Bibliometric Analysis on the Use of Social Studies Learning Models in Elementary Schools (2014-2024)
Keywords:
Social Sciences, Learning Model, Primary School, Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to map and analyze publication trends related to Social Studies (IPS) learning models at the elementary school level using bibliometric data from the Scopus database covering the period 2014–2024.
Methodology: This study employs a qualitative bibliometric method with four stages: Identification, Screening, Eligibility, and Inclusion. Data were retrieved from the Scopus database using the keywords TITLE-ABS-KEY("social sciences") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY("learning model") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY("primary school"). Analysis tools used include Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer version 1.6.19.
Main Findings: Publication trends fluctuate over the years with an increase in 2024. Scientific articles are the dominant document type (73.3%), and social sciences are the most frequently studied field (53.6%). Spain ranks first in publication and citation counts. Keyword co-occurrence analysis reveals “curriculum,” “education,” and “social sciences” as the most connected terms.
Novelty/Originality of this study:This study provides the first bibliometric mapping of global research on Social Studies learning models at the elementary school level using Scopus data. It offers new insight into publication patterns, keyword trends, and country contributions, supporting future policy-making, curriculum planning, and research directions in primary education.
References
[1] E. Yusnaldi et al., “Dimensi Dan Struktur IPS,” J. Educ., 2024, doi: 10.31004/joe.v6i4.6403.
[2] T. Ulfa and E. Munastiwi, “Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial,” J. Educ. Hum. Soc. Sci. JEHSS, 2021, doi: 10.34007/jehss.v4i1.576.
[3] I. T. Jadidah, S. Sartika, S. Putri, N. Maharani, and T. A. M. Sari, “Konsep ilmu, teknologi, dan masyarakat dalam IPS,” J. Contemp. Issues Prim. Educ., 2023, doi: 10.61476/9yaedt50.
[4] U. N. Bima, “Tren Penelitian Pembelajatan IPS di Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Database Scopus dari Tahun 2013 Higga 2022: Analisis Bibliometrik,” Unpubl. Manuscr. Local J., vol. 7, pp. 277–291, 2023.
[5] N. N. Rodríguez and K. Swalwell, Social Studies for a Better World: An Anti-Oppressive Approach for Elementary Educators. Taylor & Francis, 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781032677941/SOCIAL-STUDIES-BETTER-WORLD-NOREEN-NASEEM-RODRIGUEZ-KATY-SWALWELL/ACCESSIBILITY-INFORMATION.
[6] A. Ollinheimo and K. Hakkarainen, “Critical thinking as cooperation and its relation to mental health and social welfare,” New Ideas Psychol., 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100988.
[7] B. Tadić, M. M. Dankulov, and R. Melnik, “Mechanisms of self-organized criticality in social processes of knowledge creation.,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 96 3–1, p. 032307, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.032307.
[8] S. M. M. Loyens, J. E. van Meerten, L. Schaap, and L. Wijnia, “Situating Higher-Order, Critical, and Critical-Analytic Thinking in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 35, pp. 1–44, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x.
[9] Y. Sulistyosari, H. Sultan, H. M. Karwur, and M. E. Korompis, “The Relevance of Social Studies Education in the Independent Curriculum to the Thoughts of Ki Hadjar Dewantara,” Tech. Soc. Sci. J., 2023, doi: 10.47577/tssj.v49i1.9792.
[10] A. R. Balqis et al., “Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Sebagai Transmisi Kewarganegaraan,” Sos. J. Ilm. Pendidik. IPS, 2024, doi: 10.62383/sosial.v2i2.229.
[11] A. Jareh, “Sustainable Social Innovation as a Solution for Systemic Change and Resilience,” Sustainability, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17041583.
[12] M. da Silva-Jean and J. M. Kneippb, “‘Social learning, innovation, and sustainability: The search for directions beyond a systematic literature review,’” Heliyon, vol. 10, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28431.
[13] S. Abdelwahab et al., “Bibliometric analysis: A few suggestions (Part Two).,” Curr. Probl. Cardiol., p. 102982, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.102982.
[14] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070.
[15] W. Hassan and A. E. Duarte, “Bibliometric Analysis: A Few Suggestions.,” Curr. Probl. Cardiol., p. 102640, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102640.
[16] O. Öztürk, R. Kocaman, and D. K. Kanbach, “How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal,” Rev. Manag. Sci., 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11846-024-00738-0.
[17] S. Greener, “Evaluating literature with bibliometrics,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 30, pp. 1168–1169, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2118463.
[18] S. Uge, A. Neolaka, and M. Yasin, “Development of Social Studies Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom in Improving Students’ Knowledge and Social Attitude,” Int. J. Instr., 2019, doi: 10.29333/IJI.2019.12323A.
[19] D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and The PRISMA Group, “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement,” PLoS Med., vol. 6, no. 7, p. e1000097, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
[20] M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, p. n71, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
[21] J. Baas, M. Schotten, A. Plume, G. Côté, and R. Karimi, “Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies,” Quant. Sci. Stud., vol. 1, pp. 377–386, 2020, doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00019.
[22] V. Singh, P. Singh, M. Karmakar, J. Leta, and P. Mayr, “The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 126, pp. 5113–5142, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5.
[23] M. Thelwall and P. Sud, “Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals,” Quant. Sci. Stud., vol. 3, pp. 37–50, 2022, doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00177.
[24] Y. Mokhnacheva and V. Tsvetkova, “The role and impact of document types in the world and Russian publication arrays based on WoS CC and Scopus,” Sci. Tech. Libr., 2022, doi: 10.33186/1027-3689-2022-8-37-59.
[25] A. Martín-Martín, M. Thelwall, E. Orduna-Malea, and E. Delgado López-Cózar, “Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations,” Scientometrics, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 871–906, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4.
[26] M. Hanna, “Ethics of Scientific Writing,” Write Better Med. Pap., 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02955-5_21.
[27] Ş. S. Anagün, “Teachers’ Perceptions about the Relationship between 21st Century Skills and Managing Constructivist Learning Environments,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 825–840, 2018.
[28] M. K. Budhathoki, “Writing Better Research Articles for Publication,” Cognition, 2023, doi: 10.3126/cognition.v5i1.55411.
[29] H. N. Perera et al., “Relations of Science Teaching Self-Efficacy with Instructional Practices, Student Achievement and Support, and Teacher Job Satisfaction,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., p. 102041, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102041.
[30] C. Rosé, E. Mclaughlin, R. Liu, and K. Koedinger, “Explanatory learner models: Why machine learning (alone) is not the answer,” Br J Educ Technol, vol. 50, pp. 2943–2958, 2019, doi: 10.1111/BJET.12858.
[2] T. Ulfa and E. Munastiwi, “Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial,” J. Educ. Hum. Soc. Sci. JEHSS, 2021, doi: 10.34007/jehss.v4i1.576.
[3] I. T. Jadidah, S. Sartika, S. Putri, N. Maharani, and T. A. M. Sari, “Konsep ilmu, teknologi, dan masyarakat dalam IPS,” J. Contemp. Issues Prim. Educ., 2023, doi: 10.61476/9yaedt50.
[4] U. N. Bima, “Tren Penelitian Pembelajatan IPS di Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Database Scopus dari Tahun 2013 Higga 2022: Analisis Bibliometrik,” Unpubl. Manuscr. Local J., vol. 7, pp. 277–291, 2023.
[5] N. N. Rodríguez and K. Swalwell, Social Studies for a Better World: An Anti-Oppressive Approach for Elementary Educators. Taylor & Francis, 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781032677941/SOCIAL-STUDIES-BETTER-WORLD-NOREEN-NASEEM-RODRIGUEZ-KATY-SWALWELL/ACCESSIBILITY-INFORMATION.
[6] A. Ollinheimo and K. Hakkarainen, “Critical thinking as cooperation and its relation to mental health and social welfare,” New Ideas Psychol., 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100988.
[7] B. Tadić, M. M. Dankulov, and R. Melnik, “Mechanisms of self-organized criticality in social processes of knowledge creation.,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 96 3–1, p. 032307, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.032307.
[8] S. M. M. Loyens, J. E. van Meerten, L. Schaap, and L. Wijnia, “Situating Higher-Order, Critical, and Critical-Analytic Thinking in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 35, pp. 1–44, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x.
[9] Y. Sulistyosari, H. Sultan, H. M. Karwur, and M. E. Korompis, “The Relevance of Social Studies Education in the Independent Curriculum to the Thoughts of Ki Hadjar Dewantara,” Tech. Soc. Sci. J., 2023, doi: 10.47577/tssj.v49i1.9792.
[10] A. R. Balqis et al., “Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Sebagai Transmisi Kewarganegaraan,” Sos. J. Ilm. Pendidik. IPS, 2024, doi: 10.62383/sosial.v2i2.229.
[11] A. Jareh, “Sustainable Social Innovation as a Solution for Systemic Change and Resilience,” Sustainability, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17041583.
[12] M. da Silva-Jean and J. M. Kneippb, “‘Social learning, innovation, and sustainability: The search for directions beyond a systematic literature review,’” Heliyon, vol. 10, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28431.
[13] S. Abdelwahab et al., “Bibliometric analysis: A few suggestions (Part Two).,” Curr. Probl. Cardiol., p. 102982, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.102982.
[14] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070.
[15] W. Hassan and A. E. Duarte, “Bibliometric Analysis: A Few Suggestions.,” Curr. Probl. Cardiol., p. 102640, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102640.
[16] O. Öztürk, R. Kocaman, and D. K. Kanbach, “How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal,” Rev. Manag. Sci., 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11846-024-00738-0.
[17] S. Greener, “Evaluating literature with bibliometrics,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 30, pp. 1168–1169, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2118463.
[18] S. Uge, A. Neolaka, and M. Yasin, “Development of Social Studies Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom in Improving Students’ Knowledge and Social Attitude,” Int. J. Instr., 2019, doi: 10.29333/IJI.2019.12323A.
[19] D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and The PRISMA Group, “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement,” PLoS Med., vol. 6, no. 7, p. e1000097, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
[20] M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, p. n71, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
[21] J. Baas, M. Schotten, A. Plume, G. Côté, and R. Karimi, “Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies,” Quant. Sci. Stud., vol. 1, pp. 377–386, 2020, doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00019.
[22] V. Singh, P. Singh, M. Karmakar, J. Leta, and P. Mayr, “The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 126, pp. 5113–5142, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5.
[23] M. Thelwall and P. Sud, “Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals,” Quant. Sci. Stud., vol. 3, pp. 37–50, 2022, doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00177.
[24] Y. Mokhnacheva and V. Tsvetkova, “The role and impact of document types in the world and Russian publication arrays based on WoS CC and Scopus,” Sci. Tech. Libr., 2022, doi: 10.33186/1027-3689-2022-8-37-59.
[25] A. Martín-Martín, M. Thelwall, E. Orduna-Malea, and E. Delgado López-Cózar, “Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations,” Scientometrics, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 871–906, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4.
[26] M. Hanna, “Ethics of Scientific Writing,” Write Better Med. Pap., 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02955-5_21.
[27] Ş. S. Anagün, “Teachers’ Perceptions about the Relationship between 21st Century Skills and Managing Constructivist Learning Environments,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 825–840, 2018.
[28] M. K. Budhathoki, “Writing Better Research Articles for Publication,” Cognition, 2023, doi: 10.3126/cognition.v5i1.55411.
[29] H. N. Perera et al., “Relations of Science Teaching Self-Efficacy with Instructional Practices, Student Achievement and Support, and Teacher Job Satisfaction,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., p. 102041, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102041.
[30] C. Rosé, E. Mclaughlin, R. Liu, and K. Koedinger, “Explanatory learner models: Why machine learning (alone) is not the answer,” Br J Educ Technol, vol. 50, pp. 2943–2958, 2019, doi: 10.1111/BJET.12858.
Published
2025-07-23
How to Cite
[1]
D. Satrio and M. Mihroji, “Bibliometric Analysis on the Use of Social Studies Learning Models in Elementary Schools (2014-2024)”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 3, Jul. 2025.
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2025 Dimas Satrio, Muhroji Mihroji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
