Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Evaluating Faith and Modernity: Old Testament Theology in the Context of Contemporary Christian Education

Herowati Sitorus ORCID
Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Tarutung
Indonesia
herowatis@iakntarutung.ac.id
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study explores the evolving role of evaluative processes in Christian education, with a focus on the intersection of Old Testament theology and contemporary theological thought. It seeks to understand how evaluations in theological and Christian education reflect broader shifts in how faith, modernity, and the relevance of Old Testament principles are understood in contemporary contexts.

    Methodology: Employing a qualitative approach, this research uses a literature review. It examines secondary sources, including Scopus-indexed journals, to trace the development of evaluation within Christian education and Old Testament theology. Primary sources include books analyzing shifts and tensions in theological evaluation, historical contexts, political influences, and the changing positions of Christian congregations.

    Main Findings: The study reveals that evaluation serves as a tool that significantly influences the trajectory of theological discourse, particularly regarding the Old Testament. It highlights the interconnectedness of theology and various facets of human life, emphasizing the importance of critical evaluation, empathy, and reflection in contemporary theological engagement.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This research offers a fresh perspective by examining Old Testament theology as an evaluative space within Christian education and its connection to contemporary theological debates. It distinguishes itself by focusing on the evaluative nature of Old Testament theology, in contrast to previous research that emphasizes historical contexts or the weaknesses of objectivist lenses. It seeks to provide unique insights into the ongoing relevance of Old Testament principles in shaping contemporary theological evaluations and practices within Christian education.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Evaluating Faith and Modernity: Old Testament Theology in the Context of Contemporary Christian Education”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 609–616, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jee.v7i2.1621.

    More Citation Formats

  • 123
    Abstract views
    51
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. E. Schillebeeckx, The collected works of Edward Schillebeeckx Volume 1: Christ the sacrament of the encounter with God. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.
    2. M. M. Gondelman, “An Inconsistent Messiah: Abraham Miguel Cardozo (1626–1706) between Kabbalah, Philosophy, and Early Modern Rationality,” 2022, New York University.
    3. Y. Erez, “עוד חוזר הדיון: על ההליך של,” in Tel Aviv University Law Review Forum, 2025.
    4. P. Tillich, Theology of culture, vol. 124. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.
    5. H. U. Von Balthasar, Theology of Karl Barth. Ignatius Press, 2013.
    6. M. C. Tirayoh, J. Kistisia, M. P. Sinta, S. Vinisya, A. Wirawan, and A. Munte, “Rethinking juan luis segundo: Phenomenological philosophy, existentialism and liberation theology,” Jurnal Pendidikan West Science, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 605–621, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58812/jpdws.v1i10.716
    7. W. Manik, W. Wulandari, F. Fera, H. Agustin, D. Moyau, and A. Munte, “Ethical reflections on immanuel kant’s moral philosophy and [adolescent] delinquency",” Journal of Applied Language and Literacy Studies (JOLALI), vol. 2, no. 2, 2023.
    8. E. Levinas, The levinas reader, 1989.
    9. O. M. Sihombing et al., “Reflecting and [living]: Philosophy and architecture of the art and performance of talawang,” The Eastasouth Journal of Learning and Educations, vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 21–30, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58812/esle.v2i01.194
    10. Y. Putri, R. G. M. Suriani, Fetriani, Y. Sefle, and A. Munte, “Miroslav volf’s theosophy and charitable social living,” Athena: Journal of Social, Culture and Society, vol. 1, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.58905/athena.v1i4.144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58905/athena.v1i4.144
    11. I. J. J. Spangenberg, “Six decades of old testament theology (1952-2012): from hearing only one voice to hearing many human voices/Ses dekades ou testament-teologie (1952-2012): van een spreker tot verskeie menslike sprekers,” HTS Teologiese Studies, vol. 68, no. 1, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v68i1.1273
    12. L. Gearon, “The King James Bible and the politics of religious education: Secular state and sacred scripture,” Religious Education, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 9–27, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344087.2013.747838
    13. J. Lief, “Challenging the objectivist paradigm: Teaching biblical theology with JRR Tolkien, CS Lewis, and Guillermo del Toro,” Teaching Theology & Religion, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 321–332, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9647.2009.00546.x
    14. J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications, 2016.
    15. F. J. Willis, Now Concerning Spiritual Things: Authentic Spirituality in Pluralistic Contexts. Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2019.
    16. S. W. Wahono, Di sini kutemukan: petunjuk mempelajari dan mengajarkan Alkitab. BPK Gunung Mulia, 1986.
    17. W. Lempp and P. S. Naipospos, Tafsiran Alkitab Kejadian 1: 1-4: 26. BPK Gunung Mulia, 1987.
    18. D. Bonhoeffer, Ethics. Simon and Schuster, 2012.
    19. H. Sitorus, “Perempuan sebagai pendamping sepadan bagi laki-laki dalam konteks alkitab dan budaya batak [Women as equal companions for men in the context of the Bible and Batak culture],” Jurnal Teologi Cultivation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41–52, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46965/jtc.v3i1.251
    20. A. Hyytiä, “Sustainable development—International framework—Overview and analysis in the context of forests and forest products—Competitiveness and policy,” For. Prod. J., vol. 72, no. s1, pp. 1–4, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-20-00053
    21. J. Martin and S. Newman, “Recontesting the Sacred: political theology as ideological method,” Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 67–83, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2023.2225237
    22. F. Tava, “Justice, emotions, and solidarity,” Crit. Rev. Int. Soc. Political Philos., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 39–55, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.1893251
    23. B. Q. Ford, M. Feinberg, B. Lassetter, S. Thai, and A. Gatchpazian, “The political is personal: The costs of daily politics.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 125, no. 1, p. 1, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000335
    24. J. Moltmann, “The crucified god,” Theology Today, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 6–18, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004057367403100102
    25. A. Linzey and T. Regan, Animals and Christianity: A book of readings. Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2007.
    26. W. Dyrness, Tema-tema dalam teologi Perjanjian Lama [Themes in Old Testament theology], Malang: Gandum Mas, 2004.
    27. R. V. G. Tasker and E. A. M. Kini, Jilid II MZ, Jakarta: Yayasan Komunikasi Bina Kasih OMF, 2004.
    28. G. C. Berkouwer, Man: the image of God, Studies in dogmatics., 1962.
    29. A. A. Yewangoe, Tidak Ada Penumpang Gelap: Warga Gereja, Warga Bangsa [No Free Riders: Church Members, Nation Members]. BPK Gunung Mulia, 2009.
    30. S. Palmquist, “How Political Is the Kantian Church?,” Diametros, vol. 17, no. 65, pp. 95–113, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1639
    31. C. D. Bărbuceanu, “Exploring Heutagogy-the digital twist in self-determined learning and education,” Revista de Științe Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques, no. 81, pp. 62–69, 2024.
    32. W. Rauschenbusch, A theology for the social gospel. Westminster John Knox Press, 1997.
    33. P. J. Hoedemaker, The Politics of Antithesis: The Antirevolutionary Government of Abraham Kuyper 1901–1905. Pantocrator Press, 2021.
    34. B. Goudzwaard and H. Praamsma, A Christian political option. Wedge Publ. Foundation, 1972.
    35. J. C. Livingston and F. S. Fiorenza, Modern Christian thought: The twentieth century, vol. 2. Fortress Press, 2006.
    36. J. B. Metz, Theology of the World, (No Title), 1969.
    37. S. Sopiani, D. Dini, R. A. Nadiya, R. Natanae, and E. Inriani, “Forgiveness as solidarity in christian education based on Johann Baptist Metz,” SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 480–488, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v2i5.948
    38. J. Moltmann and S. Lösel, “My Friend Johann Baptist Metz,” Theology Today, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 310–312, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0040573620947051
    39. D. Tröhler, A cultural history of education in the age of Enlightenment, 2023.
    40. A. Hennig, Christianity and illiberal politics. Oxford Academic Oxford, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197639108.013.11
    41. D. B. Daughrity, Christ and Culture: A Global Perspective. Routledge, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429294082
    42. R. M. Grant, A. Maleakhi, and D. Tracy, Sejarah Singkat Penafsiran Alkitab [A Brief History of Bible Interpretation]. Gunung Mulia, 1993.
    43. I. Westbury, “Reading Schwab’s the ‘Practical’as an invitation to a curriculum enquiry,” Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 640–651, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.795246
    44. P. S. Chia, “What does the old testament say about memory retention: A cognitive psychology approach,” Journal of Research on Christian Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 222–231, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2022.2071513
    45. H. Ospino, “Theological horizons for a pedagogy of accompaniment,” Religious education, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 413–429, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344087.2010.493402
    46. M. Merilyn, “Memaknai בָּלַל (Bȃlal) dan פָּצַץ (Patsats) Kejadian 11: 1-9 Dalam konteks multikultural di Indonesia [Interpreting בָּלַל (Bȃlal) and פָּצַץ (Patsats) Genesis 11: 1-9 in the multicultural context of Indonesia],” Satya Widya: Jurnal Studi Agama, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 127–138, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33363/swjsa.v1i2.49