Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal


The Influence of Interpersonal Communication, Innovative Behaviour and Self-Determination on Teacher Performance

Share
  • Purpose of the Study: This study aims to analyze the effects of interpersonal communication, innovative behavior, and self-determination on teachers' performance at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri in Medan City.

    Methodology: The research was conducted at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri in Medan, with teachers as participants. A quantitative research design was applied using a simple random sampling technique based on the Slovin formula.

    Main Findings: The findings indicate that interpersonal communication, innovative behavior, and self-determination directly and indirectly impact teacher performance. These factors significantly enhance the teaching quality in Madrasah Aliyah Negeri in Medan City. The study underscores the importance of fostering effective interpersonal communication, encouraging innovative behavior, and promoting self-determination to improve teacher performance. Although the study identifies key factors influencing performance, it also acknowledges that other variables might contribute to teacher effectiveness, which were not explored in this research.

    Novelty/Originality of the Study: This research offers insights into how interpersonal communication, innovative behavior, and self-determination shape teacher performance, specifically within Madrasah Aliyah Negeri in Medan. These factors have not been extensively studied in this setting, making this research an essential addition to the field. The study highlights the importance of developing strategies that improve communication, foster innovation, and enhance teacher autonomy to boost teacher performance and educational outcomes.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “The Influence of Interpersonal Communication, Innovative Behaviour and Self-Determination on Teacher Performance”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 323–331, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1531.
  • 532
    Abstract views
    273
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. L. of the R. of Indonesia, Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 14 Year 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers, 2005, Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta.
    2. L. of the R. of Indonesia, Law No. 20/2003 on the National Education System (Sisdiknas), 2003, Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta.
    3. P. A. Thomas, D. E. Kern, M. T. Hughes, S. A. Tackett, and B. Y. Chen, Curriculum Development For Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. JHU press, 2022.
    4. O. Chernikova et al., “Facilitating diagnostic competences in higher education—a meta-analysis in medical and teacher education,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 32, pp. 157–196, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09492-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09492-2
    5. M. Gagné et al., “Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory,” Nature Reviews Psychology, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 378–392, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w
    6. S. Safrida, S. Wasesa, T. K. Yudha, and R. Simbolon, “Understanding how job stress, achievement motivation, work discipline, and emotional intelligence impact employee job satisfaction,” Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 177–186, 2023, doi:10.23969/jrbm.v16i2.8173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23969/jrbm.v16i2.8173
    7. A. M. A. Mamun, “Motivating green behaviour in Bangladeshi employees: Self-determination theory application,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18155
    8. S. Salim, F. Rohman, and M. Andinata Dalimunthe, “Innovation in Education: The influence of leadership, organizational culture, work motivation, and organizational commitment on the performance of state and private madrasa ibtidaiyah teachers in Medan,” Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, vol. 30, no. 2, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.52152/kuey.v30i2.697.
    9. Q. Lan et al., “What is semantic communication? A view on conveying meaning in the era of machine intelligence,” Journal of Communications and Information Networks, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 336–371, 2021, doi: 10.23919/JCIN.2021.9663101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/JCIN.2021.9663101
    10. F. J. Fernández-Cruz and F. Rodríguez-Legendre, “The innovation competence profile of teachers in higher education institutions,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 634–645, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2021.1905031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1905031
    11. B. Sihombing and O. P. Sijabat, “Correlation of teacher creativity in teaching with student’ s learning achievement,” Journal Evaluation in Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 56–61, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i2.312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i2.312
    12. L. Mishra, T. Gupta, and A. Shree, “Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic,” International journal of educational research open, vol. 1, p. 100012, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
    13. D. R. S. M. Fuad, K. Musa, and Z. Hashim, “Innovation culture in education: A systematic review of the literature,” Management in Education, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 135–149, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620959760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620959760
    14. O. McGarr, “The use of virtual simulations in teacher education to develop pre-service teachers’ behaviour and classroom management skills: implications for reflective practice,” Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 274–286, 2021, doi:10.1080/02607476.2020.1724654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1733398
    15. R. Kutieshat and P. Farmanesh, “The impact of new human resource management practices on innovation performance during the COVID 19 crisis: A new perception on enhancing the educational sector,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 2872, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14052872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052872
    16. A. Newman, Y. L. Bavik, M. Mount, and B. Shao, “Data collection via online platforms: Challenges and recommendations for future research,” Applied Psychology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1380–1402, 2021, . doi: 10.1111/apps.12302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12302
    17. P. Kent, C. Cancelliere, E. Boyle, J. D. Cassidy, and A. Kongsted, “A conceptual framework for prognostic research,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 20, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01050-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01050-7
    18. T. T. Lasisi, K. K. Eluwole, A. Ozturen, and T. Avci, “Explanatory investigation of the moderating role of employee proactivity on the causal relationship between innovation‐based human resource management and employee satisfaction,” Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 20, no. 2, p. e2051, 2020, DOI:10.1002/pa.2051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2051
    19. M. Lan and K. F. Hew, “Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: A self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 7, 2020, doi:10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5
    20. H. Yu, J. Zhang, and R. Zou, “A motivational mechanism framework for teachers’ online informal learning and innovation during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Frontiers in psychology, vol. 12, p. 601200, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1073529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601200
    21. R. Fitriani, L. Anatri, and O. S. Joint, “Scope of learning evaluation in science subject in junior high school students: A systematic review,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 8–16, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i1.307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i1.307
    22. B. E. Bechter, P. R. Whipp, J. A. Dimmock, and B. Jackson, “Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relationship quality as predictors of high school physical education teachers’ intrinsic motivation,” Current Psychology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 7457–7465, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02096-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02096-6
    23. Z. Xie, N. Wu, T. Yue, J. Jie, G. Hou, and A. Fu, “How leader-member exchange affects creative performance: an examination from the perspective of self-determination theory,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, p. 573793, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573793
    24. G. Wu, L. Zhang, X. Liu, and Y. Liang, “How school principals’ motivating style stimulates teachers’ job crafting: A self-determination theory approach,” Current psychology, vol. 42, no. 24, pp. 20833–20848, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03147-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03147-2
    25. A. P. Vergara-Torres, J. Tristán, J. M. López-Walle, A. González-Gallegos, A. S. Pappous, and I. Tomás, “Quality of the physical education teacher’s instruction in the perspective of self-determination,” Frontiers in psychology, vol. 12, p. 708441, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708441
    26. L. Yang, H.-M. Chiu, K.-F. Sin, and M. Lui, “The effects of school support on school engagement with self-determination as a mediator in students with special needs,” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 399–414, 2022, doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2020.1719046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1719046
    27. M. Bilal, S. Chaudhry, H. Amber, M. Shahid, S. Aslam, and K. Shahzad, “Entrepreneurial leadership and employees’ proactive behaviour: Fortifying self determination theory,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 176, 2021, doi: 10.3390/joitmc7030176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030176
    28. W. Widodo, “Enhancing teachers’ professional competence through grit, personality, and creativity,” Management Science Letters, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 129–138, 2021, doi: DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.022
    29. S. Al-Husseini, I. El Beltagi, and J. Moizer, “Transformational leadership and innovation: the mediating role of knowledge sharing amongst higher education faculty,” International Journal of Leadership in Education, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 670–693, 2021, doi:10.1080/13603124.2019.1588381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1588381
    30. M. Philogene, S. Zhiyuan, and P. Nyoni, “Teacher Professionalism Development in TVET System : Preparedness , In- Service Trainings and Challenges,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 107–117, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i3.967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v5i3.967
    31. S. L. Field and A. S. Hoffman, “Fostering self-determination through building productive relationships in the classroom,” Intervention in school and clinic, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 6–14, 2012, doi: doi: 10.1177/1053451212443150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212443150
    32. T. K. F. Chiu, G. Falloon, Y. Song, V. W. L. Wong, L. Zhao, and M. Ismailov, “A self-determination theory approach to teacher digital competence development,” Computers & education, vol. 214, p. 105017, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105017
    33. A. Sukkamart, P. Pimdee, P. Leekitchwatana, W. Kongpiboon, and T. Kantathanawat, “Predicting student-teacher self-directed learning using intrinsic and extrinsic factors: a Theory of Planned Behavior adoption,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, p. 1211594, 2023, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211594
    34. X. Ma, A. Khattak, B. Ghani, and M. Huo, “Perceived overqualification in higher education institutions: Enhancing employee innovative behavior via creative self-confidence and harmonious workplace climate,” Current Psychology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 9826–9837, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05139-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05139-2
    35. M. A. Alshahrani, M. Z. Yaqub, M. Ali, I. El Hakimi, and M. A. Salam, “Could entrepreneurial leadership promote employees’ IWB? The roles of intrinsic motivation, creative self-efficacy and firms’ innovation climate,” International Journal of Innovation Science, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2024-0211
    36. J. Xu, “Enhancing Student Creativity in Chinese universities: the role of teachers’ spiritual Leadership and the Mediating effects of positive psychological capital and sense of self-esteem,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 53, p. 101567, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101567
    37. P. M. Bednar and C. Welch, “Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 281–298, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10796-019-09921-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09921-1
    38. S. S. Mishra and J. J. Kasim, “Team culture, employee commitment and job performance in public sectors: a multi-level analysis,” International Journal of Organizational Analysis, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 351–367, 2023, doi: doi: 10.1108/IJOA-02-2021-2631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2021-2631
    39. T. T. Lasisi, C. Enea, K. K. Eluwole, and S. Egeli, “A parallel mediation study of hospitality employee’s innovative work behavior and proactivity using self-determination theory,” Sage Open, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 21582440241251932, 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241251933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241251933
    40. F. Martela, N. Hankonen, R. M. Ryan, and M. Vansteenkiste, “Motivating voluntary compliance to behavioural restrictions: Self-determination theory–based checklist of principles for COVID-19 and other emergency communications,” European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 305–347, 2021, doi: 10.1080/10463283.2020.1857082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1857082
    41. S. Y. Chou, T. Nguyen, C. Ramser, and T. Chang, “Impact of basic psychological needs on organizational justice and helping behavior: a self-determination perspective,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 3747–3765, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2019-0372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2019-0372
    42. F. Xie and A. Derakhshan, “A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context,” Frontiers in psychology, vol. 12, p. 708490, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490
    43. D. A. Hirsh, P. E. S. Crampton, and N. Y. Osman, “Applying self‐determination theory to stem medical schools’ clinical teacher sustainability crisis,” Medical Education, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 118–128, 2024, doi: 10.1111/medu.15181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15181
    44. Y. S. Lim, H. A. Halim, and T. Ramayah, “Should teachers be agile? Postulating the self-determination theory,” International Journal of Management in Education, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 636–663, 2022, doi:10.1504/IJMIE.2022.10050303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2022.126587
    45. C. J. Criss, M. Konrad, S. R. Alber-Morgan, M. E. Brock, and A. B. Harris, “Using performance feedback with and without goal setting on teachers’ classroom management skills,” Behavioral Disorders, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 91–105, 2024, doi: 10.1177/01987429231201096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429231201096
    46. N. P. K. Lo and B. K. H. To, “The transformation of identity of secondary school teachers: Professional development and English language education strategies in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Cogent Education, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2163790, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2163790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2163790
    47. W. K. Zimmer and S. D. Matthews, “A virtual coaching model of professional development to increase teachers’ digital learning competencies,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 109, p. 103544, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103544
    48. J. D. Pregoner, “Research approaches in education: A comparison of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods,” IMCC Journal of Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 31–36, 2024.