TikTok as an Effective Tool for English Language Learning: A Digital Ethics Perspective
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The integration of TikTok as a tool in English language learning has rapidly expanded due to its engaging, short-form video format and the platform’s ability to foster creativity, student participation, and peer interaction. Despite this growth, limited scholarly attention has been paid to the digital ethical challenges posed by TikTok’s use in educational settings, particularly those related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, content moderation, and disinformation.
Methodology: This research employs a systematic literature review approach, synthesizing findings from relevant studies on TikTok in education, with emphasis on English language instruction. The selection process follows PRISMA guidelines to ensure comprehensive and unbiased coverage of relevant literature.
Main Findings: Findings indicate that TikTok significantly enhances learners’ speaking, listening, and digital communication skills while encouraging collaborative and socially interactive learning environments. However, ethical issues—such as exposure to inappropriate content, misinformation, lack of algorithm transparency, and student data vulnerabilities—emerge as critical concerns that require careful pedagogical management.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study presents a novel conceptual framework for integrating TikTok into English language education ethically and responsibly, positioning it at the intersection of digital pedagogy and media ethics. It advocates for the inclusion of digital literacy and ethics training within the curriculum to equip educators and students to engage with social media tools in a more informed and secure manner.
References
A. K. Bairwa, Computation of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: First International Conference, ICCAIML 2024, Jaipur, India, January 18–19, 2024, Proceedings, Part I, vol. 2184. Springer Nature, 2025.
P. Kendeou and V. Johnson, “The nature of misinformation in education,” Curr. Opin. Psychol., vol. 55, p. 101734, 2024.
A. J. Lazard et al., “Exposure and reactions to cancer treatment misinformation and advice: survey study,” JMIR cancer, vol. 9, p. e43749, 2023.
W. Holmes et al., “Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., pp. 1–23, 2022.
D. McMillin, “Children, Youth, and Media Globalization,” in The Routledge International Handbook of Children, Adolescents, and Media, Routledge, 2022, pp. 65–72.
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and P. Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” Int. J. Surg., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 336–341, 2010.
R. C. Mayer, J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman, “An integrative model of organizational trust,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 709–734, 1995.
S. Livingstone and L. Haddon, “EU Kids Online.,” Zeitschrift Für Psychol. Psychol., vol. 217, no. 4, p. 236, 2009.
T. Harrison and D. Laco, “Where’s the character education in online higher education? Constructivism, virtue ethics and roles of online educators,” E-Learning Digit. Media, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 555–573, 2022.
R. Hanna and E. Kazim, “Philosophical foundations for digital ethics and AI Ethics: a dignitarian approach,” AI Ethics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 405–423, 2021.
A. Haleem, M. Javaid, M. A. Qadri, and R. Suman, “Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review,” Sustain. Oper. Comput., vol. 3, pp. 275–285, 2022.
K. Badillo-Urquiola, D. Smriti, B. McNally, E. Golub, E. Bonsignore, and P. J. Wisniewski, “Stranger danger! social media app features co-designed with children to keep them safe online,” in Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on interaction design and children, 2019, pp. 394–406.
A. Shouli, A. Barthwal, M. Campbell, and A. K. Shrestha, “Ethical AI for Young Digital Citizens: A Call to Action on Privacy Governance,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2503.11947, 2025.
S.-M. Lin, H.-H. Chung, F.-L. Chung, and Y.-J. Lan, “Concerns about using ChatGPT in education,” in International conference on innovative technologies and learning, Springer, 2023, pp. 37–49.
H. Hu and K. Du, “TikTok in mobile-assisted English language learning: An exploratory study,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1311–1320, 2022.
K. M. Chuah and L.-C. Ch’ng, “The usefulness of TikTok voice-over challenges as ESL speaking activities: A case study on Malaysian undergraduates.,” Electron. J. Foreign Lang. Teach., vol. 20, no. 1, 2023.
M. Caon, I. T. Steffan, and A. Rinaldi, “Opportunities and challenges of digital technologies for inclusion,” in Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Springer, 2021, pp. 205–208.
C. Are, “‘Dysfunctional’appeals and failures of algorithmic justice in Instagram and TikTok content moderation,” Information, Commun. Soc., pp. 1–18, 2024.
R. Alfaro, R. Venegas, A. Bronfman, M. Valenzuela, S. Riff, and E. Sologuren, “ARAPP: Análisis y resumen Automático de Políticas de Privacidad,” Linguamática, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 23–35, 2022.
G. Livraga, A. Motta, and M. Viviani, “Assessing user privacy on social media: The Twitter case study,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Workshop on Open Challenges in Online Social Networks, 2022, pp. 1–9.
H. Giroux, “Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 425–464, 2002.
Z. Xiuwen and A. B. Razali, “An overview of the utilization of TikTok to improve oral English communication competence among EFL undergraduate students,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1439–1451, 2021.
L. Floridi and J. Cowls, “A unified framework of five principles for AI in society,” Mach. Learn. city Appl. Archit. urban Des., pp. 535–545, 2022.
M. F. Teng, A. Kukulska-Hulme, and J. G. Wu, Theory and practice in vocabulary research in digital environments. Taylor & Francis, 2024.
S. Aftab, “The Concept of the Right to Privacy,” in Comparative Perspectives on the Right to Privacy: Pakistani and European Experiences, Springer, 2024, pp. 39–98.
K. Thomas, P. G. Kelley, S. Consolvo, P. Samermit, and E. Bursztein, “‘It’s common and a part of being a content creator’: Understanding How Creators Experience and Cope with Hate and Harassment Online,” in Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2022, pp. 1–15.
W. Tegegne, “The use of dialects in education and its impacts on students’ learning and achievements,” Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 263–269, 2015.
K. Aini, M. Misbahudholam AR, and M. Ridwan, “Growing numeral literacy skills through science, technology, engineering, arts, mathematics based on local wisdom,” Mimb. PGSD Undiksha, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2024, doi: 10.23887/jjpgsd.v12i1.67642.
M. Pikhart and O. Botezat, “The impact of the use of social media on second language acquisition,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 192, pp. 1621–1628, 2021.
A. M. Perrotti, I. Puwo, and S. Jayarathna, “Exploring TikTok as an Educational Tool for Speech-Language Pathologists, Special Education, and General Education,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks and Mobile Computing, 2023, pp. 540–544.
S. Niu, Z. Lu, A. X. Zhang, J. Cai, C. F. Griggio, and H. Heuer, “Building Credibility, Trust, and Safety on Video-Sharing Platforms,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2023, pp. 1–7.
M. N. O. Sadiku, T. J. Ashaolu, A. Ajayi-Majebi, and S. M. Musa, “Digital Safety,” Int. J. Sci. Adv., vol. 2, no. 10.51542, 2021.
S. Gn, S. Hleza, F. Tlou, S. Shonhiwa, and E. Mathonsi, “Qualitative content analysis, utility, usability and processes in educational research,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 07, pp. 553–558, 2021.
H. Silber et al., “Asking for traces: A vignette study on acceptability norms and personal willingness to donate digital trace data,” Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., p. 08944393241305776, 2024, doi: 10.1177/08944393241305776.
H. Nissenbaum, “Privacy as contextual integrity,” Wash. L. Rev., vol. 79, p. 119, 2004.
D. Taylor, Michel Foucault: key concepts. Routledge, 2014.
N. I. A. Roshdi and N. H. Rahmat, “Exploring the relationship between motivation and vocabulary use among TickTock Users,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1334–1346, 2023, doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i3/16583.
M. Ridwan, H. Hodairiyah, and S. Sulistiyono, “Language politeness as a foundation for ethical and moral development among islamic elementary school students,” AL-ISHLAH J. Pendidik., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 2967–2976, 2024, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5556.
M. Ridwan, M. M. AR, F. Budiyono, and T. Sukitman, “Improve the numeracy skills of fifth-grade students through self-efficacy in elementary schools,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 526–535, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jisd.v7i3.58660.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ninik Suryatiningsih, Dwi Priyo Widodo, Baiduri Baiduri, Ribut Wahyu Eriyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
