Effective Learning Strategies: Applying the Articulation Model in Teaching and Learning Activities
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to examine the impact of implementing the articulation model on students’ speaking skills at Madrasah Aliyah Islamiyah Syafi'iyah, Paiton, Probolinggo. The articulation model is an innovative approach that encourages students to actively retell the material they have learned to their peers. This method is designed to enhance students' comprehension, improve their communication skills, and boost their confidence.
Methodology: This research employed a quantitative approach with an experimental design, involving two groups: an experimental group taught using the articulation model and a control group taught using conventional teaching methods.
Main Findings: The findings indicate that students taught using the articulation model demonstrated a significant improvement in their speaking skills, with 85% able to deliver material coherently, logically, and confidently. Additionally, this model enhanced students’ understanding of the subject matter. However, some challenges were observed, such as varying levels of participation among students and difficulties in public speaking, which require specific attention to ensure active engagement for all learners.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study concludes that the articulation model is effective in enhancing students' speaking skills and is applicable at various educational levels, particularly in religious-based learning. Furthermore, the findings highlight the need for teacher training to optimize the implementation of this model and suggest opportunities for further research to explore its application in different educational settings. The study underscores the importance of professional development for educators and the potential for expanding research on this model’s effectiveness across diverse learning environments.
References
M. Erfan, N. Sari, N. Suarni, M. A. Maulyda, and D. Indraswati, “Improving Cognitive Learning Outcomes Through the Cooperative Learning Model Type Numbered Head Together (NHT) on the Topic of Multiplication and Division of Fractions,” J. Ika Pgsd Ikat. Alumni Pgsd Unars, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 108–118, 2020.doi 10.31764/elementary.v3i2.2425:
K. S. Jenahut and A. C. O. R. Lake, “Articulate Storyline-Based Learning Media Loaded with Local Wisdom Values in Historical Narrative Text Material for Elementary School Students,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 566–578, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jisd.v7i3.54079.
C. Hadza, A. Sesrita, and I. Suherman, “Development of Learning Media Based on Articulate Storyline,” Indones. J. Appl. Res. IJAR, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 80–85, 2020, doi: 10.30997/ijar.v1i2.54.
P. Arwanda, S. Irianto, and A. Andriani, “Development of Articulate Storyline-Based Learning Media for the 2013 Curriculum on 21st-Century Competency for Theme 7, Grade IV of Elementary School,” Al-Madrasah J. Pendidik. Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 193, 2020, doi: 10.35931/am.v4i2.331.
S. Yolanda, R. Winarni, and S. Yulisetiani, “The New Way Improve Learners’ Speaking Skills: Picture and Picture Learning Media Based on Articulate Storyline,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 173–181, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.23887/jet.v6i1.41452.
A. Wiranda, T. D. Lestari, and Y. Lubis, “The Role Of English Consonants In Language Development : Acquisition And Articulation,” J. Multimed. Dehasen, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 501–508, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.37676/mude.v2i3.4393.
R. Wu et al., “VAT-Mart: Learning Visual Action Trajectory Proposals for Manipulating 3D ARTiculated Objects,” Apr. 01, 2022, arXiv: arXiv:2106.14440. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.14440.
J. Valverde-Berrocoso, M. R. Fernández-Sánchez, F. I. Revuelta Dominguez, and M. J. Sosa-Díaz, “The educational integration of digital technologies preCovid-19: Lessons for teacher education,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 8, p. e0256283, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256283.
S. R. Silvi, S. Suarman, and R. S. Kartikowati, “The Development of Articulation Learning Model Oriented to Student Activity in Economic Subjects at Pekanbaru Plus Binabangsa High School,” J. Educ. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, p. 401, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.31258/jes.3.3.p.401-411.
Md. K. Islam, Md. F. H. Sarker, and M. S. Islam, “Promoting student-centred blended learning in higher education: A model,” E-Learn. Digit. Media, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 36–54, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1177/20427530211027721.
M. P. Rusman, Learning and Instruction: Process Standards-Oriented Education. Prenada Media, 2017.
M. Cámara, F. Marcos, and J. L. Blanco, “Decoding Vocal Articulations from Acoustic Latent Representations,” Vocal Articul. Acoust. Represent., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 15–17, 2024.
M. Tabain, A. Butcher, G. Breen, and R. Beare, “A formant study of the alveolar versus retroflex contrast in three Central Australian languages: Stop, nasal, and lateral manners of articulation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 147, no. 4, pp. 2745–2765, 2020, doi: 10.1121/10.0001012.
S. Nurmala, R. Triwoelandari, and M. Fahri, “Development of Articulate Storyline 3 Media in STEM-Based Science Learning to Foster Creativity in Elementary/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Students,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 5024–5034, 2021, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1546.
A. Andriani, I. Dewi, W. L. Sihombing, and D. Ramadhani, “Development of Learning Media Based on Articulate Storyline 3 to Improve Student‘s Understanding of Mathematical Concepts,” ICIESC 2023, vol. 4, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.4108/eai.24-10-2023.2342258.
A. Abourachid et al., “Modeling intervertebral articulation: The rotule à doigt mechanical joint (RAD) in birds and mammals,” J. Anat., vol. 239, no. 6, pp. 1287–1299, 2021, doi: 10.1111/joa.13517.
N. Kulkarni, A. Gupta, D. F. Fouhey, and S. Tulsiani, “Articulation-aware canonical surface mapping,” Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 449–458, 2020, doi: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00053.
T. Phillips, N. Porticella, M. Constas, and R. Bonney, “A Framework for Articulating and Measuring Individual Learning Outcomes from Participation in Citizen Science,” Citiz. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 3, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.5334/cstp.126.
J. A. Schmidt, J. M. Rosenberg, and P. N. Beymer, “A person‐in‐context approach to student engagement in science: Examining learning activities and choice,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 19–43, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1002/tea.21409.
D. Ní Chróinín, T. Fletcher, and M. O’Sullivan, “Pedagogical principles of learning to teach meaningful physical education,” Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagogy, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 117–133, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/17408989.2017.1342789.
D. N. Chróinín, T. Fletcher, and M. O’Sullivan, “Pedagogical principles of learning to teach meaningful physical education,” Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagogy, vol. 23, pp. 117–133, 2018, doi: 10.1080/17408989.2017.1342789.
M. Sailer, F. Schultz-Pernice, and F. Fischer, “Contextual facilitators for learning activities involving technology in higher education: The C♭-model,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 121, no. 4, p. 106794, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106794.
B.-E. Adar, “Academic Emotional Learning: A Critical Component of Self-Regulated Learning in the Emotional Learning Cycle,” Am. Psychol. Assoc., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2019.
A. Ben-Eliyahu, “Academic Emotional Learning: A Critical Component of Self-Regulated Learning in the Emotional Learning Cycle,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 84–105, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2019.1582345.
A. Casey and A. MacPhail, “Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education,” Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagogy, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 294–310, May 2018, doi: 10.1080/17408989.2018.1429588.
L. A. Dantas and A. Cunha, “An integrative debate on learning styles and the learning process,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 100017, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100017.
S. Lailiyah, Y. Arrifadah, L. U. Sadieda, S. Sutini, A. W. Yanti, and F. M. Sari, “Analysis of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teachers’ Understanding of Differentiated Learning Training for Merdeka Curriculum,” Profesi Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 8, pp. 1–19, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.23917/ppd.v11i1.4311.
H. Kang and E. A. Van Es, “Articulating Design Principles for Productive Use of Video in Preservice Education,” J. Teach. Educ., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 237–250, May 2019, doi: 10.1177/0022487118778549.
H. Hasanah and M. N. Malik, “Blended learning in improving students’ critical thinking and communication skills at University,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1295–1306, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5168.
H. Hasanah and M. N. Malik, “Blended learning in improving students’ critical thinking and communication skills at University,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1295–1306, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5168.
Guibas, A. L. Abbott, and S. Song, “Category-Level Articulated Object Pose ,” Yogyak. Chivita Books, 2016.
X. Li, H. Wang, L. Yi, L. J. Estimation,” Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3703–3712, 2020, doi: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00376.
Q. Ma, S. Saito, J. Yang, S. Tang, and M. J. Black, “Scale: Modeling clothed humans with a surface codec of articulated local elements,” Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 16077–16088, 2021, doi: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01582.
J. Mu, W. Qiu, A. Kortylewski, A. Yuille, N. Vasconcelos, and X. Wang, “A-SDF: Learning Disentangled Signed Distance Functions for Articulated Shape Representation,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 12981–12991, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01276.
R. Y. Puspita, Cara Praktis Belajar Pidato, MC, dan Penyiar Radio. Anak Hebat Indonesia, 2017.
I. Siregar, F. Rahmadiyah, and A. F. Q. Siregar, “The Impact of Multisensory Stimulation of Biological Organs in Dysarthria Patients as Articulation Skills Rehabilitation,” Br. J. Nurs. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2021, doi: 10.32996/bjns.2021.1.1.3z.
E. Colleoni, S. Moccia, X. Du, E. De Momi, and D. Stoyanov, “Deep Learning Based Robotic Tool Detection and Articulation Estimation with Spatio-Temporal Layers,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 2714–2721, 2019, doi: 10.1109/LRA.2019.2917163.
E. F. France et al., “A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases,” BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0670-7.
M. Munif, M. Sali, Z. Fajri, M. Mahmuda, and T. Farlina, “Implementation of Number Block Game Techniques for Learning Number Symbol in Early Childhood,” J. Obsesi J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 3449–3459, 2022, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i4.2074.
Z. Fajri, H. Baharun, C. Muali, Shofiatun, L. Farida, and Y. Wahyuningtiyas, “Student’s Learning Motivation and Interest; the Effectiveness of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1899, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012178.
R. Kumar Shah, “Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom,” Shanlax Int. J. Educ., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1–13, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.34293/education.v7i4.600.
M. Chowdhury, “Emphasizing Morals, Values, Ethics, And Character Education In Science Education And Science Teaching,” Malays. Online J. Educ. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2016.
K. Fuchs, “Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: is Chat GPT a blessing or a curse?,” Front. Educ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–4, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682.
M. Tohet and I. Rositha, “Strengthening the 2013 Curriculum in Fostering Student Character in Schools,” J. -Tarbiyat J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 200–219, 2019.
M. G. Arefi et al., “Speech and Reading Disorders Screening, and Problems in Structure and Function of Articulation Organs in Children in Mashhad City, Iran,” Iran. Rehabil. J., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 415–424, 2022, doi: 10.32598/irj.20.3.1656.1.
D. Datta, “A rubric-based mathematical model for evaluation of direct PO attainment through CO attainment and CO-PO articulation matrix for OBE system,” Res. Sq., vol. 6, no. 2, 2022. DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2124169/v1
H. Xu, E. G. Bazavan, A. Zanfir, W. T. Freeman, R. Sukthankar, and C. Sminchisescu, “GHUM GHUML: Generative 3D human shape and articulated pose models,” Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 6183–6192, 2020, doi: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00622.
D. P. A. Sandy, M. N. Akmal, and N. Arifin, “Implementation of the Articulation Method as an Effort to Overcome Learning Problems in Islamic Education at SDN Lakarsantri 1 Surabaya,” Indones. J. Educ. Basic, vol. 1, no. 1, 2023.
I. Safitri, M. A. Nugraha, and S. Aisyah, “Implementation of the Articulation Learning Model to Enhance the Understanding of Grade X-3 Students in Indonesian History Learning at SMA Negeri 2 Medan Academic Year 2023-2024.,” JIM J. Ilm. Mhs. Pendidik. Sej., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 776–783, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.24815/jimps.v9i4.30095.
H. Helzi, M. Minsih, A. Desstya, and M. Muhammad, “Innovative Approaches to Science and Social Studies-Centered Learning with a Focus on Student Wellbeing in Elementary Education,” Profesi Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 64–79, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.23917/ppd.v11i1.6173.
D. Kim, “Learning Language, Learning Culture: Teaching Language to the Whole Student,” ECNU Rev. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 519–541, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1177/2096531120936693.
C. Rapanta, L. Botturi, P. Goodyear, L. Guàrdia, and M. Koole, “Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity,” Postdigital Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 923–945, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y.
J. Hallström and K. J. Schönborn, “Models and modelling for authentic STEM education: reinforcing the argument,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 22, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-019-0178-z.
L. Mishra, T. Gupta, and A. Shree, “Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 100012, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012.
M. Assunção Flores and M. Gago, “Teacher education in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: national, institutional and pedagogical responses,” J. Educ. Teach., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 507–516, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2020.1799709.
N. A. Anwar, B. Kaddas, and N. Selvi, “The Effect of Articulation Type Coorperative Learning Model Assisted by Digital Media on The Speaking Skills of Grade V Students,” ALENA – J. Elem. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, 2025.
E. Buckner, “The Internationalization of Higher Education: National Interpretations of a Global Model,” Comp. Educ. Rev., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 315–336, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1086/703794.
D. Dakir, A. Mundiri, M. A. Yaqin, N. Niwati, and I. Subaida, “The Model of Teachers Communication Based on Multicultural Values in Rural Early Childhood Education,” J. Obsesi J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 3460–3472, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i4.2125.
A. Suwandi, “Implementation of the Articulation Learning Model to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Indonesian Language Subjects in Class V of SDN Gunung Sari I, Rappocini District, Makassar City,” Primary Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah., vol.11, no. 5, pp. 76-89 2022 doi: 10.33578/jpfkip.v11i5.9082
R. Bogdan, Qualitative Research for Education. london: Allyn and Bacon, 1982.
H. Sutrisno, Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 1991.
M. Mahsun, Language Research Methods: Stages, Strategies, Methods, and Techniques. Rajawali Press, 2017.
C. R. Kothari, Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, Second Rev. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers, 2004.
C. Kagan, M. Burton, and A. Siddiquee, “The Handbook of Action Research - Introduction,” Handb. Qual. Res. Methods Psychol., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 468, 2006.
Borg, Educational Research: An Introduction. New: Long Man, 1979.
F. Humairoh, “Optimizing Learning Through Group Discussion: Strategies and Benefits,” ofspreprints, June 202., doi: 10.31219/osf.io/gax5n
G. Yang et al., “LASR: Learning articulated shape reconstruction from a monocular video,” Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 15975–15984, 2021, doi: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01572.
Copyright (c) 2025 Moch Tohet, Zaenol Fajri, Rifa Muslihatin Nufus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
