Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal

The Use Of Audio Visual Media In Learning To Write Advertisement Texts Class Viii Students

Siti Nurafifah
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta ROR
Indonesia
sitinurafifah@gmail.com
Widiastuti Widiastuti
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the use of audio-visual media in teaching students to write advertisement texts in poster form for class VIII-6 students at SMPN 87 Jakarta during the 2018/2019 academic year.

    Methodology: This study used a descriptive qualitative method. Data collection instruments included observation sheets, interview guidelines, assignments, and documentation. The data were analyzed using test and non-test analysis with data recap tables. The media used was a motion graphic video titled "Bahaya Rokok."

    Main Findings: The first writing test without audio-visual media showed an average score of 7.1 with only 2 students reaching the passing score. In contrast, after implementing the motion graphic video in the second test, the average score increased to 8.6 with 33 students reaching the minimum passing score. The use of the video significantly improved students’ writing skills in advertisement texts.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces the use of motion graphic video as an innovative tool in language instruction, particularly in teaching advertisement texts. It offers empirical insight into how media can enhance writing engagement and outcomes, especially for texts with persuasive purposes in junior high school settings.

  • How to cite

    The Use Of Audio Visual Media In Learning To Write Advertisement Texts Class Viii Students. (2025). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 2(1), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i1.1960

    More Citation Formats

  • 306
    Abstract views
    182
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. Alangari, S. Jaworska, and J. Laws, “Who’s afraid of phrasal verbs? The use of phrasal verbs in expert academic writing in the discipline of linguistics,” J. English Acad. Purp., vol. 43, p. 100814, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814
    2. P. E. Jones and C. Read, “Mythbusters united? A dialogue over Harris’s integrationist linguistics and Gibson’s Ecological Psychology,” Lang. Sci., vol. 97, p. 101536, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101536
    3. T. T. Voorhees and O. Vorobel, “Integrating qualitative research into the community college linguistics course: An autoethnographic inquiry,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 2, no. June, p. 100053, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100053
    4. E. Leivada and E. Murphy, “Mind the (terminological) gap: 10 misused, ambiguous, or polysemous terms in linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 8, p. 100073, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2021.100073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2021.100073
    5. K. U. Isisag, “The efficacy of macro-linguistics in developing reading skills: An integrated lesson plan,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 698–703, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.220
    6. C. G. Quan, “Continuing with the promise of ‘Scratch’ in the applied linguistics classroom,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 103, pp. 245–254, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.332
    7. M. A. Candel-Mora and C. Vargas-Sierra, “An analysis of research production in corpus linguistics applied to translation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 95, pp. 317–324, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.653
    8. R. Z. Abid and S. A. Manan, Integrating corpus linguistics in critical literacy pedagogy: A case study of lance armstrong’s transformation from a titleholder to a fraud, vol. 208, no. Icllic 2014. Elsevier B.V., 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189
    9. H. Jalali, “Reflection of stance through it bundles in applied linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 4, pp. 30–39, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001
    10. M. Pikhart, “New horizons of intercultural communication: Applied linguistics approach,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 152, pp. 954–957, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.349
    11. H. Bromhead, “Disaster linguistics, climate change semantics and public discourse studies: a semantically-enhanced discourse study of 2011 Queensland Floods,” Lang. Sci., vol. 85, p. 101381, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381
    12. A. M. Fazilatfar and Z. S. Naseri, “Rhetorical moves in applied linguistics articles and their corresponding iranian writer identity,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 489–498, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444
    13. K. Belousov, E. Erofeeva, T. Erofeeva, Y. Leshchenko, and N. Zelyanskaya, “University teachers of linguistics and self-image of their profession,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 214, no. June, pp. 667–676, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.667
    14. X. Tian, A. E. Griffith, Z. Price, K. E. Boyer, and K. Tang, “Investigating linguistic alignment in collaborative dialogue: a study of syntactic and lexical patterns in middle school students,” Lang. Speech, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00238309241234565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nbw8x
    15. S. May, “New Zealand is ‘racist as f**k’: Linguistic racism and te reo Māori,” Ethnicities, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 662–679, 2023, doi: 10.1177/14687968231192037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968231192037
    16. I. Lenart, I. Markovina, and O. Endrody, “Age-related differences in Russian and Hungarian linguistic pictures of the world,” J. Eurasian Stud., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 60–73, 2023, doi: 10.1177/18793665231221551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665231221551
    17. R. Kopečková, U. Gut, M. Wrembel, and A. Balas, “Phonological cross-linguistic influence at the initial stages of L3 acquisition,” Second Lang. Res., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1107–1131, 2023, doi: 10.1177/02676583221123994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221123994
    18. J. Bosque-Gil, P. Cimiano, and M. Dojchinovski, “Editorial of the special issue on latest advancements in linguistic linked data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 911–916, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-223251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-223251
    19. D. Gromann et al., “Multilinguality and LLOD: A survey across linguistic description levels,” Semant. Web, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1915–1958, 2024, doi: 10.3233/SW-243591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-243591
    20. K. Bromberek-Dyzman, R. Jończyk, M. Vasileanu, A. G. Niculescu-Gorpin, and H. Bąk, “Cross-linguistic differences affect emotion and emotion-laden word processing: Evidence from Polish-English and Romanian-English bilinguals,” Int. J. Biling., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1161–1182, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1367006920987306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920987306
    21. M. P. Di Buono, H. Gonçalo Oliveira, V. Barbu Mititelu, B. Spahiu, and G. Nolano, “Paving the way for enriched metadata of linguistic linked data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1133–1157, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-222994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-222994
    22. C. Yue, “We make viewpoints in different ways: the use of stance adverbials across academic levels and disciplines,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2435169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2435169
    23. L. Zhao and P. Issra, “Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) research articles unpacked: a systemic functional linguistics (SFL) elemental genre approach,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2317617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2317617
    24. D. A. S. El-Dakhs, L. Mardini, and L. Alhabbad, “The persuasive strategies in more and less prestigious linguistics journals: focus on research article abstracts,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2325760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2325760
    25. Hendrokumoro, F. Darman, N. Nuraeni, and N. K. Ma’shumah, “The genetic relationship between alune, lisabata, luhu, and wemale (western seram, Indonesia): A historical-comparative linguistics approach,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2306718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2306718
    26. L. Fontaine, “On prepositions and particles: A case for lexical representation in systemic functional linguistics,” Word, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 115–135, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00437956.2017.1309029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2017.1309029
    27. I. Mukahal and M. M. Idrus, “Negation forms in the poetry of philip larkin,” Comp. Lit. East West, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 207–220, 2024, doi: 10.1080/25723618.2024.2395216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2024.2395216
    28. R. Nhongo and L. Siziba, “Intellectualising African languages in literature and linguistics at selected Zimbabwean higher learning institutions,” South African J. African Lang., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 223–230, 2024, doi: 10.1080/02572117.2024.2385262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2024.2385262
    29. M. Diko, “Harmonizing Africa’s linguistic symphony: navigating the complexities of translating African literature using a postcolonial theory,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2411871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2411871
    30. T. Popescu, “Developing english linguistics students’ translation competence through the language learning process,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 1075–1079, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.333
    31. Z. E. Attia, A. M. Gadallah, and H. M. Hefny, “An enhanced multi-view fuzzy information retrieval model based on linguistics,” IERI Procedia, vol. 7, pp. 90–95, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.015
    32. Z. Seifoori and J. Fattahi, “The comparison of the method section of applied linguistics articles written by native and iranian writers in terms of grammatical complexity and clause types,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 1698–1705, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.596
    33. J. M.-H. Lim, J. M. Storey, S.-L. Chang, M. S. Esa, and S. A. Damit, “Preface: Multiple roles of language and linguistics in society,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 134, no. Iclalis 2013, pp. 1–2, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.217
    34. L. Wang, “Designing and implementing outcome-based learning in a linguistics course: A case study in Hong Kong,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 12, pp. 9–18, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.004
    35. A. V. Tsepilova and L. V. Mikhaleva, “Working with formulaic language as a way to evaluate and improve EFL non-linguistics students’ pragmatic skills in a culture-specific contextual situation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 200, no. October, pp. 550–556, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022
    36. Y. Wang and J. Soler, “Investigating predatory publishing in political science: a corpus linguistics approach,” Appl. Corpus Linguist., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 100001, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100001
    37. S. Pesina and T. Solonchak, “Concept in cognitive linguistics and biocognitive science,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 192, no. 3519, pp. 587–592, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.100
    38. R. Alshalan and H. S. Alyousef, “Enhancing English–Arabic translator education through systemic functional linguistics: a study in a Saudi undergraduate classroom,” Saudi J. Lang. Stud., 2025, doi: 10.1108/sjls-09-2024-0054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-09-2024-0054
    39. A. Q. Al Darwesh, “The representation of authorial and external voice in popular science book writing: a systemic functional linguistics approach,” Saudi J. Lang. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 108–127, 2025, doi: 10.1108/sjls-08-2024-0043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-08-2024-0043
    40. A. Sendra, E. Late, and S. Kumpulainen, “From data lifecycle to research activity model: research data management in data-intensive social sciences and humanities research,” Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2025, doi: 10.1108/AJIM-12-2024-0959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2024-0959
    41. O. A. J. Mascarenhas, M. Thakur, and P. Kumar, “On assumptions, presumptions, suppositions, and presuppositions,” A Prim. Crit. Think. Bus. Ethics, pp. 223–253, 2024, doi: 10.1108/978-1-83753-346-620241008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-346-620241008
    42. L. Capoani, M. Fantinelli, and L. Giordano, “The concept of resilience in economics: a comprehensive analysis and systematic review of economic literature,” Contin. Resil. Rev., 2025, doi: 10.1108/crr-11-2024-0045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CRR-11-2024-0045
    43. N. A. Nawawi and S.-H. Ting, “Interactional metadiscourse markers in political science and creative arts journal abstracts,” Saudi J. Lang. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 76–90, 2025, doi: 10.1108/sjls-09-2024-0052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-09-2024-0052
    44. K. Berglund, M. Bertilsson, U. Hermansson, M. Sager, E. Wikstrom, and G. Hensing, “Determinants of alcohol preventive actions by managers: a cross-sectional study among Swedish managers,” Int. J. Work. Heal. Manag., no. 220180, 2025, doi: 10.1108/IJWHM-12-2024-0258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-12-2024-0258
    45. K. M. Al-Balushi, “Teaching english as discourse in Sultan Qaboos University,” Learn. Teach. High. Educ. Gulf Perspect., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 30–41, 2010, doi: 10.18538/lthe.v7.n1.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18538/lthe.v7.n1.18
    46. A. H. Al-Hoorie and A. A. K. AlAwdah, “Transdisciplinary integration for applied linguistics: the case of electrophysiology,” Saudi J. Lang. Stud., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 2024, doi: 10.1108/sjls-06-2024-0028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-06-2024-0028
    47. A. A. Zughaibi, “The barefoot shoemaker’s son: examining EFL teachers’ pragmatic competence in a Saudi context,” Saudi J. Lang. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 68–83, 2022, doi: 10.1108/sjls-02-2022-0013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-02-2022-0013
    48. H. A. Al Fadda, R. O. A. Haliem, H. S. Mahdi, and R. Alkhammash, “Undergraduates vs. postgraduates attitudes toward cooperative learning in online classes in different settings,” PSU Res. Rev., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 577–591, 2024, doi: 10.1108/PRR-05-2022-0052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-05-2022-0052