Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

TikTok as an Effective Tool for English Language Learning: A Digital Ethics Perspective

Ninik Suryatiningsih ORCID
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ROR
Indonesia
niniksuryatiningsih339@gmail.com
Dwi Priyo Widodo ORCID
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ROR
Indonesia
Baiduri Baiduri ORCID
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ROR
Indonesia
Ribut Wahyu Eriyanti ORCID
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: The integration of TikTok as a tool in English language learning has rapidly expanded due to its engaging, short-form video format and the platform’s ability to foster creativity, student participation, and peer interaction. Despite this growth, limited scholarly attention has been paid to the digital ethical challenges posed by TikTok’s use in educational settings, particularly those related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, content moderation, and disinformation.

    Methodology: This research employs a systematic literature review approach, synthesizing findings from relevant studies on TikTok in education, with emphasis on English language instruction. The selection process follows PRISMA guidelines to ensure comprehensive and unbiased coverage of relevant literature.

    Main Findings: Findings indicate that TikTok significantly enhances learners’ speaking, listening, and digital communication skills while encouraging collaborative and socially interactive learning environments. However, ethical issues—such as exposure to inappropriate content, misinformation, lack of algorithm transparency, and student data vulnerabilities—emerge as critical concerns that require careful pedagogical management.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study presents a novel conceptual framework for integrating TikTok into English language education ethically and responsibly, positioning it at the intersection of digital pedagogy and media ethics. It advocates for the inclusion of digital literacy and ethics training within the curriculum to equip educators and students to engage with social media tools in a more informed and secure manner.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “TikTok as an Effective Tool for English Language Learning: A Digital Ethics Perspective”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 405–416, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1628.

    More Citation Formats

  • 2137
    Abstract views
    605
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. K. Bairwa, Computation of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: First International Conference, ICCAIML 2024, Jaipur, India, January 18–19, 2024, Proceedings, Part I, vol. 2184. Springer Nature, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71481-8
    2. P. Kendeou and V. Johnson, “The nature of misinformation in education,” Curr. Opin. Psychol., vol. 55, p. 101734, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101734
    3. A. J. Lazard et al., “Exposure and reactions to cancer treatment misinformation and advice: survey study,” JMIR cancer, vol. 9, p. e43749, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/43749
    4. W. Holmes et al., “Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., pp. 1–23, 2022.
    5. D. McMillin, “Children, Youth, and Media Globalization,” in The Routledge International Handbook of Children, Adolescents, and Media, Routledge, 2022, pp. 65–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003118824-9
    6. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and P. Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” Int. J. Surg., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 336–341, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
    7. R. C. Mayer, J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman, “An integrative model of organizational trust,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 709–734, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
    8. S. Livingstone and L. Haddon, “EU Kids Online.,” Zeitschrift Für Psychol. Psychol., vol. 217, no. 4, p. 236, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.236
    9. T. Harrison and D. Laco, “Where’s the character education in online higher education? Constructivism, virtue ethics and roles of online educators,” E-Learning Digit. Media, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 555–573, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221104885
    10. R. Hanna and E. Kazim, “Philosophical foundations for digital ethics and AI Ethics: a dignitarian approach,” AI Ethics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 405–423, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00040-9
    11. A. Haleem, M. Javaid, M. A. Qadri, and R. Suman, “Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review,” Sustain. Oper. Comput., vol. 3, pp. 275–285, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
    12. K. Badillo-Urquiola, D. Smriti, B. McNally, E. Golub, E. Bonsignore, and P. J. Wisniewski, “Stranger danger! social media app features co-designed with children to keep them safe online,” in Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on interaction design and children, 2019, pp. 394–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323133
    13. A. Shouli, A. Barthwal, M. Campbell, and A. K. Shrestha, “Ethical AI for Young Digital Citizens: A Call to Action on Privacy Governance,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2503.11947, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174221140.03641858/v1
    14. S.-M. Lin, H.-H. Chung, F.-L. Chung, and Y.-J. Lan, “Concerns about using ChatGPT in education,” in International conference on innovative technologies and learning, Springer, 2023, pp. 37–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_4
    15. H. Hu and K. Du, “TikTok in mobile-assisted English language learning: An exploratory study,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1311–1320, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.12.1755
    16. K. M. Chuah and L.-C. Ch’ng, “The usefulness of TikTok voice-over challenges as ESL speaking activities: A case study on Malaysian undergraduates.,” Electron. J. Foreign Lang. Teach., vol. 20, no. 1, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56040/kmlc2013
    17. M. Caon, I. T. Steffan, and A. Rinaldi, “Opportunities and challenges of digital technologies for inclusion,” in Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Springer, 2021, pp. 205–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_25
    18. C. Are, “‘Dysfunctional’appeals and failures of algorithmic justice in Instagram and TikTok content moderation,” Information, Commun. Soc., pp. 1–18, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2396621
    19. R. Alfaro, R. Venegas, A. Bronfman, M. Valenzuela, S. Riff, and E. Sologuren, “ARAPP: Análisis y resumen Automático de Políticas de Privacidad,” Linguamática, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 23–35, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21814/lm.14.2.375
    20. G. Livraga, A. Motta, and M. Viviani, “Assessing user privacy on social media: The Twitter case study,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Workshop on Open Challenges in Online Social Networks, 2022, pp. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3524010.3539502
    21. H. Giroux, “Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 425–464, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.4.0515nr62324n71p1
    22. Z. Xiuwen and A. B. Razali, “An overview of the utilization of TikTok to improve oral English communication competence among EFL undergraduate students,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1439–1451, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090710
    23. L. Floridi and J. Cowls, “A unified framework of five principles for AI in society,” Mach. Learn. city Appl. Archit. urban Des., pp. 535–545, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.ch45
    24. M. F. Teng, A. Kukulska-Hulme, and J. G. Wu, Theory and practice in vocabulary research in digital environments. Taylor & Francis, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003367543-1
    25. S. Aftab, “The Concept of the Right to Privacy,” in Comparative Perspectives on the Right to Privacy: Pakistani and European Experiences, Springer, 2024, pp. 39–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45575-9_3
    26. K. Thomas, P. G. Kelley, S. Consolvo, P. Samermit, and E. Bursztein, “‘It’s common and a part of being a content creator’: Understanding How Creators Experience and Cope with Hate and Harassment Online,” in Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2022, pp. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501879
    27. W. Tegegne, “The use of dialects in education and its impacts on students’ learning and achievements,” Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 263–269, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22
    28. K. Aini, M. Misbahudholam AR, and M. Ridwan, “Growing numeral literacy skills through science, technology, engineering, arts, mathematics based on local wisdom,” Mimb. PGSD Undiksha, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2024, doi: 10.23887/jjpgsd.v12i1.67642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v12i1.67642
    29. M. Pikhart and O. Botezat, “The impact of the use of social media on second language acquisition,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 192, pp. 1621–1628, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.166
    30. A. M. Perrotti, I. Puwo, and S. Jayarathna, “Exploring TikTok as an Educational Tool for Speech-Language Pathologists, Special Education, and General Education,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks and Mobile Computing, 2023, pp. 540–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3565287.3617636
    31. S. Niu, Z. Lu, A. X. Zhang, J. Cai, C. F. Griggio, and H. Heuer, “Building Credibility, Trust, and Safety on Video-Sharing Platforms,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2023, pp. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3573809
    32. M. N. O. Sadiku, T. J. Ashaolu, A. Ajayi-Majebi, and S. M. Musa, “Digital Safety,” Int. J. Sci. Adv., vol. 2, no. 10.51542, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51542/ijscia.v2i5.21
    33. S. Gn, S. Hleza, F. Tlou, S. Shonhiwa, and E. Mathonsi, “Qualitative content analysis, utility, usability and processes in educational research,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 07, pp. 553–558, 2021.
    34. H. Silber et al., “Asking for traces: A vignette study on acceptability norms and personal willingness to donate digital trace data,” Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., p. 08944393241305776, 2024, doi: 10.1177/08944393241305776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2aum8
    35. H. Nissenbaum, “Privacy as contextual integrity,” Wash. L. Rev., vol. 79, p. 119, 2004.
    36. D. Taylor, Michel Foucault: key concepts. Routledge, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315711478
    37. N. I. A. Roshdi and N. H. Rahmat, “Exploring the relationship between motivation and vocabulary use among TickTock Users,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1334–1346, 2023, doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i3/16583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i3/16583
    38. M. Ridwan, H. Hodairiyah, and S. Sulistiyono, “Language politeness as a foundation for ethical and moral development among islamic elementary school students,” AL-ISHLAH J. Pendidik., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 2967–2976, 2024, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5556
    39. M. Ridwan, M. M. AR, F. Budiyono, and T. Sukitman, “Improve the numeracy skills of fifth-grade students through self-efficacy in elementary schools,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 526–535, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jisd.v7i3.58660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v7i3.58660