SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

9

H-Index

Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education

an Open Access Journal


Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): A Comparative Analysis of Mathematics Achievement

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study investigates global trends in mathematics education using TIMSS data to understand factors influencing student achievement.

    Methodology: Quantitative analysis of TIMSS datasets from the latest cycles was conducted using statistical tools such as SPSS and R for trend analysis, regression models, and comparative performance evaluations.

    Main Findings: Socioeconomic factors, teacher qualification, and curricular alignment were strongly associated with variations in student performance across countries.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The study offers a detailed comparative analysis of the latest TIMSS results, emphasizing underrepresented countries, thereby contributing to strategies for improving global mathematics education.

  • How to cite

    Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): A Comparative Analysis of Mathematics Achievement. (2025). Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 3(1), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v3i1.1733
  • 2692
    Abstract views
    303
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. Y. Wardat, S. Belbase, and H. Tairab, “Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions of Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)-Related Practices in Abu Dhabi Emirate Schools,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1–26, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14095436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095436
    2. D. Hernández-Torrano and M. G. R. Courtney, “Modern international large-scale assessment in education: an integrative review and mapping of the literature,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40536-021-00109-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00109-1
    3. J. Marôco, H. Harju-Lukkainnen, and J. Rautopuro, “Worldwide predictors of science literacy in lower-secondary students: a TIMSS 2019 analysis,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 0693, pp. 1–19, 2024, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2024.2394239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2394239
    4. N. Teig, R. Scherer, and R. V. Olsen, “A systematic review of studies investigating science teaching and learning: over two decades of TIMSS and PISA,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2035–2058, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2022.2109075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2109075
    5. A. Alam and A. Mohanty, “Cultural beliefs and equity in educational institutions: exploring the social and philosophical notions of ability groupings in teaching and learning of mathematics,” Int. J. Adolesc. Youth, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 576–599, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02673843.2023.2270662.
    6. H. Yu, “The application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transformation: New demands for teachers’ roles,” 2024, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289
    7. S. Jafarov, “Education, research and globalization,” South Florida J. Dev., vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: 10.46932/sfjdv5n10-012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv5n10-012
    8. J. Bound, B. Braga, G. Khanna, and S. Turner, “The globalization of postsecondary education: The role of international students in the US higher education system,” J. Econ. Perspect., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 163–184, 2021, doi: 10.1257/JEP.35.1.163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.1.163
    9. G. Fan, “The Reconfiguration of Human Education in an Uncertain World,” ECNU Rev. Educ., pp. 1–29, 2025, doi: 10.1177/20965311241266856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241266856
    10. B. C. Agbata, P. A. Kwabi, S. Abraham, S. O. Okpako, S. S. Arivi, and A. G. W. K, “everyday uses of mathematics and the roles of a mathematics teacher,” Sci. World J., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 819–827, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/swj.v19i3.29
    11. H. Choe, A. Topology, and S. Korea, “Mathematical Logic: The Foundation of Reasoning and Proof,” Glob. J. Math. Stat., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.61424/gjms.
    12. L. Amalia, M. Makmuri, and L. El Hakim, “Learning Design: To Improve Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills Using a Contextual Approach,” JIIP - J. Ilm. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2353–2366, 2024, doi: 10.54371/jiip.v7i3.3455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i3.3455
    13. A. Shutaleva et al., “Sustainability of Inclusive Education in Schools and Higher Education: Teachers and Students with Special Educational Needs,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15043011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043011
    14. A. Bhutoria, “Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, no. January, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068
    15. Y. Berhanu, E. Alemayehu, and D. Schröder, “Examining Car Accident Prediction Techniques and Road Traffic Congestion: A Comparative Analysis of Road Safety and Prevention of World Challenges in Low-Income and High-Income Countries,” J. Adv. Transp., vol. 2023, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/6643412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6643412
    16. E. Buckner and Y. Abdelaziz, “Wealth-Based Inequalities in Higher Education Attendance: A Global Snapshot,” Educ. Res., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 544–552, 2023, doi: 10.3102/0013189X231194307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231194307
    17. A. Alam and A. Mohanty, “Cultural beliefs and equity in educational institutions: exploring the social and philosophical notions of ability groupings in teaching and learning of mathematics,” Int. J. Adolesc. Youth, vol. 28, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02673843.2023.2270662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2023.2270662
    18. S. P. Kawuryan, S. A. Sayuti, A. Aman, and S. I. A. Dwiningrum, “Teachers Quality and Educational Equality Achievements in Indonesia,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 463–480, 2021.
    19. S. Maulidin, W. Kurniawan, M. Rohman, M. L. Nawawi, and D. Andrianto, “Quality Management in Improving Competitiveness in the Digital Era at Madrasa,” J. Adv. Islam. Educ. Manag., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2024, doi: 10.24042/jaiem.v.
    20. I. C. Mulaudzi, “Factors Affecting Students’ Academic Performance: A Case Study of the University Context,” J. Soc. Sci. Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 2334–2919, 2023, doi: 10.15640/10.15640/jsspi.v11n1a3.
    21. E. S. Groenewald, O. T. Kit Kilag, R. P. Unabia, M. V Manubag, M. B. Zamora, and D. Repuela, “The Dynamics of Problem-Based Learning: A Study on its Impact on Social Science Learning Outcomes and Student Interest,” Excell. Int. Multi-disciplinary J. Educ., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 2994–9521, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4416-9989
    22. O. T. Akintayo, C. A. Eden, O. O. Ayeni, and N. C. Onyebuchi, “Evaluating the impact of educational technology on learning outcomes in the higher education sector: A systematic review,” Open Access Res. J. Multidiscip. Stud., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 052–072, 2024, doi: 10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.2.0026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.2.0026
    23. A. Tang, W. Li, and D. Liu, “the Impact of Teachers’ Professional Development in Science Pedagogy on Students’ Achievement: Evidence From Timss 2019,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 258–274, 2022, doi: 10.33225/jbse/22.21.258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.258
    24. S. Sims et al., “Effective Teacher Professional Development: New Theory and a Meta-Analytic Test,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 213–254, 2023, doi: 10.3102/00346543231217480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231217480
    25. S. Mohammad, K. Alkhararbeh, and F. B. Puteh, “How Teacher Qualifications , Experience , Expectations , and Professional Development Affected Eighth- Grade Students ’ Science Achievement in Abu Dhabi : Insights from TIMSS 2019,” Al-Azkiyaa – Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 134–155, 2024.
    26. R. Bogler and A. Somech, “Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19 . The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect , the company ’ s public news and information,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 130, no. January, p. 104183, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104183
    27. E. A. Brew, B. Nketiah, and R. Koranteng, “A Literature Review of Academic Performance, an Insight into Factors and their Influences on Academic Outcomes of Students at Senior High Schools,” OALib, vol. 08, no. 06, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.4236/oalib.1107423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107423
    28. J. Munir, M. Faiza, B. Jamal, S. Daud, and K. Iqbal, “The Impact of Socio-economic Status on Academic Achievement,” J. Soc. Sci. Rev., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 695–705, 2023, doi: 10.54183/jssr.v3i2.308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.308
    29. S. Raza, M. Hameed, and N. Abbas, “The dynamic interplay of socio-economic factors in educational attainment: a holistic analysis of socio- economic status and academic success,” Int. J. Learn. Divers. Identities, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 203–213, 2023.
    30. T. Şengönül, “A Review of the Relationship between Parental Involvement and Children’s Academic Achievement and the Role of Family Socioeconomic Status in this Relationship,” Pegem Egit. ve Ogr. Derg., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 32–57, 2022, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.12.02.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.02.04
    31. M. De Clercq, B. Galand, V. Hospel, and M. Frenay, “Bridging-contextual-and-individual-factors-of-academic-achievement-A-multilevel-analysis-of-diversity-in-the-transition-to-higher-educationFrontline-Learning-Research.pdf,” Front. Learn. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 96–120, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v9i2.671
    32. A. Karakolidis, A. Duggan, G. Shiel, and J. Kiniry, “Examining educational inequalities: insights in the context of improved mathematics performance on national and international assessments at primary level in Ireland,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40536-021-00098-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00098-1
    33. L. Zhao, B. Zhao, and C. Li, “Alignment analysis of teaching–learning-assessment within the classroom: how teachers implement project-based learning under the curriculum standards,” Discip. Interdiscip. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s43031-023-00078-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00078-1
    34. T. Nilsen, H. Kaarstein, and A. C. Lehre, “Trend analyses of TIMSS 2015 and 2019: school factors related to declining performance in mathematics,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40536-022-00134-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00134-8
    35. J. S. Barrot, “K to 12 curriculum reform in the Philippines: towards making students future ready,” Asia Pacific J. Educ., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1193–1207, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2021.1973959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1973959
    36. A. Balfaqeeh, N. Mansour, and S. Forawi, “Factors Influencing Students’ Achievements in the Content and Cognitive Domains in TIMSS 4th Grade Science and Mathematics in the United Arab Emirates,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12090618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090618
    37. L. Koyuncu, “TIMSS International Benchmarks of Eighth Graders in Mathematics: A Correspondence Analysis Study,” Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 179–194, 2021, doi: 10.26822/iejee.2022.237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2022.237
    38. Y. Gao, G. Zeng, Y. Wang, A. A. Khan, and X. Wang, “Exploring Educational Planning, Teacher Beliefs, and Teacher Practices During the Pandemic: A Study of Science and Technology-Based Universities in China,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. April, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903244
    39. C. Wang, X. Chen, T. Yu, Y. Liu, and Y. Jing, “Education reform and change driven by digital technology: a bibliometric study from a global perspective,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y
    40. E. Siregar, S. Sutiarso, and Z. Yusuf, “Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Literacy Ability in Algebraic Concepts Based on Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Problems,” Tech. Soc. Sci. J., vol. 6, no. July, pp. 381–392, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v21i1.3904
    41. A. M. Hamzah, T. Turmudi, and J. A. Dahlan, “Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) as A Measurement for Student Mathematics Assessment Development,” 12 Waiheru, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 189–196, 2023, doi: 10.47655/12waiheru.v9i2.144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47655/12waiheru.v9i2.144
    42. N. Teig and T. Nilsen, “Profiles of instructional quality in primary and secondary education: Patterns, predictors, and relations to student achievement and motivation in science,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 74, no. November 2021, p. 101170, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101170
    43. B. Heppt, M. Olczyk, and A. Volodina, “Number of books at home as an indicator of socioeconomic status: Examining its extensions and their incremental validity for academic achievement,” Soc. Psychol. Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 903–928, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11218-022-09704-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09704-8
    44. H. G. van de Werfhorst, E. Kessenich, and S. Geven, “The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 3, no. April 2021, p. 100100, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100
    45. P. Kumar and P. Ekka, Statistical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the small and large-scale tourism sectors in developing countries, vol. 26, no. 4. Springer Netherlands, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03112-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03112-4
    46. M. Sajjad, A. Bhatti, B. Hill, and B. Al-Omari, “Using the theory of planned behavior to predict factors influencing fast-food consumption among college students,” BMC Public Health, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15923-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15923-1
    47. T. Chen, Y. X. Liu, and L. Huang, “ImageGP: An easy-to-use data visualization web server for scientific researchers,” iMeta, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.1002/imt2.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.5
    48. A. Omidi and C. Dal Zotto, “Socially Responsible Human Resource Management: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda,” 2022. doi: 10.3390/su14042116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042116
    49. B. Vadivel, S. Alam, I. Nikpoo, and B. Ajanil, “The Impact of Low Socioeconomic Background on a Child’s Educational Achievements,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2023, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/6565088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6565088
    50. N. A. K. Alreshidi and V. Lally, “The effectiveness of training teachers in problem-based learning implementation on students’ outcomes: a mixed-method study,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03638-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03638-6
    51. I. S. Adeniyi et al., “Educational reforms and their impact on student performance: A review in African Countries,” World J. Adv. Res. Rev., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 750–762, 2024, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0490