Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal

Analysis Use Preposition VON and AUS In Indonesian

Vita Anggraini
Senior High School 02
Indonesia
vitaangg@gmail.com
Godwin Ulick Nnko
Tanzania, United Republic of
Mona Zikri
Egypt
Share

  • Purpose of the study : Research This aiming For understand the meaning produced by the preposition von and aus in various situation communication . Pragmatics focus on usage Language in context real , so that can give outlook about How preposition This used For convey appropriate meaning​ with situation communication.

    Methodology: Research This use method descriptive qualitative For analyze preposition from and worn out in Indonesian . Data obtained from text translation , interview informants , and observations conversation . Analysis covers data reduction , classification function preposition , interpretation contextual , and triangulation For ensure validity results .

    Main Findings: Research This find that von more often used for show origin or connection ownership, while aus referring to the material or origin physical. Error translation often happen consequence translation literally, as in the sentence I am like that from Germany , which is more appropriate translated as "I come from from Germany" rather than "I'm coming from Germany". In pragmatics, by refers to the relationship abstract, whereas worn out more describe connection physique or material. Structure more Indonesian​ flexible prioritize context conversation, not rule grammatical strict .

    Novelty/Originality of this study: Novelty study This lies in the approach holistic that combines analysis translation, interviews , and observations For understand use preposition in context real. Research this also highlights importance understanding pragmatic in translation and providing contribution to teaching German and Indonesian, especially in avoid error general and understanding difference culture as well as linguistics between second language.

  • How to cite

    Analysis Use Preposition VON and AUS In Indonesian. (2024). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 1(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v1i2.1381

    More Citation Formats

  • 415
    Abstract views
    213
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. D. W. Nanda et al., “Exploring Indonesian senior high school teachers’ perceptions of first language use in teaching English,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 371–381, 2024, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21013
    2. D. Kumalasari, H. Purwanta, and S. Aw, “Comparative analysis of Generation Z’s digital history literacy in history education majors on Java Island: A study of history digital literacy,” J. Educ. e-Learning Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 90–96, 2024, doi: 10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5342
    3. M. Y. M. Aba Sha’Ar and N. L. Rofiah, “Examining Indonesian english as a foreign language lecturers’ attitudes towards translanguaging and its perceived pedagogical benefits: a mixed-methods study,” Cent. Educ. Policy Stud. J., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 117–141, 2024, doi: 10.26529/cepsj.1833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1833
    4. L. Alba-López, “Configuring collocations and prepositions in essay writing through a corpus-based strategy estructuración de colocaciones y preposiciones en escritura de ensayos usando un corpus lingüístico,” HOW, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 89–126, 2024, doi: 10.19183/how.31.2.790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19183/how.31.2.790
    5. N. I. Halil, H. Yawan, A. N. Hasanah, H. Syam, N. H. Andas, and Marhamah, “A new program to foster inclusion: unraveling language teachers’ pedagogical practices to differentiated instruction,” Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 370–383, 2024, doi: 10.26858/ijole.v8i2.64997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i2.64997
    6. W. Jiang, “The relationship between culture and language,” ELT J., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 328–334, 2000, doi: 10.1093/elt/54.4.328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.4.328
    7. N. Setyorini, “Imaginaries, Desires, and Koneksi (Connections): English Language Proficiency for Indonesian Accountants,” 2017. doi: 10.26190/unsworks/19547.
    8. M. B. Calavia, T. Blanco, and R. Casas, “Fostering creativity as a problem-solving competence through design: Think-Create-Learn, a tool for teachers,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 39, pp. 1–30, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100761
    9. F. T. Nephawe, “Evaluating embodied pedagogical game approach in the learning of selected prepositions of time,” JET (Journal English Teaching), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 150–164, 2023, doi: 10.33541/jet.v9i2.4210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v9i2.4210
    10. D. N. Djou, A. Ntelu, and E. Hinta, “Analysis of code-mixing in marriage proposals among gorontalo people in Indonesia,” Eurasian J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 48–58, 2023, doi: 10.32601/ejal.901005.
    11. H. Y. Leo, “A corpus-driven approach on learning near synonyms of pain in Indonesian,” IAFOR J. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 101–119, 2023, doi: 10.22492/ije.11.1.06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.11.1.06
    12. N. Chojimah and E. Widodo, “Figurative forms of gender equality in indonesian female ulama’s speeches,” Eurasian J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 237–246, 2022, doi: 10.32601/ejal.803019.
    13. M. A. Thohir, E. Ahdhianto, S. Mas’ula, F. A. Yanti, and M. I. Sukarelawan, “The effects of TPACK and facility condition on preservice teachers’ acceptance of virtual reality in science education course,” Contemp. Educ. Technol., vol. 15, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/12918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12918
    14. M. A1, M. Zuljalal, and A. Hamdany, “Code-Switching as the communication strategy: indonesian-english code switching between Hotel’S Employees,” 2022. [Online]. Available: www.jlls.org
    15. G. A. Dharmaputra, “Language policy, ideology and language attitudes: a study of indonesian parents and their choice of language in the home,” University of Sydney, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/handle/2123/20291/dharmaputra_ga_thesis.pdf
    16. N. J. Turner, A. Cuerrier, and L. Joseph, “Well grounded: Indigenous Peoples’ knowledge, ethnobiology and sustainability,” People Nat., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 627–651, 2022, doi: 10.1002/pan3.10321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10321
    17. R. J. Tulabut, R. V. Guzman, P. R. M. Abaring, A. P. Armada, A. H. Ilustre, and M. J. T. Torda, “Common errors in prepositions committed by grade 9 students: implications for teachings,” TESOL Int. J., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 113–123, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1247198.pdf
    18. M. Ahsanu, T. Purwati, and E. Wardani, “Unpacking reflective practice in the praxis of english language teaching in Indonesia,” Arab World English J., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 272–290, 2020, doi: 10.24093/awej/vol11no4.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.18
    19. B. Koskoviku and M. Vokrri, “Intransitive prepositions in Albanian language,” J. Lang. Linguist. Stud., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 412–420, 2021, doi: 10.52462/jlls.25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.25
    20. S. Arsyad, S. Nur, A. Nasihin, Syahrial, and Z. Adnan, “Writing in a foreign language: The rhetorical and argument styles in research article drafts by nonnative speakers of english in linguistics and language education,” Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 135–151, 2021, doi: 10.26858/ijole.v5i3.19506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i3.19506
    21. R. Mantasiah, Yusri, M. Anwar, and Hasmawati, “Integrating linguistics theories in developing foreign language teaching material (German grammar textbook for indonesian learners),” Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 125–134, 2021, doi: 10.26858/ijole.v5i3.20239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i3.20239
    22. R. F. Aajami, “A cognitive linguistic study of the English prepositions above, on, and over,” J. Lang. Linguist. Stud., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 738–751, 2021, doi: 10.52462/jlls.216.
    23. N. Alaowffi and B. Alharbi, “Preposition stranding under sluicing: Evidence from Hijazi Arabic,” J. Lang. Linguist. Stud., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 941–957, 2021, doi: 10.52462/jlls.65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.65
    24. V. Phan, L. Wright, and B. Decent, “Addressing competing objectives in allocating funds to scholarships and need-based financial aid,” Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Educ. Data Mining, EDM 2022, no. July, pp. 110–121, 2022, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6853028.
    25. T. Ningsih, D. M. Yuwono, M. S. Sholehuddin, and A. W. B. Suharto, “The significant of e-assessment for indonesian literacy with character education in pandemic era,” J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 231–256, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1334431
    26. E. Ningsih, “Increasing student learning motivation using inquiry methods in chemistry lessons,” J. Chem. Learn. Innov., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v1i1.1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jocli.v1i1.1017
    27. D. Wahyuni, Y. Maulina, A. Mulia, and Sunardi, “Cultural discourse in reading texts of indonesian language proficiency test,” Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 356–371, 2021, doi: 10.26858/ijole.v5i4.23590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i4.23590
    28. F. Rosi, A. Abdurrahman, and W. Wahyuni, “The hybrid learning model; a teacher strategies in learning management during pandemic,” EDURELIGIA J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 76–88, 2022, doi: 10.33650/edureligia.v6i1.3651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/edureligia.v6i1.3651
    29. T. M. Silviyanti, Y. Q. Yusuf, and S. Akmal, “From words to wealth: decoding the language markers and compositions of shop names in Banda Aceh,” Humanit. Arts Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 673–688, 2024, doi: 10.69598/hasss.24.3.267548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69598/hasss.24.3.267548
    30. E. Setyaningsih, “Competing a family language policy in two generations of transnational families in Indonesia : a case study,” JOLLT, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1641–1656, 2024, doi: 10.33394/jollt.v12i4.11746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i4.11746
    31. L. Liu, “Using generic inductive approach in qualitative educational research: a case study analysis,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 129, 2016, doi: 10.5539/jel.v5n2p129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p129
    32. B. R. Romijn, P. L. Slot, and P. P. M. Leseman, “Increasing teachers’ intercultural competences in teacher preparation programs and through professional development: A review,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 98, p. 103236, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103236
    33. Lukman et al., “Effective teachers’ personality in strengthening character education,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 512–521, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21629
    34. S. Gultom, A. F. Hutauruk, and A. M. Ginting, “Teaching skills of teacher in increasing student learning interest,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Inst. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1564–1569, 2020, doi: 10.33258/birci.v3i3.1086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i3.1086
    35. B. W. Pratolo and H. A. Solikhati, “Investigating teachers’ attitude toward digital literacy in EFL classroom,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 97–103, 2020, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.15747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.15747
    36. H. Kurniawan, R. Y. Purwoko, and D. S. Setiana, “Integrating cultural artifacts and tradition from remote regions in developing mathematics lesson plans to enhance mathematical literacy,” J. Pedagog. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 61–74, 2024, doi: 10.33902/JPR.202423016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202423016
    37. L. Prior, “Content analysis,” Oxford Handb. Qual. Res., no. January 2016, pp. 541–568, 2020, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190847388.013.25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190847388.013.25
    38. E. Kiel, A. Braun, M. Muckenthaler, U. Heimlich, and S. Weiss, “Self-efficacy of teachers in inclusive classes. How do teachers with different self-efficacy beliefs differ in implementing inclusion?,” Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 333–349, 2020, doi: 10.1080/08856257.2019.1683685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1683685
    39. M. Kendrick, M. Early, A. Michalovich, and M. Mangat, “Digital storytelling with youth from refugee backgrounds: possibilities for language and digital literacy learning,” TESOL Q., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 961–984, 2022, doi: 10.1002/tesq.3146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3146
    40. B. R. Werang, I. M. Suarjana, K. K. Dewi, and S. I. Asaloei, “Indonesian language teachers’ teaching performance and students’ learning outcomes,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1271–1277, 2023, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24949
    41. O. J. Ballance, “Sampling and randomisation in experimental and quasi-experimental CALL studies: Issues and recommendations for design, reporting, review, and interpretation,” ReCALL, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 58–71, 2024, doi: 10.1017/S0958344023000162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000162
    42. S. Wahjusaputri and B. Bunyamin, “Development of teaching factory competency-based for vocational secondary education in Central Java, Indonesia,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 353–360, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21709
    43. M. Oktavia, C. Hiltrimartin, and D. Wati, “Improving student learning outcomes using crossword based worksheet in primary schools,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 98–103, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jber.v4i3.725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v4i3.725