Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Integrated Teaching Factory Management Model For Character Development in Vocational High Schools: A Study in Rejang Lebong Regency

Sukarsih Sukarsih ORCID
Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup
Indonesia
sukarsih68@gmail.com
Hendra Harmi ORCID
Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup
Indonesia
Jumira Warlizasusi ORCID
Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: The implementation of the Teaching Factory (TeFa) learning model in Vocational high school has developed as a key strategy to enhance the quality of industry-based vocational education. This study aims to analyze the planning, organizing, implementation, and supervision of the Teaching Factory in fostering students’ character development in vocational schools in Rejang Lebong Regency.

    Methodology: This research employed a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study strategy conducted in vocational high schools. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation. The data were analyzed using the interactive model proposed by Miles and Huberman, which includes data collection, reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing.

    Main Findings: The findings revealed that TEFA planning begins with the development of human resource planning, financial planning, production planning, and marketing planning. The organizing process involves the active participation of teachers, students, and industrial partners to create a realistic work system while instilling positive character values such as discipline, responsibility, and teamwork. A tangible form of this organizing process is the establishment of the TeFa organizational structure.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The TEFA model has proven effective in cultivating work-ready character traits and supporting students’ preparedness to enter the professional and entrepreneurial sectors. These findings provide a significant contribution to the advancement of holistic, character-based vocational education in Indonesia.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Integrated Teaching Factory Management Model For Character Development in Vocational High Schools: A Study in Rejang Lebong Regency”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 84–93, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jee.v7i1.2209.

    More Citation Formats

  • 202
    Abstract views
    129
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. R. A. Manurung, “The development of e-learning model web-based mathematics student worksheets (LKPD) to increase learning motivation of vocational school students,” Indonesian Journal of Education and Mathematical Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 56-61, 2022, doi: 10.30596/ijems.v3i2.11083.
    2. A. Amini, M. Marliani, E. Elfrianto, and I. Kemal, “Work motivation and work discipline on teachers’ performance in state vocational schools,” Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 2271-2280, 2022, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1467
    3. Y. Yasdin, and M. Muksins, “Political paradigms and vocational education policy in Indonesia: A document analysis,” Quality Education for All, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 204-221, 2024, doi: 10.1108/QEA-10-2023-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QEA-10-2023-0007
    4. A. B. D. Dethan, D. B. Pandie, and W. Djani, “Vocational high school revitalization policy implementation in kupang district,” Journal of Tourism Economics and Policy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 119-131, 2023, doi: 10.38142/jtep.v3i2.616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38142/jtep.v3i2.616
    5. H. Sofyan, Metodologi pembelajaran kejuruan [Vocational learning methodology]. UNY Press, 2015.
    6. D. Kesuma, Pendidikan Karakter: Kajian Teori dan Praktik di Sekolah [Character Education: A Study of Theory and Practice in Schools]. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011.
    7. M. Samani and H. Hariyanto, Konsep dan Model Pendidikan Karakter [Character Education Concepts and Models]. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012.
    8. D. Lazwardi, “Manajemen kurikulum sebagai pengembangan tujuan pendidikan [Curriculum management as the development of educational goals],” Al-Idarah J. Kependidikan Islam, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 119–125, 2017, doi: 10.24042/alidarah.v7i1.1112.
    9. E. F. Sari, F. Koda, I. Shofwan, and D. N. Tyas, “TPACK-Based team based project learning design in improving digital literacy skills,” J. Nonform. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 402–413, 2024, doi: 10.15294/jone.v10i2.10988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v10i2.10988
    10. A. Alimron, S. A. Syarnubi, and M. Maryamah, “Character education model in islamic higher education”, Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 3334-3345, 2023, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.1452
    11. A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, and S. E. Septi, “Overview the inquiry learning model: Attitudes, student characters, and student responses what’s the impact?,” Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 85-92, 2023, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v17i1.20530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i1.20530
    12. J. Liu, Y. Zhu, M. G. Serapio, and S. T. Cavusgil, “The new generation of millennial entrepreneurs: A review and call for research,” Int. Bus. Rev., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.05.001
    13. A. S. Patria, N. Krisitiana, E. Ekohariadi, A. Sutiadiningsih, and M. B. T. Sampurno, “Teaching factory management on vocational high school case study: Arts and creative industry competency,” SAR J. - Sci. Res., pp. 29–35, 2024, doi: 10.18421/SAR71-05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18421/SAR71-05
    14. S. Wahjusaputri and B. Bunyamin, “Development of teaching factory competency-based for vocational secondary education in Central Java, Indonesia,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. IJERE, vol. 11, no.1, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21709
    15. D. Mourtzis, N. Panopoulos, and J. Angelopoulos, “A hybrid teaching factory model towards personalized education 4.0,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1739-1759, 2023, doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2022.2145025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2022.2145025
    16. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Panduan teknis teaching factory. 2017.
    17. A. Kautsar, G. Wiyono, M. Mulia, M. Iqbal, and M. Al-Fairusy, “Teaching factory model development in vocational high schools,” Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 6347-6360, 2022, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2461
    18. G. N. I. P. Pratama, M. B. Triyono, B. R. Setiadi, E. A. Wibawa, I. L. Milansari, C. Dinata, and T. F. Prihandini, “A systematic literature review on implementation of teaching factory model in vocational education,” WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, vol. 22, pp. 708–718, 2025, doi: 10.37394/23207.2025.22.62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2025.22.62
    19. A. Purwanto, D. Novitasari, and M. Asbari, “The role of leadership, teaching factory (TEFA) program, competence of creative products and entrepreneurship on entrepreneurial interest of the vocational school students.” International Journal of Social and Management Studies, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 58-64, 2022, doi: 10.5555/ijosmas.v3i5.185.
    20. S. Wahjusaputri, T. I. Nastiti, B. Bunyamin, and W. Sukmawati, “Development of artificial intelligence-based teaching factory in vocational high schools in Central Java Province,” Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1234-1245, 2024, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21422
    21. S. R. Setiyorini and D. Setiawan, “Perkembangan kurikulum terhadap kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia [Curriculum development towards the quality of education in Indonesia],” J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.47134/jtp.v1i1.27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47134/jtp.v1i1.27
    22. T. Tanti, W. Utami, D. Deliza, and M. Jahanifar, “Investigation in vocation high school for attitude and motivation students in learning physics subject,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479-490, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452
    23. B. S. Wijanarka, F. Wijarwanto, and P. N. Mbakwa, “Successful implementation of teaching factory in machining expertise in vocational high schools,” Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2023, doi: 10.21831/jpv.v13i1.51811.
    24. B. S. Wijanarka, F. Wijarwanto, and P. N. Mbakwa, “Successful implementation of teaching factory in machining expertise in vocational high schools,” J. Pendidik. Vokasi, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.21831/jpv.v13i1.51811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i1.51811
    25. D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, T. Tanti, and S. Maryani, “Innovative learning: Gender perception of e-module linear equations in mathematics and physics,” Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 92-106, 2022, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610
    26. M. S. P. Hasibuan, Manajemen dasar, pengertian dan masalah. Bumi Aksara, 1984.
    27. S. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.
    28. D. M. Hasan et al., “METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF”.
    29. T. H. Handoko, Manajemen I. BPFE, 2001.
    30. I. N. Saputro, “Literature review of the development of a green campus teaching factory-based learning model in vocational schools in Indonesia,” QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 65-76, 2024, doi: 10.37680/qalamuna.v16i1.3438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v16i1.3438
    31. T. Tanti, D. Deliza, and S. Hartina, “The effectiveness of using smartphones as mobile-mini labs in improving students’ beliefs in physics,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 387-394, 2024, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185
    32. C. A. Prosser and T. H. Quigley, Vocational education in a democracy, Rev. American Technical Society, 1950.
    33. S. Wahjusaputri, T. I. Nastiti, B. Bunyamin, W. Sukmawati, and J. Johan, “Development of teaching factory model-based artificial intelligence: improving the quality of learning vocational schools in Indonesia,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 5173-5183, 2024, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5979
    34. T. H. Retnowati, D. Mardapi, and B. Prihadi, “Dimensi karakter dalam penilaian proses berkarya seni lukis peserta didik sekolah menengah kejuruan [Character dimensions in assessing the painting process of vocational high school students],” Imaji, vol. 15, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.21831/imaji.v15i2.18845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/imaji.v15i2.18845
    35. R. I. Kemendikbud, “SMK pusat keunggulan terus tingkatkan relevansi mutu lulusan dengan kebutuhan DUDI [Vocational schools as centers of excellence continue to improve the relevance of graduate quality to the needs of the industrial world.],” Siar. Pers, no. 547/sipres/A6/X/2023, 2023.
    36. S. Sukardi, Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip dan Operasionalnya [Educational Evaluation: Principles and Operations]. Bumi Aksara, 2015.
    37. Y. Yoto, M. Marsono, A. Qolik, and A. Romadin, “Evaluation of teaching factory using CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model to improve vocational high school students’ skills,” J. Pendidik. Vokasi, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 12–28, 2024, doi: 10.21831/jpv.v14i1.62573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i1.62573
    38. I. Isnandar, M. A. Ichwanto, and M. M. A. Ansyorie, “Sister-cousin TF model based on the influence of work preparedness and learning outcome,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 100722, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100722
    39. S. Ubaidah, S. Trisnamansyah, H. S. Insan, and N. Harahap, “Partnership management between vocational schools with the world of business and industry to improve the quality of graduates who are ready to work,” Int. J. Nusant. Islam, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 58–69, 2021, doi: 10.15575/ijni.v9i1.11818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v9i1.11818
    40. Y. Rinawati, A. Suriansyah, and N. Ngadimun, “School partnership management in improving vocational school education quality with teaching factory in Tabalong District, South Kalimantan Province,” J. K6 Educ. Manag., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 37–50, 2021, doi: 10.11594/jk6em.04.01.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/jk6em.04.01.04
    41. J. Warlizasusi, I. Fathurrochman, “Strategic management of the regional inspectorate as an effort to improve transparent and accountable education governance”, Int Jour edu Research and Dev, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 143–152, 2025, doi: 10.52760/ijerd.v5i2.116.
    42. J. Warlizasusi, I. Ifnaldi, N. Nuzuar, A. Qodri, and H. S. Utami, "Developing academic writing learning module to improve writing skills of graduate program students,” Ta'dib, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 391-404. 2025, doi: 10.31958/jt.v26i2.10496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v26i2.10496
    43. G. Alamsya, L. Asha, I. Ifnaldi, J. Warlizasusi, and I. Fathurrochman, “Strategic management of the police academy (sekolah polisi negara) polda bengkulu in enhancing student quality”, Int. J. Educ. Manag. Innov., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 298–309, 2025, doi: 10.12928/ijemi.v6i3.14468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v6i3.14468
    44. C. Letavia, D. D. Saputri, and I. Fathurrochman, “Pemasaran jasa pendidikan berbasis nilai: Kajian teoritis dan empiris pada pondok pesantren Indonesia [Value-based marketing of educational services: A theoretical and empirical study of Indonesian Islamic boarding schools]”, TARBAWI, vol. 16, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.36781/tarbawi.v16i01.