Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Social Practices of Literacy and Numeracy Through Culturally Responsif Teaching (CRT) Approach in Sociology Learning

Atik Catur Budiati ORCID
Sebelas Maret University ROR
Indonesia
atikcaturbudiati@staff.uns.ac.id
Siany Indria Liestyasari ORCID
Sebelas Maret University ROR
Indonesia
Dwi Astutik ORCID
Sebelas Maret University ROR
Indonesia
Bagas Narendra Parahita ORCID
Sebelas Maret University ROR
Indonesia
Riadi Syafutra Siregar ORCID
Sebelas Maret University ROR
Indonesia
Ghufronudin Ghufronudin ORCID
Sebelas Maret University ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of Study: This study aims to identify social practices of literacy and numeracy using the CRT approach in Sociology learning.

    Methodology: This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with a phenomenology type. The data source consists of focus group discussion (FGD) results, observation, and document analysis. FGD involves sociology teachers in Soloraya, with the purposive sampling technique used to select informants. Observation was carried out directly by observing the sociology learning process in the class. Document analysis includes teaching modules, sociology learning gain, student worksheets, and other learning sets. Data validity was tested using source and method triangulation. Data analysis was done using Interpretative Phenomenology Analysis, encompassing four stages: bracketing, intuiting, analyzing, and describing.

    Main Findings: The result of the research shows that teachers get a support system from government regulation, the Merdeka Mengajar platform, the learning community, the supervisor, and the subject teacher working group. Each of the parties plays a role that supports CRT-based literacy and numeracy learning. The learning activity can be identified in three things. Firstly, teachers hold the authority to accustom the students to using numeric data in the context of local culture. Secondly, teachers integrate numeric data from local cultures to make learning more relevant and contextual. Thirdly, teachers create an inclusive learning environment by accommodating numeric data in the context of local culture.

    Novelty/Originality of Study: By applying CRT, sociology teachers teach literacy and numeracy skills and help students see the relevance of these skills in understanding and participating in social change.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Social Practices of Literacy and Numeracy Through Culturally Responsif Teaching (CRT) Approach in Sociology Learning”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 200–207, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i1.1373.

    More Citation Formats

  • 477
    Abstract views
    332
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. Hartoyo and D. Rahmadayanti, “Potret Kurikulum Merdeka, Wujud Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2247–2255, 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3431
    2. B. Bennett, H. Redfern, and J. Zubrzycki, “Cultural Responsiveness in Action: Co-Constructing Social Work Curriculum Resources with Aboriginal Communities,” Br. J. Soc. Work, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 808–825, 2018, doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx053
    3. V. Hargraves, “The principles of culturally responsive teaching,” Educ. Hub, pp. 1–8, 2019.
    4. D. A. H. Putri, A. Asrizal, and U. Usmeldi, “Pengaruh Integrasi Etnosains Dalam Pembelajaran Sains Terhadap Hasil Belajar: Meta Analisis,” ORBITA J. Pendidik. dan Ilmu Fis., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 103, 2022, doi: 10.31764/orbita.v8i1.7600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v8i1.7600
    5. A. Larasati, T. Sunarti, and Budiwati, “Implementasi Pendekatan CRT untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Fisika,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 94–99, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.7.1.94-99
    6. T. Taher, "Analisis Keterampilan Komunikasi dan Kolaborasi Siswa Introvert dengan Pendekatan Culturally Responsive Teaching. Jambura J. Educ. Chem., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2023, doi: 10.34312/jjec.v5i1.17463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v5i1.17463
    7. J. Muniz, “Culturally Responsive Teaching: A Reflection Guide,” p. 20, 2020.
    8. J. H. Ballantine, K. A. Roberts, and K. O. Korgen, Our Social World: Introduction to Sociology, vol. 1999, no. December. United States of America: Sage Publications, Inc, 2018.
    9. M. Fernández-Esquinas, “Dealing with the profession of sociology: opportunities and problems at the interface between training and professional development,” Int. Rev. Sociol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 336–353, 2019, doi: 10.1080/03906701.2019.1672349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2019.1672349
    10. W. N. Buti and A. Ansyah, “The Effect of Using Film-Based Learning Media on Increasing Student Interest in Learning in Tamalate Makassar,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i1.837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v5i1.837
    11. A. Better, “Learning from Experience: Integrating Students’ Everyday Lives into the Urban Community College Sociology Classroom,” Am. Sociol., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 385–395, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s12108-013-9192-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-013-9192-7
    12. Y. Sudiasih, R. M. Sinaga, and S. Widodo, “The Development of Sociology Teaching Materials Based on Articulate Storyline to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skill,” Iarjset, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.17148/iarjset.2022.9201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17148/IARJSET.2022.9201
    13. E. Erianjoni, D. Beri, and A. Yusra, for High School Sociology Learning, vol. 1. Atlantis Press SARL, 2023, doi: 10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0
    14. Y. W. Utaya, K. Khofiyati, L. M. Warner, and K. Hallam, “Learning Pancasila Values in Citizenship Education Subjects in Junior High School,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i1.852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v5i1.852
    15. S. Haniah, A. Agustang, and S. Samad, “Social Action in the Classroom: Analysis of Educational Sociology on Interaction Between Teacher and Student in Smp Kartika Chandra Makassar.,” Int. J. Acad. Res., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 66–71, 2014, doi: 10.7813/2075-4124.2014/6-4/B.10.
    16. P. H. Pratiwi and N. Hidayah, “Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran sosiologi dengan imajinasi sosiologi,” J. Kependidikan, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 56–68, 2016, doi: 10.21831/jk.v46i1.9575
    17. T. Rochana, “The Implementation of Multicultural- Based Sociology Learning in Senior High School,” Komunitas, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 288–297, 2020, doi: 10.15294/komunitas.v12i2.23338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v12i2.23338
    18. L. V. Blitz, D. Yull, and M. Clauhs, “Bringing Sanctuary to School: Assessing School Climate as a Foundation for Culturally Responsive Trauma-Informed Approaches for Urban Schools,” Urban Educ., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 95–124, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0042085916651323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916651323
    19. L. A. Afriliziana and Y. Roza, “Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan e-modul etnomatematika berbasis budaya melayu Kepulauan Riau,” J. Anal., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 135–145, 2021.
    20. A. Akhiruddin and A. Amir, “Sociology teaching materials development based on the inside out circle model to espouse learners’ multiliteracies,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 4424–4436, 2022, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7947
    21. H. Suwignyo, D. Saryono, and Roekhan, “Examining the implementation of Culturally Responsive Teaching Materials (CRTM) of Sasak culture literature using Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT),” Int. J. Humanit. Innov. (IJHI, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2019, doi: 10.33750/ijhi.v2i1.31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v2i1.31
    22. J. P. C. Demapendan, E. A. T. Aquino, G. P. Hilario, and J. P. C. Demapendan, “Technology and Livelihood Education Learning Brochures for Grade 7 Students,” vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 177–189, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i4.1113.
    23. J. A. Smith, P. Flowers, and M. Larkin, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. United States of America, 2009.
    24. N. Greening, “Phenomenological Research Methodology,” Sci. Res. J., vol. VII, no. V, pp. 88–92, 2019, doi: 10.31364/scirj/v7.i5.2019.p0519656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31364/SCIRJ/v7.i5.2019.P0519656
    25. C. Moustakas, Phenomenological Research Methods. United States of America: Sage Publications, Inc, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
    26. D. Lupton, “Digital Sociology: An Introduction,” SSRN Electron. J., 2013, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2273418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2273418
    27. R. K. D. Susilo and A. S. Dharmawan, “Par Practice for the Development of Applied Sociology in Indonesia,” Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Soc. Sci. Polit. Sci. Humanit. (ICoSPOLHUM 2021), vol. 648, no. ICoSPOLHUM 2021, pp. 165–178, 2022, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220302.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220302.025
    28. D. Purcell, “Sociology, Teaching, and Reflective Practice: Using Writing to Improve,” Teach. Sociol., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 2013, doi: 10.1177/0092055X12460028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12460028
    29. I. Online and M. A. Ifarajimi, “The Best Practices and Strategies for Developing Culturally Responsive and Inclusive Curricula in Nigeria Education,” vol. 0, no. 2010, pp. 10–18, 2022.
    30. G. Moss, “Literacies as social practice : sociological perspectives on reading Gemma Moss Literacies as social practice : sociological perspectives on reading,” Education, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 41–51, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1824701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1824701
    31. W. Jedynak and J. Kinal, “Ethical and Technological Aspects of the Learning Process in Sociology,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 140, pp. 328–332, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.429
    32. M. P. Atkinson and A. N. Hunt, “Inquiry-guided learning in sociology,” Teach. Sociol., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2008, doi: 10.1177/0092055X0803600101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0803600101
    33. C. Ferreira and S. Serpa, “Challenges in the Teaching of Sociology in Higher Education. Contributions to a Discussion,” Societies, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 30, 2017, doi: 10.3390/soc7040030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040030
    34. P. Subekti, A. R. Nugraha, A. Hubur, R. Chauhan, and R. Artha, “Social System Learning Process: An Insight Sociology,” Int. J. Health Sci. (Qassim)., vol. 6, no. S1, pp. 10293–10300, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7436
    35. R. J. Amineh and H. D. Asl, “Review of constructivism and social constructivism,” J. Soc. Sci. Lit. Lang., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://blue-ap.org
    36. J. Bhattacharjee, “Constructivist Approach to Learning– An Effective Approach of Teaching Learning,” Res. J. Interdiscip. Multidiscip. Stud. A Peer-Reviewed Mon. Res. J., vol. ISSN, no. 65, pp. 2394–7969, 2015.
    37. J. Manza, “Sociology for Beginners,” Annu. Rev. Sociol., vol. 49, pp. 241–261, 2023, doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-124148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-124148
    38. W. R. Penuel, D. K. Digiacomo, K. Van Horne, and B. Kirshner, “A social practice theory of learning and becoming across contexts and time,” Front. Learn. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 30–38, 2016, doi: 10.14786/flr.v4i4.205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i1.205
    39. M. Piotrowska, “Pierre bourdieu on art as social practice. The defence of the concept of the autonomous field of cultural production,” Art Inq., vol. 21, pp. 69–83, 2019, doi: 10.26485/AI/2019/21/5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26485/AI/2019/21/5
    40. P. Bourdieu, The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, 1990. doi: 10.4324/9781003115083-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003115083-9