SINTA

3.2

Impact

Scholar

11

H-Index

Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)

an Open Access Journal


Freshmen’s Perceptions of the Effect of Technology on Learning English: A Case Study at the National University of Battambang, Cambodia

Share
  • Purpose  of the study: This study investigates first-year students' perceptions and the impact of technology integration on English language learning at the National University of Battambang (NUBB).

    Methodology: The research garthered data from 205 students across various majors through purposive sampling and a structured questionnaire. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, independent sample t tests, one-way ANOVA, and regression analysis.

    Main Findings: The findings indicate that online searches and computer software are the most frequently utilized tools, with mobile apps and software perceived as highly effective for enhancing language skills. Students exhibit positive attitudes toward technology, contributing to improve learning outcomes. While no significant gender differences were observed in most areas, female students demonstrated lower levels of technology integration compared to males. Additionally, age did not significantly influence general technology use but affected perceptions of its effectiveness in supporting language learning. Notably, technology-assisted language learning (TALL) had the strongest positive impact on English learning outcomes.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study is original as no prior research at the National University of Battambang (NUBB) has focused on first-year students' perceptions or the impact of technology integration on English language learning. By surveying 205 freshmen from various majors using a quantitative approach, it provides a unique baseline for understanding how technology supports language acquisition in this context, addressing a critical research gap at the institution.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    K. Vireak, S. Rany, L. Bunrosy, and R. Wen, “Freshmen’s Perceptions of the Effect of Technology on Learning English: A Case Study at the National University of Battambang, Cambodia”, Jo. Soc. Know. Ed, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 54–75, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jske.v6i1.1291.
  • 835
    Abstract views
    359
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. F. Ahmad, Impact of Digital Games on Early Reading Skills in a Developing Country Context (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Waikato), 2023.
    2. M. Jewell, “Real-world contexts, skills and service learning for secondary school language learners,” in Learning Languages Through Technology, E. Hanson-Smith and S. Rilling, Eds. Alexandria, Va., USA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, 2006.
    3. N. Kerimbayev, Z. Umirzakova, R. Shadiev, and V. A. Jotsov, “Student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: A systematic review of the literature,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 61, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8
    4. D. Gibbs, “Information and communication technologies in Poland,” Telecommunications Policy, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 363–366, 1994. doi: 10.1016/0308-5961(94)90052-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-5961(94)90052-3
    5. A. Haleem, et al., “Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review,” Sustainable Operations and Computers, vol. 3, pp. 275–285, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
    6. S. Bull and Y. Ma, “Raising learner awareness of language learning strategies in situations of limited resources,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 171–200, 2001. doi: 10.1076/ilee.9.2.171.7439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/ilee.9.2.171.7439
    7. B. G. İlter, “How does technology affect language learning process at an early age?” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 199, pp. 311–316, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.552
    8. Y. F. Khodjiakbarovna, “Integrating Mobile Technologies and Creativity Pedagogy to Enhance English Language Learning: Exploring Innovative Educational Services,” Science and Innovation, vol. 3, Special Issue 16, pp. 705–707, 2024.
    9. D. Crystal, English as a Global Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    10. L. Bunrosy and K. Vireak, “Evolution of English Language Teaching (ELT) Methodologies and Contemporary Trends: A Critical Analysis of the Cambodia Context,” European Journal of English Language Teaching, vol. 9, no. 6, 2024.
    11. F. Rosell-Aguilar, “Autonomous language learning through a mobile application: A user evaluation of the busuu app,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 854–881, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1456465
    12. R. O’Dowd, “Intercultural communicative competence through virtual exchange,” in The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication, 2011, pp. 340–356.
    13. K. Kosonen, “Language education policy in Cambodia,” in The Routledge International Handbook of Language Education Policy in Asia, 2019, pp. 216–228, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666235-15
    14. S. Phon, “Factors affecting the English language proficiency of students majoring in English at a rural university in Cambodia,” UC Occasional Paper Series, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 69–92, 2017.
    15. S. Chea and W. Y. W. Lo, “International connectivity and employability in Cambodian higher education: A case study of developing employability skills in English language education,” Educational Research and Evaluation, vol. 27, no. 3–4, pp. 335–356, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2041875
    16. UNESCO, Bridging the Digital Divide: Access to Technology in Southeast Asia, UNESCO, 2022.
    17. D. Nunan and J. C. Richards, Eds., Language Learning Beyond the Classroom. Routledge, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315883472
    18. S. Al-Maashani and B. A. Mudhsh, “Educational and instructional technology in EFL/ESL classrooms: A literature review,” International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 292–304, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i2.1347
    19. R. C. Richey, K. H. Silber, and D. P. Ely, “Reflections on the 2008 AECT definitions of the field,” TechTrends, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 24–25, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0108-2
    20. M. Morris and S. Maxey, “The importance of English language competency in the academic success of international accounting students,” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 178–185, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2013.819315
    21. M. B. Purwanto, F. Nurdianingsih, and V. Afini, “Innovations and challenges in primary school English education in the industrial era 4.0,” Interaction: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 257–271, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36232/interactionjournal.v11i2.29
    22. B. Lan, V. Keo, R. Sam, and W. Roeut, “Exploring EFL learners' perception toward the difficulties in oral presentation,” in ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 174–190, Nov. 2024.
    23. K. Vireak and L. Bunrosy, “Exploring language teaching methods: An in-depth analysis of grammar translation, direct method, and audiolingual method: A literature review,” 2024.
    24. N. Ishihara and A. D. Cohen, Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet. New York: Routledge, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833842
    25. R. Sam, “Challenges and opportunities of educational technology integration in Cambodian higher education institutions: A literature review,” SSRN, May 31, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4849873
    26. D. Graddol, The Impact of Macro Socioeconomic Trends on the Future of the English Language (Doctoral Thesis, Stockholm University, Sweden), 2012.
    27. G. D. Stasberger, “Media globalization: Connecting the world through information and culture,” Global Media Journal, vol. 21, no. 64, pp. 1–3, 2023.
    28. E. N. E. Mustafa, “The impact of YouTube, Skype, and WhatsApp in improving EFL learners' speaking skills,” International Journal of Contemporary Applied Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 18–31, 2018.
    29. A. Yundayani, S. Susilawati, and C. Chairunnisa, “Investigating the effect of Canva on students’ writing skills,” English Review: Journal of English Education, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 169–176, 2019.
    30. T. C. Pham, “Effects of using technology to engage students in learning English at a secondary school,” International Journal of Language Instruction, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 86–98, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.22118
    31. L. K. Van, T. A. Dang, D. B. T. Pham, T. T. N. Vo, and V. P. H. Pham, “The effectiveness of using technology in learning English,” Asia CALL Online Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 24–40, 2021.
    32. A. P. Murdan and R. Halkhoree, “Integration of artificial intelligence for educational excellence and innovation in higher education institutions,” in 2024 1st International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Artificial Intelligence (SESAI), June 2024, pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SESAI61023.2024.10599402
    33. B. Lan, R. Sam, V. Keo, and W. Roeut, “Academic adjustment of freshmen in Cambodian higher education institutions: A systematic literature review,” Journal of General Education and Humanities, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 169–196, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v3i2.203
    34. L. Bunrosy, S. Rany, K. Vireak, and R. Wen, “Academic adjustment of freshmen in Cambodian higher education institutions: A systematic literature review,” 2024.
    35. B. Lan, R. Sam, V. Keo, and W. Rouet, “Factors influencing academic adjustment and learning outcomes in higher education institutions in Battambang: A conceptual framework,” European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 9–30, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(5).02
    36. Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sport (MoEYS), Education Congress: The Education, Youth, and Sport Performance in the Academic Year 2021–2022 and Goals for the Academic Year 2022–2023, 2023.
    37. Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sport (MoEYS), Education Congress: The Education, Youth, and Sport Performance in the Academic Year 2020–2021 and Goals for the Academic Year 2021–2022, 2022.
    38. D. M. R. Ahmadi, “The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review,” International Journal of Research in English Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 115–125, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115
    39. A. J. Januszewski and M. Molenda, Eds., Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary. Routledge, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203054000
    40. R. Luppicini, “A systems definition of educational technology in society,” Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 103–109, 2005.
    41. R. Huang, Educational Technology: A Primer for the 21st Century. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6643-7
    42. N. Dey, “Concept and scope of educational technology,” Introduction to Educational Technology, Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), 2017.
    43. L. Xu, “Navigating the educational landscape: The transformative power of smart classroom technology,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, pp. 1–32, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02233-z
    44. S. Sharma, “Smartphone-based language learning through mobile apps,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 8040–8043, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D6783.118419
    45. Y. Ofosu-Asare, “Developing classroom ICT teaching techniques, principles, and practice for teachers in rural Ghana without access to computers or internet: A framework based on literature review,” The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2023-0045
    46. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, vol. 86, Harvard University Press, 1978.
    47. J. Short, E. Williams, and B. Christie, The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. 1976.
    48. S. R. Rohani, A. Suyono, and I. Rozi, “Designing a mobile application for autonomous learning of English,” in ICEL 2019: First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, Malang, Indonesia, 23–24 March 2019, p. 150. European Alliance for Innovation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.23-3-2019.2284960
    49. M. H. Long, “The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition,” in Handbook of Research on Language Acquisition, vol. 2, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
    50. M. Peterson, “The use of massively multiplayer online role-playing games in CALL: An analysis of research,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1181–1194, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1197949
    51. M. Peterson, “Learner interaction in a massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG): A sociocultural discourse analysis,” ReCALL, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 361–380, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000195
    52. T. M. Miangah and A. Nezarat, “Mobile-assisted language learning,” International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 309, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5121/ijdps.2012.3126
    53. R. O’Dowd, “Intercultural communicative competence through virtual exchange,” in The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication, pp. 340–356, 2011.
    54. UNESCO, Bridging the Digital Divide: Access to Technology in Southeast Asia. UNESCO Reports, 2022.
    55. G. Dudeney, The Internet and the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
    56. C. I. Meutia, N. Fitri, and N. Afrida, “Readiness for integration of innovative teaching and learning technologies: EFL in-service teachers performances in classroom setting,” in The 3rd International Symposium on the Practice of Coexistence in Islamic Culture, May 2024, p. 464.
    57. M. Salam, D. N. A. Iskandar, D. H. A. Ibrahim, and M. S. Farooq, “Technology integration in service-learning pedagogy: A holistic framework,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 38, pp. 257–273, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.02.002
    58. V. W. Vongkulluksn, K. Xie, and M. A. Bowman, “The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration,” Computers & Education, vol. 118, pp. 70–81, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009
    59. C. Englund, A. D. Olofsson, and L. Price, “Teaching with technology in higher education: Understanding conceptual change and development in practice,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 73–87, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300
    60. V. Keo, S. Rany, L. Bunrosy, and R. Wen, “Challenges and opportunities of educational technology integration in Cambodian higher education institutions: A literature review,” International Journal of Education, Psychology, and Counseling, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.954013
    61. V. V. Vonog, I. V. Batunova, and V. V. Kolga, “Digital platforms and tools used in the system of teaching English,” in SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 113, p. 00019, 2021. EDP Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111300019
    62. W. Hussin, J. Harun, and N. Shukor, “Online tools for collaborative learning to enhance students’ interaction,” paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ICoICT.2019.8835197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT.2019.8835197
    63. J. Jayaron and M. J. Z. Abidin, “A pedagogical perspective on promoting English as a foreign language writing through online forum discussions,” English Language Teaching, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 84–101, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p84
    64. A. W. Bangert, “The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating online teaching,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 217–232, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.003
    65. J. T. Boyle and D. J. Nicol, “Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings,” ALT-J, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 43–57, 2003. doi: 10.1080/0968776030110305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0968776030110305
    66. D. Delaney, T. F. Kummer, and K. Singh, “Evaluating the impact of online discussion boards on student engagement with group work,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 902–920, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12614
    67. T. Roberson and J. Klotz, “How can instructors and administrators fill the missing link in online instruction?” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, vol. 5, no. 4, 2002.
    68. L. Dawley, The Tools for Successful Online Teaching. Hershey, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-956-4
    69. R. Kong and J. A. Konstan, “The challenge of organizational bulk email systems: Model and empirical studies,” in The Elgar Companion to Information Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024, pp. 407–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802203967.00032
    70. R. McGreal, “Technologies of online learning (e-learning),” in T. Anderson and F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Athabasca University, 2004, pp. 143–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.008
    71. I. A. Omipidan and B. O. Sanusi, “Rise of social media in the digital age: Whatsapp a threat to effective communication,” IMSU Journal of Communication Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 142–153, 2024.
    72. S. Alsulami, “The effects of technology on learning English as a foreign language among female EFL students at Effatt College: An exploratory study,” Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2016.
    73. N. Selwyn, S. Gorard, and J. Furlong, Adult Learning in the Digital Age: Information Technology and the Learning Society. New York, NY: Routledge, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003039
    74. T. Bartlett and K. Fischer, “The China conundrum,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Nov. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://bit.ly/uhVfEn
    75. A. Derakhshan and H. Khodabakhshzadeh, “Why CALL why not MALL: An in-depth review of text-message vocabulary learning,” Theory and Practice in Language Study, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 1150–1159, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.9.1150-1159
    76. A. F. Abu Seileek, “The use of word processor for teaching writing to EFL learners in King Saud University,” Journal of King Saud University, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2006.
    77. S. D. Sulistyaningrum, “Adopting Word Processor Tools to Overcome Post-Graduate Students’ Challenges in Academic Writing,” Journal of English Education and Teaching, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 187–201, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.8.1.174-188
    78. T. H. Morris, “Four dimensions of self-directed learning: A fundamental meta-competence in a changing world,” Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 236–254, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136231217453
    79. J. D. Morgan, “Developing a capacity for lifelong learning: Self-regulation and autonomous learning competencies within the European Framework,” Doctoral dissertation, 2024.
    80. J. P. Medina, “Informal Learning in the Workplace: A Study of a Municipal Utility in the Southeast,” Florida State University, 2023.
    81. P. D. John and S. Wheeler, The Digital Classroom: Harnessing Technology for the Future. New York: Routledge, 2008.
    82. J. Kannan and C. Macknish, "Issues affecting on-line ESL learning: A Singapore case study," The Internet TESL Journal, vol. 6, no. 11, 2000. [Online]. Available: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kannan-OnlineESL.html
    83. P. Kaur and R. Nadarajan, "Language learning and teaching using Kahoot," International Journal of Modern Education, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 19–28, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.25003
    84. B. B. Nomass, "The impact of using technology in teaching English as a second language," English Language and Literature Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 111, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v3n1p111
    85. C. Chapelle, English Language Learning and Technology: Lectures on Applied Linguistics in the Age of Information and Communication Technology. London: John Benjamins Publishing, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.7
    86. T. Gordon, Teaching Young Children a Second Language. California: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216023326
    87. L. M. Quishpi Espinel, "Motivation to boost writing skill through digital tools in the 2nd-semester students at ISU Carlos Cisneros in the 2024 first term," Master’s thesis, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Riobamba, 2024.
    88. P. Kasapoglu-Akyol, "Using educational technology tools to improve language and communication skills of ESL students," Research on Youth and Language, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 225–241, 2010.
    89. S. Peregoy and O. Boyle, Reading, Writing, and Learning in ESL: A Resource Book for Teachers. New York: Allyn & Bacon, 2012.
    90. C. A. Herron and I. Seay, "The effect of authentic oral texts on student listening comprehension in the foreign language classroom," Foreign Language Annals, vol. 24, pp. 487–495, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00495.x
    91. L. C. Jones, "Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition with multimedia annotations: The students’ voice," CALICO Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 41–65, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i1.41-65
    92. J. Wong, "English listening courses: A case of pedagogy lagging behind technology," Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–43, 2005.
    93. K. Beare, "YouTube in the classroom," 2008. [Online]. Available: About.com: English as 2nd Language web.
    94. S. Badal, Swimming Upstream: A Lifesaving Guide to Short Film Distribution. Boston: Focal Press, 2008.
    95. J. Cass, Strategies and Tools for Corporate Blogging. Boston: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080481173
    96. İ. Y. Kazu and Y. I. ssaku, "The opinion of ELT students on technology-based classroom approach," Focus on ELT Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/felt.2021.00036
    97. Z. A. Shah, A. Ahmed, and A. I. Anjum, "Improving English listening skills of IELTS students through smartphones," ELF Annual Research Journal, pp. 123–136, 2016.
    98. M. Hossain, "Exploiting smartphones and apps for language learning: A case study with the EFL learners in a Bangladeshi university," Review of Public Administration Management, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2315-7844.1000241
    99. C. John, "The evolution and impact of technology in language education," Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018, 2018.
    100. C. Long, R. Sam, C. Ny, C. Chhang, R. Ren, C. Ngork, R. Sorn, M. Sorn, and C. Sor, "The impact of assessment for 21st-century skills in higher education institutions: A narrative literature review," International Journal of Advance Social Sciences and Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.59890/ijasse.v2i1.1378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59890/ijasse.v2i1.1378
    101. B. Doeur, "The role of digital technology in English major programs in Cambodia," in Online Learning During COVID-19 and Key Issues in Education, pp. 62–72, 2021.
    102. R. Shadiev and X. Wang, "A review of research on technology-supported language learning and 21st century skills," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, 897689, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897689
    103. D. Hossan, Z. Dato’Mansor, and N. S. Jaharuddin, "Research population and sampling in quantitative study," International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship (IJBT), vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 209–222, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.472777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58915/ijbt.v13i3.263
    104. M. M. Rahman, M. I. Tabash, A. Salamzadeh, S. Abduli, and M. S. Rahaman, "Sampling techniques (probability) for quantitative social science researchers: A conceptual guideline with examples," Seeu Review, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 42–51, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2022-0023
    105. S. Li, "Quantitative research methods in ISLA," in Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods, vol. 3, pp. 31, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.3.02li
    106. M. M. Rahman, "Sample size determination for survey research and non-probability sampling techniques: A review and set of recommendations," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 42–62, 2023.
    107. M. Lewis, K. Bromley, C. J. Sutton, G. McCray, H. L. Myers, and G. A. Lancaster, "Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs: The hypothesis test strikes back!" Pilot and Feasibility Studies, vol. 7, pp. 1–14, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00770-x
    108. N. Kock and P. Hadaya, "Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods," Information Systems Journal, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 227–261, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
    109. C. Baker, "Quantitative research designs: Experimental, quasi-experimental, and descriptive," in Evidence-Based Practice: An Integrative Approach to Research, Administration, and Practice, vol. 2, pp. 155–183, 2017.
    110. M. A. Bujang, E. D. Omar, D. H. P. Foo, and Y. K. Hon, "Sample size determination for conducting a pilot study to assess reliability of a questionnaire," Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, vol. 49, no. 1, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e3
    111. M. del Mar Seguí, J. Cabrero-García, A. Crespo, J. Verdú, and E. Ronda, "A reliable and valid questionnaire was developed to measure computer vision syndrome at the workplace," Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 662–673, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.015
    112. H. G. Osburn, "Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients," Psychological Methods, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 343, 2000. [Online]. Available: DOI:10.1037/1082-989X.5.3.343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.5.3.343
    113. D. L. Streiner, "Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency," Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 99–103, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
    114. N. Dogruer, R. Eyyam, and I. Menevis, "The use of the internet for educational purposes," Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 28, pp. 606–611, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.115
    115. F. Yuberta, "The use of information and communication technology in mathematics education: Does gender make a difference?" Continuous Education: Journal of Science and Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2024. [Online]. Available: doi:10.51178/ce.v5i1.1727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51178/ce.v5i1.1727
    116. S. Ningsih, A. P. Rahayu, N. Y. Suryani, M. Martriwati, M. Sholikhah, and E. E. Khairas, "Indonesian students’ perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in English learning," in 4th International Conference on Linguistics and Culture (ICLC-4 2023), May 2024, pp. 124–132. [Online]. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-251-418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-251-4_18
    117. R. Kay, "Addressing gender differences in computer ability, attitudes and use: The laptop effect," Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 187–211, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/9BLQ-883Y-XQMA-FCAH
    118. S. Korlat et al., "Gender differences in digital learning during COVID-19: Competence beliefs, intrinsic value, learning engagement, and perceived teacher support," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, 637776, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637776
    119. UNESCO, Gender Equality in Education in Cambodia: Strengthening Inclusive and Equitable Learning Environments. Paris: UNESCO, 2019.
    120. T. Teo, "Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test," Computers & Education, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2432–2440, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
    121. R. V. Staddon, "Bringing technology to the mature classroom: Age differences in use and attitudes," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 11, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00184-4
    122. N. J. Alzaidiyeen, "English as a foreign language students' attitudes towards the utilization of iPad in language learning," Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 16–24, 2017.
    123. S. M. Haidari, T. Y. Yelken, and C. Akay, "Technology-enhanced self-directed language learning behaviors of EFL student teachers," Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 229–245, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.590003
    124. M. Taghizadeh and Z. H. Yourdshahi, "Integrating technology into young learners' classes: Language teachers' perceptions," Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 982–1006, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1618876
    125. R. Rintaningrum, "Technology integration in English language teaching and learning: Benefits and challenges," Cogent Education, vol. 10, no. 1, 2164690, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2164690
    126. M. Jennifer, "Tech-driven transformation: How technology is revolutionizing English language teaching," Bridgewater State University, June 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/how-technology-is-revolutionizing-english-language-teaching/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
    127. D. Harper, A. R. Bowles, L. Amer, N. B. Pandža, and J. A. Linck, "Improving outcomes for English learners through technology: A randomized controlled trial," Aera Open, vol. 7, 23328584211025528, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211025528
    128. Z. Turdiyeva, "The use of interactive technologies in learning English language: A literature review," SSRN, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4663150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4663150