SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal


Innovation in Augmented Reality-Based Chemical Bonding Learning Media to Support Interactive Learning

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine students’ responses toward an interactive learning media based on augmented reality technology on chemical bonding material, focusing on usability, visualization, material benefits, language clarity, and potential impact in supporting interactive learning experiences.

    Methodology: This study employed the Warsita development model consisting of design, production, and evaluation stages. The developed media included an augmented reality application integrated with a marker book. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire consisting of 40 items administered to 40 students. Validation involved media and subject experts, and data were analyzed using percentage techniques and interpretation criteria.

    Main Findings: Students showed positive responses toward the augmented reality-based interactive learning media, categorized as good overall. High acceptance was reflected in usability and illustration aspects, while material benefits, grammar, and future impact were also positively rated. The media demonstrated feasibility for classroom use with minor improvements needed for long-term learning engagement.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study presents an augmented reality-based interactive learning media specifically designed for chemical bonding with integrated marker books and application features. It emphasizes students’ response evaluation across multiple aspects, providing empirical insight into user acceptance and contributing to the development of more effective and engaging chemistry learning media.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    A. I. Nur, F. . Amina, T. . Desrina, and T. . Secha, “Innovation in Augmented Reality-Based Chemical Bonding Learning Media to Support Interactive Learning”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 69–75, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v3i1.2988.
  • 48
    Abstract views
    42
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. I. Fitrianto, “Innovation and technology in Arabic language learning in Indonesia: Trends and implications,” Int. J. Post Axial Futur. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 134–150, 2024, doi: 10.59944/postaxial.v2i3.375.
    2. W. Park and H. Kwon, “Implementing artificial intelligence education for middle school technology education in Republic of Korea,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 109–135, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10798-023-09812-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09812-2
    3. A. Firdaus, A. Amrullah, L. Robiatul Adawiyah, Q. Yuliati Zakiah, and S. Supiana, “Enhancing learning quality and student engagement: Utilizing digital technology in islamic education,” Int. J. Nusant. Islam, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 206–2018, 2023, doi: 10.15575/ijni.v11i2.29960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v11i2.29960
    4. M. Godsk and K. L. Møller, Engaging students in higher education with educational technology, vol. 30, no. 3. Springer US, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12901-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12901-x
    5. E. Nurhidayat, J. Mujiyanto, I. Yuliasri, and R. Hartono, “Technology integration and teachers’ competency in the development of 21st-century learning in EFL classroom,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 342–349, 2024, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21069
    6. K. Rigopouli, D. Kotsifakos, and Y. Psaromiligkos, “Vygotsky’s creativity options and ideas in 21st-century technology-enhanced learning design,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15020257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020257
    7. K. Logeswaran et al., “Unifying technologies in industry 4.0,” in Topics in Artificial Intelligence Applied to Industry 4.0, Wiley, 2024, pp. 127–147. doi: 10.1002/9781394216147.ch7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394216147.ch7
    8. C. E. Mendoza-ramírez, J. C. Tudon-martinez, L. C. Félix-herrán, A. Vargas-martínez, and J. D. J. Lozoya-santos, “applied sciences Augmented Reality : Survey,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 1–35, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810491
    9. V. T. T. Hoai, P. N. Son, D. T. T. An, and N. V. Anh, “An investigation into whether applying Augmented Reality (AR) in teaching chemistry enhances chemical cognitive ability,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 195–216, 2024, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.23.4.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.11
    10. Q. Liu, J. Ma, S. Yu, Q. Wang, and S. Xu, “Effects of an augmented reality-based chemistry experiential application on student knowledge Gains, learning motivation, and technology perception,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 153–167, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10956-022-10014-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10014-z
    11. S. Ji, N. A. M. Mokmin, and J. Wang, “Evaluating the impact of augmented reality on visual communication design education: Enhancing student motivation, achievement, interest, and engagement,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 6617–6639, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13050-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13050-x
    12. N. Abdullah, V. L. Baskaran, Z. Mustafa, S. R. Ali, and S. H. Zaini, “Augmented reality: The effect in students’ achievement, atisfaction and interest in cience education,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 326–350, 2022, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.21.5.17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.5.17
    13. T. H. H. van Dulmen, T. C. Visser, F. G. M. Coenders, B. Pepin, and S. McKenney, “Learning to teach chemical bonding: a framework for preservice teacher educators,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 896–913, 2022, doi: 10.1039/d2rp00049k. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00049K
    14. H. Rahman, S. A. Wahid, F. Ahmad, and N. Ali, “Game-based learning in metaverse: Virtual chemistry classroom for chemical bonding for remote education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 15, pp. 19595–19619, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12575-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12575-5
    15. M. Wuttig, C. F. Schön, J. Lötfering, P. Golub, C. Gatti, and J. Y. Raty, “Revisiting the nature of chemical bonding in chalcogenides to explain and design their properties,” Adv. Mater., vol. 35, no. 20, pp. 1–28, 2023, doi: 10.1002/adma.202208485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202208485
    16. L. Su et al., “Direct observation of elemental fluctuation and oxygen octahedral distortion-dependent charge distribution in high entropy oxides,” Nat. Commun., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30018-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30018-y
    17. J. Levy, I. C. Chagunda, V. Iosub, D. C. Leitch, and J. S. McIndoe, “MoleculAR: An augmented reality application for understanding 3D geometry,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 2533–2539, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01045
    18. T. Bouchée, L. de Putter - Smits, M. Thurlings, and B. Pepin, “Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses,” Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 183–202, 2022, doi: 10.1080/03057267.2021.1963579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1963579
    19. F. Daryanes, D. Darmadi, K. Fikri, I. Sayuti, M. A. Rusandi, and D. D. B. Situmorang, “The development of articulate storyline interactive learning media based on case methods to train student’s problem-solving ability,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15082
    20. D. Priambudi, Y. Sutopo, and Supriyadi, “Augmented reality learning media with a problem-based learning model to enhance the students’ comprehension on mathematical concepts,” Int. J. Res. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 323–334, 2024, doi: 10.26877/ijre.v4i2.701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v4i2.701
    21. A. S. Whatoni and H. Sutrisno, “Development of a learning module aspported by augmented reality on chemical bonding material to improve interest and motivation of students learning for senior High School,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2210–2218, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2057
    22. W. Tarng, Y. Tseng, and K. Ou, “Application of augmented reality for learning material structures and chemical equilibrium in high school chemistry,” System, vol. 10, no. 141, pp. 1–23, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050141
    23. A. J. Guerrero-Quiñonez, M. C. Bedoya-Flores, E. F. Mosquera-Quiñonez, Á. E. Mesías-Simisterra, and J. V. Bautista-Sánchez, “Educational platforms: Digital tools for the teaching-learning process in education,” Ibero-American J. Educ. Soc. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 259–263, 2023, doi: 10.56183/iberoeds.v3i1.626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoeds.v3i1.626
    24. H. Yaseen, A. S. Mohammad, N. Ashal, H. Abusaimeh, A. Ali, and A. A. A. Sharabati, “The impact of adaptive learning technologies, personalized feedback, and interactive AI tools on student engagement: The moderating role of digital literacy,” Sustain., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–27, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17031133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031133
    25. N. H. C. Lah, M. S. Z. M. Senu, N. F. Jumaat, D. N. E. Phon, S. Hashim, and N. N. Zulkifli, “Mobile augmented reality in learning chemistry subject: an evaluation of science exploration,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1007–1020, 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i2.25198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.25198
    26. N. Mau-Duc, P. Ngoc-Son, and T. Hoai-Minh, “Factors influencing teachers ’ adoption of augmented reality in high school chemistry education,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 346–363, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.3310
    27. M. Muklis, “The influence of innovation management on the effectiveness of digital learning media development,” Int. J. Educ. Insights Innov., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 69–74, 2025.
    28. L. N. Singelmann and D. L. Ewert, “Leveraging the innovation-based learning framework to predict and understand student success in innovation,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 36123–36139, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3163744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3163744
    29. M. Li and L. Liu, “Students’ perceptions of augmented reality integrated into a mobile learning environment,” Libr. Hi Tech, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1498–1523, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1108/LHT-10-2021-0345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-10-2021-0345
    30. M. A. Putra, E. Erman, and E. Susiyawati, “Students perception of augmented reality learning media on solar system topics,” J. Pijar Mipa, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 581–587, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v17i5.3660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i5.3660
    31. M. C. tom Dieck, E. Cranmer, A. Prim, and D. Bamford, “Can augmented reality (AR) applications enhance students’ experiences? Gratifications, engagement and learning styles,” Inf. Technol. People, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1251–1278, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1108/ITP-10-2021-0823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2021-0823
    32. T. Tarsono, S. Saadah, E. Fitriya, U. Aldi, I. Khotimah, and N. Abdillah, “Integrating augmented reality (AR) in learning to increase student engagement,” Int. J. Community Engagem. Payungi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 148–159, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://journal.payungi.org/index.php/ijcep DOI: https://doi.org/10.58879/ijcep.v5i1.89
    33. M. F. A. Hamid, M. S. Sahrir, Z. Ab. Halim, and M. F. Yahaya, “Evaluation of the usability of the animated infographic module on arabic grammar learning based on the TUP model,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2469–2479, 2023, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i12/19589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i12/19589
    34. R. L. Reyes and J. A. Villanueva, “Narrative-based concept representations: Fostering Visual cognition in the introductory chemistry classroom,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 1106–1119, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01151
    35. M. A. M. AlGerafi, Y. Zhou, M. Oubibi, and T. T. Wijaya, “Unlocking the potential: A comprehensive evaluation of augmented reality and virtual reality in education,” Electron., vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 1–29, 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12183953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953
    36. N. Drljević, I. Botički, and L. H. Wong, “Observing student engagement during augmented reality learning in early primary school,” J. Comput. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 181–213, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40692-022-00253-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00253-9
    37. M. Cerovac and T. Keane, “Early insights into Piaget’s cognitive development model through the lens of the Technologies curriculum,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 61–81, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10798-024-09906-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09906-5
    38. L. H. Lubis, B. Febriani, R. F. Yana, A. Azhar, and M. Darajat, “The use of learning media and its effect on improving the quality of student learning outcomes,” Int. J. Educ. Soc. Stud. Manag., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 7–14, 2023, doi: 10.52121/ijessm.v3i2.148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52121/ijessm.v3i2.148
    39. S. R. Kusumaningrum, U. Widiati, K. Anwar, and H. Farisia, “Integrating the technology in teaching and learning process through digital media creation as a way to improve Indonesian EYL teachers’ competence,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 197–204, 2022, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v7i5.15268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i5.15268
    40. R. Rumiyati, A. P. Lestari, and J. Juanda, “The role of learning media in enhancing the effectiveness and activeness of the learning process,” J. Didask., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 114–127, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33856/didaskalia.v8i2.614