Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

The Politeness of Teachers’ Imperative Speech Acts in Teacher–Student Interactions in Senior High School: A Sociopragmatic Approach

Muhammad Chaidir
Tadulako University ROR
Indonesia
muh.chaidir08@gmail.com
Syamsuddin Syamsuddin
Tadulako University ROR
Indonesia
Ulinsa Ulinsa
Tadulako University ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to describe, analyze, and interpret the forms, functions, and politeness strategies of teachers’ imperative speech acts in teacher–student interactions at Senior High School 1 Poso Pesisir Utara using a sociopragmatic approach.

    Methodology: This study employed a qualitative descriptive method using observation, audio recording, and note-taking techniques. Data were analyzed through Miles and Huberman’s interactive analysis model, involving data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The analysis applied Sudaryanto’s formal and informal presentation methods without any statistical or software-based tools.

    Main Findings: The study identified 17 forms of polite imperative speech acts, including directive, requestive, persuasive, and advisory types. Teachers applied Leech’s six politeness maxims tact, generosity, approbation, modesty, agreement, and sympathy to balance authority and respect. Two politeness strategies, direct and indirect, were used depending on context, social distance, and communicative goals. Teachers consistently maintained ethical, polite, and culturally sensitive communication.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides a detailed sociopragmatic analysis of teachers’ imperative speech acts within an Indonesian multicultural school context. It highlights how local linguistic features and cultural norms influence the realization of politeness in educational communication, offering new insights into the intersection of language, culture, and pedagogy rarely explored in previous research.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “The Politeness of Teachers’ Imperative Speech Acts in Teacher–Student Interactions in Senior High School: A Sociopragmatic Approach”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 238–247, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jee.v7i1.2286.

    More Citation Formats

  • 197
    Abstract views
    147
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. G. B. Aliyeva, “Language as a means of communication and social construction: Regarding the formation of our identity and shared culture,” Futurity Philosophy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 4–13, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2023.03.30.01
    2. C. Kramsch, “Language and culture,” AILA Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 30–55, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.27.02kra
    3. L. Zhao, “The influence of learners' motivation and attitudes on second language teaching,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 5, no. 11, p. 2333, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0511.18
    4. Z. I. Fadillah, R. Hashim, and S. Aini, “The strategic role of teacher communication in shaping a learning environment that promotes student learning motivation: A qualitative study,” Journal Sains and Education, vol. 3, no. 2, 2025.
    5. M. Ramzan, Z. K. Javaid, A. Kareem, and S. Mobeen, “Amplifying classroom enjoyment and cultivating positive learning attitudes among ESL learners,” Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2298–2308, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2023.1102.0522
    6. T. Tanti, W. Utami, D. Deliza, and M. Jahanifar, “Investigation in vocation high school for attitude and motivation students in learning physics subject,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479-490, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452
    7. H. Salbaş and E. Ekmekci, “The impact of classroom environment on students' willingness to communicate in foreign language learning,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 129, p. 102517, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102517
    8. A. S. Azhari, P. Priono, and N. Nuriadi, “Speech acts of classroom interaction,” International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 24–45, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v4i2.639
    9. A. Raihany and E. N. Rabbianty, “Pragmatic politeness of the imperative speech used by the elementary school language teachers,” OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 181–198, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v15i1.3810
    10. Y. A. T. Pangemanan et al., “Teaching pragmatic competence in EFL classrooms: The impact of speech act instruction on pre-service English teachers,” Voices of English Language Education Society, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 151–162, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v9i1.29561
    11. S. Marni, R. L. Tiawati, T. Helda, and W. Rahmat, “How important is the study of pragmatics to train students' communication skills in facing the challenges of the 21st century?,” Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–46, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v4i1.769
    12. R. Tanduk, “Pragmatic aspects of speech acts: A cross-linguistic perspective,” English Review: Journal of English Education, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 881–890, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.8762
    13. S. Achmad, S. T. Miolo, A. Katili, and S. Bouti, “Identifying linguistic and speech acts variations of the Buginese tribe through socio-pragmatic analysis in establishing daily discourse interactions,” Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1698–1709, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1406.29
    14. M. Rohmadi, M. Sudaryanto, D. A. Susanto, K. Saddhono, and A. D. Saputra, “Sociopragmatic study of Javanese oral discourse in big city communities as an effort to maintain indigenous language,” Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 41–59, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58256/rjah.v4i4.1290
    15. R. K. Rahardi, H. Handoko, W. Rahmat, and Y. Setyaningsih, “Javanese silly gags on daily communication on social media: pragmatic meanings and functions approach,” Jurnal Arbitrer, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.11.1.49-59.2024
    16. E. Nurdiyanto and G. A. Resticka, “Sociopragmatics competence in the characteristics of Banyumas community blakasuta,” Journal of Pragmatics Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–45, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v3i1.28-45
    17. M. Rohmadi, P. A. W. Wibowo, M. Sudaryanto, and K. Saddhono, “Religiousness in Javanese language and culture communication: A sociopragmatic study in Java Island, Indonesia,” International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–37, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7i1.112
    18. M. Tschannen-Moran and C. R. Gareis, “Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools,” Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 66–92, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2014-0024
    19. A. Adawiyah, “Promoting social values in building social interaction among inter-ethnic students in a multicultural senior high school in Indonesia,” Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 102–106, 2023.
    20. H. J. Prayitno, M. Huda, N. Inayah, H. Ardi, and N. Yusof, “Politeness of directive speech acts on social media discourse and its implications for strengthening student character education in the era of global education,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 179–200, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16205
    21. D. Mardiana, F. Rokhman, Rustono, and H. B. Mardikantoro, “Speech act of political figures in the discourse of educational development: an interpersonal pragmatic approach,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2463728, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2463728
    22. C. Agus and F. Iswandi, “Constructing and negotiating identity in talk-in-interaction: A sociopragmatic framework for analyzing pragmatic strategies,” Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 189–206, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v5i2.1320
    23. M. A. Wardana and S. Baharun, “Pragmatic functions of speech acts in Arabic language learning: A case study from Madura,” Al-Ta'rib: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab IAIN Palangka Raya, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 181–198, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/altarib.v13i1.9979
    24. A. Latrech and A. Alazzawie, “The use of politeness strategies in teacher–student interaction in the Omani EFL classroom,” Saudi Journal of Language Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 102–112, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-06-2022-0052
    25. C. J. Syting and P. J. Gildore, “Teachers’ linguistic politeness in classroom interaction: a pragmatic analysis,” World Journal of English Language, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 133–141, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p133
    26. Z. R. Eslami, T. V. Larina, and R. Pashmforoosh, “Identity, politeness and discursive practices in a changing world,” Russian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 7–38, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34051
    27. S. Andini, S. Sudarto, A. Ayatullah, and H. M. Farhan, “Language politeness in Javanese and Sundanese border cultural landscapes in elementary school student learning,” Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 681–691, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v6i4.2354
    28. E. Suroso, “Between reprimands and support: An exploration of politeness in teacher-student interaction in the classroom environment,” QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1527–1544, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v16i2.6367
    29. S. Bella, M. Sifianou, and A. Tzanne, “Teaching politeness,” in Teaching and Learning (Im)Politeness, pp. 23–51, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501501654-003
    30. N. Wang, W. L. Johnson, R. E. Mayer, P. Rizzo, E. Shaw, and H. Collins, “The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 98–112, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.09.003
    31. M. A. Muhsin, M. A. Idrus, L. Fontillas, A. A. Latiff, and G. Ergasheva, “The euphemistic expressions in EFL classrooms: Teacher strategies in instructional communication,” New Language Dimensions, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/nld.v6n1.p51-60
    32. R. K. Rahardi, Pragmatik: kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia. Erlangga, 2005.