Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal

Language Poetty in Class VIII Student Discussions of SMPIT Ash Shiddiqiyyah, South Tangerang

Putri Khoirunnisa
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta ROR
Indonesia
putrikhoi@gmail.com
Meutia Triswati
Teacher at SMPIT Ash Shiddiqiyyah, Tangerang Selatan
Indonesia
Penelope Coutas
Murdoch University ROR
Australia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to describe the deviation and compliance of the politeness of language principles that occur in class discussion activities in class VIII students of SMPIT Ash Shiddiqiyyah South Tangerang in terms of word selection and polite manner of discussion.

    Methodology: The method used in the study Analysis of the Utilization of Principles of Language politeness in the Discussion Activities of Class VIII Students of SMPIT Ash Shiddiqiyyah South Tangerang is a qualitative descriptive method. The technique used in collecting data uses the technique of referring skillful engagements, recording techniques, and note-taking techniques.

    Main Findings: The results of the study on class VIII SMPIT Ash Shiddiqiyyah South Tangerang showed that the number of violations of language politeness violations that occurred in class discussion activities were greater than their compliance. The principle of politeness that is often violated is the maxim of generosity, humility and approval. As for those who do not appear in speech in class VIII are the maxims of wisdom, the maxim of acceptance and the maxim of conclusions.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This research offers a new view regarding language politeness in discussions of class VIII students at SMPIT Ash Shiddiqiyyah Tangsel by considering the specific cultural context and school environment. Previously, studies related to language politeness were often carried out in general contexts without paying attention to the unique nuances and characteristics of each educational environment.

  • How to cite

    Language Poetty in Class VIII Student Discussions of SMPIT Ash Shiddiqiyyah, South Tangerang. (2024). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 1(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v1i1.998

    More Citation Formats

  • 252
    Abstract views
    191
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. Padli, “Penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Sakti Alam Kerinci,” Innov. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 4896–4903, 2023, doi: 10.31004/innovative.v3i4.3893.
    2. A. L. Caroline Tagg, “Repertoires on the move: exploiting technological affordances and contexts in mobile messaging interactions,” Int. J. Multiingualism, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 244–266, 2020, doi: 10.1080/14790718.2020.1867150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1867150
    3. G. V. argherita Murgiano, Yasmin Motamedi, “Situating Language in the Real-World: The Role of Multimodal Iconicity and Indexicality,” J. Cogn., vol. 4, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.5334/joc.113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.113
    4. D. Septiani and K. Sandi, “Pelanggaran prinsip kerja sama staf desa cisereh, tangerang (kajian pragmatik),” J. Pena Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 12–30, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/7191
    5. Abdul Aziz, “Komunikasi Pendidik Dan Peserta Didik Dalam Pendidikan Islam,” Mediakita, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2017, doi: 10.30762/mediakita.v1i2.365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30762/mediakita.v1i2.365
    6. I. Indrayani, R. Hendaryan, and S. Mulyani, “Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Tuturan Imperatif Guru Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Sma Negeri 1 Ciwaringin Kabupaten Cirebon,” Diksatrasia J. Ilm. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 433, 2023, doi: 10.25157/diksatrasia.v7i2.11202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25157/diksatrasia.v7i2.11202
    7. H. Christian, D. Suhartono, A. Chowanda, and K. Z. Zamli, “Text based personality prediction from multiple social media data sources using pre-trained language model and model averaging,” J. Big Data, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40537-021-00459-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00459-1
    8. E. B. Jean-Marc Dewaele, “Does multilingualism shape personality? An exploratory investigation,” Int. J. Biling., vol. 24, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.1177/13670069198885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006919888581
    9. N. Noviana and L. Oktaviani, “the Correlation Between College Student Personality Types and English Proficiency Ability At Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2022, doi: 10.33365/jeltl.v3i1.1709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v3i1.1709
    10. Rika Ningsih, Endry Boeriswati, and Liliana Muliastuti, “Language Politeness of Students and Teachers: an Ethnographic Study,” Getsempena English Educ. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 159–169, 2020, doi: 10.46244/geej.v7i1.1063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v7i1.1063
    11. N. Probosini, “Politeness Strategies in the Main Characters of ‘The Devil Wears Prada’ Movie,” J. ASPIKOM, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 166, 2020, doi: 10.24329/aspikom.v5i1.516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v5i1.516
    12. H. J. Prayitno et al., “Politeness of Directive Speech Acts on Social Media Discourse and Its Implications for Strengthening Student Character Education in the Era of Global Education,” Asian J. Univ. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 179–200, 2021, doi: 10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16205
    13. J. Culpeper and V. Tantucci, “The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity,” J. Pragmat., vol. 175, pp. 146–164, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.008
    14. R. Surjowati, “Politeness Strategies used by the Students with Regional Multicultural Background,” NOBEL J. Lit. Lang. Teach., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 112–135, 2021, doi: 10.15642/nobel.2021.12.1.112-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2021.12.1.112-135
    15. T. Budiarta, J. Nurkamto, S. Sumarlam, and D. Purnanto, “Expressive Speech Acts of Politeness in The Counselling Process,” Langkawi J. Assoc. Arab. English, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 212, 2021, doi: 10.31332/lkw.v7i2.2961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v7i2.2961
    16. R. Raihan, Y. Morelent, and T. Thamrin, “Deviation of Politeness Principles in the Comments Column of Cnn Indonesia and Kompas Tv in the Social Media Youtube Channels,” J. Cult. Ling., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 22–30, 2022, doi: 10.37301/culingua.v3i1.104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37301/culingua.v3i1.104
    17. N. R. M. N. Muhammad Hussain Hamzah, “Pragmatic deviation of politeness principle in Trump’s political speeches,” Res. J. Adv. Humanit., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.58256/v6tw8132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58256/v6tw8132
    18. D. F. Xia Xiang, Binghan Zheng, “Interpreting impoliteness and over-politeness: An investigation into interpreters’ cognitive effort, coping strategies and their effects,” J. Pragmat., vol. 169, pp. 231–244, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.021
    19. A. Nefedova, “A polysynthetic language in contact: The case of ket,” J. Asian Linguist. Anthropol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.47298/jala.v1-i1-a1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47298/jala.v1-i1-a1
    20. M. Bilá, A. Kačmárová, and I. Vaňková, “The encounter of two cultural identities: The case of social deixis,” Russ. J. Linguist., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 344–365, 2020, doi: 10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-344-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-344-365
    21. M. A. Al-Khatib, “(Im)politeness in Intercultural Email Communication between People of Different Cultural Backgrounds: A Case Study of Jordan and the USA,” J. Intercult. Commun. Res., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 409–430, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17475759.2021.1913213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2021.1913213
    22. M. Maspaitella, P. Haniko, L. Tuhuteru, Tirmidi, and A. H. Gamar, “Analysis of Character Values Contained in Indonesian Language Learning (Literature Study),” J. Pendidik. dan Konseling, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi: 10.31004/jpdk.v5i1.11762.
    23. Dina Mardiana, Iwan Fauzi, and L. N. Setiana, “The Function of Politeness of Teacher Language In Implementing Character Values To The Primary School Students,” J. Pendidik. Ilmu Pengetah. Sos., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 116–127, 2022, doi: 10.37304/jpips.v14i1.4740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37304/jpips.v14i1.4740
    24. U. Qoyyimah, “Inculcating character education through EFL teaching in Indonesian state schools,” Pedagog. An Int. J., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 109–126, 2016, doi: 10.1080/1554480X.2016.1165618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2016.1165618
    25. A. S. Tien Yulianti, “Enhancing Public Speaking Ability Through Focus Group Discussion,” J. PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), vol. 5, pp. 519–525, 2021, doi: 10.33578/pjr.v5i2.8238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v5i2.8238
    26. D. Kim, “Learning Language, Learning Culture: Teaching Language to the Whole Student,” ECNU Rev. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 519–541, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2096531120936693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120936693
    27. I. G. Riadil, “A Study of Students’ Perception: Identifying EFL Learners’ Problems in Speaking Skill,” Int. J. Educ. Lang. Relig., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 31, 2020, doi: 10.35308/ijelr.v2i1.2256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/ijelr.v2i1.2256
    28. A. G. Mahmudi, L. Irawati, and D. R. Soleh, “Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa dalam Berkomunikasi dengan Guru (Kajian Pragmatk),” Deiksis, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 98, 2021, doi: 10.30998/deiksis.v13i2.6169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v13i2.6169
    29. D. Febriasari, “Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar,” KREDO J. Ilm. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.24176/kredo.v2i1.2557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v2i1.2557
    30. E. Novitasari, “Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa Dan Guru Pada Diskusi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia : Dalam Perspektif Teori Robin Lakoff,” LITERASI J. Ilm. Pendidik. Bahasa, Sastra Indones. dan Drh., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 460–466, 2023, doi: 10.23969/literasi.v13i2.7478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23969/literasi.v13i2.7478