Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) on Student Self-Efficacy

  • Meti Rusmiati Universitas Jambi
Keywords: Realistic Mathematics Education, Self-Efficacy, Students

Abstract

Research objectives: This study aims to determine the difference in self-efficacy of students who are treated with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approaches and direct learning models.

Methodology: This type of research is a quantitative descriptive study with a pretest-posttest control group design. The sample in this study was class VIII A with the treatment of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach and class VIII B with a direct learning model to see its effect on self-efficacy. The instruments in this study were self-efficacy questionnaires and observation sheets. Data analysis was carried out using two-party t-test.

Main findings: The results showed that there were differences in self-efficacy between students who were treated with the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach and students who were treated with the direct learning model. So it can be concluded that the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach has a significant influence on students' self-efficacy on function material.

The Novelty of research: With this research, it can be used as an alternative in learning mathematics and is able to influence students' self-efficacy in mathematics.

References

A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy in Changing Societies,” New York: Cambridge University, 2009.

A. D. Kurniawati., dan T. Siswono, “Pengaruh Kecemasan Self Efficacy Siswa terhadap Kemampuan pemecahan Masalah Materi Segiempat Siswa Kelas VII MTs Negeri Ponorogo,” Mathedunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 2, no. 2. pp. 36-41, 2014.

S. Hadi, “Pendidikan Matematika Realistik dan Implementasinya,” Banjarmasin: Tulip, 2005.

Y. Hartono, “Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika,” Jakarta: Depdiknas, 2007.

A. Wijaya, “Pendidikan Matematika Realistik,” Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2012.

S. Supinah., dan A. Agus, “Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar. Sleman: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan (PPPPTK) Matematika, 2009.

H. Hobri. “Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif,” Jember: FKIP Universitas Jember, 2009.

A. Majid, “Strategi Pembelajaran,” Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset, 2014.

S. Sugiyono. “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D,” Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.

D. Daud and Y. Triadi, “Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter Cinta Tanah Air Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 134-139, 2021.

N. Afrianty and F. Yolviansyah, “Analisis Pengaruh Sikap Toleransi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Fisika di Kelas XII IPA SMA Negeri 2 Kota Jambi”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 144-147, 2021.

W. Winarni., dan R. Rohati, “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Materi Sistem Persamaan Dua Variabel dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) di SMP,” Edumatica, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 43-55, 2012.

N. Fadila, “Pengembangan Modul Matematika Berbasis Accelerated Learning pada Materi Himpunan di SMPN 1 Kota Jambi”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 19-23, 2022.

A. Aminatussaadah, “Deskripsi Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X MIPA 1 Dan X MIPA 3 di SMAN 3 Kota Sungai Penuh”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 8-12, 2022.

L. Nurnawangsih and F. Yolviansyah, “Analisis Minat Belajar Siswa Terhadap Mata Pelajaran fisika Kelas XI MIPA di SMAN 5 Kabupaten Tebo”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 55-59, 2022.

Published
2022-07-31
How to Cite
[1]
M. Rusmiati, “Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) on Student Self-Efficacy”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 97-101, Jul. 2022.
Section
Articles