Assessment of PhD Research and Evaluation Program: Insights from the Graduate Tracer Study
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The study assessed the effectiveness of the PhD in Research and Evaluation (PhD RE) program in a state university in Central Visayas, Philippines by examining the career trajectories and competencies of its graduates from 2017 to 2024.
Methodology: The study utilized a mixed-methods approach, employing online surveys and open-ended questionnaires distributed through Google Forms. Descriptive statistics was used to analyzed quantitative data, while Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis was used for qualitative data.
Main Findings: The main findings indicate that PhD RE graduates excel in research, instruction, and leadership, with most achieving professional advancement. Employers provided positive feedback, highlighting the graduates’ critical thinking, problem-solving, and research capabilities.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study is novel in that it focuses on PhD graduates in Research and Evaluation and offers fresh perspectives on how the degree affects research competencies and career advancement. The study advances understanding on doctorate programs by outlining the need for more mentoring and interdisciplinary collaboration and making recommendations for curriculum enhancements.
References
F. Ö. M. Sevim, U. Akın, “The role of graduate education in professional development of teachers: is graduation enough?”, Egitim ve Bilim, vol. 46, 2021, doi: 10.15390/EB.2021.9593.
J. M. Shosh, C. R. Zales, “Graduate teacher education as inquiry: A case study”, Teach Educ, vol. 18, pp. 257-275, 2007, doi: 10.1080/10476210701535071.
S. Friesen, M. Jacobsen, “Collaborative design of professional graduate programs in education”, Int J Design Learn, vol. 12, pp. 64-76, 2021, doi: 10.14434/ijdl.v12i1.25778.
N. M. Trautmann, M. E. Krasny, “Integrating teaching and research: A new model for graduate education?”, BioScience, vol. 56, pp. 159-165, 2006, doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0159:ITARAN]2.0.CO;2.
M. Vaughan, G. Burnaford, “Action research in graduate teacher education: A review of the literature 2000–2015”, Educ Action Res, vol. 24, pp. 280-299, 2016, doi: 10.1080/09650792.2015.1062408.
S. J. Underwood, C. E. Austin, “Higher education graduate preparation programs: characteristics and trends”, J College Stud Dev, vol. 57, pp. 326-332, 2016.
H. Byrnes, “Reconsidering graduate students’ education as teachers:“It takes a department!”, Modern Lang J, vol. 85, pp. 512-530, 2001, doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00123
L. Cassuto, R. Weisbuch, The new PhD: How to build a better graduate education, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021
J. S. Senekal, E. Munnik, J. M. Frantz, “A systematic review of doctoral graduate attributes: domains and definitions”, Front Educ, vol. 7, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1009106.
T. S. Guiamalon, “Graduate education programs: its relation to graduates work competencies in the workplace”, Int E-J Adv Educ, vol. 7, pp. 58-66, 2021, doi: 10.51508/intcess.202123.
A. C. Gines, “Tracer study of PNU graduates,” Am Int J Contemp Res, vol. 4, pp. 81-98, 2014.
D. H. R. Reusia, D. V. Rogayan, K. P. Andres, “Science education graduates of a state university from 2008-2018: a tracer study”, The Normal Lights, vol. 14, 2020, doi: 10.56278/tnl.v14i1.1496.
Z. M. G. U. Toledo, M. F. M. Sualibio, Z. P. Boral, Q. O. Asuncion, R. R. Belecina, “A tracer study of the PNU graduates of the BSMT and BSE Math programs from 1985-2010”, The Normal Lights, vol. 7, pp. 79-96, 2013
J. M. P. Sanchez, R. C. Abella, M. N. Q. Cadosales, M. M. J. Olvido, H. B. Boholano, “Exploring the professional development pathways of graduates from the master’s programs in education: inputs for curricular enhancement”, Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, vol. 13, pp. 817-832, 2023, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v13.i2.202351.
V. Braun, V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qual Res Psychol, vol. 3, pp. 77-101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
I. Brailsford, “Motives and aspirations for doctoral study: Career, personal, and inter-personal factors in the decision to embark on a history PhD”, Int J Doctor Stud, vol. 5, pp. 15-27, 2010, doi: 10.28945/710.
J. Wellington, P. Sikes, “A doctorate in a tight compartment’: Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives? ”, Stud High Educ, vol. 31, pp. 723-734, 2006, doi: 10.1080/03075070601004358.
C. Guerin, A. Jayatilaka, D. Ranasinghe, “Why start a higher degree by research? An exploratory factor analysis of motivations to undertake doctoral studies”, High Educ Res Dev, vol. 34, pp. 89-104, 2015, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934663.
M. Kowalczuk-Walędziak, A. Lopes, I. Menezes, N. Tormenta, “Teachers pursuing a doctoral degree: Motivations and perceived impact”, Educ Res, vol. 59, pp. 335-352, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00131881.2017.1345287.
B. Bryan, K. Guccione, “Was it worth it? A qualitative exploration into graduate perceptions of doctoral value”, High Educ Res Dev, vol. 37, pp. 1124-1140, 2018, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1479378.
H. Horta, “Holding a post-doctoral position before becoming a faculty member: does it bring benefits for the scholarly enterprise? ”, High Educ, vol. 58, pp. 689-721, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9221-1.
P. Rosenfeld, K. S. Glassman, “Why pursue a doctorate? findings from a study of doctorally prepared RNs in an integrated healthcare system”, JONA J Nurs Admin, vol. 54, pp. 286-291, 2024, doi: 10.1097/nna.0000000000001425.
M. R. Jalongo, “Scholarly publication during doctoral candidature: obstacles, benefits, and strategies for success”, Early Child Educ J, vol. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10643-024-01724-7.
R. B. Paixão, M. A. D. Souza, “Impact of programs on competency, career, and income on management graduates”, RAUSP Manage J, vol. 53, pp. 441-458, 2018, doi: 10.1108/rausp-04-2018-004.
I. G. Parcasio, R. B. Dolendo, B. A. Langaoen, P. A. Lubrica, “Pathways to a succesful career: unveiling the postgraduate journey–a tracer study”, Soc Sci Hum Educ J, vol. 5, pp. 129-143, 2024, doi: 10.25273/she.v5i1.19223.
Commission on Higher Education, “CHED Memorandum Order No. 15, series of 2019”.
P. M. Gilmour, “Enhancing research collaboration within a large university department”, Innov Educ Teach Int, vol. 61, pp. 622-635, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2209064.
D. L. Wanzer, “What is evaluation?: perspectives of how evaluation differs (or not) from research”, Am J Eval, vol. 42, pp. 28-46, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1098214020920710.
R. D. Brown, R. L. Geesa, K. R. McConnel, “Creating, implementing, and redefining a conceptual framework for mentoring pathways for education doctorate students”, High Learn Res Comm, vol. 10, pp. 20-37, 2020, doi: 10.0.73.182/hlrc.v10i2.1188.
Z. Xu, N. Tang, C. Xu, X. Cheng, “Data science: connotation, methods, technologies, and development”, Data Sci Manage, vol. 1, pp. 32-37, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.dsm.2021.02.002.
M. A. Saeed, A. A. M. Ah-Ahdal, H. S. Al Qunayeer, “Integrating research proposal writing into a postgraduate research method course: what does it tell us?”, Int J Res Method Educ, vol. 44, pp. 303-318, 2021, doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2020.1777963.
E. Ariani, B. Patrick, M. Karimi, “Evaluation of using Odua Weston Jambi Hotel services: the influence of internship student service quality on consumer satisfaction”, J Eval Educ, vol. 5, pp. 61-67, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i2.929.
A. Ramadhanti, “Literature study: application of positive psychology to the field of education in Indonesia”, J Eval Educ, vol. 4, pp. 62-67, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i2.312.
I. A. Jama, “The effect of school leadership on student’s academic achievement: case study Bosaso secondary schools in Puntland”, J Eval Educ, vol. 4, pp. 36-39, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i1.291.
Copyright (c) 2024 Joje Mar Sanchez, Jo Ann M. Petancio, Marchee T. Picardal, Chery B. Fernandez, Helen B. Boholano, Remedios C. Bacus, Michelle Mae J. Olvido, Venus M. Cortes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
