SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

9

H-Index

Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education

an Open Access Journal

Critical Thinking as a Key to Solving Mathematical Problems: Findings from the TIMSS Framework in Middle Schools

Chan Roath
National Institute of Education ROR
National Institute of Education ROR
Singapore
croath@gmail.com
Zhyan Rafaat Ali Alkaki
Salahaddin University
Iraq
Julie S James
University of Mississippi ROR
United States
Share

  • Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of critical thinking skills on students' mathematical problem solving based on the TIMSS framework.

    Methodology: This study uses a quantitative approach with a correlational survey design. The population of the study was junior high school students with a sample of 200 students selected by random sampling. Data collection used the Critical Thinking Ability Test and the Mathematics Problem Solving Test based on TIMSS. Data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation tests, and simple linear regression using SPSS. Validity tests used content and construction tests, and reliability was tested with Cronbach's Alpha (0.745).

    Main Findings: The results of this study indicate a significant positive relationship between students' critical thinking skills and mathematical problem solving. The average score of critical thinking skills and mathematical problem solving is in the moderate category. The evaluation indicator has the highest score, while inference and synthesis have the lowest scores. The results of the Pearson correlation test showed a moderate relationship (r = 0.550), and the simple linear regression test showed that critical thinking skills significantly affect mathematical problem solving (R² = 0.303, p < 0.05).

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers a fresh perspective by examining students’ critical thinking skills within the context of mathematical problem-solving using the TIMSS framework. The results enhance existing literature by demonstrating a strong link between critical thinking and effective problem-solving.

  • How to cite

    Critical Thinking as a Key to Solving Mathematical Problems: Findings from the TIMSS Framework in Middle Schools. (2025). Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 3(1), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v3i1.1626

    More Citation Formats

  • 564
    Abstract views
    682
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. É. Fülöp, “Developing Problem-Solving Abilities by Learning Problem-Solving Strategies: An Exploration of Teaching Intervention in Authentic Mathematics Classes,” Scand. J. Educ. Res., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1309–1326, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1080/00313831.2020.1869070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1869070
    2. A. Schulz, “Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers,” J. Math. Teach. Educ., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 981–1008, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7
    3. I. V. Lovianova, R. Yu Kaluhin, D. A. Kovalenko, O. G. Rovenska, and A. V. Krasnoshchok, “Development of logical thinking of high school students through a problem-based approach to teaching mathematics,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2288, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2288/1/012021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2288/1/012021
    4. S. Suherman and T. Vidákovich, “Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 44, no. February, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
    5. J. Su and W. Yang, “A systematic review of integrating computational thinking in early childhood education,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 4, no. January, p. 100122, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100122
    6. Y.-P. Cheng, C.-F. Lai, Y.-T. Chen, W.-S. Wang, Y.-M. Huang, and T.-T. Wu, “Enhancing student’s computational thinking skills with student-generated questions strategy in a game-based learning platform,” Comput. Educ., vol. 200, p. 104794, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104794
    7. K. Lavidas, Z. Apostolou, and S. Papadakis, “Challenges and opportunities of mathematics in digital times: preschool teachers’ views,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 7, 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12070459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070459
    8. S. Sachdeva and P.-O. Eggen, “Learners’ critical thinking about learning mathematics,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 16, no. 3, p. em0644, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iejme/11003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11003
    9. J. Nilimaa, “New examination approach for real-world creativity and problem-solving skills in mathematics,” Trends High. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 477–495, 2023, doi: 10.3390/higheredu2030028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu2030028
    10. D. T. K. Ng, J. K. L. Leung, J. Su, R. C. W. Ng, and S. K. W. Chu, “Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 137–161, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
    11. B. Thornhill-Miller et al., “Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education,” J. Intell., vol. 11, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
    12. M. M. Mahmud and S. F. Wong, “Digital age: The importance of 21st century skills among the undergraduates,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, no. November, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.950553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.950553
    13. H. van Ravenswaaij, R. A. M. Bouwmeester, M. F. van der Schaaf, G. Dilaver, H. V. M. van Rijen, and R. A. M. de Kleijn, “The generic skills learning systematic: Evaluating university students’ learning after complex problem-solving,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, no. November, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1007361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1007361
    14. M. Chi et al., “Implementation of the flipped classroom combined with problem-based learning in a medical nursing course: a quasi-experimental design,” Healthc., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122572
    15. R. AlAli, Y. Wardat, and M. Al-Qahtani, “SWOM strategy and influence of its using on developing mathematical thinking skills and on metacognitive thinking among gifted tenth-grade students,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/12994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12994
    16. G. OK and D. KAYA, “Analysis of middle school mathematics and science curriculum learning outcomes according to TIMSS-2019 evaluation frameworks,” Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 63–83, 2024, doi: 10.14686/buefad.1133056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1133056
    17. M. S. Mahmud and N. F. Mohd Drus, “The use of oral questioning to improve students’ reasoning skills in primary school mathematics learning,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, no. May, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1126816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1126816
    18. R. Dutta, A. Mantri, G. Singh, and N. P. Singh, “Measuring the impact of augmented reality in flipped learning mode on critical thinking, learning motivation, and knowledge of engineering students,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 912–930, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10956-023-10051-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10051-2
    19. N. Monrat, M. Phaksunchai, and R. Chonchaiya, “Developing students’ mathematical critical thinking skills using open-ended questions and activities based on student learning preferences,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2022, no. 2015, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/3300363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3300363
    20. M. A. Tashtoush, Y. Wardat, F. Aloufi, and O. Taani, “The effect of a training program based on TIMSS to developing the levels of habits of mind and mathematical reasoning skills among pre-service mathematics teachers,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 18, no. 11, 2022, doi: 10.29333/EJMSTE/12557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12557
    21. Y. Wardat, S. Belbase, H. Tairab, R. A. Takriti, M. Efstratopoulou, and H. Dodeen, “The influence of student factors on students’ achievement in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study in Abu Dhabi Emirate Schools,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 424, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1168032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070424
    22. Y. Wardat, S. Belbase, and H. Tairab, “Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions of Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)-Related Practices in Abu Dhabi Emirate Schools,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 9, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14095436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095436
    23. L. N. Glassow, V. Rolfe, and K. Y. Hansen, “Assessing the comparability of teacher-related constructs in TIMSS 2015 across 46 education systems: an alignment optimization approach,” Educ. Assessment, Eval. Account., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 105–137, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11092-020-09348-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09348-2
    24. M. Chumburidze, E. Setiabudi, M. Vassiliadou, and R. Hasanov, “Unveiling the complex Interplay Between Active Learning and Teacher Development : Insights from TIMSS 2022 in Georgia,” Interval Indones. J. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.37251/ijome.v1i2.1363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v1i2.1363
    25. M. Chumburidze, E. Setiabudi, M. Vassiliadou, and R. Hasanov, “Active Learning , Content Focus and Teacher Development Based on TIMSS 2022 in Georgia,” Interval Indones. J. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 178–185, 2024, doi: 10.37251/ijome.v2i2.13655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v2i2.1365
    26. R. Othman, N. M. Tajudin, and M. Adnan, “Needs Analysis for Developing A Thinking-Based Learning Module In Mathematics Learning,” Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1165–1172, 2021, doi: 10.17762/turcomat.v12i4.629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i4.629
    27. R. Kmieciak, “Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: empirical evidence from Poland,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., 2020, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134
    28. Ö. V. Yaz and M. A. Kurnaz, “Comparative analysis of the science teaching curricula in Turkey,” SAGE Open, vol. 10, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2158244019899432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899432
    29. A. Bhutoria and N. Aljabri, “Managerial practices and school efficiency: a data envelopment analysis across OECD and MENA countries using TIMSS 2019 data,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40536-022-00147-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00147-3
    30. M. AlSalouli, M. AlGhamdi, F. AlShaya, A. AlMufti, B. Aldarwani, and S. Pagliarani, “The impact of science teaching strategies in the Arabic-speaking countries: A multilevel analysis of TIMSS 2019 data,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 5, p. e27062, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27062
    31. M. AlSalouli, M. AlGhamdi, S. AlShamrani, A. AlMufti, B. Aldarwani, and M. Jakubowski, “Mathematics teaching strategies and 4th-grade student achievement in Arab countries: evidence from TIMSS 2019 data,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-04113-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04113-y
    32. P. Parameswari and T. Kurniyati, “Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika,” JPM J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 89, 2020, doi: 10.33474/jpm.v6i2.6606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v6i2.6606
    33. R. Yanti, Sumardi, and Y. Suryana, “Pengaruh Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Penyelesaian Soal Cerita Matematika,” Pedadidaktika J. Ilm. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 319–337, 2018.
    34. A. R. Rachmantika and Wardono, “Peran Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Pemecahan Masalah,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 441, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v2n2.p62-69
    35. U. Alturki and A. Aldraiweesh, “The Factors Influencing 21st Century Skills and Problem-Solving Skills: The Acceptance of Blackboard as Sustainable Education,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 17, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151712845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712845
    36. Astalini, Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, S. W. Oktavia, E. Triani, and M. Z. Azzahra, “The Exploration of Character Values in Physics Learning on Momentum, Impulse, and Collision Materials,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 277–284, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jere.v7i2.52381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i2.52381
    37. D. S. Setiana, R. Y. Purwoko, and Sugiman, “The application of mathematics learning model to stimulate mathematical critical thinking skills of senior high school students,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 509–523, 2021, doi: 10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.509
    38. N. H. Salsabila, U. Lu’luilmaknun, R. A. Apsari, N. P. Wulandari, and S. Sripatmi, “The Perspectives of Mathematics Pre-Service Teacher Student Toward the Use of Educational Games in Mathematics Learning,” Edumatika J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 85, 2020, doi: 10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.527
    39. I. W. Widiana, “Dampak Penggunaan E-learning Berbasis Asesmen Proyek Terhadap Kemandirian Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Selama Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 162–172, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jppp.v6i2.48850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v6i2.48850
    40. M. Iravani, M. B. Nasab, H. Bahmaei, S. Ghanbari, Z. Mohaghegh, and S. F. Siahkal, “The level of satisfaction and quality of E-learning in medical universities of Iran during the epidemic of COVID-19.,” J. Educ. Health Promot., vol. 11, p. 9, 2022, doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1555_20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1555_20
    41. Ö. Özyurt, “Examining the critical thinking dispositions and the problem solving skills of computer engineering students,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 353–361, 2015, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1342a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1342a
    42. J. K. Sugumar and P. Guha, “Comparative study on the hedonic and fuzzy logic based sensory analysis of formulated soup mix,” Futur. Foods, vol. 5, no. January, p. 100115, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100115
    43. S. Fitri and N. Hidayati, “Hubungan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMA,” Delta-Pi J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 111–120, 2024, doi: 10.33387/dpi.v13i1.7733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33387/dpi.v13i1.7733
    44. H. M. Sari Nst, E. Syahputra, and M. Mulyono, “Pengaruh Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, Literasi, Spasial dan Komunikasi Matematis Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP Kelas VIII di Medan,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 820–830, 2023, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.2234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.2234
    45. E. N. E. Napitu and M. M. Simanjorang, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Soal Berbasis TIMSS,” J. Ris. Rumpun Mat. dan Ilmu, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 371–382, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrimipa.v2i2.2576