Integrated Science Education Journal
Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

6.1

Impact

GScholar

18

H-Index

Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

Mapping Students’ Misconceptions in Momentum and Impulse: A Systematic Literature Review of Conceptual Understanding and Instructional Interventions

Dhinar Asri Intantri ORCID
State University of Malang ROR
Indonesia
Sutopo Sutopo
State University of Malang ROR
Indonesia
Nasikhudin Nasikhudin
State University of Malang ROR
Indonesia
Sentot Kusairi ORCID
State University of Malang ROR
Indonesia
sentot.kusairi.fmipa@um.ac.id
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to identify and analyze students’ misconceptions regarding momentum and impulse through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), focusing on patterns of misconceptions, difficulties in conceptual understanding, and effective instructional interventions reported in previous studies.

    Methodology: This study employed a PRISMA-based Systematic Literature Review design. Articles were collected from Scopus-indexed journals, SINTA-accredited journals, ERIC, Taylor & Francis, ResearchGate, and Google Scholar published between 2018 and 2025. The article selection process used purposive sampling based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. From 1,032 identified articles, 8 eligible studies were selected for analysis. Data were collected through document analysis and analyzed using thematic analysis and narrative synthesis.

    Main Findings: The findings indicate that students’ conceptual understanding of momentum and impulse remains low, while misconceptions persist in force–time–impulse relationships, graphical interpretation, momentum conservation, and momentum–energy integration. Most misconceptions originate from an incomplete understanding of Newtonian mechanics and fragmented conceptual structures. Several instructional approaches, including multiple representations, knowledge integration, cognitive conflict, conceptual change text, and demonstration-based learning, were found effective in reducing misconceptions and improving conceptual understanding.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides a focused synthesis of misconception patterns specifically in momentum and impulse topics and emphasizes the importance of conceptual integration-based instruction in reducing persistent misconceptions in physics learning.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Mapping Students’ Misconceptions in Momentum and Impulse: A Systematic Literature Review of Conceptual Understanding and Instructional Interventions”, In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 506–518, May 2026, doi: 10.37251/isej.v7i3.3191.

    More Citation Formats

  • 72
    Abstract views
    40
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. [1] S. N. M. Royani, S. Sutopo, A. Hidayat, and P. Parno, “Research trends in physics learning strategies: a systematic literature review addressing students’ conceptual understanding difficulties in kinematics,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10047
    2. [2] K. K. Islamiyah, S. Rahayu, and I. W. Dasna, “The effectiveness of remediation learning strategy in reducing misconceptions on chemistry: A systematic review,” Tadris J. Kegur. dan Ilmu Tarb., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–77, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.24042/tadris.v7i1.11140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v7i1.11140
    3. [3] H. J. Banda and J. Nzabahimana, “Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 23108, 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.023108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.023108
    4. [4] Y. Safari and P. Nurhida, “Pentingnya pemahaman konsep dasar matematika dalam pembelajaran matematika [The importance of understanding basic mathematical concepts in learning mathematics],” Karimah Tauhid, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 9817–9824, 2024, doi: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i9.14625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i9.14625
    5. [5] M. A. Al-Mutawah, R. Thomas, A. Eid, E. Y. Mahmoud, and M. J. Fateel, “Conceptual understanding, procedural knowledge and problem-solving skills in mathematics: High school graduates work analysis and standpoints,” Int. J. Educ. Pract., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 258–273, 2019, doi: 10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273
    6. [6] S. Vosniadou, “The development of students’ understanding of science,” Front. Educ., vol. 4, no. April, pp. 1–6, 2019, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00032
    7. [7] W. Xu et al., “Assessment of knowledge integration in student learning of momentum,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010130.
    8. [8] W. Xu, Q. Liu, K. Koenig, and J. Fritchman, “Assessment of knowledge integration in student learning of momentum,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 10130 (1–15), 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010130
    9. [9] W. Xu, Y. Jiang, L. Yang, and L. Bao, “Conceptual framework based instruction for promoting knowledge integration in learning momentum,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 20124, 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020124
    10. [10] U. V. Paramita and M. N. R. Jauhariyah, “Identifying student misconceptions on momentum and impulse using four-tier diagnostic test instrument with CRI,” J. Pijar Mipa, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 75–82, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6086
    11. [11] G. Resbiantoro, R. Setiani, and Dwikoranto, “A review of misconception in physics: The diagnosis, causes, and remediation,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 403–427, 2022, doi: 10.36681/tused.2022.128.
    12. [12] A. Setiani, D. Firmansyah, and C. I. Ramadhani, “Analysis of momentum and impulse misconceptions of college students using four-tier diagnostic tests,” Int. J. Educ. Teach. Zo., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 349–359, 2023, doi: 10.57092/ijetz.v2i3.146.
    13. [13] H. Halmuniati, M. D. Saputra, N. Syam, and L. Wui, “Analysis of teacher difficulties in teaching physics courses in MAN 1 Konawe Selatan,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 157–162, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jpft.v8i2.3843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v8i2.3843
    14. [14] L. Puspitasari, B. Astuti, and M. Masturi, “Penerapan project based learning (pjbl) terbimbing untuk meningkatkan keaktifan dan pemahaman siswa pada konsep momentum, impuls, dan tumbukan [Implementation of guided project based learning (PjBL) to increase student activity and understanding of the concepts of momentum, impulse, and collision.],” Phys. Educ. Res. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 69, 2020, doi: 10.21580/perj.2020.2.2.4959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2020.2.2.4959
    15. [15] G. Resbiantoro, R. Setiani, and Dwikoranto, “A review of misconception in physics: The diagnosis, causes, and remediation,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 403–427, 2022, doi: 10.36681/tused.2022.128.
    16. [16] I. P. M. Sari and F. U. Ermawati, “Instrumen tes diagnostik konsepsi lima tingkat pada materi gerak lurus: pengembangan, uji validitas dan reliabilitas serta uji coba terbatas [Five-level conceptual diagnostic test instrument on straight motion material: development, validity and reliability testing and limited trials],” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 152–162, 2021, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.5.2.152-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.2.152-162
    17. [17] T. U. Pebriani, F. Mufit, and S. Y. Sari, “Systematic review: Misconceptions and remediation on momentum and impulse [Systematic review: Misconceptions and remediation on momentum and impulse],” Pillar Phys. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 85–98, 2024, doi: 10.24036/15637171074.
    18. [18] A. Budiyono, S. A. Mulyadi, A. Wildani, N. Ayu, S. Pertiwi, and F. Alatas, “Mapping the evolution of tiered diagnostic instruments for identifying students’ misconceptions in physics: A systematic review of indonesian research (2015-2025),” vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 225–242, 2025, doi: 10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17879
    19. [19] G. C. Rosa, C. Cari, N. S. Aminah, and H. J, “Students’ understanding level and scientific literacy competencies related to momentum and impulse,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1097, no. 012019, pp. 1–8, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012019
    20. [20] S. Syuhendri, “The development of newtonian mechanics conceptual change texts to overcome students’ misconceptions,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 510–519, 2018, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v12i3.8285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i3.8285
    21. [21] A. Setiani, D. Firmansyah, and C. I. Ramadhani, “Analysis of momentum and impulse misconceptions of college students using four-tier diagnostic tests,” Int. J. Educ. Teach. Zo., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 349–359, 2023, doi: 10.57092/ijetz.v2i3.146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i3.146
    22. [22] H. F. Rahim, M. R. A. Taqwa, A. Hidayat, and S. Sutopo, “Students’ conceptual understanding level in momentum and impulse: Based on resource theory,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 3108, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1063/5.0215413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0215413
    23. [23] M. Taufik and A. Syahrial, “Impact of impulse and impact force: An innovative approach to teaching momentum in physics,” J. Pendidikan, Sains, Geol. dan Geofis. (GeoScienceEd Journal), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1035–1038, 2024, doi: 10.29303/goescienceed.v5i4.625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v5i4.625
    24. [24] R. Adimayuda, A. Suhandi, A. Samsudin, E. Suhendi, A. Setiawan, and N. J. Fratiwi, “Breaking misconceptions: Technology-integrated more model for meaningful learning of momentum and impulse,” Online Learn. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–40, 2025, doi: 10.58524/oler.v5i1.606 Breaking. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i1.606
    25. [25] X. Wu, Y. Li, and S. N. Rebello, “Uncovering student conceptual structure by a multimethod evaluation of the energy and momentum conceptual survey,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 2469–9896, 2025, doi: 10.1103/kvph-l899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kvph-l899
    26. [26] R. Nurul and A. Hidayat, “Physics learning media with multirepresentation: A systematic literature review,” vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 353–366, 2024, doi: doi.org/10.21009/1.10212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/1.10212
    27. [27] N. Munfaridah, L. Avraamidou, and M. Goedhart, “The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: What do we know and where do we go from here?,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/9577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577
    28. [28] S. Ainsworth, “DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations,” Learning and instruction, vol. 16, pp. 183–198, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
    29. [29] Y. A. Vexler, A. Merzel, R. Z. Li, M. Walter, and Y. A. Vexler, “Research in dance education breaking silos: The effectiveness of a knowledge integration approach for dance curricula,” Res. Danc. Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–30, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14647893.2024.2365309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2024.2365309
    30. [30] N. Munfaridah, L. Avraamidou, and M. Goedhart, “Preservice physics teachers’ development of physics identities : the role of multiple representations,” no. 5, pp. 1699–1715, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11165-021-10019-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10019-5
    31. [31] A. Pane and M. Darwis Dasopang, “Belajar Dan Pembelajaran,” FITRAHJurnal Kaji. Ilmu-ilmu Keislam., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 333, 2017, doi: 10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945
    32. [32] L. Bao and J. C. Fritchman, “Knowledge integration in student learning of Newton’s third law: Addressing the action-reaction language and the implied causality,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 20116, 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020116
    33. [33] C. Lu, Y. Liu, S. Xu, S. Zhou, H. Mei, and X. Zhang, “Conceptual framework assessment of knowledge integration in student learning of measurement uncertainty,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 2, p. 20145, 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020145
    34. [34] L. Xie, Y. Li, Q. Fu, Y. Xiao, L. Yang, and L. Bao, “Assessing and enhancing university students’ knowledge integration in learning electromagnetic induction,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 47, no. 13, pp. 1659–1681, 2025, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2024.2371165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2371165
    35. [35] G. J. Posner, K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson, and W. A. Gertzog, “Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change,” Sci. Educ., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 211–227, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
    36. [36] F. Mufit and A. Fauzan, “The effect of cognitive conflict-based learning (ccbl) model on remediation of misconceptions,” Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 26–49, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.003
    37. [37] R. Duit and D. F. Treagust, “Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 671–688, 2003, doi: 10.1080/0950069032000076652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
    38. [38] A. Akmam, “Integration of cognitive conflict in generative learning model to enhancing students’ creative thinking skills,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 9, 2024, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/15026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15026
    39. [39] M. Limo, “On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change : a critical appraisal,” Learn. Instr., vol. 11, pp. 357–380, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
    40. [40] B. C. Madu and E. Orji, “Effects of cognitive conflict instructional strategy on students ’ conceptual change in temperature and heat,” Sage Open, vol. 5, no. 3, 2015, doi: 10.1177/2158244015594662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015594662
    41. [41] C. A. Chinn, W. F. Brewer, and W. F. Brewer, “Review of educational and implications for science instruction,” Rev. Educ. Res. Spring, vol. 63, no. 11–49, 1993, doi: 10.3102/00346543063001001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063001001
    42. [42] M. Makhrus and A. Busyairi, “Reducing misconception of force concepts through learning conceptual change model with cognitive conflict approach,” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, vol. 8, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jpft.v8i2.4332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v8i2.4332
    43. [43] I. Wilujeng and Z. Hidayatullah, “Alternative learning model in physics learning: Effect of the conceptual change model with cognitive conflict on critical thinking skill,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2021, doi: 10.21067/mpej.v5i2.5260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v5i2.5260
    44. [44] R. W. Bachtiar, R. F. G. Meulenbroeks, and W. R. Van Joolingen, “Stimulating mechanistic reasoning in physics using student constructed stop motion animations,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., pp. 777–790, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10956-021-09918-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09918-z
    45. [45] J. Beautemps, A. Bresges, and S. Becker, “Enhancing learning through animated video: An eye tracking methodology approach,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 148–159, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10956-024-10162-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10162-4
    46. [46] K. Dian, I. Sari, I. M. C. Wibawa, A. I. Wayan, and I. Yuda, “Media video animasi untuk meningkatan hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran ipas kelas iv sekolah dasar [Animated video media to improve student learning outcomes in science learning for grade IV elementary school],” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Sains dan Hum., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 187–196, 2024, doi: 10.23887/jppsh.v8i2.78479 Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsh.v8i2.78479
    47. [47] T. M. Yusuf, and U. Hasanah, “Enhancing students’ deep conceptual understanding in physics through video demonstrations: A systematic literature review,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 355-365, 2025, doi: 10.52434/jpif.v5i2.43355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52434/jpif.v5i2.43355
    48. [48] L. A. Caella and S. Yulianto, “The effectiveness of animation video media to increase interest and learning outcomes in science subjects,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 6621–6630, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8445
    49. [49] I. Kaniawati, G. Triyani, A. Danawan, I. Suyana, A. Samsudin, and E. Suhendi, “Implementation of interactive conceptual instruction (ICI) with computer simulation : impact of students ’ misconceptions on momentum and impulse material,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 10, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.8375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.8375
    50. [50] M. U. Agustin, L. Yuliati, N. Munfaridah, P. Aktif, and M. Momentum, “Enhancing students concept mastery through integrative active learning models of momentum and impulse,” Kasuari Phys. Educ. J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 342–350, 2024, doi: 10.37891/kpej.v7i2.677.
    51. [51] N. Wulandari, E. Agustine, A. Febriandirza, and E. Prakasa, “Augmented reality–assisted PDEODE instruction for reducing misconceptions in momentum and impulse,” Syntax Lit. J. Ilm. Indones., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2882–2896, 2026, doi: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v11i4.64099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v11i4.64099

Categories