Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal

The Effect of Peer Assessment through Twitter on Students’ Writing the Analytical Exposition Text Ability

Habiburrohman Habiburrohman
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta ROR
Indonesia
habibur@gmail.com
Eli Supartini
Teacher at SMA Negeri 1 Dramaga, Jawa Barat
Indonesia
Paul Onsare Onchera
University of Kabianga ROR
Kenya
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This research is aimed to get empirical evidence on the effect of peer assessment through Twitter on students’ writing the analytical exposition text ability at eleventh-grade students of Senior High School 1 Dramaga

    Methodology:This research used the quantitative method and quasi-experimental design. The sample consisted of 60 eleventh-grade students from Senior High School 1 Dramaga, selected using purposive sampling. The samples were divided into two groups of 30 class XI social science 2 as the control class and class XI social science 3 as the experimental class. Then, the data were collected by using a writing test in the form of a pre-and post-test.

    Main Findings: The result shows that the mean score of the post-test in the experimental class is 78.133 with 17.633 as the gained mean score while the mean score of the post-test in the control class is 70.167 with 8.167 as the gained mean score. Besides, the result shows that sig (2 tailed) is 0.000. Then the tvalue of the post-test (4.396) is higher than ttable (2.301) meaning Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected.

    Novelty/Originality of this study:This research offers novelty by exploring in depth the influence of learning methods based on Islamic values ​​on language politeness in class VIII student discussions at SMPIT Ash Shiddiqiyyah Tangsel.

  • How to cite

    The Effect of Peer Assessment through Twitter on Students’ Writing the Analytical Exposition Text Ability. (2024). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 1(1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v1i1.997

    More Citation Formats

  • 493
    Abstract views
    206
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. L. Yuliawati, “The Mechanics Accuracy of Students ’ W riting,” Educ. Teach. J. A J. og English Lit. Linguist. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2021, doi: 10.25273/etj.v9i1.8890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25273/etj.v9i1.8890
    2. P. J. c Emily Purser a, Shoshana Dreyfus b, “Big ideas & sharp focus: Researching and developing students’ academic writing across the disciplines,” J. English Acad. Purp., vol. 43, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100807
    3. S. Crossley, “Linguistic features in writing quality and development : An overview,” J. Writ. Res., vol. 11, no. 2020, pp. 415–443, 2020, doi: 10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01
    4. W. Akhuai et al., Social Capital of Pancasila Education in Smart Education with Social Media in Cybercrime Prevention in the Industrial Revolution Era, vol. 4, no. 2. 2022. doi: 10.15294/panjar.v4i2.55047. Type: DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/panjar.v4i2.55047
    5. M. Pramono, H. Shinta, C. Puspita, and U. N. Surabaya, “The Strategic Plan of University in Facing Challenges of Industrial Revolution 4.0,” J. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, 2020, doi: doi.org/10.26740/jp.v5n1.p%25p.
    6. M. I. A. Summantri and M. F. K. R. A. S. Syahrial, “Digital Communication In Agricultural Extension In The Era Of The Industrial Revolution 4 . 0,” J. Eng. Manag. Inf. Technol., vol. 01, no. 04, pp. 177–190, 2023, doi: 10.61552/JEMIT.2023.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61552/JEMIT.2023.04.003
    7. D. Denmar, B. Setiyadi, and S. Rahmawati, “Communication in the Industrial Revolution Era 4 . 0 Through Learning Based Learning and Inquiry,” J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 481–489, 2021, doi: 10.51276/edu.v2i2.152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i2.152
    8. M. Fadilurrahman, T. Kurniawan, and S. Shaddiq, “Systematic Literature Review of Disruption Era in Indonesia : The Resistance of Industrial Revolution 4 . 0,” J. Robot. Control, vol. 2, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.18196/jrc.2152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.2152
    9. B. S. W. Widodo, E. Sudibyo, Suryanti, D. A. P Sari , Inzanah, “The Effectiveness Of Gadget-Based Interactive Multimedia In Improving Generation Z ’ S,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 248–256, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23208
    10. M. F. Vizcaya-moreno, “Social Media Used and Teaching Methods Preferred by Generation Z Students in the Nursing Clinical Learning Environment : A Cross-Sectional Research Study,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: doi:10.3390/ijerph17218267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218267
    11. D. V. D. &Sergey A. Vartanov, “Emerging digital media culture in Russia: modeling the media consumption of Generation Z,” J. Multicult. Discourses, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 186–203, 2020, doi: 10.1080/17447143.2020.1751648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2020.1751648
    12. M. P. Vanja Vitezic, “Artificial intelligence acceptance in services: connecting with Generation Z,” Serv. Ind. J., vol. 41, no. 13, pp. 926–946, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02642069.2021.1974406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.1974406
    13. W. C. Farrell, “Generation Z in Thailand,” Intrnational J. Cross Cult. Manag., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 25–51, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1470595820904116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595820904116
    14. Puspita Sari, “Students’ Expository Writing: A Case Study In Paragraph Writing Class,” English J. Literaci Utama, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 6, 2021, doi: 10.33197/ejlutama.vol5.iss2.2021.136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.vol5.iss2.2021.136
    15. D. D. P. Zefki Okta, Ashadi Ashadi, Sulis Triyono, “Thematic Structure in Students’ Writings: Implications on their Ideas Organization and Development,” Regist. J., vol. 16, no. 1, 2023, doi: doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.49-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.49-72
    16. T. A. Ukrainetz, “Evidence-Based Expository Intervention: A Tutorial for Speech-Language Pathologists,” Am. J. Speech-lLanguage, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 654–675, 2024, doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00036
    17. F. Elfa, “An Analysis of Students’ Writing Compositions Analytical Exposition Text,” Inovish J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 44–57, 2020, doi: 10.35314/inovish.v5i1.1350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35314/inovish.v5i1.1350
    18. S. Baig, F. Javed, A. Siddiquah, and A. Khanam, “A Content Analysis of English Textbook of Punjab Textbook Board of Grade 8 in Pakistan,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211023159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211023159
    19. T. T. T. Nguyen, T. S. Le, and N. T. P. Nam, “Effects of Idea-Generation Strategies on Vietnamese Efl Students’ Expository Writing Quality and Self-Efficacy,” Eur. J. Foreign Lang. Teach., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 46–68, 2024, doi: 10.46827/ejfl.v8i1.5249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v8i1.5249
    20. L. Ikawati, “Scaffolding in Teaching Writing,” AL-TARBIYAH J. Pendidik. (The Educ. Journal), vol. 30, no. 1, p. 48, 2020, doi: 10.24235/ath.v30i1.6487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24235/ath.v30i1.6487
    21. D. E. Silalahi, P. S. R Sihombing, and L. Purba, “High Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Questions on Learners’ Writing Ability of Report Text At Efl of Fkip Universitas Hkbp Nommensen 1*),” J. Din. Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 17–32, 2021, doi: 10.33541/jdp.v14i1.1295.
    22. H. Amalia, F. Abdullah, and A. S. Fatimah, “Teaching writing to junior high school students: A focus on challenges and solutions,” J. Lang. Linguist. Stud., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 794–810, 2021, doi: 10.17263/jlls.904066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.904066
    23. D. Ramadhanti and D. P. Yanda, “Students’ metacognitive awareness and its impact on writing skill,” Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 193–206, 2021, doi: 10.26858/ijole.v5i3.18978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i3.18978
    24. T. Betoni and R. Ulfaika, “The correlation between students’ grammatical mastery and students’ writing achievement at XI grade students of SMAN 1 Tarakan academic year,” Borneo J. English Lang. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–55, 2020, doi: 10.35334/bjele.v2i1.1615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35334/bjele.v2i1.1615
    25. A. Muhyidin, “Does the writing exposition text ability correlate to reading habit and discourse markers mastery?,” J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 885–895, 2020, doi: 10.17478/JEGYS.682065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.682065
    26. S. Fahmi and C. Rachmijati, “Improving Students’ Writing Skill Using Grammaly Application for Second Grade in Senior High School,” Proj. (Professional J. English Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 69, 2021, doi: 10.22460/project.v4i1.p69-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i1.p69-74
    27. D. Purnamasari, D. N. Hidayat, and L. Kurniawati, “an Analysis of Students’ Writing Skill on English Descriptive Text,” English Educ. J. Tadris Bhs. Ingg., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 101–114, 2021, doi: 10.24042/ee-jtbi.v14i1.7943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v14i1.7943
    28. R. A. Dawadi, Saraswati, Shrestha, Sagun Giri, “Open Research Online,” PhD thesis, Open Univ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1-266., 2021, doi: 10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20
    29. R. Popenoe, A. Langius-Eklöf, E. Stenwall, and A. Jervaeus, “A practical guide to data analysis in general literature reviews,” Nord. J. Nurs. Res., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 175–186, 2021, doi: 10.1177/2057158521991949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2057158521991949
    30. M. M. Musheke and J. Phiri, “The Effects of Effective Communication on Organizational Performance Based on the Systems Theory,” Open J. Bus. Manag., vol. 09, no. 02, pp. 659–671, 2021, doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2021.92034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.92034