Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal

Exploring Linguistic Elements In Students’ Written Discussion Texts

Siti Fhadillah
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo
Indonesia
sitifhadilla@gmail.com
Erna Widyawati
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to examine the language features used by students in writing discussion texts, specifically identifying the frequency and type of features such as modal verbs, conjunctions, and conditional clauses.

    Methodology: This qualitative descriptive study used documentation as the data collection technique. The research analyzed 28 discussion texts written by third-semester students in the Genre-Based Writing course at the English Education Department, UIN Walisongo. Analysis was conducted using Feez’s (1998) framework and the categorization of connectors by Celce-Murcia and Larsen-Freeman (1999).

    Main Findings: The study revealed that students frequently used modal verbs, particularly “can” and “will,” to express hedging and certainty. Causal connectors like “because” were used more than sequential ones, reflecting the argumentative nature of the texts. However, conditional clauses were underutilized or often misapplied. The texts exhibited general awareness of discussion text features but lacked full mastery in applying them correctly, especially in balancing argumentation and reasoning.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study contributes to genre-based writing pedagogy by specifically mapping the linguistic elements used in students’ discussion texts. Unlike prior research that mainly addressed discourse markers or argument structure, this study focuses on the integration of specific language features, offering insight into students’ actual grammatical competence within the context of academic genres.

  • How to cite

    Exploring Linguistic Elements In Students’ Written Discussion Texts. (2025). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 2(1), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i1.1959

    More Citation Formats

  • 341
    Abstract views
    213
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. Alangari, S. Jaworska, and J. Laws, “Who’s afraid of phrasal verbs? The use of phrasal verbs in expert academic writing in the discipline of linguistics,” J. English Acad. Purp., vol. 43, p. 100814, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814
    2. P. E. Jones and C. Read, “Mythbusters united? A dialogue over Harris’s integrationist linguistics and Gibson’s Ecological Psychology,” Lang. Sci., vol. 97, p. 101536, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101536
    3. T. T. Voorhees and O. Vorobel, “Integrating qualitative research into the community college linguistics course: An autoethnographic inquiry,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 2, no. June, p. 100053, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100053
    4. E. Leivada and E. Murphy, “Mind the (terminological) gap: 10 misused, ambiguous, or polysemous terms in linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 8, p. 100073, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2021.100073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2021.100073
    5. K. U. Isisag, “The efficacy of macro-linguistics in developing reading skills: An integrated lesson plan,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 698–703, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.220
    6. C. G. Quan, “Continuing with the promise of ‘Scratch’ in the applied linguistics classroom,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 103, pp. 245–254, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.332
    7. M. A. Candel-Mora and C. Vargas-Sierra, “An analysis of research production in corpus linguistics applied to translation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 95, pp. 317–324, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.653
    8. R. Z. Abid and S. A. Manan, Integrating corpus linguistics in critical literacy pedagogy: A case study of lance armstrong’s transformation from a titleholder to a fraud, vol. 208, no. Icllic 2014. Elsevier B.V., 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189
    9. H. Jalali, “Reflection of stance through it bundles in applied linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 4, pp. 30–39, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001
    10. M. Pikhart, “New horizons of intercultural communication: Applied linguistics approach,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 152, pp. 954–957, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.349
    11. H. Bromhead, “Disaster linguistics, climate change semantics and public discourse studies: a semantically-enhanced discourse study of 2011 Queensland Floods,” Lang. Sci., vol. 85, p. 101381, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381
    12. A. M. Fazilatfar and Z. S. Naseri, “Rhetorical moves in applied linguistics articles and their corresponding iranian writer identity,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 489–498, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444
    13. K. Belousov, E. Erofeeva, T. Erofeeva, Y. Leshchenko, and N. Zelyanskaya, “University teachers of linguistics and self-image of their profession,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 214, no. June, pp. 667–676, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.667
    14. T. Popescu, “Developing english linguistics students’ translation competence through the language learning process,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 1075–1079, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.333
    15. Z. E. Attia, A. M. Gadallah, and H. M. Hefny, “An enhanced multi-view fuzzy information retrieval model based on linguistics,” IERI Procedia, vol. 7, pp. 90–95, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.015
    16. Z. Seifoori and J. Fattahi, “The comparison of the method section of applied linguistics articles written by native and iranian writers in terms of grammatical complexity and clause types,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 1698–1705, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.596
    17. J. M.-H. Lim, J. M. Storey, S.-L. Chang, M. S. Esa, and S. A. Damit, “Preface: Multiple roles of language and linguistics in society,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 134, no. Iclalis 2013, pp. 1–2, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.217
    18. L. Wang, “Designing and implementing outcome-based learning in a linguistics course: A case study in Hong Kong,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 12, pp. 9–18, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.004
    19. A. V. Tsepilova and L. V. Mikhaleva, “Working with formulaic language as a way to evaluate and improve EFL non-linguistics students’ pragmatic skills in a culture-specific contextual situation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 200, no. October, pp. 550–556, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022
    20. Y. Wang and J. Soler, “Investigating predatory publishing in political science: a corpus linguistics approach,” Appl. Corpus Linguist., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 100001, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100001
    21. S. Pesina and T. Solonchak, “Concept in cognitive linguistics and biocognitive science,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 192, no. 3519, pp. 587–592, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.100
    22. A. L. R. Schuster, N. L. Crossnohere, N. B. Campoamor, I. L. Hollin, and J. F. P. Bridges, “The rise of best-worst scaling for prioritization: A transdisciplinary literature review,” J. Choice Model., vol. 50, no. May 2023, p. 100466, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100466
    23. T. A. Shiryaeva, A. A. Arakelova, E. V. Tikhonova, and N. M. Mekeko, “Anti-, Non-, and Dis-: the linguistics of negative meanings about youtube,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 12, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05763
    24. N. V. Semenova and A. N. Sitsyna-Kudryavtseva, “About the term ‘dependent taxis’ in modern linguistics,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 200, no. October, pp. 149–156, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.036
    25. M. Brooke, “‘Feminist’ in the sociology of sport: An analysis using legitimation code theory and corpus linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 7, p. 100068, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2020.100068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2020.100068
    26. H. Van Pham, P. Moore, and B. Cong Cuong, “Applied picture fuzzy sets with knowledge reasoning and linguistics in clinical decision support system,” Neurosci. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 100109, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100109
    27. S. Rezaei, D. Kuhi, and M. Saeidi, “Diachronic corpus analysis of stance markers in research articles: The field of applied linguistics,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2021.1872165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1872165
    28. D. Khairiah, S. Fatinah, J. Endardi, Nursyamsi, and D. Atmawati, “Genetic relationship between Kaili and Pamona languages: a historical comparative linguistics study,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2409517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2409517
    29. M. Diko, “Harmonizing Africa’s linguistic symphony: navigating the complexities of translating African literature using a postcolonial theory,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2411871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2411871
    30. R. Nhongo and L. Siziba, “Intellectualising African languages in literature and linguistics at selected Zimbabwean higher learning institutions,” South African J. African Lang., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 223–230, 2024, doi: 10.1080/02572117.2024.2385262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2024.2385262
    31. R. Iye, I. W. Simpen, I. N. Sedeng, I. M. Netra, I. M. Said, and F. I. N. Abida, “Language contextualization in public space in Maluku Province: A landscape linguistics study,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2247648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2247648
    32. I. Mukahal and M. M. Idrus, “Negation forms in the poetry of philip larkin,” Comp. Lit. East West, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 207–220, 2024, doi: 10.1080/25723618.2024.2395216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2024.2395216
    33. L. Fontaine, “On prepositions and particles: A case for lexical representation in systemic functional linguistics,” Word, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 115–135, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00437956.2017.1309029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2017.1309029
    34. Hendrokumoro, F. Darman, N. Nuraeni, and N. K. Ma’shumah, “The genetic relationship between alune, lisabata, luhu, and wemale (western seram, Indonesia): A historical-comparative linguistics approach,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2306718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2306718
    35. D. A. S. El-Dakhs, L. Mardini, and L. Alhabbad, “The persuasive strategies in more and less prestigious linguistics journals: focus on research article abstracts,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2325760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2325760
    36. L. Zhao and P. Issra, “Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) research articles unpacked: a systemic functional linguistics (SFL) elemental genre approach,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2317617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2317617
    37. C. Yue, “We make viewpoints in different ways: the use of stance adverbials across academic levels and disciplines,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2435169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2435169
    38. M. P. Di Buono, H. Gonçalo Oliveira, V. Barbu Mititelu, B. Spahiu, and G. Nolano, “Paving the way for enriched metadata of linguistic linked data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1133–1157, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-222994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-222994
    39. D. Gromann et al., “Multilinguality and LLOD: A survey across linguistic description levels,” Semant. Web, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1915–1958, 2024, doi: 10.3233/SW-243591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-243591
    40. A. F. Khan et al., “When linguistics meets web technologies. Recent advances in modelling linguistic linked data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 987–1050, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-222859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-222859
    41. R. Kopečková, U. Gut, M. Wrembel, and A. Balas, “Phonological cross-linguistic influence at the initial stages of L3 acquisition,” Second Lang. Res., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1107–1131, 2023, doi: 10.1177/02676583221123994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221123994
    42. R. Alshalan and H. S. Alyousef, “Enhancing English–Arabic translator education through systemic functional linguistics: a study in a Saudi undergraduate classroom,” Saudi J. Lang. Stud., 2025, doi: 10.1108/sjls-09-2024-0054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-09-2024-0054
    43. A. Q. Al Darwesh, “The representation of authorial and external voice in popular science book writing: a systemic functional linguistics approach,” Saudi J. Lang. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 108–127, 2025, doi: 10.1108/sjls-08-2024-0043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-08-2024-0043
    44. A. Sendra, E. Late, and S. Kumpulainen, “From data lifecycle to research activity model: research data management in data-intensive social sciences and humanities research,” Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2025, doi: 10.1108/AJIM-12-2024-0959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2024-0959
    45. O. A. J. Mascarenhas, M. Thakur, and P. Kumar, “On assumptions, presumptions, suppositions, and presuppositions,” A Prim. Crit. Think. Bus. Ethics, pp. 223–253, 2024, doi: 10.1108/978-1-83753-346-620241008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-346-620241008
    46. L. Capoani, M. Fantinelli, and L. Giordano, “The concept of resilience in economics: a comprehensive analysis and systematic review of economic literature,” Contin. Resil. Rev., 2025, doi: 10.1108/crr-11-2024-0045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CRR-11-2024-0045
    47. K. Berglund, M. Bertilsson, U. Hermansson, M. Sager, E. Wikstrom, and G. Hensing, “Determinants of alcohol preventive actions by managers: a cross-sectional study among Swedish managers,” Int. J. Work. Heal. Manag., no. 220180, 2025, doi: 10.1108/IJWHM-12-2024-0258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-12-2024-0258
    48. K. M. Al-Balushi, “Teaching english as discourse in Sultan Qaboos University,” Learn. Teach. High. Educ. Gulf Perspect., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 30–41, 2010, doi: 10.18538/lthe.v7.n1.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18538/lthe.v7.n1.18
    49. A. H. Al-Hoorie and A. A. K. AlAwdah, “Transdisciplinary integration for applied linguistics: the case of electrophysiology,” Saudi J. Lang. Stud., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 2024, doi: 10.1108/sjls-06-2024-0028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-06-2024-0028
    50. A. A. Zughaibi, “The barefoot shoemaker’s son: examining EFL teachers’ pragmatic competence in a Saudi context,” Saudi J. Lang. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 68–83, 2022, doi: 10.1108/sjls-02-2022-0013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-02-2022-0013