Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal


Assessment of PhD Research and Evaluation Program: Insights from the Graduate Tracer Study

Share
  • Purpose of the study: The study assessed the effectiveness of the PhD in Research and Evaluation (PhD RE) program in a state university in Central Visayas, Philippines by examining the career trajectories and competencies of its graduates from 2017 to 2024.

    Methodology: The study utilized a mixed-methods approach, employing online surveys and open-ended questionnaires distributed through Google Forms. Descriptive statistics was used to analyzed quantitative data, while Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis was used for qualitative data.

    Main Findings: The main findings indicate that PhD RE graduates excel in research, instruction, and leadership, with most achieving professional advancement. Employers provided positive feedback, highlighting the graduates’ critical thinking, problem-solving, and research capabilities.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study is novel in that it focuses on PhD graduates in Research and Evaluation and offers fresh perspectives on how the degree affects research competencies and career advancement. The study advances understanding on doctorate programs by outlining the need for more mentoring and interdisciplinary collaboration and making recommendations for curriculum enhancements.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Assessment of PhD Research and Evaluation Program: Insights from the Graduate Tracer Study”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 155–166, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i4.1145.
  • 985
    Abstract views
    399
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. F. Ö. M. Sevim, U. Akın, “The role of graduate education in professional development of teachers: is graduation enough?”, Egitim ve Bilim, vol. 46, 2021, doi: 10.15390/EB.2021.9593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2021.9593
    2. J. M. Shosh, C. R. Zales, “Graduate teacher education as inquiry: A case study”, Teach Educ, vol. 18, pp. 257-275, 2007, doi: 10.1080/10476210701535071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210701535071
    3. S. Friesen, M. Jacobsen, “Collaborative design of professional graduate programs in education”, Int J Design Learn, vol. 12, pp. 64-76, 2021, doi: 10.14434/ijdl.v12i1.25778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v12i1.25778
    4. N. M. Trautmann, M. E. Krasny, “Integrating teaching and research: A new model for graduate education?”, BioScience, vol. 56, pp. 159-165, 2006, doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0159:ITARAN]2.0.CO;2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0159:ITARAN]2.0.CO;2
    5. M. Vaughan, G. Burnaford, “Action research in graduate teacher education: A review of the literature 2000–2015”, Educ Action Res, vol. 24, pp. 280-299, 2016, doi: 10.1080/09650792.2015.1062408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1062408
    6. S. J. Underwood, C. E. Austin, “Higher education graduate preparation programs: characteristics and trends”, J College Stud Dev, vol. 57, pp. 326-332, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0028
    7. H. Byrnes, “Reconsidering graduate students’ education as teachers:“It takes a department!”, Modern Lang J, vol. 85, pp. 512-530, 2001, doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00123
    8. L. Cassuto, R. Weisbuch, The new PhD: How to build a better graduate education, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021
    9. J. S. Senekal, E. Munnik, J. M. Frantz, “A systematic review of doctoral graduate attributes: domains and definitions”, Front Educ, vol. 7, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1009106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1009106
    10. T. S. Guiamalon, “Graduate education programs: its relation to graduates work competencies in the workplace”, Int E-J Adv Educ, vol. 7, pp. 58-66, 2021, doi: 10.51508/intcess.202123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.875807
    11. A. C. Gines, “Tracer study of PNU graduates,” Am Int J Contemp Res, vol. 4, pp. 81-98, 2014.
    12. D. H. R. Reusia, D. V. Rogayan, K. P. Andres, “Science education graduates of a state university from 2008-2018: a tracer study”, The Normal Lights, vol. 14, 2020, doi: 10.56278/tnl.v14i1.1496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56278/tnl.v14i1.1496
    13. Z. M. G. U. Toledo, M. F. M. Sualibio, Z. P. Boral, Q. O. Asuncion, R. R. Belecina, “A tracer study of the PNU graduates of the BSMT and BSE Math programs from 1985-2010”, The Normal Lights, vol. 7, pp. 79-96, 2013
    14. J. M. P. Sanchez, R. C. Abella, M. N. Q. Cadosales, M. M. J. Olvido, H. B. Boholano, “Exploring the professional development pathways of graduates from the master’s programs in education: inputs for curricular enhancement”, Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, vol. 13, pp. 817-832, 2023, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v13.i2.202351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v13.i2.202351
    15. V. Braun, V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qual Res Psychol, vol. 3, pp. 77-101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    16. I. Brailsford, “Motives and aspirations for doctoral study: Career, personal, and inter-personal factors in the decision to embark on a history PhD”, Int J Doctor Stud, vol. 5, pp. 15-27, 2010, doi: 10.28945/710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/710
    17. J. Wellington, P. Sikes, “A doctorate in a tight compartment’: Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives? ”, Stud High Educ, vol. 31, pp. 723-734, 2006, doi: 10.1080/03075070601004358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601004358
    18. C. Guerin, A. Jayatilaka, D. Ranasinghe, “Why start a higher degree by research? An exploratory factor analysis of motivations to undertake doctoral studies”, High Educ Res Dev, vol. 34, pp. 89-104, 2015, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934663
    19. M. Kowalczuk-Walędziak, A. Lopes, I. Menezes, N. Tormenta, “Teachers pursuing a doctoral degree: Motivations and perceived impact”, Educ Res, vol. 59, pp. 335-352, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00131881.2017.1345287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2017.1345287
    20. B. Bryan, K. Guccione, “Was it worth it? A qualitative exploration into graduate perceptions of doctoral value”, High Educ Res Dev, vol. 37, pp. 1124-1140, 2018, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1479378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1479378
    21. H. Horta, “Holding a post-doctoral position before becoming a faculty member: does it bring benefits for the scholarly enterprise? ”, High Educ, vol. 58, pp. 689-721, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9221-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9221-1
    22. P. Rosenfeld, K. S. Glassman, “Why pursue a doctorate? findings from a study of doctorally prepared RNs in an integrated healthcare system”, JONA J Nurs Admin, vol. 54, pp. 286-291, 2024, doi: 10.1097/nna.0000000000001425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001425
    23. M. R. Jalongo, “Scholarly publication during doctoral candidature: obstacles, benefits, and strategies for success”, Early Child Educ J, vol. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10643-024-01724-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01724-7
    24. R. B. Paixão, M. A. D. Souza, “Impact of programs on competency, career, and income on management graduates”, RAUSP Manage J, vol. 53, pp. 441-458, 2018, doi: 10.1108/rausp-04-2018-004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-04-2018-004
    25. I. G. Parcasio, R. B. Dolendo, B. A. Langaoen, P. A. Lubrica, “Pathways to a succesful career: unveiling the postgraduate journey–a tracer study”, Soc Sci Hum Educ J, vol. 5, pp. 129-143, 2024, doi: 10.25273/she.v5i1.19223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25273/she.v5i1.19223
    26. Commission on Higher Education, “CHED Memorandum Order No. 15, series of 2019”.
    27. P. M. Gilmour, “Enhancing research collaboration within a large university department”, Innov Educ Teach Int, vol. 61, pp. 622-635, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2209064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2209064
    28. D. L. Wanzer, “What is evaluation?: perspectives of how evaluation differs (or not) from research”, Am J Eval, vol. 42, pp. 28-46, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1098214020920710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020920710
    29. R. D. Brown, R. L. Geesa, K. R. McConnel, “Creating, implementing, and redefining a conceptual framework for mentoring pathways for education doctorate students”, High Learn Res Comm, vol. 10, pp. 20-37, 2020, doi: 10.0.73.182/hlrc.v10i2.1188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v10i2.1188
    30. Z. Xu, N. Tang, C. Xu, X. Cheng, “Data science: connotation, methods, technologies, and development”, Data Sci Manage, vol. 1, pp. 32-37, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.dsm.2021.02.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2021.02.002
    31. M. A. Saeed, A. A. M. Ah-Ahdal, H. S. Al Qunayeer, “Integrating research proposal writing into a postgraduate research method course: what does it tell us?”, Int J Res Method Educ, vol. 44, pp. 303-318, 2021, doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2020.1777963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1777963
    32. E. Ariani, B. Patrick, M. Karimi, “Evaluation of using Odua Weston Jambi Hotel services: the influence of internship student service quality on consumer satisfaction”, J Eval Educ, vol. 5, pp. 61-67, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i2.929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v5i2.929
    33. A. Ramadhanti, “Literature study: application of positive psychology to the field of education in Indonesia”, J Eval Educ, vol. 4, pp. 62-67, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i2.312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i2.309
    34. I. A. Jama, “The effect of school leadership on student’s academic achievement: case study Bosaso secondary schools in Puntland”, J Eval Educ, vol. 4, pp. 36-39, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i1.291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i1.291