Effect of Using Cooperative Model Think Talk Write Type and Think Pair Share Type with Talking Stick Strategy on Student Learning Outcomes
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the effect of using the cooperative model of the think talk write type and the think pair share type with the talking stick strategy on the geography learning outcomes of students in class X IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono in the 2016/2017 academic year (subject matter of inland waters and their potential).
Methodology: This research is a quasi-experimental research (Quasi Experiment) with Posttest only control design. The population in this study was class X IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono in the 2016/2017 academic year. The research sample was taken using the Cluster Random Sampling technique with three times taking from the population and obtained class X IPS 4 as the experimental class 1 (defined as the TTW Learning Method with the TS strategy), class X IPS 2 as the experimental class 2 (defined as the TPS Learning Method with the TS strategy ), and class X IPS 5 as the control class (defined as Group Discussion Method). Data collection techniques using tests, documentation and observation. The data analysis technique is parametric inferential statistics with hypothesis testing using one way Anava (one way Anava) and followed by a post Anava test (Scheffe' test) with a significant level of 5%.
Main Finding: There are differences in geography learning outcomes between the use of the TTW type cooperative learning model and the TS strategy, the TPS type and the TS strategy and group discussions with a mean score ratio of 20.69; 19.39; 18.12 and proven by the one-way anava test with a significant level of 5% obtained Fcount>Ftable (6.22706>3.08). The TTW type of cooperative learning model with the TS strategy (20.69) is better than the TPS type with the Talking Stick strategy (19.39). The TTW type cooperative learning model with the TS strategy (20.69) is better than group discussions (18.12). TPS type cooperative learning model with TS strategy (19.39) is better than group discussion (18.12). The three learning models have different qualities, the learning model that has the greatest influence is the TTW model with the TS strategy, followed by the TPS model with the TS strategy and group discussions.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The cooperative model of the think talk write type and the think pair share type with the talking stick strategy on the learning outcomes of students' geography.
References
M. Iqbal, A. A. B. Ginting, F. T. Aldila, W. A. Putri, S. Maryani, and T. Ratnawati, “Hubungan Persepsi Siswa dalam Penggunaan Web-Based Assessment dengan Karakter Siswa di SMPN 2 Batanghari,” J. Pendidik. Edutama, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2022.
W. A. Putri, R. Fitriani, E. F. Setya Rini, F. T. Aldila, and T. Ratnawati, “Pengaruh Motivasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 248–254, 2021, doi: 10.36987/jpms.v7i1.1942.
F. T. Aldila, M. M. Matondang, and L. Wicaksono, “Identifikasi Minat Belajar Siswa terhadap Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN 1 Muaro Jambi,” J. Sci. Educ. Pract., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 22–31, 2020.
A. Ramadhanti, N. N. Simamora, E. Febri, S. Rini, and R. Fitriani, “Deskripsi Motivasi Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 82–86, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i3.245.
D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. F. Setiya Rini, “Gender Analysis in Measurement Materials: Critical Thinking Ability and Science Processing Skills,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-BiRuNi, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2022, doi: 10.24042/jipf.
D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, F. T. Aldila, and H. Pathoni, “Gender and Perception: Implementation of Web-based Character Assessment in Science Learning,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jere.v6i1.37737.
A. Asrial, S. Syahrial, D. A. Kurniawan, F. T. Aldila, and M. Iqbal, “Gender and Perception: Implementation of Web-based Character Assessment on Students’ Character Outcomes,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 311–338, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jere.v6i1.37737.
N. K. D. Yunita and N. K. D. Tristiantari, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Tgt Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Tri Hita Karana Terhadap Hasil Belajar,” J. Pendidik. Multikultural Indones., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 96–107, 2018, doi: 10.23887/jpmu.v1i2.20778.
Kasimuddin, “Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TPS (Think Pair Share) untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA 2 SMAN 9 Makassar,” J. Pendidik. Fis. Univ. Muhammadiyah Makassar, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 88–105, 2016.
T. N. Azis, “Strategi Pembelajaran Era Digital,” Annu. Conf. Islam. Educ. Soc. Sains (ACIEDSS 2019), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 308–318, 2019.
Y. I. Suhara, N. D. Kiska, and F. T. Aldila, “Hubungan Karakter Gemar Membaca terhadap Hasil Belajar Tematik Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2022, doi: 10.37251/isej.v3i1.182.
F. T. Aldila, D. Darmaji, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Analisis Respon Pengguna terhadap Penerapan Web-based Assessment pada Penilaian Sikap Siswa terhadap Mata Pelajaran IPA dan Nilai-nilai Pendidikan Karakter,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1253–1262, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.2091.
B. C. Putri, F. T. Aldila, and M. M. Matondang, “Hubungan Antara Karakter Motivasi Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 45–49, 2022, doi: 10.37251/isej.v3i2.252.
F. T. Aldila, R. P. W. Yuda, M. Wulandari, and A. P. Ningsi, “Deskripsi Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMAN 10 Muaro Jambi pada Materi Kesetimbangan pada Tali,” J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 112–119, 2020.
D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and F. T. Aldila, “Students’ Perceptions in the Use of Web-Based Character Assessment: A View from Gender Perspective,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 362–383, 2021, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v.
M. Wulandari, R. P. Wirayuda, F. Aldila, and R. Wulandari, “Description of Students’ Integrated Science Process Skills on Friction Material on a Flat Field,” Lensa J. Kependidikan Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 93–103, 2020, doi: 10.33394/j-lkf.v8i2.3206.
A. Sanova, A. Bakar, A. Afrida, D. A. Kurniawan, and F. T. Aldila, “Digital Literacy on the Use of E-Module Towards Students’ Self-Directed Learning on Learning Process and Outcomes Evaluation Cources,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 154–164, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.36509.
Copyright (c) 2023 Shara Nur Istiqomah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of social knowledge education (JSKE) is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
