Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Designing Social Studies Brain-based Lesson Plan using Activation, Connection, and Transfer (ACT) Model

John Albert R Dela Rosa ORCID
Bataan Peninsula State University ROR
Philippines
jardelarosa@bpsu.edu.ph
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study develops a model for designing brain-based lesson plans in Secondary Social Studies. The developed model may serve as a reference for developing brain-based lesson plans grounded in an understanding of how the brain learns and works effectively.

    Methodology: This study employed a developmental research design. The research data were gathered through the validation of lesson plans, observation of lesson try-outs, focus group discussions, semi-structured interviews, and other techniques such as student behavioral measures, emoticons, ratings, and metaphors. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, while a thematic analysis was utilized for analyzing qualitative data.

    Main Findings: The results indicated that when applying the ACT Model in instruction, Social Studies teachers should begin by activating students’ brains through engaging and enjoyable learning activities that present essential concepts at the start of the lesson. This should be followed by connecting the lesson to the students’ life experiences. Lastly, to demonstrate relevance, the Social Studies lesson should conclude by transferring students’ learning into their lives more realistically, allowing them to practice and internalize the content.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study advances academic discourse on applying brain science to social studies education. It highlights the importance of integrating neuroscience with social studies education to design scientifically sound teaching methods. Additionally, it contributes to the field of research by outlining a process for developing a learning model aimed at enhancing social studies education.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Designing Social Studies Brain-based Lesson Plan using Activation, Connection, and Transfer (ACT) Model”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1291–1302, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i4.2097.

    More Citation Formats

  • 328
    Abstract views
    151
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. S. Dundar and U. Ayvaz, “From cognitive to educational neuroscience,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 9, no. 9, p. 50, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.5539/ies.v9n9p50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n9p50
    2. J. Stevens and D. Goldberg, For the Learners’ Sake: Brain-Based Instruction For the 21st Century. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press, 2001.
    3. J. D. Connell, Brain-Based Strategies To Reach Every Learner. in Teaching resources. New York: Scholastic, 2005.
    4. E. Jensen, Teaching with the brain in mind, 2nd ed., rev.Updated. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2005.
    5. D. A. Sousa, How the brain learns: a classroom teacher’s guide, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin Press, 2001.
    6. K. Shabatat and M. Al-Tarawneh, “The impact of a teaching-Learning program based on a brain-based learning on the achievement of the female students of 9th grade in chemistry,” High. Educ. Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 162, May 2016, doi: 10.5539/hes.v6n2p162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n2p162
    7. V. A. G. Torio and M. Z. Cabrillas-Torio, “Whole brain teaching in the Philippines: Teaching strategy for addressing motivation and academic performance,” Int. J. Res. Stud. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2015.1289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2015.1289
    8. Ü. T. Çal and H. Demirkaya, “The role and importance of social studies in the education of gifted students,” J. Hist. Cult. Art Res., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 25, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.7596/taksad.v9i2.2344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i2.2344
    9. K. 8. H. ,. Özturk, C. ,. &. Yiğit, Ö., “Image of social studies at google,” TOJET Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 162–171, 2012.
    10. National Council for the Social Studies, “National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment.” 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.socialstudies.org/standards/national-curriculum-standards-social-studies
    11. I. Satria and B. Budrianto, “Strengthening integrated mutual understanding of social sciences learning in islamic education institutions: A comparative study in madrasas, islamic boarding schools and integrated islamic schools in Bengkulu City,” J. Eval. Educ. JEE, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 208–215, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i1.1330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i1.1330
    12. J. J. Chiodo and J. Byford, “Do They Really Dislike Social Studies? A Study of Middle School and High School Students,” J. Soc. Stud. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–26, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1177/235227982004028001002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/235227982004028001002
    13. Y. Zhao and J. D. Hoge, “What Elementary Students and Teachers Say about Social Studies,” Soc. Stud., vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 216–221, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.3200/TSSS.96.5.216-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.96.5.216-221
    14. H. 12. L. ,. &. Moroz, W., “Male and female students’ attitudes toward social studies – a case study,” Aust. Assoc. Res. Educ., 2001, [Online]. Available: https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2001/han01503.pdf
    15. K. Alazzi and J. J. Chiodo, “Perceptions of Social Studies Students About Citizenship: A Study of Jordanian Middle and High School Students,” Educ. Forum, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 271–280, May 2008, doi: 10.1080/00131720802046123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720802046123
    16. R. B. Johnson and A. J. Onwuegbuzie, “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come,” Educ. Res., vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 14–26, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
    17. E. Crede and M. Borrego, “A Content Analysis Of The Use Of Mixed Methods Studies In Engineering Education,” in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Louisville, Kentucky: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2010, p. 15.22.1-15.22.18. doi: 10.18260/1-2--15973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--15973
    18. S. Almalki, “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data in Mixed Methods Research—Challenges and Benefits,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 288, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.5539/jel.v5n3p288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p288
    19. R. C. Richey and J. D. Klein, Design and development research: methods, strategies, and issues. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, 2007.
    20. E. Baumgartner et al., “Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry,” Educ. Res., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 5–8, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
    21. M. W. Tracey, “Design and development research: a model validation case,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 553–571, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9075-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9075-0
    22. F. Wang and M. J. Hannafin, “Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 5–23, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1007/BF02504682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
    23. C. Teddlie and F. Yu, “WITHDRAWN - Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples,” J. Mix. Methods Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. NP1–NP1, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1177/2345678906292430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430
    24. Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, MALAYSIA and M. S. B. Yusoff, “ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation,” Educ. Med. J., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 49–54, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6
    25. D. G. Bonett and T. A. Wright, “Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning,” J. Organ. Behav., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 3–15, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1002/job.1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1960
    26. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    27. D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, T. Tanti, and S. Maryani, “Innovative learning: Gender perception of e-module linear equations in mathematics and physics,” Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), vol. 4, no. 2, pp, 92-106, 2022, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610
    28. A. Williams, “Delivering effective student feedback in higher education: An evaluation of the challenges and best practice,” Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 473–501, May 2024, doi: 10.46328/ijres.3404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3404
    29. A. Hankins and C. Harrington, “Lack of high-quality, frequent feedback contributes to low success rates for community college students,” Impacting Educ. J. Transform. Prof. Pract., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2–7, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.5195/ie.2022.201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2022.201
    30. T. Tanti, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, D. Darmaji, T. O. Puspitasari, and I. Wardhana, “Attitude for physics: The condition of high school students,” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 126-132, 2021, doi: 10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.18919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.18919
    31. D. Allen and K. Tanner, “Rubrics: Tools for making learning goals and evaluation criteria explicit for both teachers and learners,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 197–203, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-06-0168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-06-0168
    32. T. Tanti, D. Deliza, and S. Hartina, “The effectiveness of using smartphones as mobile-mini labs in improving students’ beliefs in physics,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 387-394, 2024, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185
    33. D. Herlo, E. Ambrosio, and P. Galcheva, “Analysis of the application of the group investigation learning model and its influence on students’ critical thinking abilities on chemical elements in Eastern Europe,” J. Eval. Educ. JEE, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 144–150, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i4.785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i4.785
    34. L. Erlauer, The brain-compatible classroom: using what we know about learning to improve teaching. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2003.
    35. A. Smith, Accelerated learning in practice: brain-based methods for accelerating motivation and achievement, 3. reprint. Stafford: Network Educational Press, 2001.
    36. P. Wolfe, Brain Matters: Translating Research into Classroom Practice, 2nd Edition, 2nd ed. Alexandria: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, 2010.
    37. G. Whitman and I. Kelleher, Neuroteach: brain science and the future of education. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.
    38. M. A. Scaddan, 40 Engaging Brain-Based Tools for the Classroom. New York: Skyhorse Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2016.
    39. R. N. Caine and G. Caine, Making connections: teaching and the human brain. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1991.
    40. D. R. Euston, A. J. Gruber, and B. L. McNaughton, “The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making,” Neuron, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1057–1070, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.002
    41. L. Anggraini, F. P. Sinaga, and S. W. Oktavia, “Identification of Discovery Learning Method Based on Edutainment (Zenius) to Increase Student Motivation on Business and Energy Materials,” J. Eval. Educ. JEE, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 138–143, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i3.812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v5i3.812
    42. T. Tanti, D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and M. Iqbal, “Analysis of user responses to the application of web-based assessment on character assessment,” Journal of education technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 356-364, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jet.v5i3.33590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.33590
    43. T. Tanti, W. Utami, D. Deliza, and M. Jahanifar, “Investigation in vocation high school for attitude and motivation students in learning physics subject”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479-490, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452
    44. I. Amalia, D. Pratiwi, L. A. Razieb, and S. H. Maab, “Alignment Between Student Learning Needs and Classroom Learning Models: Case Study,” Linguists J. Linguist. Lang. Teach., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 113, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.29300/ling.v10i1.4627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v10i1.4627
    45. G. H. Van Rensburg, Y. Botma, T. Heyns, and I. M. Coetzee, “Creative strategies to support student learning through reflection,” South Afr. J. High. Educ., vol. 32, no. 6, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.20853/32-6-2888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/32-6-2888
    46. Z. Zhang, T. Bekker, P. Markopoulos, and H. M. Skovbjerg, “Supporting and understanding students’ collaborative reflection-in-action during design-based learning,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 307–343, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10798-023-09814-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09814-0
    47. M. B. Ratzer and P. Jaeger, Think tank library: brain-based learning plans for new standards, grades 6-12. Santa Barbara, Calif: Libraries Unlimited, 2015. doi: 10.5040/9798216025511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216025511
    48. R. Deng, “Emotionally engaged learners are more satisfied with online courses,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 20, p. 11169, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132011169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011169
    49. T. Hascher, “Learning and emotion: Perspectives for theory and research,” Eur. Educ. Res. J., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 13–28, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.2304/eerj.2010.9.1.13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.1.13
    50. S. Jesuthasan, N. Umakanth, and S. Dineshkumar, “Role of knowledge sharing and learning process of students,” J. Bus. Stud., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 98–116, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.4038/jbs.v8i1.76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/jbs.v8i1.76
    51. B. Chang, “Reflection in Learning,” Online Learn., vol. 23, no. 1, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.24059/olj.v23i1.1447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1447
    52. M. Sprenger, Brain-based teaching :) in the digital age. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2010.
    53. R. Hains-Wesson and S. Le Roux, “Bridging teacher knowledge and practice: Exploring authentic assessment across educational levels,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 8, p. 894, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14080894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080894
    54. A. A. Sewagegn and B. M. Diale, “Authentic assessment as a tool to enhance student learning in a higher education institution: Implication for student competency,” in Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, E. A. Railean, Ed., IGI Global, 2020, pp. 256–271. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2314-8.ch013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2314-8.ch013