Active Learning, Content Focus and Teacher Development Based on TIMSS 2022 in Georgia
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study investigates the relationships between active learning, teacher professional development, and content-specific pedagogical knowledge (Content Focus) in shaping mathematics achievement, utilizing data from the 2022 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) for Georgia.
Methodology: Employing a quantitative research design, data were collected from 194 teachers through structured questionnaires to examine the interplay between these instructional strategies.
Main Findings: The findings revealed acceptable psychometric properties for all constructs, with moderate but statistically significant relationships among the variables. Content Focus demonstrated a critical role in supporting mathematics outcomes, highlighting its potential as a mediating or moderating factor in instructional effectiveness. Despite the lack of significant path coefficients, the results underscore the complexity of educational processes, suggesting that contextual and mediating factors may influence the observed outcomes.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This research contributes to the understanding of how pedagogical strategies and content knowledge intersect to improve mathematics achievement, offering actionable insights for policymakers and educators aiming to refine instructional practices and professional development programs.
References
J. Hattie, Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge, 2009.
M. C. Wang, G. D. Haertel, and H. J. Walberg, “Fostering educational resilience”, Educational Leadership, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 12-19, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s13384-019-00344-0.
J. Graham, and C. Colin, “Exploring the dynamics of education in Australia: Policies, Practices, and Progressions in the 21st Century”, Influence: international journal of science review, 5(3), 14-23, 2023, doi: 10.54783/influencejournal.v5i3.178.
M. S. A. Helal, O. Y. Hock, and A. M. Karim, “Unlocking potential: The smart investment in education management for future success in bangladesh”, International Journal of Academic Reserach in Economics and Management Sciences, vol. 12, no. 4, 2023.
P. O. Chigbu, and M. A. Adamu, “Instructional materials and curriculum development in nigerian educational system: Challenges and prospects”, International Journal of Formal Education, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 392-406, 2023.
L. Darling-Hammond, M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner, “Effective teacher professional development”, Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute, 2017.
L. Darling-Hammond, “Defining teaching quality around the world”, European Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 295-308, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080.
M. Cochran-Smith, “Exploring teacher quality: International perspectives”, European journal of teacher education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 415-428, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2021.1915276.
T. R. Guskey, “Professional development and teacher change”, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 381-391, 2002, doi: 10.1080/135406002100000512.
K. Melhuish, E. Thanheiser, A. White, B. Rosencrans, J. M. Shaughnessy, L. Foreman, A. Riffel, and L. Guyot, “The efficacy of research-based “mathematics for all” professional development”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 307-333, 2022, doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc-2019-0053.
S. Hennessy, R. Kershner, E. Calcagni, and F. Ahmed, “Supporting practitioner‐led inquiry into classroom dialogue with a research‐informed professional learning resource: A design‐based approach”, Review of Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. e3269, 2021, doi: 10.1002/rev3.3269.
O. A. Ajani, “Exploring the alignment of professional development and classroom practices in african contexts: A Discursive investigation. Journal of Integrated Elementary Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 120-136, 2023, doi: 10.21580/jieed.v3i2.17693.
T. Seidel, and R. J. Shavelson, “Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design”, Educational Researcher, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 537-544, 2007.
S. K. Carpenter, S. C. Pan, and A. C. Butler, “The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice”, Nature Reviews Psychology, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 496-511, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00089-1.
A. Marougkas, C. Troussas, A. Krouska, and C. Sgouropoulou, “Virtual reality in education: a review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade”, Electronics, vol. 12, no. 13, pp. 2832, 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12132832.
A. S. Nur, S. B. Waluya, R. Rochmad, and W. Wardono, “Contextual learning with ethnomathematics in enhancing the problem solving based on thinking levels”, Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 331-344, 2020, doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v5i3.11679.
V. S. Zambak, and A. M. Tyminski, “Connections between prospective Middle-Grades mathematics teachers’ technology-enhanced specialized content knowledge and beliefs”, RMLE Online, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1-20, 2023, doi: 10.1080/19404476.2022.2151681.
F. Abebe, and G. Trainin, “Predicting Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Formation in Elementary Math Education”, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 125-150, 2024.
M. Stevenson, “Growth of pedagogical content knowledge and ‘understanding mathematics in depth’: conceptions of pre-service teachers”, Teacher Development, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 165-183, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13664530.2020.1730944.
X. Du, Y. Chaaban, S. Sabah, A. M. Al-Thani, and L. Wang, “Active learning engagement in teacher preparation programmes-A comparative study from Qatar, Lebanon and China”, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 283-298, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2020.1717436.
Y. Wardat, S. Belbase, and H. Tairab, “Mathematics teachers’ perceptions of trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS)-related practices in Abu Dhabi Emirate schools”, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 5436, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14095436.
A. Daly-Smith, J. L. Morris, E. Norris, T. L. Williams, V. Archbold, J. Kallio, ... and G> K. Resaland, “Behaviours that prompt primary school teachers to adopt and implement physically active learning: a meta synthesis of qualitative evidence”, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, vol. 18, pp. 1-20, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01221-9.
T. Hailikari, V. Virtanen, M. Vesalainen, and L. Postareff, “Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning”, Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 217-231, 2022, doi: 10.1177/1469787421989160.
K. W. Copridge, S. Uttamchandani, and T. Birdwell, “Faculty reflections of pedagogical transformation in active learning classrooms”, Innovative Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 205-221, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10755-021-09544-y.
E. P. Driessen, J. K. Knight, M. K. Smith, and C. J. Ballen, “Demystifying the meaning of active learning in postsecondary biology education”, CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. ar52, 2020, doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-04-0068.
S. K. Schmidt, S. Bratland-Sanda, and R. Bongaardt, “Secondary school teachers' experiences with classroom-based physically active learning:“I'm excited, but it's really hard”, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 116, pp. 103753, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103753.
Y. Wardat, S. Belbase, H. Tairab, R. A. Takriti, M. Efstratopoulou, and H. Dodeen, “The influence of school factors on students’ mathematics achievements in trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) in Abu Dhabi Emirate schools”, Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 424, 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12070424.
Y. Zhang, S. Russell, and S. Kelly, “Engagement, achievement, and teacher classroom practices in mathematics: Insights from TIMSS 2011 and PISA 2012”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 73, pp. 101146, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101146.
D. Hernández-Torrano, and M. G. Courtney, “Modern international large-scale assessment in education: An integrative review and mapping of the literature”, Large-Scale Assessments in Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40536-021-00109-1.
Q. Hao, B. Barnes, and M. Jing, “Quantifying the effects of active learning environments: separating physical learning classrooms from pedagogical approaches”, Learning Environments Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 109-122, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10984-020-09320-3.
D. Reinholz, E. Johnson, C. Andrews-Larson, A. Stone-Johnstone, J. Smith, B. Mullins,... and N. Shah, “When active learning is inequitable: Women’s participation predicts gender inequities in mathematical performance”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 204-226, 2022, doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0143.
O. L. Ng, F. Ting, W. H. Lam, and M. Liu, “Active learning in undergraduate mathematics tutorials via cooperative problem-based learning and peer assessment with interactive online whiteboards”, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 29, pp. 285-294, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40299-019-00481-1.
C. Chiang, P. K. Wells, and G. Xu, “How does experiential learning encourage active learning in auditing education?”, Journal of Accounting Education, vol. 54, pp. 100713, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100713.
J. J. De Simone, “The roles of collaborative professional development, self-efficacy, and positive affect in encouraging educator data use to aid student learning”, Teacher Development, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 443-465, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13664530.2020.1780302.
U, Sekaran, Research methods for business: A skill building approach, John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
C. Fornell, and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39-50, 1981, doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104.
J. F. Hair Jr, L. M. Matthews, R. L. Matthews, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use”, International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 107-123, 2017, doi: 10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624.
I. Celik, “Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 138, pp. 107468, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468.
R. Sancar, D. Atal, and D. Deryakulu, “A new framework for teachers’ professional development”, Teaching and teacher education, vol. 101, pp. 103305, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305.
M. Schmid, E. Brianza, and D. Petko, “Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK. xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model”, Computers & Education, vol. 157, pp. 103967, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967.
M. Imran, Z. Sultana, and S. Ahmed, “The influence of student-teacher interactions on secondary school students'academic performance”, Benazir Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.31703/gsr.2023(VIII-II).45.
H. L. Sun, T. Sun, F. Y. Sha, X. Y. Gu, X. R. Hou, F. Y. Zhu, and P. T. Fang, “The influence of teacher–student interaction on the effects of online learning: Based on a serial mediating model”, Frontiers in psychology, vol. 13, pp. 779217, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779217.
A. Arifin, S. S. Suryaningsih, and O, Arifudin, “The relationship between classroom environment, teacher professional development, and student academic performance in secondary education”, International Education Trend Issues, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 151-159, 2024, doi: 10.56442/ieti.v2i2.467.
C. L. Weber, and E. L. Mofield, “Considerations for professional learning supporting teachers of the gifted in pedagogical content knowledge”, Gifted Child Today, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 128-141, 2023, doi: 10.1177/10762175221149258.
T. Mapulanga, Y. Ameyaw, G. Nshogoza, and A. Bwalya, “Integration of topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge components in secondary school science teachers’ reflections on biology lessons”, Discover Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00104-y.
Z. Aguirre-Muñoz, and M. Pando, “Conceptualizing STEM teacher professional knowledge for teaching ELs: Initial impact of subject matter and disciplinary literacy PD on content knowledge and practice”, Bilingual Research Journal, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 335-359, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15235882.2021.1970654.
K. Pak, L. M. Desimone, and A. Parsons, “An integrative approach to professional development to support college-and career-readiness standards”, Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 28, no. 111, 2020, doi: 10.14507/epaa.28.4970.
Copyright (c) 2024 Manana Chumburidze, Edy Setiabudi, Maria Vassiliadou, Rovsen Hasanov, Khamphone Duangpaserth
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
