in understanding the Nature of Science,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 15965-15997, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12473-w.
L. Herayanti, F. Fuaddunnazmi, and B. A. Sukroyanti, “Development of ethnoscience-based teaching materials to improve students' scientific literacy,” Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 365-374, 2025, doi: 10.33394/jk.v11i1.13429.
I. N. Tika, and P. Artawan, “The effect of ethnoscience-based problem-based learning on energy literacy and learning outcomes in high school,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 353-361, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i8.12330.
N. Andrina, L. Nazli, M. A. Pratiwi, M. S. Sitepu, and D. S. Putri, “The effect of using napier stem media on students'understanding of mathematical concepts,” Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 52-63, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i8.12330.
S. K. Ahmed, “How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers,” Oral Oncology Reports, vol. 12, pp. 100662, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662.
A. L. Tan, Y. S. Ong, Y. S. Ng, and J. H. J. Tan, “STEM problem solving: Inquiry, concepts, and reasoning,” Science & Education, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 381-397, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00310-2.
K. Adhelacahya, S. Sukarmin, and S. Sarwanto, “The impact of problem-based learning electronics module integrated with STEM on students' critical thinking skills,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 4869-4878, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.3931.
Z. Zulfawati, T. Mayasari, and J. Handhika, “The effectiveness of the problem-based learning model integrated STEM approach in improving the critical thinking skills,” Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 76-91, 2022, doi: 10.26740/jpfa.v12n1.p76-91.
A. Rasyid, R. Rinto, and M. Susanti, “Project-based learning through the STEM approach in elementary schools: How to improve problem-solving ability,” Journal of Education For Sustainable Innovation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2023, doi: 10.56916/jesi.v1i1.477.
S. Purnomo, Y. S. Rahayu, and R. Agustini, “Effectiveness of adi-stem to improve student’s science literacy skill,” IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 632-647, 2023, doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v4i5.382.
M. Nasir, C. Cari, W. Sunarno, and F. Rahmawati, “The effect of STEM-based guided inquiry on light concept understanding and scientific explanation,” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2175, 2022, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/12499.
B. Almeida, M. Santos, and R. Justi, “Aspects and abilities of science literacy in the context of nature of science teaching,” Science & Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 567-587, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00324-4.
M. Istyadji and S. Sauqina. (2023). Conception of scientific literacy in the development of scientific literacy assessment tools: A systematic theoretical review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(2), 281-308, 2023, doi: 10.36681/tused.2023.016.
W. Bangun, I. N. S. Degeng, H. Praherdhiono, and S. R. Lestari, “The effect of blended project-based learning for enhancing student’s scientific literacy skills: An experimental study in University,” Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 223-233, 2023, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.13.01.24.
I. Deveci, and I. Karteri, “Context-based learning supported by environmental measurement devices in science teacher education: A mixed method research,” Journal of Biological Education, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 487-512, 2022, doi: 10.1080/00219266.2020.1821083.
B. A. Gungor, S. Saracoglu, and M, Metin, “Perspective of teachers to context-based learning and its use in science education,” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 27-47, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42330-023-00266-1.
C. E. Mundy, and B. K. Nokeri, “Investigating the effects of a context-based laboratory exercise for meaningful learning,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 3118-3125, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01260.
A. I. Oladejo, T. T. Olateju, P. A. Okebukola, R. Sanni, H. Akintoye, F. Onowugbeda, and U. Adam, “Breaking barriers to meaningful learning in STEM subjects in africa: A systematic review of the culturo-techno-contextual approach,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 2310, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17052310.
R. Ramli, R. Razali, A. N. Gadeng, N. Diana, and J. Hariadi, “Integrating local knowledge into higher education: A qualitative study of curriculum innovation in Aceh, Indonesia,” Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1214, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15091214.
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Naqqi Imani, Wahono Widodo, Sukarmin Sukarmin, Muhammad Satriawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
