SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

9

H-Index

Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education

an Open Access Journal


Analysis of Critical Thinking Level of Students in Surrounding and Area of Circle Based on Elder and Paul's Critical Thinking Theory in View Of Students' Mathematical Ability

Share
  • The type of research used in this research is qualitative research. The subjects in this study were students in class VIII A and VIII I of SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta, which consisted of six students. The sampling technique in this study used a purposive sampling technique. The instruments used in this research are interview sheets and test instruments. Qualitative data analysis techniques in this study used the Miles and Huberman method which included data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study are that the level of critical thinking that can be achieved by research subjects with low mathematical abilities is critical thinking level 1 with characteristics of low mathematical ability in solving mathematical problems on the circumference and area of a circle. Furthermore, the level of critical thinking that can be achieved by research subjects with moderate mathematical abilities is critical thinking level 2. The level of critical thinking that can be achieved by research subjects with high mathematical abilities is critical thinking level 3.

  • How to cite

    Analysis of Critical Thinking Level of Students in Surrounding and Area of Circle Based on Elder and Paul’s Critical Thinking Theory in View Of Students’ Mathematical Ability. (2023). Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 1(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v1i1.609
  • 410
    Abstract views
    341
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. Irawan and M. A. R. Hakim, “KEPRAKTISAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN KOMIK MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN KELAS VII SMP/MTs,” PythagorasJurnal Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. April, pp. 91–100, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v10i1.2934
    2. E. F. Setiya Rini, R. Fitriani, W. A. Putri, A. A. Br. Ginting, and M. M. Matondang, “Analisis Kerja Keras dalam Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 221–226, 2021, doi: 10.30998/sap.v5i3.7764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7764
    3. S. Hardiarti, “Etnomatematika: Aplikasi Bangun Datar Segiempat Pada Candi Muaro Jambi,” Aksioma, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 99, 2017, doi: 10.26877/aks.v8i2.1707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v8i2.1707
    4. A. Özerem, “Misconceptions In Geometry And Suggested Solutions For Seventh Grade Students,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 55, pp. 720–729, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557
    5. Z. Jojo, “Disrupting A Learning Environment for Promotion of Geometry Teaching,” Africa Educ. Rev., vol. 14, no. 3–4, pp. 245–262, 2017, doi: 10.1080/18146627.2017.1314175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1314175
    6. S. M. Chiphambo and N. N. Feza, “Exploring Geometry Teaching Model: Polygon Pieces and Dictionary Tools for The Model,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 16, no. 9, 2020, doi: 10.29333/EJMSTE/8358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8358
    7. B. Ulum, “Etnomatematika Pasuruan: Eksplorasi Geometri Untuk Sekolah Dasar Pada Motif Batik Pasedahan Suropati,” J. Rev. Pendidik. Dasar J. Kaji. Pendidik. dan Has. Penelit., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 686, 2018, doi: 10.26740/jrpd.v4n2.p686-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v4n2.p686-696
    8. G. Y. Marthani and N. Ratu, “Media Pembelajaran Matematika Digital ‘ BABADA ’ pada Materi Kesebangunan Bangun Datar,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 305–316, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i2.1410
    9. M. N. S. A. El-haq and M. T. Budiarto, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Flash Pada Materi Lingkaran Dengan Memperhatikan Fungsi Kognitif Rigorous Mathematical Thinking (RMT),” MATHEdunesa, vol. 2, no. 3, 2013.
    10. A. Ramadhanti, N. N. Simamora, E. Febri, S. Rini, and R. Fitriani, “Deskripsi Motivasi Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 82–86, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i3.245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v3i3.245
    11. Kholilah, A. Ramadhanti, R. Fitriani, E. Febri, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Hubungan Kerja Keras dan Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMA Negeri 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Sci. Educ. Pract., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33751/jsep.v4i1.2829
    12. K. Wardany, Sajidan, and M. Ramli, “Pengembangan Penilaian Untuk Mengukur Higher Order Thinking Skills Siswa,” J. Inkuiri, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.6.2.2018.21-31
    13. Y. Prihartini, W. Wahyudi, N. Nuraini, and M. Ridha DS, “Penerapan Konsep Matematika Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Pada Ftk Di Uin Sts Jambi,” Tarbawi J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 15, 2018, doi: 10.32939/tarbawi.v14i2.267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32939/tarbawi.v14i2.267
    14. M. Hamdani, B. . Prayitno, and P. Karyanto, “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Metode Eksperimen,” Proceeding Biol. Educ. Conf., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 139–145, 2019.
    15. L. Mahmudah, “Pentingnya Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Di Madrasah,” Elem. Islam. Teach. J., vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.21043/elementary.v4i1.2047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v4i1.2047
    16. E. F. S. Rini and F. T. Aldila, “Practicum Activity: Analysis of Science Process Skills and Students ’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–61, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i2.322
    17. D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. F. Setiya Rini, “Gender Analysis in Measurement Materials: Critical Thinking Ability and Science Processing Skills,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-BiRuNi, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2022, doi: 10.24042/jipf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11509
    18. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, E. Febri, and S. Rini, “Science Processing Skill and Critical Thinking : Reviewed Based on the Gender,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.35116
    19. W. A. Putri, Astalini, and Darmaji, “Analisis Kegiatan Praktikum untuk Dapat Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 3361–3368, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2638
    20. F. T. Aldila, E. F. S. Rini, S. W. Octavia, N. N. Khaidah, F. P. Sinaga, and N. Septiani, “The Relationship of Teacher Teaching Skills and Learning Interests of Physics Students of Senior High School,” Edufisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 101–105, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24864
    21. Astalini et al., “Impact of Science Process Skills on Thinking Skills in Rural and Urban Schools,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 803–822, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16242a
    22. M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitatif Data Analysis. SAGE Publications, 1994.