SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal

Implementation of Information and Communication Technology Media in Project-Based Learning and Its Impact on Learning Outcomes in Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solution Material

Rian Kadarusman
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University
Indonesia
kdrsrianman@gmail.com
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to examine the influence of information and communication technology media applied in project-based learning on student learning outcomes in the material of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions.

    Methodology: The research method used was a quasi-experimental design with a pretest and posttest design for two groups. Two classes were randomly selected as the experimental and control groups. The experimental group used information and communication technology media in project-based learning, while the control group used a demonstration method. Data were obtained through tests and analyzed to determine the effect of the treatment.

    Main Findings: The analysis results show that the use of information and communication technology media in project-based learning has a positive impact on student learning outcomes. This is evidenced by the calculated t value being greater than the t table, which is 2.2, which is greater than 1.671. Furthermore, the posttest score for the experimental group was also higher than that of the control group, indicating a significant improvement in learning outcomes.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers novelty by integrating information and communication technology media within project-based learning specifically for electrolyte and non-electrolyte solution topics, which are often abstract for students. It advances existing knowledge by demonstrating how technology-enhanced learning projects improve conceptual understanding and learning outcomes, providing a more interactive and student-centered approach compared to conventional instructional methods.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    R. Kadarusman, “Implementation of Information and Communication Technology Media in Project-Based Learning and Its Impact on Learning Outcomes in Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solution Material”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 76–83, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v3i1.2990.

    More Citation Formats

  • 58
    Abstract views
    38
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. T. Sumual, H. Lumapow, and V. Rotty, “The role of human capital investment in improving the quality of human resources (HR) in education in the digital era,” Asian J. Eng. Soc. Heal., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 2520–2528, 2024, doi: 10.46799/ajesh.v3i11.449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v3i11.449
    2. N. Prykhodkina, M. Tsynova, H. Kravets, O. Нrechanovska, and V. Nichyshyna, “The role of interactive technologies in improving the quality of learning and development of scientific competences in modern education,” Period. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 69–82, 2025, doi: 10.21533/pen.v13.i1.253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v13.i1.253
    3. P. Onu, A. Pradhan, and C. Mbohwa, Potential to use metaverse for future teaching and learning, vol. 29, no. 7. 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12167-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12167-9
    4. M. A. Adeoye, K. A. S. I. Wirawan, M. S. S. Pradnyani, and N. I. Septiarini, “Revolutionizing education: unleashing the power of the ADDIE model for effective teaching and learning,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 202–209, 2024, doi: 10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624
    5. N. H. Ahmed, J. Andersion, and A. Garcíae Martínez, “Innovative blended learning approaches to enhance student engagement in university,” J. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2024, doi: 10.71305/jtl.v1i1.100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71305/jtl.v1i1.100
    6. J. Saheli, “Innovative teaching strategies for better student engagement and tips of implementation,” Pen Prosper., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 145–155, 2025, doi: 10.70798/pp/020300018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70798/PP/020300018
    7. N. Fitriyana, H. Pratomo, A. Wiyarsi, and Marfuatun, “In-service high school chemistry teachers’ view towards chemistry: Is it a difficult subject?,” 2023, p. 040016. doi: 10.1063/5.0109916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0109916
    8. Y. Rahmawati, Z. Zulhipri, O. Hartanto, I. Falani, and D. Iriyadi, “Students’ conceptual understanding in chemistry learning using PhET interactive simulations,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 303–326, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3926/jotse.1597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1597
    9. E. Hidayanti and S. Senam, Electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions: The effectiveness of project-based Learning on students’ analytical thinking ability, no. Icriems 2022. Atlantis Press SARL, 2025. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-481-5_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-481-5_3
    10. W. Siswaningsih, B. Susetyo, A. S. Ariesta, and T. Rahmawati, “Implementation of minimum competency assessment (MCA) containing ethnoscience on the topic of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions,” 2023, p. 090009. doi: 10.1063/5.0113856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113856
    11. L. Jelovica, N. Erceg, V. Mešić, and I. Aviani, “Students’ understanding of microscopic models of electrical and thermal conductivity: Findings within the development of a multiple-choice concept inventory,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–26, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14030275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030275
    12. T. Wang et al., “Approaches to enhancing electrical conductivity of pristine metal–organic frameworks for supercapacitor applications,” Small, vol. 18, no. 32, pp. 1–17, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1002/smll.202203307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202203307
    13. A. Nguyen, M. Kremantzis, A. Essien, I. Petrounias, and S. Hosseini, “Enhancing student engagement through artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the basics, opportunities, and challenges,” J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.53761/caraaq92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/caraaq92
    14. N. A. Johar, S. N. Kew, Z. Tasir, and E. Koh, “Learning analytics on student engagement to enhance students’ learning performance: A systematic review,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1–25, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15107849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107849
    15. K. M. Malik and M. Zhu, “Do project-based learning, hands-on activities, and flipped teaching enhance student’s learning of introductory theoretical computing classes?,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3581–3604, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11350-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11350-8
    16. E. Karan and L. Brown, “Enhancing student’s problem-solving skills through project-based learning,” J. Probl. Based Learn. High. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 74–87, 2022, doi: 10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v10i1.6887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v10i1.6887
    17. A. Fauzan, M. Ardiansyah, and A. S. Fauzan, “A systematic literature review on the role of digital learning Media in improving learning outcomes,” J. Vokasi Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 160–173, 2025, doi: 10.24036/javit.v5i1.217.
    18. I. W. Kandia, N. M. Suarningsih, W. Wahdah, A. Arifin, J. Jenuri, and D. M. Suwarma, “The strategic role of learning media in optimizing student learning outcomes,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 508–514, 2023, doi: 10.37985/jer.v4i2.193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i2.193
    19. M. David, W. Derigent, G. Loubet, A. Takacs, and D. Dragomirescu, “Communicating materials: communicating concrete development for construction industry,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 6983–6994, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TII.2024.3352261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2024.3352261
    20. S. O. Ajwang and A. W. Nambiro, “Climate change adaptation and mitigation using information and communication technology,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 6, pp. 1046–1063, 2022, doi: 10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.101.
    21. M. Garlinska, M. Osial, K. Proniewska, and A. Pregowska, “The influence of emerging technologies on distance education,” Electron., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1–29, 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12071550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071550
    22. S. Timotheou et al., “Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 6695–6726, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
    23. P. Setiawan, W. Wahidin, and A. G. Arip, “Application of the project based (PjBL) model through making tempe to improve student learning outcomes and creativity,” Begin. J. Teach. Educ. Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 37–49, 2023, doi: 10.61166/bgn.v1i2.37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54783/influencejournal.v5i2.153
    24. T. Wulandari and N. A. F. Nawangsari, “Project-based learning in the merdeka curriculum in terms of primary school students’ learning outcomes,” EDUKASIA J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 31–42, 2024, doi: 10.62775/edukasia.v5i2.793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v5i2.793
    25. B. Harahap, “The effect of image media on learning outcomes of class V MIS students in siboruangin village in information communication technology (ICT) subjects,” J. Inform., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 2022, doi: 10.57094/ji.v1i1.352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57094/ji.v1i1.352
    26. W. L. Zen, I. Zukdi, Z. Zulfahmi, and Z. Trinova, “Implementing information and communication technology-based learning (ICT-Based Learning) models to increase student learning motivation,” Society, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 579–590, 2022, doi: 10.33019/society.v10i2.450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v10i2.450
    27. J. S. O. Zajić and J. Maksimović, “Quasi-experimental research as an epistemological-methodological approach in education research,” Int. J. Cogn. Res. Sci. Eng. Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 177–183, 2022, doi: 10.23947/2334-8496-2022-10-3-177-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2022-10-3-177-183
    28. O. J. Ballance, “Sampling and randomisation in experimental and quasi-experimental CALL studies: Issues and recommendations for design, reporting, review, and interpretation,” ReCALL, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 58–71, 2024, doi: 10.1017/S0958344023000162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000162
    29. N. D. Nayeri, F. A. Noodeh, H. S. Nia, A. Yaghoobzadeh, K. A. Allen, and A. H. Goudarzian, “Statistical procedures used in pretest-posttest control group design: A review of papers in five iranian journals,” Acta Med. Iran., vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 584–591, 2023, doi: 10.18502/acta.v61i10.15657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v61i10.15657
    30. S. K. Ahmed, “How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers,” Oral Oncol. Reports, vol. 12, no. 100662 Contents, pp. 1–7, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662
    31. F. Nyimbili and L. Nyimbili, “Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies,” Br. J. Multidiscip. Adv. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90–99, 2024, doi: 10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419
    32. C. Choirudin, R. Sugianto, R. Darmayanti, and I. Muhammad, “Teacher competence in the preparation of test and non-test instruments,” J. Teach. Learn. Math., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2023, doi: 10.22219/jtlm.v1i1.27695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jtlm.v1i1.27695
    33. E. Hidayatullah, “Evaluating the effectiveness of ChatGPT to improve English students’ writing skills,” Conf. Ser., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2024.
    34. F. Habibzadeh, “Data distribution: Normal or abnormal?,” J. Korean Med. Sci., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2024, doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e35
    35. Y. Zhou, Y. Zhu, and W. K. Wong, “Statistical tests for homogeneity of variance for clinical trials and recommendations,” Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun., vol. 33, no. 101119, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101119
    36. J. A. Montero, “A structured guide to univariate test selection based on normality, variance homogeneity, and graphical data exploration,” J. Surg. Res., vol. 318, pp. 230–240, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.053
    37. M. B. Mutanga, “Students’ perspectives and experiences in project-based learning: A qualitative study,” Trends High. Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 903–911, 2024, doi: 10.3390/higheredu3040052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3040052
    38. H.-Y. Chang, Y.-J. Chang, and M.-J. Tsai, “Strategies and difficulties during students’ construction of data visualizations,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1–22, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40594-024-00463-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00463-w
    39. E. Xu, W. Wang, and Q. Wang, “The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1
    40. Z. Zulkifli, M. Kristiawan, and R. N. Sasongko, “Improving students’ active learning through demonstration method,” AL-ISHLAH J. Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 6539–6550, 2022, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2313
    41. A. Mabe, K. Brown, J. E. Frick, and F. Padovan, “Using technology to enhance project-based learning in high school: a phenomenological study,” Educ. Leadersh. Rev. Dr. Res., vol. 10, p. 2022, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1380610
    42. M. Mielikäinen, E. Viippola, and T. Tepsa, “Experiences of a project-based blended learning approach in a community of inquiry from information and communication technology engineering students at Lapland university of applied sciences in Finland,” E-Learning Digit. Media, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 406–426, 2024, doi: 10.1177/20427530231164053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231164053