SINTA

3.2

Impact

Scholar

11

H-Index

Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)

an Open Access Journal


The Relationship Between Students’ Attitudes Towards Cooperative Learning Strategies and Their Academic Achievement

Share
  • Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study was to investigate students’ attitudes toward cooperative learning, their levels of academic achievement, the relationship between these two dimensions, and the reasons behind their demonstrated attitudes. 

    Methodology: This explanatory sequential mixed methods design was employed, and the convenient sampling technique was adopted to choose 422 students and 7 teachers studying and working at two Generation Schools (NGSs). A survey questionnaire and interview protocol were utilized to collect the data. The statistics, such as percentage, mean, standard deviation, and the independent samples t-test, were used to analyze the data.   

    Main Findings: The findings indicated that students’ attitudes towards cooperative learning were highly positive. The reason behind students’ attitudes towards cooperative learning focuses on its value and benefits. That is to say, students valued cooperative learning for its benefits, including the development of social skills and cognitive domain, stress reduction, enjoyment, and learning performance. However, they had some concerns, including time-consuming, conflicting interests, and potential grade drawbacks in terms of their final course grade.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The study revealed that cooperative learning improves social skills, cognitive growth, and stress reduction, but students are also concerned about efficiency and fairness in grading. Accordingly, this study shed light on the practical and emotional problems of cooperative learning that were generally missed in the literature. The findings would also provide a more complete knowledge of cooperative learning's adoption in education by bridging theoretical advantages and real-world student concerns.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    H. Nou, S. Mok, S. Lim, and S. Em, “The Relationship Between Students’ Attitudes Towards Cooperative Learning Strategies and Their Academic Achievement”, Jo. Soc. Know. Ed, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 200–210, May 2025, doi: 10.37251/jske.v6i2.1606.
  • 1097
    Abstract views
    433
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. S. Jurkowski and A. Abramczyk, “Collaboration in In-Service Teacher Training -- The Missing Link between Empirical Evidence and Practice?” Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 550–563, 2024, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2024.2327062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2024.2327062
    2. M. Kim and S. Park, “Theory Into Practice: Better Together: Promoting Cooperative Learning in Physical Education,” Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 38–40, 2024, doi: 10.1080/08924562.2024.2304177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2024.2304177
    3. Y. Lou, P. C. Abrami, J. C. Spence, C. Poulsen, B. Chambers, and S. d’Apollonia, “Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 423–458, Dec. 1996, doi: 10.3102/00346543066004423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004423
    4. G. C. Fenneman, “The Validity of Previous Experience, Aptitude, and Attitude Toward Mathematics as Predictors of Achievement in Freshman Mathematics at Wartburg College,” PhD, University of Northern Colorado, 1973.
    5. A. G. Greenwald, “Behavior change following a persuasive communication,” Journal of Personality, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 370–391, 1965, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01392.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01392.x
    6. A. S. Lamb, “Persuasion and computer-based instruction: the impact of various involvement strategies in a computer-based instruction lesson on the attitude change of college students toward the use of seat belts,” Doctor of Philosophy, Iowa State University, Digital Repository, Ames, 1987. doi: 10.31274/rtd-180813-11862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-11862
    7. G. Perry and N. Kopperman, “A Better Chance: Evaluation of Student Attitudes and Academic Performance, 1964-1972,” A Better Chance, Inc., Mar. 1973. Accessed: Mar. 13, 2025.
    8. S. Tang and P. Ruannakarn, “Implementation of Cooperative Learning Method to Enhance the Students’ Learning Ability and Students’ Core Competencies,” Higher Education Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 104–115, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v14n3p104
    9. R. J. Stahl, “The Essential Elements of Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. ERIC Digest,” Mar. 1994.
    10. N. M. Webb and L. K. Cullian, “Group Interaction and Achievement in Small Groups: Stability Over Time,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 411–423, Jan. 1983, doi: 10.3102/00028312020003411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312020003411
    11. R. M. Gillies, “The behaviors, interactions, and perceptions of junior high school students during small-group learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 137–147, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.95.1.137
    12. Ö. Kirik, “Relationship between Democratic Attitudes and Attitudes toward Implementing Cooperative Learning: A Cross-Sectional Study of Pre-Service Science Teachers,” Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 22–42, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2024.1046.2
    13. M. Suendarti and V. Virgana, “Elevating Natural Science Learning Achievement: Cooperative Learning and Learning Interest,” Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 114–120, Feb. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i1.20419
    14. D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and E. J. Holubec, The New Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom and School. ASCD, 1994.
    15. P. T. H. Thanh, R. Gillies, and P. Renshaw, “Cooperative Learning (CL) and Academic Achievement of Asian Students: A True Story,” International Education Studies, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 82–88, Aug. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v1n3p82
    16. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS), the Kingdom of Cambodia, “Cambodia Secondary Education Blueprint 2030.” Author, 2021.
    17. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, 1978.
    18. D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Allyn and Bacon, 1999.
    19. A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191
    20. S. Chan, Maneewan, Sorakrich, and R. and Koul, “Cooperative learning in teacher education: its effects on EFL pre-service teachers’ content knowledge and teaching self-efficacy,” Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 654–667, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2021.1931060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1931060
    21. N. Each and S. Suppasetseree, “The Effects of Mobile-Blended Cooperative Learning on EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension in Cambodian Context,” LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 143–170, 2021.
    22. S. Bon and S. Charubusp, “Teachers’ Attitudes toward English as Lingua Franca (ELF), World Englishes (WEs), and Teachers’ Professional Identities (TPIs),” AJP, vol. 11, pp. 311–326, Nov. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.11-4-3
    23. J. H. McMillan, L. Hellsten, and D. A. K. Professor, Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction. Pearson Education Canada, 2010.
    24. J. K. Mensah, M. Okyere, and A. Kuranchie, “Student attitude towards Mathematics and performance: Does the teacher attitude matter?” International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 132–139, 2013.
    25. D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, and R. Melsayanti, “Students’ attitude towards natural sciences,” IJERE, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 455, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v8i3.16395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.16395
    26. M. Delgado-García, S. Conde Vélez, and M. de la O. Toscano Cruz, “Cooperative Learning at University: Opinion of Students and Application of the Instrument Cooperative Learning Questionnaire (CLQ),” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 564–573, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2021.1932557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1932557
    27. D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, “Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning: The Teacher’s Role,” in The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom, R. M. Gillies, A. F. Ashman, and J. Terwel, Eds., Boston, MA: Springer US, 2008, pp. 9–37. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_1
    28. R. E. Slavin, “Cooperative learning in elementary schools,” Education 3-13, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 5–14, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/03004279.2015.963370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.963370
    29. S. Veenman, N. van Benthum, D. Bootsma, J. van Dieren, and N. van der Kemp, “Cooperative learning and teacher education,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 87–103, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00052-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00052-X
    30. D. M. Woods and K.-C. Chen, “Evaluation Techniques For Cooperative Learning,” IJMIS, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.19030/ijmis.v14i1.815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/ijmis.v14i1.815
    31. Q. Yusuf, Z. Jusoh, and Y. Q. Yusuf, “Cooperative Learning Strategies to Enhance Writing Skills among Second Language Learners,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1399–1412, Jan. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12189a
    32. R. Ajaja and S. A. Mezieobi, “Effect of Cooperative learning strategy on students' performance in social studies,” International Journal of Education and Evaluation, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 96–103, 2018.
    33. S. Kaymak, Z. Kassymbek, A. Kalamkas, and F. Saydenov, “The Effect of Cooperative Learning on Students' Academic Achievement,” MS, vol. 9, no. 6, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.17265/2328 2185/2021.06.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2185/2021.06.009
    34. W. Jolliffe, “Cooperative Learning in the Classroom : Putting it into Practice,” pp. 1–144, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446213971
    35. F. Gull and S. Shehzad, “Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement,” Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), vol. 9, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.2071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.2071
    36. T. H. Ollendick and C. S. Schroeder, Encyclopedia of Clinical Child and Pediatric Psychology. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
    37. S. Bon, T. Sorn, M. Mon, M. Muon, and M. Mon, “Classroom Activities and Student Motivation in Learning an English Subject: A Case Study at a Public Secondary School in Cambodia,” ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 96–113, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.22515/elereviews.v2i2.5562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/elereviews.v2i2.5562
    38. S. Bon, “Developing Cambodian secondary school students’ intercultural competence: Strategies and challenges,” Issues in Educational Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 887–905, Sep. 2022.
    39. L. Lastri, S. Kartikowati, and S. Sumarno, “Analysis of Factors that Influence Student Learning Achievement,” Journal of Educational Sciences, pp. 679–693, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.31258/jes 4.3.p.679-693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.4.3.p.679-693
    40. V. D. Tran, “The Effects of Cooperative Learning on the Academic Achievement and Knowledge Retention,” International Journal of Higher Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 131–140, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p131
    41. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th edition. Washington, DC: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018.
    42. K. McLeish, “Attitude of Students Towards Cooperative Learning Methods at Knox Community College: A Descriptive Study,” 2009.
    43. S. Bon and M. Chuaychoowong, “Evaluation of the Global English Coursebook Motivate!3: Implication for Pedagogical Material in the Cambodian Context,” The New English Teacher ISSN 2985-0959 (Online), vol. 17, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2023.
    44. S. Bon and B. Inpin, “Roles of two PD modes in technology integration for EFL classes: Training and professional learning communities,” Issues in Educational Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3316/informit.T2024050900000101953727552.
    45. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS), the Kingdom of Cambodia, “New Generation School Operational Policy Guidelines.” Author, 2019.
    46. G. Norman, “Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics,” Adv in Health Sci Educ, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 625–632, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
    47. G. A. Ferguson and Y. Takane, Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education, 6th Edition, 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1989.
    48. M. R. Simonson, “Attitude Change and Achievement: Dissonance Theory in Education,” The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 163–169, Jan. 1977, doi: 10.1080/00220671.1977.10884976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1977.10884976
    49. M. A. Collini, K. Miguel, R. Weber, and M. B. Atkinson, “Investigating Changes in Students’ Attitudes towards Organic Chemistry: A Longitudinal Study,” Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 613–624, 2024, doi: 10.1039/d3rp00228d. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00228D
    50. K. Akhtar, Q. Perveen, S. Kiran, M. Rashid, and K. Satti, “A study of students’ attitudes towards cooperative learning,” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 141–147, 2012.
    51. N. Phiwpong and N. K. Dennis, “Using cooperative learning activities to enhance fifth grade students’ reading comprehension skill,” International Journal of Research–Granthaalayah4, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 146–152, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v4.i1.2016.2853
    52. N. Farzaneh and D. Nejadansari, “Students’ attitude towards using cooperative learning for teaching reading comprehension,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 287–293, Feb. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.2.287-292
    53. S. Wichadee, “The effects of cooperative learning on English reading skills and attitudes of the first-year students at Bangkok University,” BU academic Review, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 22–31, 2005.
    54. E. Baines, P. Blatchford, and P. Kutnick, “Changes in grouping practices over primary and secondary school,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 9–34, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00071-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00071-5
    55. L. R. Antil, J. R. Jenkins, S. K. Wayne, and P. F. Vadasy, “Cooperative Learning: Prevalence, Conceptualizations, and the Relation Between Research and Practice,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 419–454, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.3102/00028312035003419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035003419
    56. D. W. Johnson and F. P. Johnson, Joining together: Group theory and group skills, 4th ed. in Joining together: Group theory and group skills, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1991, pp. xii, 530.
    57. Z. Nzuza and M. Chitiyo, “Cooperative Learning as an Approach to Enhance the Implementation of Inclusive Education,” International Journal of Whole Schooling, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2024.
    58. R. Hertz-Lazarowitz and N. Miller, Interaction in Cooperative Groups: The Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
    59. D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, “Learning Together and Alone: Overview and Meta‐analysis,” Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1080/0218879020220110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220110