SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

9

H-Index

Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education

an Open Access Journal


Understanding Elementary Students’ Mathematics Learning Difficulties: A Qualitative Analysis of Internal and External Factors

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to describe the factors causing mathematical difficulties.

    Methodology: This qualitative study involved 25 students who indicated they were having difficulty learning mathematics. Data collection techniques included observation, interviews, questionnaires, documentation, and field notes. Data analysis involved data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions.

    Main Findings: The types of learning difficulties experienced by students include difficulty understanding the concept of fractional comparison, difficulty calculating whole numbers, and difficulty solving word problems. Factors contributing to students' learning difficulties include internal and external factors. Internal factors include negative attitudes toward learning mathematics, low motivation to learn, suboptimal physical health, and sensory impairment. External factors include a lack of variety in teaching methods, suboptimal use of learning media, school infrastructure, and family environment.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: Providing information about the causes of difficulties in learning mathematics that are often experienced by students, so that efforts can be made to reduce difficulties in learning mathematics.

  • How to cite

    Understanding Elementary Students’ Mathematics Learning Difficulties: A Qualitative Analysis of Internal and External Factors . (2025). Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 3(2), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v3i2.2512
  • 215
    Abstract views
    150
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. Jamil, T. Batool Bokhari, and J. Iqbal, “Incorporation of Critical Thinking Skills Development: A Case of Mathematics Curriculum for Grades I-XII,” J. Asian Dev. Stud., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 375–382, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.62345/jads.2024.13.1.32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.1.32
    2. I. P. P. Suryawan, I. G. P. Sudiarta, and I. G. P. Suharta, “Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Solving Mathematical Problems: Systematic Literature Review,” Indones. J. Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 120–133, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.23887/ijerr.v6i1.56462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i1.56462
    3. B. C. Agbata et al., “Everyday uses of mathematics and the roles of a mathematics teacher,” Sci. World J., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 819–827, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.4314/swj.v19i3.29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/swj.v19i3.29
    4. P. Sharma, “Importance and Application of Mathematics in Everyday Life,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 868–879, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2021.38869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.38869
    5. D. Sulistyaningsih, P. Purnomo, and A. Aziz, “Development of Learning Design for Mathematics Manipulatives Learning based on E-learning and Character Building,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 197–205, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.29333/iejme/3996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3996
    6. M. Nurwahid, B. Hidayatullah, F. A. Malik, N. Amalliyah, and W. Setiawan, “The Role of Students’ Developmental Psychology in Mathematics Learning,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Educ. Relig., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 115–127, 2025.
    7. H. S. Iswara, F. Ahmadi, and D. Da Ary, “Numeracy Literacy Skills of Elementary School Students through Ethnomathematics-Based Problem Solving,” Interdiscip. Soc. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1604–1616, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.55324/iss.v2i2.316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v2i2.316
    8. D. Harefa and Fatolosa Hulu, “Mathematics Learning Strategies That Support Pancasila Moral Education: Practical Approaches for Teachers,” Afore J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 51–60, 2024, doi: 10.57094/afore.v3i2.2299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57094/afore.v3i2.2299
    9. M. N. Kholid, A. Imawati, A. Swastika, S. Maharani, and L. N. Pradana, “How are Students’ Conceptual Understanding for Solving Mathematical Problem?,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1776, no. 1, p. 012018, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012018
    10. D. H. Tong, B. P. Uyen, and N. Van Anh Quoc, “The improvement of 10th students’ mathematical communication skills through learning ellipse topics,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 11, p. e08282, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08282
    11. S. Inganah, R. Darmayanti, and N. Rizki, “Problems, Solutions, and Expectations: 6C Integration of 21 st Century Education into Learning Mathematics,” JEMS J. Edukasi Mat. dan Sains, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 220–238, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.25273/jems.v11i1.14646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14646
    12. K. Culver, A. Kezar, and E. R. Koren, “Improving Access and Inclusion for VITAL Faculty in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Through Sustained Professional Development Programs,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1071–1094, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10755-023-09672-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09672-7
    13. C. Önal, H. Kurcan Önal, S. Önal, H. H. Öztürk, and N. Eyvaz Önal, “The Role of Attitude toward Mathematics, Fear of Negative Evaluation and Stress Level for Academic Expectations in Predicting Mathematics Achievement / Matematiğe Yönelik Tutumun, Negatif Değerlendirme Korkusunun ve Akademik Beklenti Stres Seviyesinin Mat,” Disiplinlerarası Eğitim Araştırmaları Derg., vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 87–104, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.57135/jier.1468708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57135/jier.1468708
    14. E. A. Alibraheim, “Factors Affecting Freshman Engineering Students’ Attitudes Toward Mathematics,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 17, no. 6, p. em1973, May 2021, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/10899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10899
    15. M. Hariyani, T. Herman, D. Suryadi, and S. Prabawanto, “Exploration of Student Learning Obstacles in Solving Fraction Problems in Elementary School,” Int. J. Educ. Methodol., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 505–515, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.12973/ijem.8.3.505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.3.505
    16. S. Ida, R. Aziz, and W. H. Irawan, “Critical and Creative Thinking Skills to Solving Math Story Problems in Elementary School Students,” J. Tatsqif, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 98–113, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.20414/jtq.v19i2.4069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v19i2.4069
    17. L. Ardiansari, “Exploring Elementary School Teachers’ Understanding of Number Concepts and Arithmetic Operations,” Proc. Int. Conf. Multidiciplinary Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.32672/picmr.v7i1.2653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32672/picmr.v7i1.2653
    18. Y. Rakhmawati and A. Mustadi, “The circumstances of literacy numeracy skill: Between notion and fact from elementary school students,” J. Prima Edukasia, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–18, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.21831/jpe.v10i1.36427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i1.36427
    19. N. Sholihah, I. Iklimatunnajah, F. D. Hartanti, and P. Pitriyani, “Identification of Student Learning Difficulties Based on Self, Environment, and Family Aspects in Learning Mathematics at the Elementary School Level,” Educ. Insights, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 01–09, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.58557/eduinsights.v1i1.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58557/eduinsights.v1i1.2
    20. S. Wibowo, M. N. Wangid, and F. M. Firdaus, “The relevance of Vygotsky’s constructivism learning theory with the differentiated learning primary schools,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 431–440, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21197
    21. N. M. Moussa and T. Saali, “Factors Affecting Attitude Toward Learning Mathematics: A Case of Higher Education Institutions in the Gulf Region,” Sage Open, vol. 12, no. 3, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1177/21582440221123023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221123023
    22. H. Harun, B. Kartowagiran, and A. Manaf, “Student Attitude and Mathematics Learning Success: A Meta-Analysis,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 209–222, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14413a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14413a
    23. Fadilah, R. Priyanda, and R. Amalia, “Analysis of external factors affecting students’ achievement student of mathematics education of samudra university,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1806, no. 1, p. 012050, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012050
    24. O. Nurbavliyev, S. Kaymak, and B. Sydykov, “The Effect Of Active Learning Method On Students’ Academic Success, Motivation And Attitude Towards Mathematics,” J. Lang. Linguist. Stud., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 701–713, 2022, [Online]. Available: www.jlls.org
    25. M. Ainurrifqi, “Challenges in Implementing Educational Media in Madrasah,” Al-Iftah J. Islam. Stud. Soc., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20–29, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.35905/aliftah.v5i1.8764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35905/aliftah.v5i1.8764
    26. I. W. H. D. Bhusana and I. W. Gara, “The Suboptimal Process of Teaching and Learning Hinduism in Java,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 97–109, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.37329/ijms.v2i1.2256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37329/ijms.v2i1.2256
    27. R. Darmayanti et al., “Students’ Attitudes Towards Learning Mathematics: ‘Too Soft Attitudes-Very Difficult-Boring-In A Good Way,’” Indones. J. Learn. Educ. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–50, May 2023, doi: 10.62385/ijles.v1i1.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62385/ijles.v1i1.11
    28. A. Prasanna, S. I. Mohideen, and G. Sivanesan, “Challenges in Learning Mathematics : A Study from the Perspective of School Student’s,” Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip. Res. Stud., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1239–1245, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.multiresearchjournal.com/arclist/list-2023.3.4/id-1598
    29. A. Hussain and S. Afzal, “Lack of infrastructure and educational facilities in public schools and its effects on quality education of students,” J. Excell. Soc. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–50, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://journals.smarcons.com/index.php/jess/article/view/160
    30. A. Mgimba and M. Mwila, “Infrastructural Challenges Influencing Academic Performance in Rural Public Secondary Schools in Iringa District, Tanzania,” J. Res. Innov. Implic. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 17–24, 2022, [Online]. Available: www.jriiejournal.com
    31. G. Nelson et al., “A Systematic Review of Research Syntheses on Students with Mathematics Learning Disabilities and Difficulties,” Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 18–36, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12272
    32. Z. A. N. Alhadoor, A. Aldbyani, and K. K. Alshammari, “A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of strategies and programs used to address the mathematics learning difficulties,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 19, no. 10, p. em2337, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/13607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13607
    33. S. Rahmah and A. H. Lubis, “Problem Posing as a Learning Model to Improve Primary School Students’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Gayo Lues,” J. Indones. Prim. Sch., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 93–104, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.62945/jips.v1i4.409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62945/jips.v1i4.409
    34. R. Rasmitadila, W. Widyasari, T. Prasetyo, R. Rachmadtullah, A. Samsudin, and R. R. Aliyyah, “General Teachers’ Experience of The Brain’s Natural Learning Systems-Based Instructional Approach in Inclusive Classroom,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 95–116, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.1436a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1436a
    35. G. F. Jannah, N. Robicha, K. I. Syarifah, and R. Rasilah, “Introduction To Basic Mathematical Concepts Through Learning Media,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–58, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.58421/misro.v4i1.290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v4i1.290
    36. S. R. Adawiyah, D. B. Maritasari, and M. Yazid, “The Effect of Interactive Learning Media on Students’ Understanding of Basic Mathematical Concepts in SDN 1 Tebaban,” IJE Interdiscip. J. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 211–219, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.61277/ije.v2i3.156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61277/ije.v2i3.156
    37. Y. Yulita and S. Q. Ain, “Analysis of Students’ Learning Difficulties in Learning Mathematics at Elementary Schools,” AL-ISHLAH J. Pendidik., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 892–899, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.745
    38. A. C. Usman, M. Al-Hendawi, and S. Bulut, “Approaches to qualitative research: A narrative literature review,” Narrat. Rev. Sci. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 81–95, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.128049.
    39. S. P. Chand, “Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews, Focus Groups, Observations, and Document Analysis,” Adv. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 303–317, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.25082/AERE.2025.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2025.01.001
    40. N. D. Safitri, R. Darmayanti, U. Usmiyatun, and D. Nurmalitasari, “21st Century Mathematics Learning Challenges: Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Best Practices in Shinta Indexed Scientific Publications,” JEMS J. Edukasi Mat. dan Sains, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 136–152, 2023, doi: 10.25273/jems.v11i1.14283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14283
    41. P.-Y. Chen, G.-J. Hwang, S.-Y. Yeh, Y.-T. Chen, T.-W. Chen, and C.-H. Chien, “Three decades of game-based learning in science and mathematics education: an integrated bibliometric analysis and systematic review,” J. Comput. Educ., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 455–476, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40692-021-00210-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00210-y
    42. Z. U. H. Kakar, R. Rasheed, A. Rashid, and S. Akhter, “Criteria for Assessing and Ensuring the Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research,” Int. J. Bus. Reflections, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 150–173, 2023, doi: 10.56249/ijbr.03.01.44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56249/ijbr.03.01.44
    43. S. K. Ahmed, “The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research,” J. Med. Surgery, Public Heal., vol. 2, p. 100051, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
    44. A. Ahmadin, “Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches,” J. Kaji. Sos. dan Budaya, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 104–113, 2022.
    45. H. I. Cheong, A. Lyons, R. Houghton, and A. Majumdar, “Secondary Qualitative Research Methodology Using Online Data within the Context of Social Sciences,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 22, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.1177/16094069231180160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231180160
    46. J. W. Drisko, “Transferability and Generalization in Qualitative Research,” Res. Soc. Work Pract., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 102–110, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1177/10497315241256560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315241256560
    47. D. G. Hays and W. B. McKibben, “Promoting Rigorous Research: Generalizability and Qualitative Research,” J. Couns. Dev., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 178–188, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jcad.12365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12365
    48. F. Prasetiawan, M. Sofwan, and B. A. Wulandari, “The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Model on Learning Motivation and Problem-Solving Skills of Fourth Grade Elementary School Students,” J. Innov. Res. Prim. Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 543–556, 2025, doi: 10.56916/jirpe.v4i3.1403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i3.1403
    49. W. A. Yaniar and S. Muryaningsih, “Analysis of Students’ Learning Difficulties in Understanding Mathematics Sentences and Elementary School Calculations,” in 1st International Conference on Child Education 2023, 2023, p. 2023.
    50. S. E. H. Rizvi, F. Danish, R. Jan, I. A. Mageed, S. Al Maadeed, and J. M. Aljaam, “Heuristic Algorithm for Obtaining Approximate Optimum Stratification with Mixture of Ratio and Product Estimators,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, no. July, pp. 105803–105810, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3435376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3435376
    51. S. R. Powell, E. N. Mason, S. E. Bos, S. Hirt, L. R. Ketterlin‐Geller, and E. S. Lembke, “A Systematic Review of Mathematics Interventions for Middle‐School Students Experiencing Mathematics Difficulty,” Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 295–329, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12263
    52. Q. Lei and Y. P. Xin, “A synthesis of mathematical word problem‐solving instructions for English learners with learning disabilities in mathematics,” Rev. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1002/rev3.3396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3396
    53. K. Eungoo and H.-J. Hwang, “Ethical Conducts in Qualitative Research Methodology :Participant Observation and Interview Process,” J. Res. Publ. Ethics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 5–10, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jrpe.2.2.202109.5
    54. E. Knott, A. H. Rao, K. Summers, and C. Teeger, “Interviews in the social sciences,” Nat. Rev. Methods Prim., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 73, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6
    55. K. Dunwoodie, L. Macaulay, and A. Newman, “Qualitative interviewing in the field of work and organisational psychology: Benefits, challenges and guidelines for researchers and reviewers,” Appl. Psychol., vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 863–889, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1111/apps.12414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12414
    56. P. Panyasai and E. A. Ambele, “Developing Interview Guide in Qualitative Research: Problems and Solutions from a Needs Analysis Doctoral Study,” rEFLections, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 576–594, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.61508/refl.v32i1.280411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i1.280411
    57. R. W. Elastika, Sukono, and S. P. Dewanto, “Analysis of factors affecting students’ mathematics learning difficulties using sem as information for teaching improvement,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 281–300, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14417a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14417a
    58. N. Agustyaningrum, R. N. Sari, A. M. Abadi, and A. Mahmudi, “Dominant Factors that Cause Students’ Difficulties in Learning Abstract Algebra: A Case Study at a University in Indonesia,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 847–866, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14151a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14151a
    59. B. T. Khoa, B. P. Hung, and M. H. Brahmi, “Qualitative research in social sciences: data collection, data analysis and report writing,” Int. J. Public Sect. Perform. Manag., vol. 12, no. 1/2, pp. 187–209, 2023, doi: 10.1504/IJPSPM.2023.132247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2023.132247
    60. G. Punuh, D. A. Katuuk, J. A. M. Rawis, and V. N. J. Rotty, “Vocational Education Management: Multi-Case Study at SMK Center of Excellence Bitung City, Manado City, Tomohon City North Sulawesi Province,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 61–93, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.62711/ijite.v3i1.140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62711/ijite.v3i1.140
    61. E. Wulandari, E. Verlantika, and M. H. Khusnadi, “The Concept of Tazkiyat al-Nafs by Al-Ghazali as a Method in Moral Education,” J. Iqra’ Kaji. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 368–373, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.iaimnumetrolampung.ac.id/index.php/ji/article/view/5954
    62. R. S. Supriyadi, B. Giyanto, and A. Asropi, “Analysis of The Compliance of Implementing Performance Allowances For Civil Servants at Lemdiklat Polri With The Provisions of The Indonesian National Police Chief Regulation Number 7 of 2020,” J. Apresiasi Ekon., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–64, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.31846/jae.v12i1.725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31846/jae.v12i1.725
    63. S. Monaro, J. Gullick, and S. West, “Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Research: A Step-by-Step Example of Phenomenological Interpretation,” Qual. Rep., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1040–1057, 2022, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5249
    64. R. Takbir, R. Dewi, and F. A. Baso, “Lecturer’s Strategies in Teaching Speaking During Covid-19 Pandemic,” Indones. J. Psycholinguist., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56983/ijp.v2i1.483
    65. H. F. Apriwulan, D. H. Siswanto, M. M. E. Susetyawati, and E. Hidayati, “Systematic Management of Digital Education Services in Islamic Senior High Schools,” J. Ilm. Multidisiplin Ilmu, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 216–226, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://journal.smartpublisher.id/index.php/jimi/article/view/1119%0Ahttps://journal.smartpublisher.id/index.php/jimi/article/download/1119/859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69714/y1jnvs13
    66. D. Hadiwijaya, M. Murniadi, A. Ardiyanti, and S. Sutarman, “Human resource management implementation to achieve institutional vision at Muhammadiyah Boarding School Tangerang,” Edukasi Islam. J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 12, no. 04, pp. 557–568, 2023, doi: 10.30868/ei.v12i04.7619.
    67. M. A. Tashtoush, Y. Wardat, R. AlAli, and S. Saleh, “Artificial Intelligence in Education: Mathematics Teachers’ Perspectives, Practices and Challenges,” Iraqi J. Comput. Sci. Math., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 60–77, 2024, doi: 10.52866/ijcsm.2024.05.01.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2024.05.01.004
    68. K.-T. Lindner, S. Schwab, M. Emara, and E. Avramidis, “Do teachers favor the inclusion of all students? A systematic review of primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education,” Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 766–787, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1080/08856257.2023.2172894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2172894