Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

A Study of Students’ Mathematical Concept Understanding Ability: Learning Anxiety and Independence in Learning Mathematics

Rizki Heni Muslimah ORCID
Universitas Negri Semarang
Indonesia
rizkih3n11@students.unnes.ac.id
Yuli Witanto ORCID
State University of Semarang ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the Study: This study aims to explore fourth-grade students’ understanding of mathematical concepts by examining two psychological and behavioral variables: mathematics anxiety and learning independence. Specifically, the study investigates how these two factors influence students’ abilities to comprehend and apply mathematical concepts in classroom learning. Addressing this issue is essential, as early mathematical understanding serves as a foundation for more complex problem-solving in later education.

    Methodology: This research employs a qualitative case study approach, with data collected through classroom observations, structured interviews with students and teachers, and analysis of related documents, including student worksheets, math test scores, and teacher reflections. The study utilizes a customized analytical framework based on a modified version of Bloom’s Taxonomy, allowing for a detailed exploration of cognitive understanding, emotional responses, and metacognitive strategies in relation to mathematical learning.

    Main Findings: Findings indicate that many fourth-grade students experience moderate to high levels of math anxiety, often rooted in negative prior experiences. This anxiety correlates with lower conceptual understanding and reduced classroom performance. Conversely, students who demonstrate high learning independence characterized by initiative, persistence, and self-regulation tend to show greater comprehension and confidence in learning mathematics, even in the face of challenging tasks.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in its integrative framework that connects emotional (anxiety), behavioral (independence), and cognitive (conceptual understanding) domains in elementary mathematics education. It also introduces a structured interview instrument designed specifically to uncover students’ internal learning experiences, providing deeper insight into early mathematical development.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “A Study of Students’ Mathematical Concept Understanding Ability: Learning Anxiety and Independence in Learning Mathematics”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 417–427, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1482.

    More Citation Formats

  • 1092
    Abstract views
    364
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. L. Darling-Hammond, “Defining teaching quality around the world,” European Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 295-308, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080
    2. M. Taghizadeh, and F. Hajhosseini, “Investigating a blended learning environment: Contribution of attitude, interaction, and quality of teaching to satisfaction of graduate students of TEFL,” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 459-469, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40299-020-00531-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00531-z
    3. H. M. Asim, A. Vaz, A. Ahmed, and S. Sadiq, “A review on outcome based education and factors that impact student learning outcomes in tertiary education system,” International Education Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1-11, 2021, doi: 10.5539/ies.v14n2p1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n2p1
    4. K. A. Gamage, D. M. S. C. P. K. Dehideniya, and S. Y. Ekanayake, “The role of personal values in learning approaches and student achievements,” Behavioral sciences, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 102, 2021, doi: 10.3390/bs11070102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11070102
    5. A. Calma, and C. Dickson-Deane, “The student as customer and quality in higher education,” International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1221-1235, 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-03-2019-0093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2019-0093
    6. S. Morano, A. M. Markelz, K. M. Randolph, A. M. Myers, and N. Church, “Motivation matters: Three strategies to support motivation and engagement in mathematics,” Intervention in School and Clinic, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 15-22, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1053451221994803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451221994803
    7. J. Zajda, and J. Zajda, “Motivation in the classroom: Creating effective learning environments,” Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments, pp. 17-34, 2021, doi: 10.7459/ept/40.2.06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_2
    8. Z. Shan, “Behaviorism reinforcement learning and its application in mathematics teaching in primary and middle schools,” Frontiers in Educational Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 93-98, 2021, doi: 10.25236/FER.2021.040419.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2021.040419
    9. K. M. Schieltz, D. P. Wacker, A. N. Suess, J. E. Graber, N. H. Lustig, and J. Detrick, “Evaluating the effects of positive reinforcement, instructional strategies, and negative reinforcement on problem behavior and academic performance: An experimental analysis,” Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, vol. 32, pp. 339-363, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10882-019-09696-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09696-y
    10. R. Sigalingging, H. Nababan, A. Putra, and M. Nababan, “Enhancing learning motivation in elementary schools: The impact and role of rewards,” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 01-13, 2023, 10.35335/jiph.v12i1.27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/jiph.v12i1.27
    11. A. Alam, and A. Mohanty, “Cultural beliefs and equity in educational institutions: exploring the social and philosophical notions of ability groupings in teaching and learning of mathematics,” International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 2270662, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02673843.2023.2270662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2023.2270662
    12. Z. K. Szabo, P. Körtesi, J. Guncaga, D. Szabo, and R. Neag, “Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 10113, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su122310113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113
    13. J. Nilimaa, “New examination approach for real-world creativity and problem-solving skills in mathematics,” Trends in Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 477-495, 2023, doi: 10.3390/higheredu2030028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu2030028
    14. S. Dolapcioglu, and A. Doğanay, “Development of critical thinking in mathematics classes via authentic learning: an action research,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1363-1386, 2022, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1819573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1819573
    15. H. C. Celik, and F. Ozdemir, “Mathematical thinking as a predictor of critical thinking dispositions of pre-service mathematics teachers,” International Journal of Progressive Education, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 81-98, 2020, doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.268.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.268.6
    16. D. S. Setiana, and R. Y. Purwoko, “The application of mathematics learning model to stimulate mathematical critical thinking skills of senior high school students,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 509-523, 2021, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.509
    17. S. L. Chew, and W. J. Cerbin, “The cognitive challenges of effective teaching,” The Journal of Economic Education, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 17-40, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00220485.2020.1845266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1845266
    18. Z. Wang, H. Pang, J. Zhou, Y. Ma, and Z. Wang, ““What if… it never ends?”: Examining challenges in primary teachers’ experience during the wholly online teaching,” The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 89-103, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00220671.2021.1884823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1884823
    19. S. Pieschl, J. Budd, E. Thomm, and J. Archer, “Effects of raising student teachers’ metacognitive awareness of their educational psychological misconceptions,” Psychology Learning & Teaching, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 214-235, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1475725721996223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725721996223
    20. M. Leuchter, H. Saalbach, U. Studhalter, and A. Tettenborn, “Teaching for conceptual change in preschool science: Relations among teachers’ professional beliefs, knowledge, and instructional practice,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1941-1967, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1805137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1805137
    21. Ç. Şenyiğit, “The effect of problem-based learning on pre-service primary school teachers'conceptual understanding and misconceptions,” International Online Journal of Primary Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 50-72, 2021.
    22. C. Wekerle, M. Daumiller, and I. Kollar, “Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455
    23. D. C. Owens, T. D. Sadler, A. T. Barlow, and C. Smith-Walters, “Student motivation from and resistance to active learning rooted in essential science practices,” Research in Science Education, vol. 50, pp. 253-277, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1
    24. S. M. Aguillon, G. F. Siegmund, R. H. Petipas, A. G. Drake, S. Cotner, and C. J. Ballen, “Gender differences in student participation in an active-learning classroom,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 19, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048
    25. K. Sormunen, K. Juuti, and J. Lavonen, “Maker-centered project-based learning in inclusive classes: Supporting students’ active participation with teacher-directed reflective discussions,” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 18, pp. 691-712, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-09998-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09998-9
    26. S. J. Taylor, R. Bogdan, and M. L. DeVault, Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260485
    27. W. Lim, J. E. Lee, K. Tyson, H. J. Kim, and J. Kim, “An integral part of facilitating mathematical discussions: Follow-up questioning,” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 18, pp. 377-398, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-09966-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09966-3
    28. D. Lee, and S. Yeo, “Developing an AI-based chatbot for practicing responsive teaching in mathematics,” Computers & Education, vol. 191, pp. 104646, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646
    29. I. Ayuwanti, and D. Siswoyo, “Teacher-student interaction in mathematics learning,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 660-667, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21184
    30. S. L. Stockero, K. R. Leatham, M. A. Ochieng, L. R. Van Zoest, and B. E. Peterson, “Teachers’ orientations toward using student mathematical thinking as a resource during whole-class discussion,” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, vol. 23, pp. 237-267, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10857-018-09421-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-09421-0
    31. H. K. Warshauer, C. Starkey, C. A. Herrera, and S. Smith, “Developing prospective teachers’ noticing and notions of productive struggle with video analysis in a mathematics content course,” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, vol. 24, pp. 89-121, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10857-019-09451-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09451-2
    32. E. Jaffe, “Mindset in the classroom: Changing the way students see themselves in mathematics and beyond,” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 255-263, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00098655.2020.1802215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2020.1802215
    33. N. Planas, J. M. Alfonso, A. Arnal-Bailera, and V. Martín-Molina, “Mathematical naming and explaining in teaching talk: Noticing work with two groups of mathematics teachers,” ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56(6), 1211-1222, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11858-024-01576-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01576-w
    34. H. M. Niemi, and P. Kousa, “A case study of students' and teachers' perceptions in a finnish high school during the COVID pandemic,” International journal of technology in education and science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 352-369, 2020, doi: 10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.167
    35. D. J. Connor, and W. Cavendish, “‘Sit in my seat’: perspectives of students with learning disabilities about teacher effectiveness in high school inclusive classrooms,” International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 288-309, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1459888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1459888
    36. A. Alsina, A. Maurandi, E. Ferre, and C. Coronata, “Validating an instrument to evaluate the teaching of mathematics through processes,” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 19, pp. 559-577, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10763-020-10064-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10064-y
    37. F. Fitriati, R. Rosli, Z. Iksan, and A. Hidayat, “Exploring challenges in preparing prospective teachers for teaching 4C skills in mathematics classroom: A school-university partnership perspectives,” Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 2286812, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2286812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2286812
    38. C. Herodotou, B. Rienties, M. Hlosta, A. Boroowa, C. Mangafa, and Z. Zdrahal, “The scalable implementation of predictive learning analytics at a distance learning university: Insights from a longitudinal case study,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 45, pp. 100725, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100725
    39. L. Astuti, Y. Wihardi, and D. Rochintaniawati, “The development of web-based learning using interactive media for science learning on levers in human body topic.” Journal of Science Learning, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 89-98, 2020, doi: 10.17509/jsl.v3i2.19366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i2.19366
    40. S. Chand, K. Chaudhary, A. Prasad, and V. Chand, “Perceived causes of students’ poor performance in mathematics: A case study at Ba and Tavua secondary schools,” Frontiers in applied mathematics and statistics, vol. 7, pp. 614408, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fams.2021.614408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2021.614408
    41. C. Göloglu Demir, and Ö. Kaplan Keles, “The Impact of High-Stakes Testing on the Teaching and Learning Processes of Mathematics,” Journal of Pedagogical Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 119-137, 2021, doi: 10.33902/JPR.2021269677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021269677
    42. A. T. Capinding, “Impact of modular distance learning on high school students mathematics motivation, interest/attitude, anxiety and achievement during the COVID-19 pandemic,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 917-934, 2022, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.917
    43. S. Han, and H. Suh, “The effects of shadow education on high school students’ creative thinking and academic achievement in mathematics: The case of the Republic of Korea,” Educational Studies, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 314-333, 2023, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2020.1850427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850427
    44. F. O. Egara, and M. Mosimege, “Effect of flipped classroom learning approach on mathematics achievement and interest among secondary school students,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 8131-8150, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12145-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12145-1
    45. C. Attard, and K. Holmes, “An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms,” Mathematics Education Research Journal, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 719-740, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2
    46. C. Attard, and K. Holmes, ““It gives you that sense of hope”: An exploration of technology use to mediate student engagement with mathematics,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02945
    47. S. Dart, S. Cunningham‐Nelson, and L. Dawes, “Understanding student perceptions of worked example videos through the technology acceptance model,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1278-1290, 2020, doi: 10.1002/cae.22301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22301
    48. A. R. Drozdikova-Zaripova, and E. G. Sabirova, “Usage of digital educational resources in teaching students with application of “flipped classroom” technology,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/8582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8582
    49. C. K. Lo, and K. F. Hew, “A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: the effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 464-481, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1541910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541910
    50. M. C. L. Huang, C. Y. Chou, Y. T. Wu, J. L. Shih, C. Y. Yeh, A. C. Lao, ... and T. W. Chan, “Interest-driven video creation for learning mathematics,” Journal of Computers in Education, vol. 7, pp. 395-433, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40692-020-00161-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00161-w
    51. A. Tohir, “Learning interest and discipline on learning motivation,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 424-435, 2022, doi: 10.46328/ijemst.2290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2290
    52. E. Lugosi, and G. Uribe, “Active learning strategies with positive effects on students’ achievements in undergraduate mathematics education,” International Journal of mathematical education in science and technology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 403-424, 2022, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1773555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1773555
    53. C. Wang, H. J. Cho, B. Wiles, J. D. Moss, E. M. Bonem, Q. Li, ... and C. Levesque-Bristol, “Competence and autonomous motivation as motivational predictors of college students’ mathematics achievement: from the perspective of self-determination theory,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00359-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00359-7