Students' Conceptions About Flat Side Space Materials Viewed From The Cognitive Styles of Students in Junior High School

Novan Hardi; Isaac Daniel Tambo; Olanrewaju  Fabelurin; Bounmy Khaminsou

doi:10.37251/ijome.v1i1.610

Novan Hardi Universitas Sebelas Maret
Isaac Daniel Tambo University of Zambia
Olanrewaju Fabelurin Obafemi Alwolowo University
Bounmy Khaminsou National University of Laos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v1i1.610

Keywords: Student's Conception, Build a flat side room, Cognitive Style

Abstract

This research is a qualitative research using a case study research design. The subjects in this study were students of class VIII even semester at SMP Negeri 2 Bayan which consisted of one class. The interview guideline instrument was in the form of a question guide used by researchers to gather information on students' conceptions of: (1) the definition of cubes and blocks and (2) the elements of cubes and blocks. Qualitative data analysis is carried out interactively and continues continuously until complete, so that the data is saturated. Data analysis techniques in this study used the Miles and Huberman methods. The results of this study are the conception of class VIII students of SMP Negeri 2 Bayan who have a field dependent (FD) Cognitive Style in stating the definition of cubes and blocks by stating that cubes are geometric shapes that have the same sides and blocks are geometric shapes that have unequal sides, by declaring that a cube is a geometric shape that has 6 square sides while a beam is a geometric shape formed from a combination of squares and rectangles, by stating that a cube is a figure whose sides are the same while a block is a figure that has length , width, and height.

References

Y. R. Rahmawati Z and M. Muchlian, “Eksplorasi etnomatematika rumah gadang Minangkabau Sumatera Barat,” J. Anal., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123–136, 2019, doi: 10.15575/ja.v5i2.5942.

S. Setiono, “Analisis Respon Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran Online Berbasis Aktifitas di Perguruan Tinggi,” J. Pendidik., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 15–23, 2021, doi: 10.36232/pendidikan.v9i2.1095.

I. U. Albab, Y. Hartono, and D. Darmawijoyo, “Kemajuan Belajar Siswa Pada Geometri Transformasi Menggunakan Aktivitas Refleksi Geometri,” J. Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 338–348, 2014, doi: 10.21831/cp.v3i3.2378.

E. F. Setiya Rini, G. Wibisono, A. Ramadhanti, N. N. Simamora, and D. Chen, “Pengaruh Kemandirian Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI di SMA Negeri 11 Kota Jambi,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 256, 2020, doi: 10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2211.

R. F. Hartini, Ibrohim, and A. Qohar, “Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Proses Sains melalui Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Lingkungan pada Materi Ekosistem,” J. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1168–1173, 2018.

S. Z. Sholihah and E. A. Afriansyah, “Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Proses Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tahapan Berpikir Van Hiele,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 287–298, 2018, doi: 10.31980/mosharafa.v6i2.317.

W. A. Putri, R. Fitriani, E. F. Setya Rini, F. T. Aldila, and T. Ratnawati, “Pengaruh Motivasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 248–254, 2021, doi: 10.36987/jpms.v7i1.1942.

S. Supriyadi, J. Mansyur, U. Tadulako, M. Rizal, and U. K. Indonesia, “KARAKTERISTIK PEMECAHAN MASALAH MAHASISWA KATEGORI TINGGI ISBN 978-602-51096-0-7 i,” no. November 2018, 2017.

L. Mahmudah, “Pentingnya Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Di Madrasah,” Elem. Islam. Teach. J., vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.21043/elementary.v4i1.2047.

D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. F. Setiya Rini, “Gender Analysis in Measurement Materials: Critical Thinking Ability and Science Processing Skills,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-BiRuNi, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2022, doi: 10.24042/jipf.

F. Nurjanah, R. Triwoelandari, and M. K. Nawawi, “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik Terintegrasi Nilai-Nilai Islam dan Sains untuk Meningkatkan Karakter Religius Siswa,” Pendas J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 178–181, 2018.

M. Fitrah, “Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Pada Materi Segiempat Siswa Smp,” KALAMATIKA J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 51, 2017, doi: 10.22236/kalamatika.vol2no1.2017pp51-70.

A. Özerem, “Misconceptions In Geometry And Suggested Solutions For Seventh Grade Students,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 55, pp. 720–729, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557.

E. Hidayat, N. Ratnaningsih, A. Sunendar, and J. S. Siregar, “Ethnomathematics: Disclosing Mathematical Concept in Batak Toba Traditional House,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1657, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012053.

C. Chikiwa and M. Schäfer, “Promoting critical thinking in multilingual mathematics classes through questioning,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 8, 2018, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/91832.

R. N. Irfani, “Formulasi Kajian Psikologis Tentang Teori-Teori Belajar dalam Al-Quran dan Hadits,” Ta’dib J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2017, doi: 10.29313/tjpi.v6i1.2319.

A. Ramadhanti, N. N. Simamora, E. Febri, S. Rini, and R. Fitriani, “Deskripsi Motivasi Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 82–86, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i3.245.

N. N. Simamora, W. A. Putri, M. Iqbal, A. Ramadhanti, and E. F. S. Rini, “Description of Student Discipline Attitudes at SMP Negeri 16 Jambi City,” Lensa J. Kependidikan Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 76, 2020, doi: 10.33394/j-lkf.v8i2.3175.

D. P. Utomo, Mengembangkan Model Pembelajaran: Merancang dan Memadukan Tujuan, Sintaks, Sistem Sosial, Prinsip Reaksi, dan Sistem Pendukung Pembelajaran. Yogya: BILDUNG, 2020.

S. Syahrial, D. A. Kurniawan, A. Asrial, H. Sabil, S. Maryani, and E. F. S. Rini, “Professional Teachers: Study of ICT Capabilities and Research Competencies in Urban and Rural?,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 2247–2261, 2022, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v17i7.7590.

M. Y. Lestari and N. Diana, “Keterampilan proses sains (KPS) pada pelaksanaan praktikum Fisika Dasar I,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 2018.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.

I. R. Gay, G. E. Mills, and P. W. Airasian, Educational Research: Competencies For Analysis and Applications, vol. 148. USA: Pearson Education, 2012.

M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitatif Data Analysis. SAGE Publications, 1994.

E. F. Setiya Rini, D. Darmaji, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Identifikasi Kegiatan Praktikum dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains di SMPN Se-Kecamatan Bajubang,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2476–2481, 2022, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2360.

E. F. S. Rini and F. T. Aldila, “Practicum Activity: Analysis of Science Process Skills and Students ’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–61, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.322.