How to cite

Metrics — Badges

1. P. Zhang and S. Li, “Associative cultural landscape approach to interpreting traditional ecological wisdom: A case of Inuit habitat,” Front. Archit. Res, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 79–96, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2023.09.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.09.008
2. J. Aguelo, J. M. Aquino, C. Quezon, and S. C. Laguna, “Students’ dance performances and the utilization of e-materials in physical education,” Edu Sportivo, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46–56, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/es:ijope.2023.vol4(1).11262
3. A. Jalil, “Karakter pendidikan untuk membentuk pendidikan karakter [Character education to form character education],” Nadwa J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 175–194, 2016, doi: 10.21580/nw.2012.6.2.586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/nw.2012.6.2.586
4. N. F. Saidin, N. D. A. Halim, and N. Yahaya, “A review of research on augmented reality in education: Advantages and applications,” Int. Educ. Stud, vol. 8, no. 13, pp. 1–8, 2015, doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n13p1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p1
5. İ. Yaman, M. Şenel, and D. B. A. Yeşilel, “Exploring the extent to which ELT students utilise smartphones for language learning purposes,” South African J. Educ, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2015, doi: 10.15700/saje.v35n4a1198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n4a1198
6. B. R. Meganingtyas, R. Winarni, and T. Murwaningsih, “The effect of using course review horay and talking stick learning methods towards social science learning result reviewed from learning interest,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Rev, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 190–197, 2019, doi: 10.24331/ijere.518053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.518053
7. L. A. I. U. Khasanah, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Terpadu Tipe Shared Berbasis Saintifik untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa di SD [Development of Integrated Learning Devices of Shared Type Based on Science to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Elementary Schools],” J. Elem. Edukasia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2021, doi: 10.31949/jee.v4i1.3043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v4i1.3043
8. L. Anggraini, F. P. Sinaga, and S. W. Oktavia, “Identification of discovery learning method based on edutainment (Zenius) to increase student motivation on business and energy materials,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 138–143, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i3.812.
9. M. D. Zulkhi, “Increasing students’ learning activity through a differentized learning approach using the project based learnig model in primary schools,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 96–107, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jber.v5i2.1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v5i2.1001
10. R. Perdana, S. W. Oktavia, and F. P. Sinaga, “Effective learning strategies : Minimum completeness criteria and remedial program as an effort to improve physics learning on dynamic fluid material,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 123–127, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i3.815.
11. A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, and S. W. Octavia, “Assembler edu E-Modules: Improving argumentation skills, perseverance, and curiosity in physics learning,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 550–562, 2024, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v8i2.37238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i2.37238
12. K. K. Ilyas, S. Beglerovic, and T. Bin Atique, “Use of learning facilities on students’ islamic religious education learning achievement in high school,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam Indones, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 89–94, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v4i4.783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jpaii.v4i4.783
13. H. Mansyur, S. W. Oktavia, A. Andriyanto, and S. Susbiyanto, “Identification of discovery learning methods to increase student learning motivation,” EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 9, no. 2, pp, 165-172, 2024, doi: 10.59052/eduphysics.v9i1.32656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v9i2.32656
14. H. Sabil, D. A. Kurniawan, R. Perdana, P. A. Rivani, and R. I. Widodo, “The character of students’ love for their homeland on electronic modules assisted by assemblr edu in learning,” Int. J. Elem. Educ, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 335–341, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i2.57915
15. M. D. Ernawati, Asrial, R. Perdana, S. E. Septi, and Rahmi, “Evaluation of students’ attitudes and science process skills toward middle school science subject in indonesia,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 258–274, 2021, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202110
16. Kamid, R. K. Dewi, D. A. Kurniawan, M. Z. Azzahra, and A. M. Nawahdani, “Student learning difficulties in terms of the STIF in framework of fractional material,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pendidik, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 187–194, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jppp.v7i2.57371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v7i2.57371
17. A. Asrial et al., “Science teacher’s book: analyzing elementary school students’ character values,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 180–187, 2024, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32766
18. N. Nada, H. Mustapa, N. K. Harahap, and S. W. Oktavia, “Analysis of emotional intelligence on science learning achievement,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 261–267, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i3.28165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i3.28165
19. S. A. Wardani and N. Janattaka, “Analisis karakter rasa ingin tahu siswa pada tema 8 kelas iii sekolah dasar,” Prima Magistra J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 365–374, 2022, doi: 10.37478/jpm.v3i4.2035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37478/jpm.v3i4.2035
20. A. Maymunah, M. Ramorola, and I. O. Shobowale, “Development of an inquiry-based science module on plant parts and their functions in elementary schools,” J. Educ. Technol. Learn. Creat, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 50–58, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jetlc.v1i2.789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v1i2.789
21. I. Ibrohim, S. Sutopo, M. Muntholib, Y. Prihatnawati, and I. Mufidah, “Implementation of inquiry-based learning (IBL) to improve students’ understanding of nature of science (NOS),” AIP Conf. Proc, vol. 2215, no. April, 2020, doi: 10.1063/5.0000632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000632
22. K. Hochberg, S. Becker, M. Louis, P. Klein, and J. Kuhn, “Using smartphones as experimental tools-a follow-up: cognitive effects by video analysis and reduction of cognitive load by multiple representations,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 303–317, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10956-020-09816-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09816-w
23. S. J. Lou, Y. C. Chou, R. C. Shih, and C. C. Chung, “A study of creativity in CaC 2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 2387–2404, 2017, doi: 10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01231A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01231a
24. D. R. Rizaldi, E. Nurhayati, and Z. Fatimah, “The correlation of digital literation and STEM integration to improve indonesian students’ skills in 21st century,” Int. J. Asian Educ, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2020, doi: 10.46966/ijae.v1i2.36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i2.36
25. I. Magdalena, A. Nurchayati, N. Uyun, and G. T. Rean, “Implikasi teori psikologi kognitif dalam proses belajar dan pembelajaran [Implications of cognitive psychology theory in the learning and teaching process],” Al-DYAS, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 552–558, 2023, doi: 10.58578/aldyas.v2i3.1465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58578/aldyas.v2i3.1465
26. N. V. Telegina, S. E. Drovosekov, D. G. Vasbieva, and V. L. Zakharova, “The use of project activity in teaching mathematics,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ, vol. 15, no. 8, 2019, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/108439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108439
27. T. R. Ningsih, “Problems encountered in learning speaking and the solving strategies by eleventh graders at SMA N 5 Tebo,” Indones. J. Educ. Res, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 79–83, 2020, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v1i3.563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/ijoer.v1i3.563
28. R. Lee, K. Hoe Looi, M. Faulkner, and L. Neale, “The moderating influence of environment factors in an extended community of inquiry model of e-learning,” Asia Pacific J. Educ, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2020.1758032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1758032
29. G. Ramadhan, A. Sukhragchaa, and T. Sarkar, “Evaluation of visitor responses to lake sipin tourism services,” J. Eval. Educ, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 175–182, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i4.949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i4.949
30. A. Alshehri, M. Rutter, and S. Smith, “Assessing the relative importance of an e-learning system’s usability design characteristics based on students’ preferences,” Eur. J. Educ. Res, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 839–855, 2019, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.839
31. A. Abulibdeh, E. Zaidan, and R. Abulibdeh, “Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 437, pp. 140527, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140527
32. C. T. Soon, H. F. Neo, and C. C. Teo, “Reading Augmented Reality Story Book in Enhancing Learning Perceptions,” J. Logist. Informatics Serv. Sci., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 105–118, 2022, doi: 10.33168/LISS.2022.0408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33168/LISS.2022.0408
33. R. Juwita and P. Mateha, “Moving toward a healthy eating pattern: Exploring the interrelationship of knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in young adults,” Indones. J. Educ. Res, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 69–75, 2024, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v5i2.936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/ijoer.v5i2.936
34. S. Ardiyanto, C. Svonni, and N. M. Wasike, “T-Test analysis of learning achievement of bilingual students and regular students,” Indones. J. Educ. Res, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 85–92, 2023, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v4i4.706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/ijoer.v4i4.706
35. D. A. E. Fernanda and T. Sudarwanto, “Pengaruh media pembelajaran online berbasis edmodo terhadap hasil belajar siswa [The influence of online learning media based on Edmodo on student learning outcomes],” J. Pendidik. Tata Niaga, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1195–1201, 2021.
36. D. Alita, A. D. Putra, and D. Darwis, “Analysis of classic assumption test and multiple linear regression coefficient test for employee structural office recommendation,” IJCCS (Indonesian J. Comput. Cybern. Syst, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 295, 2021, doi: 10.22146/ijccs.65586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.65586
37. F. Aningrum, V. M. Aliazas, and S. Kim, “Optimizing elementary school education through the implementation of karawitan-based learning grounded in local wisdom,” J. Basic Educ. Res, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jber.v5i1.917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v5i1.917
38. Y. Zhou et al., “Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities: A journey through scales,” Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom, vol. 423, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2020.132838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2020.132838
39. S. Midway, M. Robertson, S. Flinn, and M. Kaller, “Comparing multiple comparisons: practical guidance for choosing the best multiple comparisons test,” PeerJ, vol. 8, pp. 1–26, 2020, doi: 10.7717/peerj.10387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10387
40. A. Amin, A. Alimni, D. A. Kurniawan, E. Triani, and W. A. Pratama, “Implications of teacher interpersonal communication ability on student learning motivation in islamic religious education lessons during pandemic,” J. Educ. Res. Eval, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 156–167, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jere.v6i1.39547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i1.39547
41. J. Jusmaniar, I. Riani, E. C. Anderson, M. C. Lee, and S. W. Oktavia, “Gasing game: Ethnoscientific exploration of circular motion in physics learning on the coast of east sumatra to build the character of perseverance,” Schrödinger J. Phys. Educ, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v5i1.902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v5i1.902
42. L. Chen, and S. Xiao, “Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review,” Educational Research Review, vol. 32, pp. 100377, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
43. K. Altmeyer, S. Kapp, M. Thees, S. Malone, J. Kuhn, and R. Brünken, “The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses—Theoretical background and empirical results,” Br. J. Educ. Technol, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 611–628, 2020, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12900
44. J. M. Aquino, “Teachers’ management in implementation of CHED Memorandum Order (CMO) 39, series of 2021 towards the achievement of students’ learning outcomes in physical education,” Phys. Educ. Sport. Stud. Res, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–43, 2023, doi: 10.56003/pessr.v2i1.190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56003/pessr.v2i1.190
45. K. Resch, I. Schrittesser, and M. tedKnapp, “Overcoming the theory-practice divide in teacher education with the ‘Partner School Programme’. A conceptual mapping,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ, vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2022.2058928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2022.2058928
46. E. M. Rosa, S. Sundari, E. R. Ambarwati, G. Suryandari, E. Rochmawati, and F. Suryanto, “‘E-Matching card’ to improve cooperation and cognitive abilities among nursing students,” J. Keperawatan Indones, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 89–96, 2023, doi: 10.7454/jki.v26i2.1136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v26i2.1136
47. A. Ratana-Ubol and J. A. Henschke, “Cultural learning processes through local wisdom,” Int. J. Adult Vocat. Educ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 41–60, 2015, doi: 10.4018/ijavet.2015040104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijavet.2015040104
48. U. Nasri, “Exploring qualitative research: A comprehensive guide to case study methodology,” al-Hikmah J. Stud. Islam, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 72–85, 2023.
49. L. Kano, E. W. K. Tsang, and H. W. chung Yeung, “Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature,” J. Int. Bus. Stud, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 577–622, 2020, doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00304-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00304-2
50. A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, and S. E. Septi, “Overview the inquiry learning model: Attitudes, student characters, and student responses what’s the impact?,” J. Educ. Learn, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2023, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v17i1.20530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i1.20530
51. A. K. I. Syahwani and A. Soeyono, “The Effect of Lecturer Competence in Online Learning Methods on Student College Satisfaction During the Pandemic,” Procedia Soc. Sci. Humanit, vol. 1, no. c, pp. 239–250, 2021, doi: 10.21070/pssh.v1i.53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v1i.53
52. J. Martín-Gutiérrez, C. E. Mora, B. Añorbe-Díaz, and A. González-Marrero, “Virtual technologies trends in education,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 469–486, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00626a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00626a
53. Herpratiwi and A. Tohir, “Learning interest and discipline on learning motivation,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 424–435, 2022, doi: 10.46328/IJEMST.2096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2290