Integrated Science Education Journal
Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

6.1

Impact

GScholar

18

H-Index

Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

Beyond Content: Constructivist 7E Lessons and Emergence of Critical Thinking, Creativity, and Problem-solving in Ghanaian Senior High Electronics Studies

Innocent Kwesi Ofori ORCID
New Abirem/Afosu Senior High School
Ghana
innocentdestinyofori@gmail.com
Eric Appiah-Twumasi ORCID
Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development ROR
Ghana
Kenneth Ateko Darko
St. Joseph Seminary Senior High School
Ghana
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study explored how 7E-instructed lessons on electronics concepts improved 21st-century skills among Senior High School (SHS) physics students in the Birim North District, Eastern Region, Ghana. Driven by Constructivist Learning Theory, Experiential Learning Theory, and the P21 Framework for 21st-Century Skills, it focused on three questions: students’ proficiency in critical thinking, creativity and innovation, and problem-solving; the impact of 7E lessons on these skills; and the appearance of these skills in students’ post-test responses.

    Methodology: Using a pragmatist approach, a mixed-methods design with concurrent triangulation was employed, combining a pre-test-post-test quantitative assessment with qualitative content analysis. The study involved 103 SHS 2 physics students from two purposively chosen public schools.

    Main Findings: The main assessment, a 21st-Century Skills Test on Electronics Concepts, was scored with detailed, task-specific rubrics. Pre-test results indicated that all three skills were at low levels, with average scores below 2.0 on a 4-point scale, highlighting the shortcomings of traditional, teacher-centered teaching. After six weeks of the 7E instructional program, paired-samples t-tests revealed significant improvements across all skills, with large effect sizes: critical thinking (η² = 0.912), problem-solving (η² = 0.867), and creativity and innovation (η² = 0.834). Qualitative analysis uncovered three themes in post-test responses: enhanced analytical integration, the emergence of feasible novel ideas, and structured procedural coherence.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The 7E Instructional Model may be an effective, curriculum-aligned strategy for fostering 21st-century skills among Ghanaian SHS physics students in electronics.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Beyond Content: Constructivist 7E Lessons and Emergence of Critical Thinking, Creativity, and Problem-solving in Ghanaian Senior High Electronics Studies”, In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 681–695, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.37251/isej.v7i4.3308.

    More Citation Formats

  • 10
    Abstract views
    17
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. [1] Ministry of Education, “Physics curriculum for secondary education,” National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Accra, Ghana, 2023.
    2. [2] L. Colodeeva, “A comparative study of traditional teaching methods versus 21st century approaches: focusing on the 4 CS in education,” Buletinul ştiinţific al Universităţii de Stat "Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu" din Cahul, Seria "Stiinte Umanistice," vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 127–134, 2024.
    3. [3] Ministry of Education, National pre-tertiary education curriculum framework. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Accra, Ghana, 2018.
    4. [4] National Teaching Council, A framework for professional development of teachers. The National Teaching Council (Ministry of Education), Accra, Ghana, 2020.
    5. [5] J. Hinojosa, F. L. Martínez-Viviente, V. Garcerán-Hernández, and R. Ruiz-Merino, “Teaching-learning model for the science of electronics,” Journal of Technology and Science Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 87–100, 2020, doi: 10.3926/jotse.604.
    6. [6] J. Parker, I. Asare, C. Badu, and T. A. Ossei-Anto, “Examining the use of 21st-century teaching skills in basic school science classrooms,” European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 28–31, 2022, doi: 10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.4.393.
    7. [7] R. K. Annan-Brew, I. J. Ezugwu, S. H. Surman, and J. Dadzie, “Enhancing pre-service teacher effectiveness: Integration of 21st-century skills during off-campus teaching experiences,” European Journal of Education, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 12737, 2024, doi: 10.1111/ejed.12737.
    8. [8] O. Goto and J. Goto, “Secondary school students' perceptions of the 21st-century 4Cs in Zimbabwe,” Perspectives in Education, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 145–161, 2024, doi: 10.38140/pie.v42i2.7489.
    9. [9] G. S. Yıldız, “An examination of high school students' 21st century skills in terms of some demographic variables,” Ulakbilge Magazine, vol. 51, pp. 884–897, 2020, doi: 10.7816/ulakbilge-08-51-02.
    10. [10] B. Mor, R. N. Patel, and B. Prajapati, “21st-century competencies in physics: Assessment strategies for critical thinking, problem-solving, and character formation,” Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 135–143, 2025, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v6i2.2030.
    11. [11] A. Eisenkraft, “Expanding the 5E model,” The Science Teacher, vol. 70, no. 6, p. 56, 2003.
    12. [12] I. N. Suardana, I. W. Redhana, A. A. Sudiatmika, and I. N. Selamat, “Students’ critical thinking skills in chemistry learning using local culture-based 7E learning cycle model,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 399–412, 2018, doi: 10.12973/iji.2018.11227a.
    13. [13] N. Okafor and H. Nwonu, “Promoting critical thinking skills of secondary school chemistry students through 7E-learning cycle model,” Tropical Journal of Education, vol. 3, pp. 16–27, 2021, doi: 10.47524/tje.v3i1.17.
    14. [14] Y. Yuberti, J. Rantika, I. Irwandani, and A. E. Prasetiyo, “Gender-based learning cycle 7E model assisted by mind map: The impact on students’ critical thinking ability,” Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 175–191, 2019.
    15. [15] M. Iqbal and Z. Noreen, “Impact of 7E model on students’ academic achievement: A comprehensive analysis in educational settings,” Journal of Education and Social Studies, 2024, doi: 10.52223/jess.2024.5115.
    16. [16] F. Khan, S. Khan, and Z. U. Islam, “Effectiveness of instructions in academic achievements: An experimental study using 7E's instructional model,” Global Regional Review, vol. 3, pp. 151–165, 2020, doi: 10.31703/grr.2020(V-III).17.
    17. [17] K. Leekhot, W. Payougkiattikun, and T. Thongsuk, “The results of inquiry-based learning management on critical thinking and academic achievement of grade-8 students,” Integrated Science Education Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 161–167, 2024, doi: 10.37251/isej.v5i3.901.
    18. [18] C. R. Nuzulia, S. Ayub, A. Harjono, and A. Doyan, “Problem-solving ability of work and energy of grade X students using the learning cycle 7E model,” Kappa Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 272–278, 2023, doi: 10.29408/kpj.v7i2.20930.
    19. [19] N. Erlina, B. Jatmiko, and R. Raharjo, “Development of physics learning tools using the 7E learning cycle model to improve problem-solving skills,” Journal of Science Education Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1032–1038, 2017, doi: 10.26740/jpps.v5n2.p1032-1038.
    20. [20] W. Febriani, “The effect of physics learning cycle 7E model on science process skills in State Senior High School 1 Percut Sei Tuan in the 2019/2020 academic year,” Physics Alumni Association Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 28, 2020, doi: 10.24114/jiaf.v6i3.15278.
    21. [21] M. L. D. Lubiano and M. S. Magpantay, “Enhanced 7E instructional model towards enriching science inquiry skills,” International Journal of Research in Education and Science, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 630–658, 2021, doi: 10.46328/ijres.1963.
    22. [22] S. Donkoh, M. K. Annan, and J. Osei, “Demystifying the ‘Dense’ problem of density using 5E learning cycle,” Journal of STEAM Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 2021.
    23. [23] K. D. Ateko, I. Owusu-Mensah, and G. Oduro-Okyireh, “Exploring effective approach to teaching thermal physics: Comparing 5E model, differentiated instruction and conventional teaching,” Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46–60, 2025, doi: 10.70232/jrep.v2i1.22.
    24. [24] D. T. Tiruneh, M. De Cock, A. G. Weldeslassie, J. Elen, and R. Janssen, “Measuring critical thinking in physics: Development and validation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism,” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 663–682, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10763-016-9723-0.
    25. [25] F. Mufit, F. Festiyed, A. Fauzan, and L. Lufri, “Impact of learning model based on cognitive conflict toward student's conceptual understanding,” in IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 335, no. 1, p. 012072, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012072.
    26. [26] K. D. Amponsah, J. K. Kotoka, C. Beccles, and S. N. Dlamini, “Effectiveness of collaboration on low and high-achieving school students' comprehension of electrochemistry in South Africa,” European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 4, 2018, doi: 10.20897/ejsteme/2685.
    27. [27] L. Thibaut et al., “Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education,” European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 02, 2018, doi: 10.20897/ejsteme/85525.
    28. [28] Y. L. K. Tan and R. Subramaniam, “Promoting integrated STEM education among students through fabrication of interactive exhibit,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 9, pp. 1423158, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1423158.
    29. [29] M. Gourmaj, A. Naddami, A. Fahli, and D. Nehari, “Teaching power electronics and digital electronics using personal learning environments: From traditional learning to remote experiential learning,” International Journal of Online Engineering, vol. 13, no. 8, 2017, doi: 10.3991/ijoe.v13i08.6840.
    30. [30] J. Addido, A. C. Borowczak, and G. B. Walwema, “Teaching Newtonian physics with LEGO EV3 robots: An integrated STEM approach,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. em2280, 2023, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/13232.
    31. [31] T. K. Murugiah, “Challenges in transforming assessments for 21st century skills development: Lecturers’ perspective,” Asian Journal of Education and Training, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2020, doi: 10.20448/journal.522.2020.61.41.46.
    32. [32] I. Benek and B. Akcay, “The effects of socio-scientific STEM activities on 21st century skills of middle school students,” Participatory Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 25–52, 2022, doi: 10.17275/per.22.27.9.2.
    33. [33] R. AlAli, “Enhancing 21st-century skills through integrated STEM education using project-oriented problem-based learning,” Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 421–430, 2024, doi: 10.30892/gtg.53205-1217.
    34. [34] L. Gavrilas and K. T. Kotsis, “Integrating learning theories and innovative pedagogies in STEM education: A comprehensive review,” Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2025, doi: 10.30935/ejsee/16538.
    35. [35] H. Maarouf, “Pragmatism as a supportive paradigm for the mixed research approach: Conceptualizing the ontological, epistemological, and axiological stances of pragmatism,” International Business Research, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1–12, 2019, doi: 10.5539/ibr.v12n9p1.
    36. [36] P. Leavy, Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, 2017.
    37. [37] T. K. Koo and M. Y. Li, “A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research,” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
    38. [38] J. Pallant, SPSS Survival Manual: A Step-by-Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS, 4th ed. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 2011.
    39. [39] R. K. Putri, N. Bukit, and M. P. Simanjuntak, “The effect of project-based learning model's on critical thinking skills, creative thinking skills, collaboration skills, & communication skills (4C) physics in senior high school,” in Proc. 6th Annu. Int. Sem. Transform. Educ. Educ. Leadership (AISTEEL 2021), pp. 323–330, Atlantis Press, 2021, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.211110.103.
    40. [40] D. Yulianti, S. Sugianto, and K. M. Ngafidin, “Scratch-assisted physics learning with a STEM approach in the pandemic era to develop 21st-century learning skills,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 185–194, 2022, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v11i1.32607.
    41. [41] Z. Hidayatullah, I. Wilujeng, N. Nurhasanah, T. G. Gusemanto, and M. Makhrus, “Synthesis of the 21st century skills (4C) based physics education research in Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 88–97, 2021, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v6i1.1889.
    42. [42] N. R. Millen and S. Supahar, “The effectivity study: Implementation of the physics e-module with PjBL-STEM model to describe students’ creative thinking skills and learning motivation profile,” Journal of Science Education Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2023.
    43. [43] I. K. Amalina and T. Vidákovich, “An integrated STEM-based mathematical problem-solving test: Developing and reporting psychometric evidence,” Journal on Mathematics Education, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 587–604, 2022, doi: 10.22342/jme.v13i4.pp587-604.
    44. [44] D. Amankwaah, E. Appiah-Twumasi, K. D. Ateko, and Y. D. Asamoah, “Efficacy of ADDIE instructional design in promoting conceptual change in electronic concepts at Tano-North Municipality, Ghana,” Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 76–87, 2024, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v5i3.1064.
    45. [45] L. Bao and K. Koenig, “Physics education research for 21st century learning,” Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8.
    46. [46] M. K. Amedeker, “Changing educational policies: Implications for ICT integration in science instruction and performance of students in Ghanaian senior high schools,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Educ. Technol. 2020, pp. 72–78, 2020.
    47. [47] A. Abubakar-Zagoon, E. Intsiful, and H. Zagoon-Sayeed, “Exploring public knowledge on technical vocational education in Ghana,” SN Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 5, p. 98, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43545-024-00898-6.
    48. [48] Y. Maryuningsih, T. Hidayat, R. Riandi, and N. Rustaman, “Developing performance assessment instruments to measure 4C skills in online discussion activities of science learning,” Scientiae Educatia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 109, 2020, doi: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v9i1.7500.
    49. [49] R. Vanderburg, G. Mann, and M. Cowling, “Changing physics instruction by synergizing Vygotskian educational theory and virtual reality,” Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 92–98, 2021.
    50. [50] S. Adak, “Effectiveness of constructivist approach on academic achievement in science at secondary level,” Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 1074–1079, 2017, doi: 10.5897/ERR2017.3298.
    51. [51] H. Saraç and D. Tarhan, “Effect of multimedia-assisted 7E learning model applications on academic achievement and retention in students,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 299–311, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.299.
    52. [52] A. L. Steele and C. Schramm, “Situated learning perspective for online approaches to laboratory and project work,” in Proc. Canadian Engineering Education Assoc. (CEEA), 2021, doi: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.14844.
    53. [53] E. Appiah-Twumasi, D. Nti, R. Acheampong, and C. Eminah, “Effect of the 5E instructional model on physics academic achievement based on gender and students’ ability: A case of Berekum senior high schools in Ghana,” East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.46606/eajess2021v02i01.0060.
    54. [54] E. S. Parno, L. Yuliati, A. N. Widarti, M. Ali, and U. Azizah, “The influence of STEM-based 7E learning cycle on students’ critical and creative thinking skills in physics,” International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 761–769, 2019.
    55. [55] M. Jamil, F. A. Hafeez, and N. Muhammad, “Critical thinking development for 21st century: Analysis of physics curriculum,” Journal of Social & Organizational Matters, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2024, doi: 10.56976/jsom.v3i1.45.
    56. [56] E. Knain, T. Fredlund, and A. Furberg, “Exploring student reasoning and representation construction in school science through the lenses of social semiotics and interaction analysis,” Research in Science Education, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 93–111, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11165-020-09975-1.

Categories