Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal


National Vital Object Security Management Approach in Supporting Sustainable Tourism in Geothermal Power Plants

Share
  • Purpose of the Study: This study aims to analyze and prioritize security management approaches—preemptive, preventive, and repressive—to safeguard the Dieng Geothermal Power Plants, designated as a National Vital Object (Obvitnas), while simultaneously promoting sustainable tourism development in the Dieng area. Balancing national security requirements with community-based tourism initiatives presents a complex challenge that this study seeks to address.

    Methodology: A qualitative research method was employed, integrating the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to systematically prioritize security strategies. Data collection involved structured surveys and in-depth interviews with three key stakeholder groups: company management, security personnel, and community leaders. Triangulation was used to validate findings and ensure a comprehensive understanding of diverse stakeholder perspectives.

    Main Findings: The results reveal that the preemptive security approach is prioritized as the most critical strategy, emphasizing the importance of community involvement, partnership programs, and environmental initiatives to ensure the safety of the geothermal plant while fostering trust and collaboration with local communities. Repressive and preventive approaches, while still important, are ranked lower in effectiveness for achieving both security and tourism sustainability objectives. The study highlights that fostering proactive community engagement and ecological stewardship can serve as dual drivers of security and socio-economic development.

    Novelty/Originality of this Study: This research offers a novel integration of security management and sustainable tourism principles, proposing a community-centered security framework specifically adapted for Obvitnas like Dieng GPPs. It provides new insights into how national energy infrastructure can be protected without hindering, and even supporting, local tourism growth and community empowerment.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “National Vital Object Security Management Approach in Supporting Sustainable Tourism in Geothermal Power Plants”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 601–610, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1677.
  • 390
    Abstract views
    215
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. B. Pavlakovič, M. R. Demir, N. Pozvek, and M. Turnšek, “Role of tourism in promoting geothermal energy: Public interest and motivation for geothermal energy tourism in slovenia,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 18, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su131810353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810353
    2. G. Axelsson, “The future of geothermal energy,” in Living With Climate Change, 2024. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-18515-1.00009-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18515-1.00009-5
    3. J. Moraga, H. S. Duzgun, M. Cavur, and H. Soydan, “The Geothermal Artificial Intelligence for geothermal exploration,” Renew Energy, vol. 192, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.113
    4. RPS, “Geothermal energy is vital to the energy transition,” https://www.rpsgroup.com/insights/energy/why-geothermal-energy-must-be- included-in-our-conversations-about-energy-transition/.
    5. Hariyadi, P. Wirutomo, S. S. Moersidik, and S. W. Sularno, “Social acceptance to geothermal development in Indonesia,” Opcion, vol. 35, no. SpecialEdition24, 2019.
    6. A. Wachowicz-Pyzik, L. Pająk, B. Papiernik, and M. Michna, “The application of numerical modeling to geothermal investments,” Computer Assisted Methods in Engineering and Science, vol. 22, no. 4, 2015.
    7. M. P. Dewi, A. D. Setiawan, Y. Latief, and W. W. Purwanto, “Investment decisions under uncertainties in geothermal power generation,” AIMS Energy, vol. 10, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3934/energy.2022038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2022038
    8. P. Allahvirdizadeh, “A review on geothermal wells: Well integrity issues,” 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124009
    9. T. Sharmin, N. R. Khan, M. S. Akram, and M. M. Ehsan, “A State-of-the-Art Review on Geothermal Energy Extraction, Utilization, and Improvement Strategies: Conventional, Hybridized, and Enhanced Geothermal Systems,” 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100323
    10. M. Bošnjaković, M. Stojkov, and M. Jurjević, “Environmental impact of geothermal power plants,” Tehnicki Vjesnik, vol. 26, no. 5, 2019, doi: 10.17559/TV-20180829122640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20180829122640
    11. M. Soltani et al., “Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems,” 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110750
    12. W. T. Stringfellow and P. F. Dobson, “Technology for the recovery of lithium from geothermal brines,” 2021. doi: 10.3390/en14206805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206805
    13. F. Zeren, N. Gülcan, S. Gürsoy, İ. H. Ekşi, M. I. Tabash, and M. Radulescu, “The Relationship between Geothermal Energy Consumption, Foreign Direct Investment, and Economic Growth in Geothermal Consumer Countries: Evidence from Panel Fourier Causality Test,” Energies (Basel), vol. 16, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16031258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031258
    14. J. Mahwa, D. jiang Li, J. hua Ping, W. Leng, J. bo Tang, and D. yun Shao, “Mapping the spatial distribution of fossil geothermal manifestations and assessment of geothermal potential of the Tangyin rift, Southeast of Taihang Mountain in China,” J Mt Sci, vol. 19, no. 8, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11629-022-7329-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-022-7329-2
    15. S. Mohammadzadeh Bina, S. Jalilinasrabady, H. Fujii, and N. A. Pambudi, “Classification of geothermal resources in Indonesia by applying exergy concept,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 93, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.018
    16. Enel Green Power, “ All the advantages of geothermal energy.,” https://www.enelgreenpower.com/learning-hub/renewable-energies/geothermal- energy/advantages.
    17. Enel Green Power, “All the advantages of geothermal energy,” https://www.enelgreenpower.com/learning-hub/renewable-energies/geothermal- energy/advantages.
    18. A. Barich et al., “Social license to operate in geothermal energy,” Energies (Basel), vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15010139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010139
    19. S. Azmi, B. Ginting, R. Sitepu, and ..., “Geothermal Investment Legal Protection Policy in North Sumatra,” … Communication and Sosial …, 2020.
    20. S. W. Yudha, B. Tjahjono, and P. Longhurst, “Unearthing the Dynamics of Indonesia’s Geothermal Energy Development,” Energies (Basel), vol. 15, no. 14, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15145009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15145009
    21. M. Spada, E. Sutra, and P. Burgherr, “Comparative accident risk assessment with focus on deep geothermal energy systems in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries,” Geothermics, vol. 95, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102142
    22. M. P. Hochstein and S. Sudarman, “History of geothermal exploration in Indonesia from 1970 to 2000,” Geothermics, vol. 37, no. 3, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2008.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2008.01.001
    23. A. McClean and O. W. Pedersen, “The role of regulation in geothermal energy in the UK,” Energy Policy, vol. 173, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113378
    24. O. A. Alabi, F. A. Ajayi, C. A. Udeh, and F. P. Efunniyi, “Predictive analytics in human resources: Enhancing workforce planning and customer experience,” International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 149-158, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.1109016
    25. J. He, Y. Mao, A. M. Morrison, and J. A. Coca-Stefaniak, “On being warm and friendly: the effect of socially responsible human resource management on employee fears of the threats of COVID-19,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 346-366, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2020-0300
    26. M. R. Azizi, R. Atlasi, A. Ziapour, J. Abbas, and R. Naemi, “Innovative human resource management strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic narrative review approach,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 6, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07233
    27. V. Agarwal, K. Mathiyazhagan, S. Malhotra, and T. Saikouk, “Analysis of challenges in sustainable human resource management due to disruptions by Industry 4.0: an emerging economy perspective,” International Journal of Manpower, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 513-541, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0192
    28. N. Nawaz, H. Arunachalam, B. K. Pathi, and V. Gajenderan, “The adoption of artificial intelligence in human resources management practices," International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 100208, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100208
    29. D. Ngoc Su, D. Luc Tra, H. M. Thi Huynh, H. H. T. Nguyen, and B. O’Mahony, “Enhancing resilience in the Covid-19 crisis: lessons from human resource management practices in Vietnam,” Current Issues in Tourism, vol. 24, no. 22, pp. 3189-3205, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1863930
    30. G. Lilienthal, and N. Ahmad, “Criminal Intent and the Ruthless Risk-Taker,” Eur. JL Reform, vol. 24, pp. 218, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/EJLR/138723702022024002004
    31. R. M. A. Ilyasa, “Legal and Victimological Perspective on Sexual Violence against Children Cases in Indonesia,” The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 281-300, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v3i3.48269
    32. N. Yuzikova, T. Korniakova, S. Khomiachenko, and T. Chasova, “Moral and psychological features of the motivational sphere of juveniles who commit crimes: Risk assessment of determining communication,” European Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 123-123, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p123
    33. O. E. Jonathan, A. J. Olusola, T. C. A. Bernadin, and T. M. Inoussa, “Impacts of crime on socio-economic development,” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 12, 5, pp. 71, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2021-0045
    34. S. O. Kharytonov, R. S. Orlovskyi, T. V. Kurman, and O. O. Maslova, “Criminal legal protection of the environment: national realities and international standards,” European Energy and Environmental Law Review, vol. 32, no. 6, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EELR2023018
    35. A. Fathalla, K. Li, and A. Salah, “Best-KFF: a multi-objective preemptive resource allocation policy for cloud computing systems.” Cluster Computing, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 321-336, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03407-z
    36. S. J. Kamble, and M. R. Kounte, “A survey on emergency vehicle preemption methods based on routing and scheduling,” International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 60-71, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22247/ijcna/2022/211623
    37. E. Ko, J. Cho, and J. Lee, “A study on improving operational criteria of preemption/priority signal control for emergency vehicles,” Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 299-311, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2021.39.3.299
    38. N. Farida, and M. Syauqillah, “Ring of Security Review on The Vital Objects of The Electricity Subfield,” Jurnal Ekonomi, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1248-1258, 2023.
    39. A. L. Diab, I. Iswandi, A. Yaqub, L. M. Muthalib, and A. Z. Baharuddin, “Safeguarding consumers: The role of industry and trade office in countering monopolistic practices and ensuring business protection,” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 299-312, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i2.9065
    40. S. Gwerevende, and Z. M. Mthombeni, “Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage: exploring the synergies in the transmission of Indigenous languages, dance and music practices in Southern Africa,” International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 398-412, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2193902
    41. Y. Dao, K. Yusnaldi, and K. Kusuma, “Mitigating destructive fishing through the optimization of community-based coastal surveillance as an effort to safeguard maritime security,” Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 2783-2796, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v3i7.9506
    42. D. Hartanto, “Strengthening the police institutional system in eradicating narcotics crime in the North Sumatra Regional Police, Indonesia,” Traektoriâ Nauki, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3008-3013, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.89-7
    43. E. E. Supriyanto, M. Rachmawati, and F. J. Nugroho, “Transformative policies and infrastructure strengthening towards the police era 4.0,” Jurnal Bina Praja, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 231-243, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.231-243
    44. K. C. Apostolakis, N. Dimitriou, G. Margetis, S. Ntoa, D. Tzovaras, and C. Stephanidis, “DARLENE–Improving situational awareness of European law enforcement agents through a combination of augmented reality and artificial intelligence solutions,” Open Research Europe, vol. 1, pp. 87, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13715.2
    45. O. S. Oliinyk, R. M. Shestopalov, V. O. Zarosylo, M. I. Stankovic, and S. G. Golubitsky, “Economic security through criminal policies: A comparative study of Western and European approaches,” Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova, vol. 20, no. 38, pp. 265-285, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.899
    46. A. T. Hariwanto, “The phenomena of dieng plateau tourismdestination development planning,” Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Policy Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/jitps.v6i2.272
    47. A. Haryanto, I. R. Shandy, and Q. A. Setyawan, “Analysis of the Dieng Culture Festival from the Perspective of Sustainable Tourism,” KnE Social Sciences, pp. 542-551, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i3.12855
    48. M. E. Apriyanti, H. Subiyantoro, and C. Ratnasih, “Focus on local cultural attraction in increasing tourist visits in Central Java Tourism Villages,” Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, vol. 2, no.11, pp. 2645-2653, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v2i11.480
    49. P. Shojaei, E. Vlahu-Gjorgievska, and Y. W. Chow, “Security and privacy of technologies in health information systems: A systematic literature review,” Computers, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 41, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13020041
    50. V. R. Sugumaran, E. Dinesh, R. Ramya, and E. Muniyandy, “Distributed blockchain assisted secure data aggregation scheme for risk-aware zone-based MANET,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 8022, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92656-8
    51. O. L. Harris, T. R. Robinson, and T. M. Wilson, “Agent-based modelling of evacuation scenarios for a landslide-generated tsunami in Milford Sound, New Zealand,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 113, pp. 104847, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104847