Analysis of Critical Thinking Level of Students in Surrounding and Area of Circle Based on Elder and Paul's Critical Thinking Theory in View Of Students' Mathematical Ability

Bayu Pamungkas; Ifeanyi Sunday Onah; Norhayati Hamzah; Bernadett Aradi

doi:10.37251/ijome.v1i1.609

Bayu Pamungkas Universitas Sebelas Maret
Ifeanyi Sunday Onah University of Nigeria Nsukka
Norhayati Hamzah Universiti Brunei Darussalam
Bernadett Aradi University of Debrence

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v1i1.609

Keywords: Critical Thinking, Mathematical

Abstract

The type of research used in this research is qualitative research. The subjects in this study were students in class VIII A and VIII I of SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta, which consisted of six students. The sampling technique in this study used a purposive sampling technique. The instruments used in this research are interview sheets and test instruments. Qualitative data analysis techniques in this study used the Miles and Huberman method which included data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study are that the level of critical thinking that can be achieved by research subjects with low mathematical abilities is critical thinking level 1 with characteristics of low mathematical ability in solving mathematical problems on the circumference and area of a circle. Furthermore, the level of critical thinking that can be achieved by research subjects with moderate mathematical abilities is critical thinking level 2. The level of critical thinking that can be achieved by research subjects with high mathematical abilities is critical thinking level 3.

References

A. Irawan and M. A. R. Hakim, “KEPRAKTISAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN KOMIK MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN KELAS VII SMP/MTs,” PythagorasJurnal Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. April, pp. 91–100, 2021.

E. F. Setiya Rini, R. Fitriani, W. A. Putri, A. A. Br. Ginting, and M. M. Matondang, “Analisis Kerja Keras dalam Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 221–226, 2021, doi: 10.30998/sap.v5i3.7764.

S. Hardiarti, “Etnomatematika: Aplikasi Bangun Datar Segiempat Pada Candi Muaro Jambi,” Aksioma, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 99, 2017, doi: 10.26877/aks.v8i2.1707.

A. Özerem, “Misconceptions In Geometry And Suggested Solutions For Seventh Grade Students,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 55, pp. 720–729, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557.

Z. Jojo, “Disrupting A Learning Environment for Promotion of Geometry Teaching,” Africa Educ. Rev., vol. 14, no. 3–4, pp. 245–262, 2017, doi: 10.1080/18146627.2017.1314175.

S. M. Chiphambo and N. N. Feza, “Exploring Geometry Teaching Model: Polygon Pieces and Dictionary Tools for The Model,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 16, no. 9, 2020, doi: 10.29333/EJMSTE/8358.

B. Ulum, “Etnomatematika Pasuruan: Eksplorasi Geometri Untuk Sekolah Dasar Pada Motif Batik Pasedahan Suropati,” J. Rev. Pendidik. Dasar J. Kaji. Pendidik. dan Has. Penelit., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 686, 2018, doi: 10.26740/jrpd.v4n2.p686-696.

G. Y. Marthani and N. Ratu, “Media Pembelajaran Matematika Digital ‘ BABADA ’ pada Materi Kesebangunan Bangun Datar,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 305–316, 2022.

M. N. S. A. El-haq and M. T. Budiarto, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Flash Pada Materi Lingkaran Dengan Memperhatikan Fungsi Kognitif Rigorous Mathematical Thinking (RMT),” MATHEdunesa, vol. 2, no. 3, 2013.

A. Ramadhanti, N. N. Simamora, E. Febri, S. Rini, and R. Fitriani, “Deskripsi Motivasi Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 82–86, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i3.245.

Kholilah, A. Ramadhanti, R. Fitriani, E. Febri, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Hubungan Kerja Keras dan Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMA Negeri 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Sci. Educ. Pract., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2020.

K. Wardany, Sajidan, and M. Ramli, “Pengembangan Penilaian Untuk Mengukur Higher Order Thinking Skills Siswa,” J. Inkuiri, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2017.

Y. Prihartini, W. Wahyudi, N. Nuraini, and M. Ridha DS, “Penerapan Konsep Matematika Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Pada Ftk Di Uin Sts Jambi,” Tarbawi J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 15, 2018, doi: 10.32939/tarbawi.v14i2.267.

M. Hamdani, B. . Prayitno, and P. Karyanto, “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Metode Eksperimen,” Proceeding Biol. Educ. Conf., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 139–145, 2019.

L. Mahmudah, “Pentingnya Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Di Madrasah,” Elem. Islam. Teach. J., vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.21043/elementary.v4i1.2047.

E. F. S. Rini and F. T. Aldila, “Practicum Activity: Analysis of Science Process Skills and Students ’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–61, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.322.

D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. F. Setiya Rini, “Gender Analysis in Measurement Materials: Critical Thinking Ability and Science Processing Skills,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-BiRuNi, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2022, doi: 10.24042/jipf.

Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, E. Febri, and S. Rini, “Science Processing Skill and Critical Thinking : Reviewed Based on the Gender,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2022.

W. A. Putri, Astalini, and Darmaji, “Analisis Kegiatan Praktikum untuk Dapat Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 3361–3368, 2022.

F. T. Aldila, E. F. S. Rini, S. W. Octavia, N. N. Khaidah, F. P. Sinaga, and N. Septiani, “The Relationship of Teacher Teaching Skills and Learning Interests of Physics Students of Senior High School,” Edufisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 101–105, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24864.

Astalini et al., “Impact of Science Process Skills on Thinking Skills in Rural and Urban Schools,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 803–822, 2023.

M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitatif Data Analysis. SAGE Publications, 1994.