Integrated Science Education Journal
Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

6.1

Impact

GScholar

18

H-Index

Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

The Influence of the STEAM Method on the Cognitive Ability of Logical Critical Creative Thinking in Children Aged 5-6 Years

Devi Maulanasari ORCID
Universitas PGRI Argopuro Jember
Indonesia
Ratnasari Dwi Ade Chandra
Universitas PGRI Argopuro Jember
Indonesia
ratnasaridac@gmail.com
Hendrik Siswono ORCID
Universitas PGRI Argopuro Jember
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to compare the effect of the STEAM method with conventional methods in supporting the development of logical, critical, and creative thinking in children aged 5-6 years. The background of this study is based on the need for a learning approach that can develop high-level thinking skills from an early age, considering that conventional methods are deemed inadequate to support this development.

    Methodology: The method used is quantitative research with a quasi-experimental approach. The research sample consisted of children aged 5-6 years in kindergarten, divided into two groups: the group using the STEAM method and the group using conventional learning methods. Data collection was conducted through tests assessing logical, critical, and creative thinking abilities before and after treatment.

    Main Findings: The study's results showed that the application of the STEAM method significantly improved the logical, critical, and creative thinking skills in children aged 5-6 years compared to conventional learning methods. The group using the STEAM method experienced a higher increase in scores on the three aspects of thinking.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The discussion in this study confirms that integrating the STEAM method into kindergarten learning can be a practical innovation for developing high-level thinking skills in early childhood. This study implies that educators and policymakers should consider the broader application of the STEAM method in early childhood education as a means to prepare a generation that can think logically, critically, and creatively from an early age.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “The Influence of the STEAM Method on the Cognitive Ability of Logical Critical Creative Thinking in Children Aged 5-6 Years”, In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 132–138, May 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v6i2.1766.

    More Citation Formats

  • 333
    Abstract views
    217
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. Arifudin, Pendidkan Anak Usia Dini: Landasan dan Perkembangannya [Early Childhood Education: Foundations and Development], Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2016
    2. S. Setiana, and E. I. Eliasa, “Karakteristik perkembangan fisik, kognitif, emosi sosial, dan moral pada anak usia sekolah dasar (7-12 Tahun) [Characteristics of physical, cognitive, social emotional and moral development in elementary school age children (7-12 years)],” Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE), vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 127-138, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jh.v4i6.1742
    3. Y. Novitasari, “Analisis permasalahan “perkembangan kognitif anak usia dini”,” PAUD Lect. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 82–90, 2018, doi: 10.31849/paudlectura.v2i01.2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/paudlectura.v2i01.2007
    4. M. Fauziddin and M. Mufarizuddin, “Useful of clap hand games for optimalize cogtivite aspects in early childhood education,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 162, 2018, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v2i2.76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v2i2.76
    5. S. Sunarsih, M. A. Musi, and I. Alriani, “Meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir logis menggunakan metode exsperimen anak usia dini 5-6 tahun [Improving logical thinking skills using experimental methods for early childhood aged 5-6 years],” J. Profesi Kependidikan, pp. 57–62, 2012.
    6. N. I. Purnamasari and N. A. Yusma, “Mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir logis anak melalui kegiatan bermain warna [Developing children's logical thinking skills through color play activities],” J. Early Child. Educ. Stud, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 37–71, 2021, doi: 10.54180/joeces.2021.1.2.37-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54180/joeces.2021.1.2.37-71
    7. W. Kartini, E. Faatinisa, and Y. N. Annisa, “Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis pada anak usia dini melalui pembelajaran berbasis steam [Improving critical thinking skills in early childhood through steam-based learning],” J. Al Fitrah J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023.
    8. O. W. Mulyadi, H. Mahfud, and A. R. Pudyaningtyas, “Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis anak usia 5-6 tahun melalui metode guided discovery dalam pembelajaran sains [Improving critical thinking skills of children aged 5-6 years through the guided discovery method in science learning],” Kumara Cendekia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2021.
    9. R. Castro, “The effects of chemistry virtual laboratories in academic achievement of secondary level learners: A meta-analysis,” In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24-37, 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v6i1.1379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1379
    10. Kemendikbud, “Kurikulum Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, Dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah,” Permendikbud Ristek Nomor 12 Tahun 2024, pp. 1–26, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59966/arunikawidya.v1i1.18
    11. Kemendikbud, “Capaian Pembelajaran Fase Fondasi,” Kemendibudristek, pp. 1–38, 2022.
    12. W. T. Ummah and Y. Yohamintin, “Integrating scientific attitude to realize pancasila learner profile in science learning,” In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15-23, 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v6i1.1318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1318
    13. R. Hasibuan and D. Suryana, “Pengaruh Metode Eksperimen Sains Terhadap Perkembangan Kognitif Anak Usia 5-6 Tahun,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1169–1179, 2021, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i3.1735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i3.1735
    14. A. R. Chrismanto, M. Magta, and R. Ardiana, “Peran program kelas dalam membina literasi sains pada anak usia dini [The role of classroom programs in fostering scientific literacy in early childhood],” J. MENTARI Manajemen, Pendidik. dan Teknol. Inf, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 176–187, 2024, doi: 10.33050/mentari.v2i2.490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33050/mentari.v2i2.490
    15. N. S. Bylla, B. Fransyska, U. M. Pontianak, and T. K. Z. Pontianak, “Penggunaan metode discovery learning dalam pembelajaran sains untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir kritis anak usia 5-6 tahun di tk zonakata Pontianak [The use of the discovery learning method in science learning to improve critical thinking skills of 5-6 year old children at the Pontianak Zonakata Kindergarten],” vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1948–1956, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59837/jpmba.v2i6.1140
    16. M. Jarnawi, H. Haeruddin, I. K. Werdhiana, S. Syamsuriwal, and S. E. S. Mu’aziyah, “Integrating thinking styles into differentiated instruction: enhancing learning outcomes in science education,” In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 47-53, 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v6i1.1328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1328
    17. M. N. Amelia and L. Nuraeni, “Penerapan metode proyek berbasis steam untuk mengembangkan kemampuan mengenal huruf anak usia dini kelompok b [Application of steam-based project methods to develop the ability to recognize letters in early childhood group B],” J. Ceria (Cerdas Energik Responsif Inov. Adapt, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 151–159, 2021.
    18. M. Prahartiwi, A. Mudiono, A. Samawi, and I. Arifin, “Implementasi pembelajaran steam dalam pengembangan kreativitas anak [Implementation of steam learning in developing children's creativity],” Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 12-25, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpa.v14i1.748
    19. N. Novitasari., “Pembelajaran steam pada anak usia dini [Steam learning for early childhood],” Al-Hikmah Indones. J. Early Child. Islam. Educ, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 69–82, 2022, doi: 10.35896/ijecie.v6i1.330.
    20. J. Beno, A. . Silen, and M. Yanti, “Strategi guru pendidikan anak usia dini dalam penerapan pembelajaran STEAM (Science, Technology, Enginering, Art, Mathematics) di Kota Malang [Early childhood education teacher strategies in implementing STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematics) learning in Malang City],” Braz Dent J, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022.
    21. S. Salamah, R. Hidayat, and A. Herniawati, “Analisis Pembelajaran Steam Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis (Hots) Anak Usia 5-6 Tahun,” J. Intisabi, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 50–61, 2024, doi: 10.61580/itsb.v1i2.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61580/itsb.v1i2.10
    22. N. Pitaloka and S. I. Sinaga, “Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis steam terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif anak [The influence of steam-based learning on children's creative thinking abilities],” Kumara Cendekia, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2023.
    23. R. I. Nurqolbi, A. A. Riyanto, and R. H. Lestari, “Pengaruh keterampilan proses sains terhadap kemampuan berpikir logis pada anak usia dini [The influence of science process skills on logical thinking abilities in early childhood],” CERIA (Cerdas Energik Responsif Inov. Adapt, vol. 2, no. 5, p. 189, 2019, doi: 10.22460/ceria.v2i5.p189-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/ceria.v2i5.p189-196
    24. A. A. Lestari, E. H. Mulyana, and D. A. Muiz, “Analisis unsur engineering pada pengembangan pembelajaran STEAM untuk anak usia dini [Analysis of engineering elements in the development of STEAM learning for early childhood],” JPG J. Pendidik. Guru, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 211, 2020, doi: 10.32832/jpg.v1i4.3555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32832/jpg.v1i4.3555
    25. G. Adnan, and M. A. Latief, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Penelitian Kuantitatif, Penelitian Kualitatif, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas [Educational Research Methods Quantitative Research, Qualitative Research, Classroom Action Research], Erhaka Utama, 2020.
    26. T. D. Hastjarjo, “Rancangan eksperimen-kuasi [Quasi-experimental design],” Bul. Psikol, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 187, 2019, doi: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.38619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.38619
    27. A. S. Kholiyah, K. Maryani, and C. Atikah, “Pengaruh media loose parts terhadap kemampuan mengenal konsep pola pada anak usia 4-5 tahun [The influence of loose parts media on the ability to recognize pattern concepts in children aged 4-5 years],” J. Progr. Stud. PGRA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 141–149, 2023.
    28. M. F. Luthfiyah, Metodologi Penelitian: Penelitian Kualitatif, Tindakan Kelas Dan Studi Kasus [Research Methodology: Qualitative Research, Classroom Action and Case Study], November, p. 26, 2017.
    29. B. Sudarsono, “Memahami dokumentasi [Understanding documentation],” Acarya Pustaka, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 47, 2017, doi: 10.23887/ap.v3i1.12735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ap.v3i1.12735
    30. Widhiarso, “Tanya jawab tentang uji normalitas [Questions and answers about normality test],” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, p. 3, 2019.
    31. Usmadi, “Pengujian persyaratan analisis (uji homogenitasdan uji hipotesis) [Testing of analysis requirements (homogeneity test and hypothesis test)],” Inov. Pendidik, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 50–62, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31869/ip.v7i1.2281
    32. S. Wahyuni, N. Salama, and Taslim, “Pengaruh permainan tradisional congklak terhadap kemampuan berhitung anak usia dini [The influence of traditional congklak games on the arithmetic abilities of early childhood children],” J. Ris. Golden Age PAUD UHO, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 218–223, 2020.
    33. P. Spss and D. Statistik-Yogyakarta, “105 hal.; 17,5 X 24,5 cm Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Pertama,” 2014.
    34. I. Nurhikmayati, “Implementasi STEAM dalam pembelajaran matematika [Implementation of STEAM in mathematics learning],” Didact. Math, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 41–50, 2019, doi: 10.31949/dmj.v1i2.1508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/dmj.v1i2.1508
    35. K. Chen and C. Chen, “Effects of STEM inquiry method on learning attitude and creativity [Effects of STEM inquiry method on learning attitude and creativity],” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.29333/EJMSTE/11254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11254
    36. P. J. Laksono, S. Suhadi, and A. Efriani, “Unveiling STEM education conceptions: Insights from pre-service mathematics and science teachers,” In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 54-61, 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v6i1.1387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1387
    37. T. Cahyani Kusuma, E. Boeriswati, and A. Supena, “Peran guru dalam meningkatkan berpikir kritis anak usia dini [The role of teachers in improving critical thinking in early childhood],” Aulad J. Early Child, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 413–420, 2023, doi: 10.31004/aulad.v6i3.563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/aulad.v6i3.563
    38. E. Skaraki, “Creating a watermill through steam activities for preschool children in the school yard,” Adv. Mob. Learn. Educ. Res, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 748–753, 2023, doi: 10.25082/amler.2023.02.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.001
    39. N. Novitasari, and N. A. Zaida, “Pembelajaran STEAM pada anak usia dini [STEAM learning in early childhood],” Al Hikmah: Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Islamic Education (IJECIE), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 69-82, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35896/ijecie.v6i1.330
    40. A. Ng, S. Kewalramani, and G. Kidman, “Integrating and navigating STEAM (inSTEAM) in early childhood education: An integrative review and inSTEAM conceptual framework,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ, vol. 18, no. 7, 2022, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/12174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12174
    41. D. Herro and C. Quigley, “Innovating with STEAM in middle school classrooms: remixing education,” Horiz, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 190–204, 2016, doi: 10.1108/OTH-03-2016-0008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-03-2016-0008
    42. Viti Fatimah and Nurul Ismaiyah, “Stimulasi pengembangan kognitif anak melalui media tanaman dengan pembelajaran berbasis STEAM [Stimulating children's cognitive development through plant media with STEAM-based learning],” Kiddo J. Pendidik. Islam Anak Usia Dini, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 394–405, 2024, doi: 10.19105/kiddo.v1i1.12762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19105/kiddo.v1i1.12762
    43. T. Ratnasih, H. Hidayat, and ..., “Pengaruh metode STEAM menggunakan bahan loose parts terhadap kreativitas anak usia dini [The influence of the STEAM method using loose parts on the creativity of early childhood],” … Djati Conf. Ser., vol. 8, 2022.
    44. S. Wahyuningsih, N. E. Nurjanah, U. E. E. Rasmani, R. Hafidah, A. R. Pudyaningtyas, and M. M. Syamsuddin, “STEAM learning in early childhood education: A literature review,” Int. J. Pedagog. Teach. Educ, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 33, 2020, doi: 10.20961/ijpte.v4i1.39855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v4i1.39855
    45. A. Gea et al., Metode Pembelajaran Kreatif dalam Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini [Creative Learning Methods in Early Childhood Education], 2025.
    46. R. Rizkia, “Implementasi metode steam berbasis media film dalam meningkatkan aspek kognitif pada pendidikan anak usia dini [Implementation of the film-based steam method in improving cognitive aspects in early childhood education],” J. Ceria (Cerdas Energik Responsif Inov. Adapt, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 267, 2020.
    47. N. Halimatu Sadiah, R. Hunafa Lestari, P. Melati, J. Kebon manggu Padasuka Cimahi, and I. Siliwangi, “Upaya meningkatkan pengetahuan sains pada anak usia dini melalui pembelajaran steam [Efforts to improve science knowledge in early childhood through steam learning],” CERIA (Cerdas Energik Responsif Inovatif Adaptif), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 237-244, 2020.
    48. G. Yakman, H. Lee, A. Pendidik, T. Virginia, M. Presiden, and K. Steam, “Menjelajahi pendidikan STEAME teladan di as sebagai kerangka pendidikan praktis untuk korea [Exploring exemplary STEAME education in the US as a practical educational framework for Korea],” J. Korea. Sci. Edu, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1–15, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.6.1072
    49. P. Purwanti and Z. Zulkarnaen, “Media pembelajaran berbahan loose part berbasis STEAM dapat membangun merdeka belajar pada anak usia dini [STEAM-based loose part learning media can build independent learning in early childhood],” Pedagog. J. Ilmu Pendidik, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2023, doi: 10.24036/pedagogi.v23i1.1469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v23i1.1469

Categories