Evaluating Tafsir Tarbawi Learning with the CIPP Model: A Study of Islamic Education Students in Tarbiyah Faculties
Abstract
Purpose of the study: Insect visitors to oil palm flowers, an important component in the pollination process and ecosystem services, are evaluated for their diversity in this study. The research explores their potential as a resource for environment-based learning rooted in local contexts within smallholder plantations, aiming to raise awareness and support sustainable education practices in the community.
Methodology: Insects were collected using sweep nets, yellow pan traps, and direct observation. Identification was conducted using a Nikon SMZ445 stereo microscope and reference to entomological keys. Data analysis was carried out descriptively, focusing on species composition and abundance. An e-pocket book was developed as a learning resource.
Main Findings: The results showed a total of 50 morphospecies of insect visitors on both male and female oil palm flowers. The number of insect species visiting male flowers was higher, consisting of 38 morphospecies belonging to 21 families and 10 orders. The results of the study were developed into a local wisdom-based pocket book focused on the diversity of insect visitors to oil palm flowers in smallholder plantations. The learning resource was validated by content experts, design experts, media experts, and students, with an average score of 81.7%, indicating it is highly suitable for use in environment-based education.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study highlights insect diversity in smallholder oil palm plantations, which is rarely documented. It also links ecological data with educational applications, providing a model for utilizing local biodiversity as a teaching resource in environmental and biology education.
References
R. A. Suryadi, “Signifikansi munasabah ayat Al Quran dalam Tafsir pendidikan [The significance of the munasabah verses of the Koran in educational Tafsir],” Ulul Albab, vol. 17, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.18860/ua.v17i1.3331.
M. Harahap, L. M. Siregar, Y. Yunita, and D. I. P. Sari, “Efektivitas modul pembelajaran tafsir tarbawi berbasis model team based project [The effectiveness of the tarbawi interpretation learning module based on the team-based project model],” Al-Hikmah J. Agama dan Ilmu Pengetah., vol. 21, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.25299/al-hikmah:jaip.2024.vol21(1).16575.
C. Surahman, “Tafsīr tarbawi in Indonesia: Efforts to formulate Qur’an-Based Islamic education concept,” J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 211–226, 2019, doi: 10.15575/jpi.v5i2.5915.
Z. Mufid and I. Mirza, “Pengaruh tafsir tarbawi dalam lingkungan pondok pesantren dan nilai-nilai pendidikan salafiyyah [The influence of tarbawi interpretation in the Islamic boarding school environment and the values of salafiyyah education],” Kasyafa J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2025, doi: 10.61166/kasyafa.v2i1.64.
A. Sahin, Love of Learning as a Humanizing Pedagogic Vocation Perspectives from Traditions of Higher Education in Islam. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-82371-9.
M. Hendawi, G. Al Murshidi, A. Asrori, M. F. Hadi, M. Huda, and T. Lovat, “The development of islamic education curriculum from the quranic perspective,” Ar-Fahruddin J. Islam. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 93–123, 2024, doi: 10.7401/hms52091 The.
F. Mubarok, “Study of Tafsir Tarbawi as an Effort for the Relevance of Al-Qur’an Teachings in Educational Development in Indonesia,” in Proceeding International Conference on Religion, Science and Education, 2024, pp. 795–804. [Online]. Available: http://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/icrse/article/view/1079%0Ahttps://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/icrse/article/download/1079/1091
F. R. Amir, “The Educational Method in the Perspective of Al-Quran A Tafsir Tarbawi Study,” TARLIM J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33–47, 2023, doi: 10.32528/tarlim.v6i1.299.
A. Alwizar et al., “Analisis systematic literature review tafsir tarbawi: Implementasi tafsir tarbawi pada pendidikan islam [Systematic analysis of literature review of tarbawi interpretation: Implementation of tarbawi interpretation in Islamic education],” JPPI (Jurnal Penelit. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 729–737, 2021, doi: 10.29210/020212746.
B. Ulum and N. Hasan, “Integrasi metode hermeneutik dalam Tafsir Tarbawi: Tantangan dan implikasi dalam pendekatan pedagogis al-Qur’an [Integration of hermeneutic methods in Tafsir Tarbawi: Challenges and implications in the pedagogical approach to the Al-Qur'an],” EL-BANAT J. Pemikir. dan Pendidik. Islam, vol. 14, no. 66, pp. 116–131, 2024, doi: 10.54180/elbanat.2024.14.1.116-131.
I. Tsani, A. Arsyadana, S. Sufirmansyah, and E. Shafira, “Evaluasi Model CIPP Pada Pembelajaran Pai Dan Budi Pekerti di SMA Negeri 7 Kota Kediri,” Al-Tadzkiyyah J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17–45, 2021, doi: 10.24042/atjpi.v12i1.8165.
M. J. Morgan, Elements of biblical exegesis: A basic guide for students and ministers. Baker Academic, 2010.
A. T. S. Najah, “Evaluasi program kelas tahfizh Al-Qur’an dengan model cipp (context, input, process dan product) di pondok pesantren tahfidz Muhammadiyah Al Fattah Malang,” J. Eval. Pendidik., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 7823–7830, 2024, doi: 10.21009/jep.v15i2.49288.
A. Haryanto, Integrasi Nilai-Nilai Al-Qur’an dalam Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
M. Musolin, F. Fauzi, and H. Muflihin, “Evaluating curriculum at madrasah aliyah : Applying the context, input, process, product (cipp) model,” Al-Ishlah J. Pendidik., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 6737–6748, 2023, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.2516.
G. K. Shevatekar, “Using the CIPP model of evaluation on a health disparities curriculum delivered to medical residents in 12 residency programs,” Georg. South. Univ. Georg. South. Commons, 2023.
D. Stufflebeam “Evaluation Models,” New Dir. Eval., vol. 89, 2001, doi: 10.1002/ev.3.
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. America, 2014. doi: 10.4324/9780429469237-3.
M. Soven, D. Lehr, S. Nayanaha, and W. Olson, Linked Courses for General Education and Integrative Learning A Guide for Faculty and Administrators. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781003445760.
K. da S. Santos, M. C. Ribeiro, D. E. U. de Queiroga, I. A. P. da Silva, and S. M. Ferreira, “The use of multiple triangulations as a validation strategy in a qualitative study,” Cienc. e Saude Coletiva, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 655–664, 2020, doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018.
L. D. Hammond and J. Bransford, “Accountability in teacher education,” Action in teacher Education, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 60-71, 2020.
L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. 1985. doi: 10.3928/0048-5713-19850401-09.
C. A. Tomlinson, How To Differentiate Instruction In Mixed-Ability Classrooms. 1987. doi: 10.1016/0300-483X(87)90046-1.
J. Brophy, “Motivating students to learn,” Routledge, New York, 2004. doi: 10.4324/9781410610218.
R. Boelens, M. Voet, and B. De Wever, “The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning,” Comput. Educ., vol. 120, pp. 197–212, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009.
D. Darmawan, B. Qomaruzzaman, A. Hanan, and A. I. Mauliddin, “The impact of problem-based learning on understanding and application of tafsīr among University Students,” Educ. Adm. Theory Pract., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 8684–8690, 2024, doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4444.
E. Suryawati and K. Osman, “Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 61–76, 2018, doi: 10.12973/ejmste/79329.
R. A. Shahjahan, A. L. Estera, K. L. Surla, and K. T. Edwards, “‘Decolonizing’ curriculum and pedagogy: A comparative review across disciplines and global higher education contexts,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 73–113, 2022, doi: 10.3102/00346543211042423.
M. S. B. Ali, R. Yasmeen, and Z. Munawar, “The impact of technology integration on student engagement and motivation,” Int. J. Integr. Educ., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJIE.
S. Sulistyowati, “Development and innovation of qur’anic learning methodologies in Indonesia,” Al-Lubab, vol. 10, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.19120/al-lubab.v10i2.5951.
S. Mokodenseho, H. Mokoagow, P. R. Pobela, C. P. Kobandaha, and R. Sabir, “Analysis of the Effectiveness of the use of Tafsir in Islamic religious education on the achievement of character education of junior high school students in Central Java,” Eastasouth J. Learn. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: 10.58812/esle.v2i01.230.
M. F. H. Sarker, R. Mahmud, M. S. Islam, and M. K. Islam, “Use of e-learning at higher educational institutions in Bangladesh: Opportunities and challenges,” J. Appl. Res., vol. 11, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-06-2018-0099.
Z. M. Zaki, S. F. Ishak, and K. A. Mohammad, “User interface designs of an educational mobile application: A study of qiraat teaching and learning,” Adv. Human‐Computer Interact., vol. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/6648550.
Y. P. Sari, J. Nugraha, and H. Basri, “Technology-Based Islamic Education : Building inclusive, adaptive, and future-ready learning foundations,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 37–54, 2024, doi: 10.15575/jipai.v4i1.40150.
R. Ali and S. N. Isnaini, “Digitising interpretation: Transforming tafsir al-mishbah in the context of the living Quran,” J. Stud. Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur’an dan Hadis, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2024, doi: 10.14421/qh.v25i1.5186.
U. Efe and A. V. Akcan, “A literature review of the studies on islam-science-technology in web of science,” J. STEM Teach. Institutes, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–80, 2024, doi: https://jstei.com/index.php/jsti/article/view/70.
S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 2004, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
S. Bell, “Project-Based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future,” Clear. House A J. Educ. Strateg. Issues Ideas, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 39–43, 2010, doi: 10.1080/00098650903505415.
A. Darmuki, F. Nugrahani, I. Fathurohman, M. Kanzunnudin, and N. A. Hidayati, “The impact of inquiry collaboration project based learning model of indonesian language course achievement,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 247–266, 2023, doi: 10.29333/iji.2023.16215a.
J. Edwards and P. R. Hobson, Religious Education in a Pluralist Society The Key Philosophical Issues. Rouletde, 2019.
P. . John W. Thomas, “A Review of Research On Project-Based Learning,” http://www.autodesk.com/foundation. pp. 47–64, 2000. doi: 10.1080/00206814.2019.1702592.
L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwol, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://www.uky.edu/~rsand1/china2018/texts/Anderson-Krathwohl - A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing.pdf
C. Rosaen, A. Meyer, S. Starchan, and J. Meier, “Reading horizons learning to facilitate highly interactive literary discussions to engage students as thinkers,” Read. Horizons A J. Lit. Lang. Arts, vol. 56, no. 1, 2017.
M. A. Nugraha, D. T. Kusuma, and M. I. Pamungkas, “Analysis of the implementation of the islamic boarding school curriculum in enhancing students’ competence in the Tahfidzul Qur’an Program,” J. Islam. Educ. Res. |, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 125–144, 2025, doi: 10.35719/jier.v6i2.472.
W. Bermi, F. Asroriah, and I. Shodiq, “The concept of learning in the Qur’an: A study of Tafsir Quran Karim by Mahmud Yunus,” Al-Lubab, vol. 10, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.19120/al-lubab.v10i2.5950.
A. R. Assegaf, H. S. Zainiyah, and M. Fahmi, “Curriculum Innovation for the Internationalization of Islamic Education Study Program at Higher Education Institutions in Surabaya, Indonesia,” Millah J. Relig. Stud., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 671–706, 2022, doi: 10.20885/millah.vol21.iss3.art3.
S. Shofaussamawati, A. Khusniyah, E. O. Setyaningsih, and M. Kusairi, “Philological Insights in Qur ’ an and Tafsir Education : A Framework for Developing Teaching Materials,” J. Ultim. Reserch Trends Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 153–166, 2024, doi: 10.31849/utamax.v6i2.20273.
Y. Affandi, A. Darmuki, and A. Hariyadi, “The Evaluation of JIDI (Jigsaw Discovery) Learning Model in the Course of Qur an Tafsir,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 799–820, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15146a.
I. Andriani, Z. Hartati, and S. Surawan, "The The Cipp Analysis of PAI Development Program for Mualaf in MCI Palangka Raya," At-Tarbiyat Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 499-511, 2021, doi: 10.37758/jat.v4i3.316
U. W. Rohmah, M. Muslimah, and S. Lutfi, “Evaluasi program Qur’an, Tajwid, dan Tahfidz di SMA IT Hasanka Palangka Raya [Evaluation of the Qur'an, Tajweed, and Tahfidz programs at Hasanka IT High School, Palangka Raya],” didaktika.j.kep, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 3797-3810, Aug. 2024.
S. Surawan and I. Andriani, “Evaluasi model CIPP program pembinaan PAI di MCI Palangka Raya [Evaluation of the CIPP model for the PAI development program at MCI Palangka Raya ],” In: Seminar Nasional Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 2022
N. Khalda, M. Muslimah, and S. Surawan, “Enhancing student self-disclosure through the deep talk critical method: A case study of islamic religious education,” Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 651-661, Jun. 2025.
I. D. . Oktaviana, M. R. . Anshari, and S. Surawan, “Communication patterns of islamic religious education teachers in learning at SMKN 3 Palangka Raya,” jiip, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 6321-6327, Jun. 2025.
M. Mazrur, S. Surawan, and S. Norhidayah, Teknologi Komunikasi Dalam Pembelajaran PAI: Sarna Membangun Relasi Guru dan Murid [Communication Technology in Islamic Religious Education Learning: A Means of Building Teacher-Student Relationships]. K-Media, 2024.
Copyright (c) 2025 Saiful Lutfi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
