Integrated Science Education Journal
Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

6.1

Impact

GScholar

18

H-Index

Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

Analysis of Driving Factors for the Implementation of Clean Technology to Optimize Green Manufacturing in the Wiradesa Batik Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

Muhammad Slamet Rahajo
Sultan Agung Islamic University ROR
Indonesia
mslametrahajo@gmail.com
Achana Kumyat ORCID
Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok ROR
Thailand
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This research aims to improve green manufacturing in the batik SME environment. It must also improve clean technology.

    Methodology: Give name, brand, type of tools, methods, software, review, and survey that has been used to do this study. No discussion or explanation.

    Main Findings: The results of the study show that the highest weight is the need for a supply chain (F6) with a weight of 0.443, then the second most important factor is the good name factor of batik SMEs (F2) which is ranked second with a weight of 0.241. Next, the third most important factor is the internal motivation factor (F9) which is ranked third with a weight of 0.088. Followed by other factors until the least important factor is the competitor factor (F11) which is ranked seventh with a weight of 0.036.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: what is new in this study that may benefit readers and how it is advancing the existing knowledge or creating new knowledge in this subject.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Analysis of Driving Factors for the Implementation of Clean Technology to Optimize Green Manufacturing in the Wiradesa Batik Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)”, In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 258–268, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v6i3.2115.

    More Citation Formats

  • 291
    Abstract views
    364
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. R. C. I. Prahmana and U. D’Ambrosio, “Learning geometry and values from patterns: Ethnomathematics on the batik patterns of yogyakarta, indonesia,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 439–456, 2020, doi: 10.22342/jme.11.3.12949.439-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12949.439-456
    2. E. Sugiarto, M. I. Syarif, K. B. Mulyono, A. Nizam, and M. Krisnawati, “How is ethnopedagogy-based education implemented ? ( A case study on the heritage of batik in Indonesia ),” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, p., 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2466245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2466245
    3. S. O. Pela, N. N. Le, P. G. Kaboro, and A. Nurjamil, “Innovation of Physics E-Module : Utilizing Local Wisdom of Lampung ’ s Handwritten Batik in Teaching Heat and Temperature Material to Foster Students ’ Scientific Attitude,” vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 132–138, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i4.924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i4.924
    4. A. M. Aljeboree et al., “Direct Dyes Derived from 4 , 4 -Diaminobenzanilide Synthesis , Characterization and Toxicity Evaluation of a Disazo Symmetric Direct Dye,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://www.septic.umn.edu/prod/groups/cfans/@pub/@cfans/@ostp/documents/asset/cfans_asset_131281.pdf%5Cnhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12257-009-0199-4%5Cnhttp://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610214007504%5Cnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.12.0
    5. R. Legino, N. Zuhir, M. A. Samin, and S. Suminto, “A Comparison of the Motifs on Kuala Terengganu Block Batik Sarong,” Environ. Proc. J., vol. 8, no. SI16, pp. 85–89, 2023, doi: 10.21834/e-bpj.v8isi16.5225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI16.5225
    6. R. Oktavia, L. Wihastuti, and A. Nurpita, “Comparative study of fashion and convection smis in Yogyakarta, Solo, and Pekalongan,” Rev. Manag. Entrep., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–46, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.37715/rme.v4i1.1219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37715/rme.v4i1.1219
    7. I. Isdiana, M. A. Zaid, and S. Akhtar, “Satu suro ceremony tradition: Tahlilan in the perspective of islamic religious education,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam Indones., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v5i1.906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jpaii.v5i1.906
    8. S. A. Anggita, M. A. Mahboob, and S. S. Bin Hussein, “Celebrating the Prophet’s Birthday: a Manifestation of the Character of Cooperation in Islamic Education,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam Indones., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v5i1.907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jpaii.v5i1.907
    9. S. Bouchard, S. Gamache, and G. Abdulnour, “Operationalizing mass customization in manufacturing SMEs—A systematic literature review,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15043028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043028
    10. V. Gupta, “An empirical evaluation of a generative artificial intelligence technology adoption model from entrepreneurs’ perspectives,” Systems, vol. 12, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.3390/systems12030103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12030103
    11. A. Ollerenshaw, J. Corbett, and H. Thompson, “Increasing the digital literacy skills of regional SMEs through high-speed broadband access,” Small Enterp. Res., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 115–133, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13215906.2021.1919913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2021.1919913
    12. S. I. Syed Shaharuddin et al., “A Review on the Malaysian and Indonesian Batik Production, Challenges, and Innovations in the 21st Century,” Sage Open, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 55, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211040128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040128
    13. S. Bin Silah, B. Isa, P. Ponimin, and T. Karyono, “Malaysian and Indonesian batik: The best practices,” KnE Soc. Sci., vol. 2021, pp. 47–55, 2021, doi: 10.18502/kss.v5i6.9177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i6.9177
    14. F. A. Phang, A. N. Roslan, Z. A. Zakaria, M. A. A. Zaini, J. Pusppanathan, and C. A. Talib, “Environmental awareness in batik making process,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 6094, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14106094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106094
    15. S. Rismantojo, V. Sirivesmas, E. Joneurairatana, and W. A. Natalia, “Transforming the Batik Tiga Negeri (Three-Countries Batik) in pleats to represent indonesia, malaysia, and thailand’s batik heritage by applying the ATUMICS Method,” Arch. Des. Res., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 65–96, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.15187/adr.2024.08.37.4.65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2024.08.37.4.65
    16. S. I. Syed Shaharuddin et al., “A review on the Malaysian and Indonesian batik production, challenges, and innovations in the 21st century,” Sage Open, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 118–138, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211040128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040128
    17. I. Hermawan and A. Suwondo, “Making of Stamped Batik by Machined Batik Stamp Pattern Made from Hand Made Design Batik Image,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Eng., vol. 3, no. 03, pp. 2014–2017, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijirae.com/volumes/Vol3/iss3/05.MRAE10088.pdf
    18. I. Wijayanti, T. Surti, A. D. Anggo, and E. Susanto, “Effect Different Packaging on Proximate and Lysine Content of Milkfish [Chanos Chanos (Forsskål, 1775)] Floss During Storage,” Aquat. Procedia, vol. 7, pp. 118–124, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.aqpro.2016.07.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2016.07.016
    19. L. von Kotzebue et al., “The framework dikolan (Digital competencies for teaching in science education) as basis for the self-assessment tool dikolan-grid,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 12, p. 775, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11120775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120775
    20. Z. J. Yong, W. J. Lin, S. C. Hsieh, and H. J. Lin, “Comparison of carbon budgets and greenhouse gas fluxes in monoculture ponds with milkfish (Chanos chanos) and Taiwanese hard clams (Meretrix taiwanica),” Aquac. Reports, vol. 43, no. January, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2025.102924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2025.102924
    21. L. Indrayani and M. Triwiswara, “The implementation of green industry standard batik industry to develop eco-friendly,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 980, no. 1, p. 012081, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/980/1/012081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/980/1/012081
    22. L. A. Mukadar, T. Joko, and O. Setiani, “Liquid waste pollution load analysis home industry batik and the impact on the quality of river water in the Sub-District of Pekalongan Selatan, Pekalongan City,” Int. J. Heal. Educ. Soc., vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 47–60, 2021, [Online]. Available: www.ijhes.com
    23. N. M. D. Resiani and I. W. Sunanjaya, “The Efficiency of Water in Supporting Local Wisdom and Food Sustainability in Subak Sange, Bali Indonesia,” Agromet, 2020, doi: 10.29244/j.agromet.34.2.67-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/j.agromet.34.2.67-74
    24. M. Hussain et al., “Effect of varying dietary protein levels on growth performance and survival of milkfish Chanos chanos fingerlings reared in brackish water pond ecosystem,” Egypt. J. Aquat. Res., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 329–334, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ejar.2021.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2021.05.001
    25. D. T. Amijaya, S. Komariah, K. P. Putri, and M. C. Devi, “Multiple regression: Deteminant on profitability at islamic commercial banks in Indonesia,” Dinasti Int. J. Econ. Financ. Account., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2020, doi: 10.38035/DIJEFA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v1i1.201
    26. N. Tor and G. Gordon, “Digital interactive quantitative curiosity assessment tool: Questions worlds,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 614–621, 2020, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.8.1433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.8.1433
    27. L. SÜRÜCÜ and A. MASLAKÇI, “Validity and Reliability in Quantitative Research,” Bus. Manag. Stud. An Int. J., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2694–2726, 2020, doi: 10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
    28. O. D. Apuke, “Quantitative Research Methods : A Synopsis Approach,” Kuwait Chapter Arab. J. Bus. Manag. Rev., vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 40–47, 2017, doi: 10.12816/0040336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336
    29. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th Editio. Newbury Park: Sage publications, 2017.
    30. L. Yao, S. Haberman, D. F. McCaffrey, and J. R. Lockwood, “Large-Sample Properties of Minimum Discriminant Information Adjustment Estimates Under Complex Sampling Designs,” ETS Res. Rep. Ser., vol. 2020, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: 10.1002/ets2.12297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12297
    31. M. A. Adeoye, “Review of Sampling Techniques for Education,” ASEAN J. Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2023.
    32. S. K. Fianko, T. C. Dzogbewu, and E. Agbamava, “Mass Customisation Strategies in Additive Manufacturing : A Systematic Review and Implementation Framework,” pp. 1–42, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13061855
    33. F. K. Şemin, “Competencies of principals in ensuring sustainable education: Teachers’ views,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 201–212, 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18273
    34. C. Ai Tran, D. H. Van, T. Thuy Phuong Nguyen, T. Thi Thanh Nguyen, and T. Minh Nguyen, “Research in higher education quality assurance worldwide (2003–2023): a bibliometric analysis from the Scopus database,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, p., 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2479405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2479405
    35. M. Jingjit, “The Effects of multimedia learning on Thai primary pupils’ achievement in size and depth of vocabulary knowledge,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 6, no. 32, pp. 72–81, 2015.
    36. S. Ghavifekr and W. A. W. Rosdy, “Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools,” Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 175–191, 2015, doi: 10.21890/ijres.23596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596
    37. S. Sousa, E. Correia, J. Leite, and C. Viseu, “Environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior of higher education students: a case study in Portugal,” Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10382046.2020.1838122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1838122
    38. L. Verschaffel, S. Schukajlow, J. Star, and W. Van Dooren, “Word problems in mathematics education: a survey,” ZDM - Math. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
    39. A. Xu and L. Ye, “Impacts of teachers’ competency on job performance in research universities with industry characteristics: Taking academic atmosphere as moderator,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1283–1292, 2014, doi: 10.3926/jiem.1261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1261
    40. E. Muslimah, M. Anis, and M. Djunaidi, “The impact of using raw materials and batik industry waste on the environment,” in 1st Virtual Workshop on Writing Scientific Article for International Publication Indexed SCOPUS, Sciendo, 2022, pp. 428–433. doi: 10.2478/9788366675827-075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/9788366675827-075
    41. A. Stancu and M. Panait, “Marketing strategy metamorphosis under the impact of artificial intelligence services,” Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–25, 2025, doi: 10.3390/systems13040227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13040227

Categories