Evaluating Instructional Strategy Effectiveness of Physical Education Teachers in Implementing the Independent Curriculum
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The implementation of Indonesia’s Independent Curriculum places strong emphasis on student-centered, project-based, and differentiated learning, including in Physical Education, Sports, and Health (PJOK), which plays a vital role in students’ holistic development. This study aims to evaluate the extent to which PJOK teaching strategies aligned with the Independent Curriculum are implemented in five elementary schools in Palu City
Methodology: A quantitative descriptive research design was employed, integrating questionnaire data, classroom observations, and document analysis to obtain a comprehensive picture of instructional practices. The participants consisted of 15 PJOK teachers from five public elementary schools, with data collected using a four-point Likert-scale questionnaire to capture teachers’ perceptions and self-reported practices.
Main Findings: The findings indicate that PJOK teachers have largely adopted the Independent Curriculum principles, particularly in planning, assessment, and participation in training programs, which achieved high performance levels. Nevertheless, persistent challenges were identified in the utilization of learning media, limited infrastructure, and time constraints, which restricted the optimal implementation of innovative PJOK learning activities.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in its focused empirical examination of PJOK within the Independent Curriculum framework, a subject area that remains underrepresented in curriculum implementation research. By highlighting contextual disparities and practical constraints, this study provides evidence-based insights to inform policy decisions, school leadership strategies, and targeted professional development to strengthen PJOK instruction in primary education.
References
S. E. S. Mu’aziyah and I. Isnawati, “Curriculum change vs changes in the field: How contextual is learning in the merdeka curiculum?,” Equator Sci. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73–79, 2023, doi: 10.61142/esj.v1i2.34.
Y. Fitri, L. Waluyo, and I. Siti, “Transforming teachers’ roles in navigating the challenges of implementing the independent curriculum: Adaptive strategies and professional reflection in elementary school,” vol. 6, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i3.1866.
M. Mulyadi, M. F. Hidayatullah, R. Syaifullah, and S. Riyadi, “Evaluative study of the implementation of the independent curriculum in physical education elementary school level using the CIPP model,” QALAMUNA J. Pendidikan, Sos. dan Agama, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1017–1030, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.37680/qalamuna.v16i2.5718.
T. Tanti, W. Utami, D. Deliza, and M. Jahanifar, “Investigation in vocation high school for attitude and motivation students in learning physics subject,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479-490, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452.
S. Fajrina et al., “The feature of project-based learning and differentiated instruction practices in biology learning,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 10142–10151, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.8992.
Z. D. Andriyani, D. Wijayanti, N. Ubaidah, A. Lutfi, and D. Meng, “Does the use of differentiated instruction through project-based learning in mathematics classroom settings facilitate the students’ collaborative skills?,” J. Elem., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 460–478, 2024, doi: 10.29408/jel.v10i3.24381.
D. Holman and E. Švejdarová, “The 21st-Century empowering wholeness adaptive (EWA) educational model transforming learning capacity and human capital through wholeness systems thinking towards a sustainable future,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1301, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15021301.
D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, T. Tanti, and S. Maryani, “Innovative learning: Gender perception of e-module linear equations in mathematics and physics,” Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 92-106, 2022, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610.
S. Zakariyah, “Thematic subject specific pedagogy to integrate 21st century learning skills,” vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 30–41, 2022, doi: 10.56741/ijlree.v1i01.64.
S. Sumarjono, S. Nopembri, and H. Yuliarto, “Genealogy on policies and strategies of physical education for elementary schools in Indonesia,” Retos, vol. 57, pp. 416–425, 2024, doi: 10.47197/retos.v57.104741.
A. Wahyudi, B. Priyono, S. T. Paramitha, and B. M. Suryonegoro, “Analysis of volleyball learning and its impact on physical fitness: A longitudinal review of speed , strength , and flexibility in the perspective of the sport pedagogy approach to physical and health education,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 397–404, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1553.
G. Stephanou and D. Karamountzos, “Enhancing students’ metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive regulation and performance in physical education via TGFU,” Res. Psychol. Behav. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.12691/rpbs-8-1-1.
M. Batez, “ICT skills of university students from the faculty of sport and physical education during the covid-19 pandemic,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 1711, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13041711.
J. A. Rudd, T. J. Greenbowe, B. M. Hand, and M. J. Legg, “Using the science writing heuristic to move toward an inquiry-based laboratory curriculum: An example from physical equilibrium,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 78, no. 12, p. 1680, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1021/ed078p1680.
K. M. Sudrajat, T. Muhtar, and D. Susilawati, “Evaluasi kurikulum merdeka tahun 2022 mata pelajaran pendidikan jasmani olahraga dan kesehatan [Evaluation of the 2022 independent curriculum for physical education, sports and health subjects],” J. Sport (Sport, Phys. Educ. Organ. Recreat. Training), vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 771–788, 2023, doi: 10.37058/sport.v7i3.8430.
E. Hacıeminoğlu, N. G. Yıldız, and R. Şeker, “Factors related to cognitive reasoning of pre-service teachers’ science process skills: Role of experiments at home on meaningful learning,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 13, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14137703.
Q. Liu, “Interdisciplinary integration in physical education curriculum design and implementation: A study on the role and strategies,” Educ. Rev. USA, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1514–1520, 2023, doi: 10.26855/er.2023.10.010.
F. Reichert, D. Lange, and L. Chow, “Educational beliefs matter for classroom instruction: A comparative analysis of teachers’ beliefs about the aims of civic education,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 98, pp. 103248, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103248.
K. L. Simonton, T. E. Layne, and C. C. Irwin, “Project-based learning and its potential in physical education: An instructional model inquiry,” Curric. Stud. Heal. Phys. Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 36–52, 2021, doi: 10.1080/25742981.2020.1862683.
N. Tsangaridou, “Early childhood teachers’ views about teaching physical education: Challenges and recommendations,” Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagog., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 283–300, 2017, doi: 10.1080/17408989.2016.1192593.
A. Casey and A. MacPhail, “Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education,” Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagog., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 294–310, 2018, doi: 10.1080/17408989.2018.1429588.
B. Barrett and J. Hordern, “Rethinking the foundations: towards powerful professional knowledge in teacher education in the USA and England,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 153–165, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00220272.2021.1887359.
G. V. Crookes, “Redrawing the boundaries on theory, research, and practice concerning language teachers’ philosophies and language teacher cognition: Toward a critical perspective,” Mod. Lang. J., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 485–499, 2015, doi: 10.1111/modl.12237.
H. Aldowah, H. Al-Samarraie, and S. Ghazal, “How course, contextual, and technological challenges are associated with instructors’ individual challenges to successfully implement e-learning: A developing country perspective,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 48792–48806, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2910148.
A. P. Hills, D. R. Dengel, and D. R. Lubans, “Supporting public health priorities: Recommendations for physical education and physical activity promotion in schools,” Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 368–374, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.09.010.
T. Lynch and G. J. Soukup, “Primary physical education (PE): School leader perceptions about classroom teacher quality implementation,” Cogent Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1348925, 2017, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2017.1348925.
C. A. Webster, L. Russ, S. Vazou, T. L. Goh, and H. Erwin, “Integrating movement in academic classrooms: understanding, applying and advancing the knowledge base,” Obes. Rev., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 691–701, 2015, doi: 10.1111/obr.12285.
P. Gruba, M. S. Cárdenas-Claros, R. Suvorov, and K. Rick, “Macro-Level Evaluation,” in Blended Language Program Evaluation, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016, pp. 85–104. doi: 10.1057/9781137514370_5.
Z. Li, “The Application of CIPP Model in the Value-added Evaluation of Physical Education Skills Teaching in Higher Vocational Colleges,” Pacific Int. J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 47–56, 2025, doi: 10.55014/pij.v8i4.844.
P. Milley, B. Szijarto, K. Svensson, and J. B. Cousins, “The evaluation of social innovation: A review and integration of the current empirical knowledge base,” Evaluation, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 237–258, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1356389018763242.
C. U. Madsen and P. Hasle, “Commitment or compliance? institutional logics of work environment management,” Nord. J. Work. Life Stud., vol. 7, no. S2, 2017, doi: 10.18291/njwls.v7iS2.96688.
O. J. Alkhatib, “A framework For implementing higher-order thinking skills (problem-solving, critical thinking, creative thinking, and decision-making) in engineering humanities,” in 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), 2019, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714232.
M. E. Martinez and V. Gomez, “Active learning strategies: A mini review of evidence-based approaches,” Acta Pedagog. Asiana, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2025, doi: 10.53623/apga.v4i1.555.
S. Zhou and X. Qu, “The design of collaborative learning activities supporting the development of higher-order thinking--based on embodied cognition theory,” in Proceedings of the 2024 9th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning, 2024, pp. 407–412. doi: 10.1145/3675812.3675861.
C. Cresswell and C. P. Speelman, “Does mathematics training lead to better logical thinking and reasoning? A cross-sectional assessment from students to professors.,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 0236153, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236153.
F. M. Otero-Saborido, F. J. Vázquez-Ramos, J. M. Cenizo-Benjumea, and J. A. González-Jurado, “Analysis of the assessment in Physical Education curricula in Primary Education,” Sport. Educ. Soc., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 903–916, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13573322.2020.1804349.
H. Liu et al., “Development and students’ evaluation of a blended online and offline pedagogy for physical education theory curriculum in China during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 2235–2254, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11423-022-10131-x.
B. D. Kern and K. C. Graber, “Physical education teacher change: initial validation of the teacher change questionnaire-physical education,” Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 161–173, 2017, doi: 10.1080/1091367X.2017.1319371.
E. H. Kwon and M. E. Block, “Implementing the adapted physical education E-learning program into physical education teacher education program,” Res. Dev. Disabil., vol. 69, pp. 18–29, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.07.001.
A. Priyohutomo, Komarudin, and Sridadi, “The Perspective of Physical Education Teachers: Challenges within the Project-Based Learning Model,” Phys. Educ. Theory Methodol., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 511–517, 2025, doi: 10.17309/tmfv.2025.3.05.
J. Farrow, S. S. Kavanagh, P. Samudra, and C. Pupik Dean, “The promise of the project to student-centered learning: Connections between elements, curricular design, and practices of project based learning,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 152, pp. 104776, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2024.104776.
V. Vaithianathan, N. Subbulakshmi, S. Boopathi, and M. Mohanraj, “Integrating project-based and skills-based learning for enhanced student engagement and success,” In Adaptive Learning Technologies for Higher Education (pp. 345-372). IGI Global, 2024, doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-3641-0.ch015.
C. Li and C. Zhang, “Exploring the current landscape of primary school physical education within the framework of the new curriculum reform: A quality evaluation model perspective,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 20677–20698, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13132-024-01873-5.
N. Goyibova, N. Muslimov, G. Sabirova, N. Kadirova, and B. Samatova, “Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs,” MethodsX, vol. 14, pp. 103163, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103163.
S. Dole, L. Bloom, and K. Kowalske, “Transforming pedagogy: Changing perspectives from teacher-centered to learner-centered,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 10, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1538.
C. Ji and P. Li, “A study of digital literacy enhancement paths for physical education teachers in vocational undergraduate colleges based on multiple linear regression modeling,” J. Comb. Math. Comb. Comput., vol. 127 b, no., pp. 949–964, 2025, doi: 10.61091/jcmcc127b-053.
N. Kulyk, R. Masliuk, V. Kyselov, S. Voropai, and T. Koycheva, “Formation of ICT competence in future specialists of physical education and sports in the conditions of distance learning,” Rev. Amaz. Investig., vol. 12, no. 70, pp. 241–254, 2023, doi: 10.34069/AI/2023.70.10.22.
J. Rojo-Ramos et al., “Study of the digital teaching competence of physical education teachers in primary schools in one region of Spain,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 23, pp. 8822, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238822.
T. Amin and A. Rasyid, “Elementary school students ’ perceptions of physical education learning and its relation to the development of basic motor skills,” vol. 6, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i3.1795.
R. Blank et al., “International clinical practice recommendations on the definition, diagnosis, assessment, intervention, and psychosocial aspects of developmental coordination disorder,” Dev. Med. Child Neurol., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 242–285, 2019, doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14132.
M. Mustakim, I. W. Suastra, and I. W. Lasmawan, “The independent curriculum in educational theory review: challenges and solutions,” Realita J. Bimbing. dan Konseling, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 2480, 2024, doi: 10.33394/realita.v9i2.12391.
T. Tanti, D. Deliza, and S. Hartina, “The effectiveness of using smartphones as mobile-mini labs in improving students’ beliefs in physics,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 387-394, 2024, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185.
J. Carvalho, F. Sobral, and J. Mansur, “Exploring shared leadership in public organizations: Evidence from the educational arena,” Rev. Adm. Pública, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 524–544, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1590/0034-761220190319x.
Y.-H. Liou, “Leadership dynamics in educational ecosystems: examining social influence networks in school reform,” J. Prof. Cap. Community, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 98–118, May 2025, doi: 10.1108/JPCC-05-2024-0058.
N. M. Wiwik Astuti et al., “Indonesia: National progress report on the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action (2011-2013),” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 205–213, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006.
N. M. Wiwik Astuti, I. K. Werdhiana, and U. Wahyono, “Impacts of direct disaster experience on teachers’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of disaster risk reduction curriculum implementation in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 53, pp. 101992, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101992.
Copyright (c) 2026 Kamarudin Kamarudin, Hendra Iskandar, Moh Tris Maulana Daipaha, Muh Saldi, Muhamad Usba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
