SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

9

H-Index

Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education

an Open Access Journal


Dynamic Analysis and Stability Evaluation of a Discrete Mathematical Model for Flying Fox String Vibrations

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to find the stability of changes in string deflection and the angle of string deflection when an object is launched along a flying fox.

    Methodology:This study uses a model developed by Kusumastuti et al. (2017). There are two models analyzed, namely the discrete model of the string deviation y(t) and the angle of the string deviation θ(t). The analysis steps include model reduction, model discretization, model linearization, fixed point search, and stability analysis. Stability is analyzed based on the eigenvalues ​​it has.

    Main Findings:Based on the research conducted, the following eigenvalues ​​were obtained: λ1 = -0.005h + (0.14565h)i, λ2 = -0.005h - (0.14565h)i, λ3 = -0.005h + (0.1331480769h)i, and λ4 = -0.005h - (0.1331480769h)i. The results of the study indicate that the system is in a stable condition (sink) because all eigenvalues ​​obtained are complex numbers with negative real parts. Thus, it can be concluded that the rope deflection, rope deflection velocity, rope deflection angle, and rope deflection angular velocity are in a stable condition.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides a new contribution to the understanding of discrete system dynamics in flying fox string vibrations, by showing that the stability of the system can be analyzed through the negative complex eigenvalues ​​generated from the model.

  • How to cite

    Dynamic Analysis and Stability Evaluation of a Discrete Mathematical Model for Flying Fox String Vibrations. (2025). Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 3(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v3i1.1576
  • 199
    Abstract views
    213
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. Mo, L. A. Timmiss, T. Pearson, M. T. Kerr, S. Steves, and J. A. Welbergen, “‘Normalising’ flying-foxes: a bold vision for improving the public perceptions of our largest and most conspicuous bats,” Aust. Zool., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 545–573, 2024, doi: 10.7882/az.2024.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2024.001
    2. S. H. Yabsley et al., “Variety is the spice of life: Flying-foxes exploit a variety of native and exotic food plants in an urban landscape mosaic,” Front. Ecol. Evol., vol. 10, no. August, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.907966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.907966
    3. C. Zhang, Z. Song, Y. Yang, C. Zhang, and Y. Guo, “A Decomposition-Based Multi-Objective Flying Foxes Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications,” Biomimetics, vol. 9, no. 7, 2024, doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9070417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9070417
    4. R. M. Napitupulu, D. S. Lubis, and J. Silitonga, “The Silima-Lima Waterfall’s Potential as Halal Tourism: A SWOT Analysis,” BISNIS J. Bisnis dan Manaj. Islam, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 99, 2022, doi: 10.21043/bisnis.v10i1.14552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v10i1.14552
    5. A. Machmury, “An Analysis Tourist’s Perceptions Toward Tourism Development: Secondary Tourist Attraction Study,” in SHES: Conference Series, 2024, pp. 73–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v7i4.96456
    6. R. Aalloul, A. Elaissaoui, M. Benlattar, and R. Adhiri, “Emerging Parameters Extraction Method of PV Modules Based on the Survival Strategies of Flying Foxes Optimization (FFO),” Energies, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1–24, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16083531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083531
    7. M. T. Ibouroi, V. Arnal, A. Cheha, S. A. O. Dhurham, C. Montgelard, and A. Besnard, “Noninvasive genetic sampling for flying foxes: a valuable method for monitoring demographic parameters,” Ecosphere, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1002/ecs2.3327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3327
    8. G. Jeong, H. Kim, H. S. Lee, M. Park, and H. Hyun, “Analysis of safety risk factors of modular construction to identify accident trends,” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1040–1052, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13467581.2021.1877141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.1877141
    9. J. Duarte, A. Torres Marques, and J. Santos Baptista, “Occupational accidents related to heavy machinery: A systematic review,” Safety, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2021, doi: 10.3390/safety7010021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/safety7010021
    10. K. M. Styles, A. T. Brown, and A. P. Sagona, “A Review of Using Mathematical Modeling to Improve Our Understanding of Bacteriophage, Bacteria, and Eukaryotic Interactions,” Front. Microbiol., vol. 12, no. September, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.724767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.724767
    11. O. J. Peter, F. A. Oguntolu, M. M. Ojo, A. Olayinka Oyeniyi, R. Jan, and I. Khan, “Fractional order mathematical model of monkeypox transmission dynamics,” Phys. Scr., vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 1–25, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac7ebc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ac7ebc
    12. G. Noorsumar, S. Rogovchenko, K. G. Robbersmyr, and D. Vysochinskiy, “Mathematical models for assessment of vehicle crashworthiness: a review,” Int. J. Crashworthiness, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1545–1559, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13588265.2021.1929760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2021.1929760
    13. Q. Khan and R. Akmeliawati, “Review on system identification and mathematical modeling of flapping wing micro-aerial vehicles,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–30, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11041546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041546
    14. T. Li, “Application of Mathematical Model in Dynamic Analysis and Monitoring of Mechanical System,” Int. J. Front. Sociol., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 36–46, 2021, doi: 10.25236/ijfs.2021.030806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.030806
    15. O. Afanaseva, O. Bezyukov, D. Pervukhin, and D. Tukeev, “Experimental Study Results Processing Method for the Marine Diesel Engines Vibration Activity Caused by the Cylinder-Piston Group Operations,” Inventions, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.3390/inventions8030071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions8030071
    16. V. G. Salunkhe and R. G. Desavale, “An Intelligent Prediction for Detecting Bearing Vibration Characteristics Using a Machine Learning Model,” J. Nondestruct. Eval. Diagnostics Progn. Eng. Syst., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1115/1.4049938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049938
    17. A. E. Abouelregal, Ö. Civalek, and B. Akgöz, “A Size-Dependent Non-Fourier Heat Conduction Model for Magneto-Thermoelastic Vibration Response of Nanosystems,” J. Appl. Comput. Mech., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 344–357, 2025, doi: 10.22055/jacm.2024.46746.4584.
    18. J. H. Kusumastuti, “Analysis Construction of Mathematical Modelling of Flying Fox String Vibration,” J. Teknol., 2017.
    19. P. Trucillo, “Drug Carriers: A Review on the Most Used Mathematical Models for Drug Release,” Processes, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1–24, 2022, doi: 10.3390/pr10061094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10061094
    20. S. B. Beale et al., “Continuum scale modelling and complementary experimentation of solid oxide cells,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., vol. 85, p. 100902, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100902
    21. R. Dona and B. Ciuffo, “Virtual Testing of Automated Driving Systems. A Survey on Validation Methods,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 24349–24367, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3153722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3153722