Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Ethnosemiotic Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Symbols in Torompio Traditional Dance of the Pamona Ethnic Group, Central Sulawesi

Meilyn Wowor ORCID
Tadulako University ROR
Indonesia
mowormeilyn@gmail.com
Syamsuddin Syamsuddin ORCID
Tadulako University ROR
Indonesia
Agustan Agustan ORCID
Tadulako University ROR
Indonesia
Ida Nuraeni ORCID
Tadulako University ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the verbal and nonverbal symbols in the Torompio traditional dance of the Pamona ethnic group in Central Sulawesi. It seeks to interpret the cultural meanings embedded in its movements, lyrics, costumes, and music through an ethnosemiotic approach to reveal the moral, social, and spiritual values reflected in the dance.

    Methodology: This study employed a qualitative descriptive method with an ethnosemiotic approach, integrating ethnography and semiotics. Data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation using audio-visual tools such as cameras and recorders. Supporting data were analyzed using an interactive model of data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing with reference to Miles and Huberman.

    Main Findings: The study found that verbal symbols in the Torompio dance such as traditional chants and lyrics express love, respect, and harmony, while nonverbal symbols such as gestures, movements, costumes, and colors represent unity, spirituality, and cultural identity. These symbols together form a semiotic system reflecting Pamona philosophical values of balance, modesty, and social harmony in human relationships and cultural life.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers a new ethnosemiotic interpretation of the Torompio traditional dance, highlighting its dual role as an artistic performance and a medium of cultural communication. By revealing how verbal and nonverbal signs convey moral, spiritual, and social meanings, it advances understanding of Indonesian traditional arts as living semiotic systems that preserve local wisdom and identity.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Ethnosemiotic Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Symbols in Torompio Traditional Dance of the Pamona Ethnic Group, Central Sulawesi”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 221–229, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jee.v7i1.2288.

    More Citation Formats

  • 163
    Abstract views
    206
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. E. Fatmawati, “Strategies to grow a proud attitude towards Indonesian cultural diversity,” Linguistics and Culture Review, vol. 5, no. S1, pp. 810–820, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1465
    2. M. K. Tumonggor, T. M. Karafet, B. Hallmark, J. S. Lansing, H. Sudoyo, M. F. Hammer, and M. P. Cox, “The Indonesian archipelago: an ancient genetic highway linking Asia and the Pacific,” Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 165–173, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2012.154
    3. G. Ma, “Islands and the world from an anthropological perspective,” International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 12, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-020-00038-x
    4. A. S. Nuraini, S. N. Aprlianti, and T. N. E. Agustin, “Cultural diversity and historical traditions in Indonesia,” HISTORICAL: Journal of History and Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58355/historical.v4i1.119
    5. L. V. Aragon, “Copyrighting culture for the nation? Intangible property nationalism and the regional arts of Indonesia,” International Journal of Cultural Property, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 269–312, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739112000203
    6. D. Syafrini, M. F. Nurdin, Y. S. Sugandi, and A. Miko, “The impact of multiethnic cultural tourism in an Indonesian former mining city,” Tourism Recreation Research, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 511–525, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2020.1757208
    7. R. Asfina and R. Ovilia, “Be proud of Indonesian cultural heritage richness and be alert of its preservation efforts in the global world,” Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 195–206, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jh.v15i2.6428
    8. H. K. Patonga, I. Hatta, R. Resmiwati, and M. Z. Badollahi, “Exploring symbolism in the Torompio dance within the traditions of the Pamona tribe,” SIGn Journal of Social Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 127–140, 2024.
    9. A. Giurchescu, “The power of dance and its social and political uses,” Yearbook for Traditional Music, vol. 33, pp. 109–122, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1519635
    10. J. A. Meglin and L. M. Brooks, “Embodied texts, textual choreographies,” Dance Chronicle, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01472526.2016.1136183
    11. N. C. Akas, “Symbols in traditional dance: A study of Nkwanwite dance,” Journal of Gender and Power, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 115–133, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jgp-2020-0007
    12. A. Deshkar, “Non-verbal communication in Indian classical dance forms,” Bodhi: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/bodhi.v10i1.66929
    13. P. M. May-Machunda, “Theorizing performance: An embodied and multisensory communicative framework for analysis of African American children's, youth's, and young adults' rhythmic play and performance,” Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 39–80, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/jfr.00011
    14. N. Nursalam, A. Santoso, I. A. Basuki, A. Laia, C. B. Sinamo, and B. Prastio, “Exploration of symbolic meanings: A semiotic study of Kelong oral literature performance in Makassar community,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2439660, 2024.
    15. J. A. K. Yaunton, J. A. Latief, I. Rore, and C. Kapile, “The symbolic meaning in the Matende Mamongo traditional ceremony of the Pamona ethnic group in Taripa Village, East Pamona Subdistrict,” International Journal of Integrative Sciences, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1101–1110, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v4i5.285
    16. N. Ollora-Triana, M. Corbi, A. Jiménez-Eguizábal, and E. García-Zabaleta, “Semiologic process in the performance of a dance performance: A critical review,” Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, pp. 1–19, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.90332
    17. F. Wang, “Philosophical manifestation in dance: Bridging movement and thought,” Trans/Form/Ação, vol. 47, no. 5, p. e02400248, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n5.e02400248
    18. E. De Stefani and D. De Marco, “Language, gesture, and emotional communication: An embodied view of social interaction,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, p. 2063, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02063
    19. W. Xiao, “The language of the body: The role and significance of body shaping in drama art education,” Arts Educa, vol. 38, 2024.
    20. M. S. Djalolovna, “The role of non-verbal communication in spoken language,” Web of Discoveries: Journal of Analysis and Inventions, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 4–8, 2025.
    21. G. Mazzarino, “Ethnosemiotics,” Zeitschrift für Semiotik, vol. 44, no. 3–4, pp. 99–121, 2022.
    22. X. Ge and H. Jia, “On the traditions and trends of ethnosemiotics in China: An interview with Prof. Hongwei Jia,” Chinese Semiotic Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 231–248, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2022-2058
    23. A. I. Saidi, D. G. Puspitasari, C. Parung, T. Sulistyaningtyas, and Y. Suryani, “The semiotics of Yogyakarta’s batik, nature as ontological and epistemological basis of the work,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2510061, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2510061
    24. A. Ghazvineh and A. Fahimifar, “Behind the scenes of theatrical meaning: A social semiotic approach to inter-and intramodal interactions in performance,” Language and Semiotic Studies, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 461–479, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2024-0029
    25. V. B. Afolaranmi and A. O. Afolaranmi, “Cultural revitalization through dance as a panacea for peacebuilding,” Advanced Journal of Theatre and Film Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2024.
    26. G. Chu, “Cultural identity and community resilience: The role of ethnic dance in maintaining rural traditions and history,” Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, vol. 25, no. 3, 2025.
    27. B. Maloney Leaf and B. Ngo, “‘You are not invisible’: A qualitative study examining ritual, pedagogical relationships, and student visibility in Kathak dance,” Research in Dance Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 280–295, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2020.1815689
    28. C. B. Dillard, “When the music changes, so should the dance: Cultural and spiritual considerations in paradigm ‘proliferation’,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 59–76, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500450185
    29. M. S. Casumbal-Salazar, “The indeterminacy of the Philippine indigenous subject: Indigeneity, temporality, and cultural governance,” Amerasia Journal, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 74–94, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17953/aj.41.1.74
    30. V. J. Fisher, “Embodied songs: Insights into the nature of cross-modal meaning-making within sign language informed, embodied interpretations of vocal music,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, p. 624689, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624689
    31. H. K. Patonga, I. Hatta, R. Resmiwati, and M. Z. Badollahi, “Exploring symbolism in the torompio dance within the traditions of the pamona tribe,” SIGn Journal of Social Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 127-140, 2024, doi: 10.37276/sjss.v4i2.339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjss.v4i2.339
    32. X. Peng, “Historical development and cross-cultural influence of dance creation: Evolution of body language,” Herança, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 88-99, 2024 doi: 10.52152/heranca.v7i1.764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52152/heranca.v7i1.764
    33. B. Zhang, “Multicultural dance-making in Singapore: Merdeka, youth solidarity and cross-ethnicity, 1955–1980s,” In Inter-Asia in Motion (pp. 198-214). Routledge, 2023, doi: 10.4324/9781003434160-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003434160-13
    34. K. Graber, S. K. Johnson, and A. L. Thiessen, “Centering relationship: The necessity and complexity of worshiping with songs and prayers with connections to indigenous communities,” Conrad Grebel Review, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 21-55, 2023.
    35. P. Shah, “Performance of ṭhumrī in kathak dance,” Asian Theatre Journal, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 326-361, 2023, doi: 10.1353/atj.2023.a912919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/atj.2023.a912919
    36. J. Zhang, “Delicate scents: The emotional and symbolic role of fragrance in jiang kuiʼs baishi ci poetry,” Journal of the Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 23-36, 2025, doi: 10.14943/jfhhs.20.23.
    37. P. N. Nelson, “Formal training in musical instrument and effective performance on stage,” American Journal of Music and Performing Arts, 5(1), 1-10, 2023.
    38. C. Toader, C. P. Tataru, I. A. Florian, R. A. Covache-Busuioc, B. G. Bratu, L. A. Glavan, and A. V. Ciurea, “Cognitive crescendo: How music shapes the brain’s structure and function,” Brain Sciences, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1390, 2023, doi: 10.3390/brainsci13101390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101390
    39. N. Nursalam, A. Santoso, I. Agus Basuki, A. Laia, C. Buena Sinamo, and B. Prastio, “Exploration of symbolic meanings: A semiotic study of Kelong oral literature performance in Makassar community,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 2439660, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2439660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2439660
    40. J. V. D. Reyes, “Sabhay: An Ethnochoreological Movement Study of a Subanen Courtship Dance,” Journal of Physical Education Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 01-15, 2025.