SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

9

H-Index

Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education

an Open Access Journal

Development of Realistic Mathematics Education Based Mathematics Learning Tools to Improve Problem Solving Skills

Putri Fadilah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara ROR
Indonesia
fdlputri51@gmail.com
Waratchaya Panomram
Buriram Rajabhat University ROR
Thailand
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to develop mathematics learning tools based on the Realistic Mathematics Education approach for comparison material in Grade VII junior high school.

    Methodology: The development process followed the 4-D model, consisting of the define, design, and develop stages. The research subjects were students of class VII-B at Al-Hidayah Junior High School Medan. To evaluate the quality of the developed learning tools, expert validation sheets were used to measure validity, while student response questionnaires were employed to assess practicality.

    Main Findings: The findings indicate that all developed learning tools met the established validity criteria with very good classifications. The Learning Implementation Plan achieved an average score of 4.50 out of 5.00, while the Teaching Materials obtained an average score of 4.60. The Student Worksheets reached an average score of 4.52, and the Learning Media recorded an average score of 4.50, all categorized as very good. In addition, the Learning Outcome Tests achieved an average score of 4.53 out of 5.00, confirming their strong validity. The practicality of the learning tools was also highly supported by students, as reflected in the student response questionnaire, which yielded an average score of 4.88 out of 5.00 with very good criteria.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This research offers a new contribution by combining RME principles and adaptive learning tool design, to create relevant and contextual learning experiences to support students' critical thinking skills.

  • How to cite

    Development of Realistic Mathematics Education Based Mathematics Learning Tools to Improve Problem Solving Skills. (2025). Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 3(2), 124-136. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v3i2.1570

    More Citation Formats

  • 205
    Abstract views
    129
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. I. S. Ahmad, M. I. Idrus, and S. Rijal, “The Role of Education in Fostering Entrepreneurial Spirit in the Young Generation,” J. Contemp. Adm. Manag. (ADMAN, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 93–100, 2023, doi: 10.4995/HEAd23.2023.16159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.28
    2. J. Southworth, “Bridging critical thinking and transformative learning: The role of perspective-taking,” Theory Res. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 44–63, 2022, doi: 10.1177/14778785221090853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785221090853
    3. P. C. H. Runtunuwu, “An analysis of employee welfare levels study at trimega bangun persada company,” Indones. Audit. Res. J., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 107–113, 2022, doi: 10.35335/arj.v11i3.20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/arj.v11i3.20
    4. M. S. I. Waqfin, “Values of Character Education According to KH. Hasyim Asy’ari and Its Relevance,” Sch. Soc. Lit. Study Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 284–288, 2024, doi: 10.32764/schoolar.v3i3.4493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32764/schoolar.v3i3.4493
    5. M. Arif, “Character Education Innovation in Forming Millennial generation Personality,” Didakt. Relig. J. Islam. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 75–99, 2022.
    6. I. Wulansari, M. Yanto, and D. Wanto, “Merdeka Curriculum Management Based on Character Education in The Millennial Generation,” J. Qual. Assur. Islam. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 74–86, 2022, doi: 10.47945/jqaie.v2i2.702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47945/jqaie.v2i2.702
    7. H. Helda and S. Syahrani, “National Standards of Education in Contents Standards and Education Process Standards in Indonesia,” Indones. J. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 257–269, 2022, doi: 10.54443/injoe.v3i2.32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54443/injoe.v3i2.32
    8. Z. Deng, “Powerful knowledge, educational potential and knowledge-rich curriculum: pushing the boundaries,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 599–617, 2022, doi: 10.1080/00220272.2022.2089538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2022.2089538
    9. W. Ndari, Suyatno, Sukirman, and F. N. Mahmudah, “Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum and Its Challenges,” Eur. J. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 111–116, 2023, doi: 10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.648
    10. F. Fauzan, R. A. M. Ansori, M. Dannur, A. Pratama, and A. Hairit, “The Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum (Independent Curriculum) in Strengthening Students’ Character in Indonesia,” Aqlamuna J. Educ. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 136–155, 2023, doi: 10.58223/aqlamuna.v1i1.237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58223/aqlamuna.v1i1.237
    11. M. N. Hakim, K. Z. Solihah, F. Ismail, A. Salim, and N. T. Prasetiyo, “Optimizing the Merdeka Curriculum for Developing the Pancasila Student Profile through Project-Based Learning,” Munaddhomah, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 395–408, 2024, doi: 10.31538/munaddhomah.v5i4.1396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v5i4.1396
    12. Z. Zainuddin, A. Nafisah, and M. Muttaqin, “Transforming Character Education through the Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Indonesia,” Int. J. Educ. Humanit., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 560–572, 2025, doi: 10.58557/(ijeh).v5i3.346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58557/(ijeh).v5i3.346
    13. F. A. Halim, “Project-Based Learning in the Independent Curriculum : Improving Secondary Students ’ Mathematical Problem -Solving Skills,” EDUKASIA J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1027–1038, 2025, doi: 10.62775/edukasia.v6i2.1676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i2.1676
    14. H. Hunaepi and I. G. P. Suharta, “Transforming Education in Indonesia: The Impact and Challenges of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum,” Path Sci., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 5026–5039, 2024, doi: 10.22178/pos.105-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.105-31
    15. P. Malangtupthong, W. Nurittamont, and B. Phayaphrom, “Factors Influencing Mathematical Problem-Solving Competency: A Case Study on High School Students,” SSRN Electron. J., vol. 11, no. April, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4522267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4522267
    16. D. Olivares, J. L. Lupiáñez, and I. Segovia, “Roles and characteristics of problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: a review,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1079–1096, 2021, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1738579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1738579
    17. S. Sachdeva and P.-O. Eggen, “Learners’ Critical Thinking About Learning Mathematics,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 16, no. 3, p. em0644, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iejme/11003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11003
    18. Marzuki, Wahyudin, E. Cahya, and D. Juandi, “Students’ critical thinking skills in solving mathematical problems; a systematic procedure of grounded theory study,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 529–548, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14431a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14431a
    19. B. Dixit, M. Bedekar, A. Jahagirdar, and N. Sathe, “Role of active learning techniques in development of problem solving skills,” J. Eng. Educ. Transform., vol. 34, no. Special Issue, pp. 670–674, 2021, doi: 10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157241
    20. E. Karan and L. Brown, “Enhancing Student’s Problem-solving Skills through Project-based Learning,” J. Probl. Based Learn. High. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 74–87, 2022, doi: 10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v10i1.6887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v10i1.6887
    21. E. V. Soboleva, K. K. Zhumakulov, K. P. Umurkulov, G. I. Ibragimov, L. V. Kochneva, and M. O. Timofeeva, “Developing a Personalised Learning Model Based on Interactive Novels to Improve the Quality of Mathematics Education,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.29333/EJMSTE/11590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11590
    22. M. Sabilah and F. Yolanda, “Development of mathematics learning devices with a problem based learning model oriented on the mathematics problem solving ability,” Int. J. Trends Math. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 180–190, 2022, doi: 10.33122/ijtmer.v5i2.136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i2.136
    23. S. Sutarni, S. Sutama, H. joko Prayitno, A. Sutopo, and P. A. Laksmiwati, “The Development of Realistic Mathematics Education-Based Student Worksheets to Enhance Higher-Order Thinking Skills and Mathematical Ability,” Infin. J. Math. Educ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 285–300, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p285-300
    24. W. R. Tumangger, I. A. Khalil, and R. C. I. Prahmana, “The Impact of Realistic Mathematics Education-based Student Worksheet for Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills,” IndoMath Indones. Math. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 196–215, 2024, doi: 10.30738/indomath.v7i2.122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v7i2.122
    25. K. Koerunnisa et al., “The Influence of a Realistic Mathematical Approach on Student Learning in Elementary Schools,” J. Math. Instr. Soc. Res. Opin., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 105–114, 2024, doi: 10.58421/misro.v4i1.282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v4i1.282
    26. N. T. Da, “Realistic mathematics education and authentic learning: A combination of teaching mathematics in high schools,” J. Math. Sci. Teach., vol. 3, no. 1, p. em029, 2023, doi: 10.29333/mathsciteacher/13061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13061
    27. L. Amalia, M. Makmuri, and L. El Hakim, “Learning Design: To Improve Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills Using a Contextual Approach,” JIIP - J. Ilm. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2353–2366, 2024, doi: 10.54371/jiip.v7i3.3455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i3.3455
    28. K. A. Harahap, B. Sinaga, and P. Siagian, “Development of Geogebra-Assisted Problem Based Learning (PBL) Learning Tools to Improve Visual Thinking Skills in Mathematical Problem Solving Students of SMA Negeri 1 Samudera,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Linguist. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 239–251, 2021, doi: 10.33258/birle.v4i1.1581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1581
    29. E. P. S. Bayu, A. Fauzan, and A. Armiati, “Realistic mathematics education approach,” 2023, p. 030005. doi: 10.1063/5.0148141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0148141
    30. N. Bal and M. Seckin Kapucu, “The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Activities Applied in Secondary School 7th Grade Mathematics Education on the Development of Life Skills,” Eurasia Proc. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 25, no. 2014, pp. 113–122, 2022, doi: 10.55549/epess.1218207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1218207
    31. P. Üredi and A. Doğanay, “Developing the Skill of Associating Mathematics with Real Life Through Realistic Mathematics Education: An Action Research * Gerçekçi Matematik Eğitimi Yoluyla Matematiği Gerçek Yaşamla İlişkilendirme Becerisinin Geliştirilmesi: Bir Eylem Araştırması,” J. Theor. Educ. Sci., vol. 16, no. April, pp. 394–422, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1214339
    32. L. P. Nugraheni and M. Marsigit, “Realistic mathematics education: An approach to improve problem solving ability in primary school,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 511–518, 2021, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v15i4.19354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i4.19354
    33. D. S. Setiana, R. Y. Purwoko, and Sugiman, “The application of mathematics learning model to stimulate mathematical critical thinking skills of senior high school students,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 509–523, 2021, doi: 10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.509
    34. A. L. Palinussa, J. S. Lakusa, and L. Moma, “Comparison of Problem-Based Learning and Discovery Learning To Improve Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills,” Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 109–122, 2023, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v13i1.15205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v13i1.15205
    35. N. I. H. L, N. Nasruddin, A. E. Sejati, and A. Sugiarto, “Developing Teaching Material of Research Methodology and Learning with 4D Model in Facilitating Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic to Improve Critical Thinking Skill,” J. Kependidikan J. Has. Penelit. dan Kaji. Kepustakaan di Bid. Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 541–554, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i2.7110
    36. T. Widodo, L. N. Rachmawati, and S. N. Hasanah, “Development of Digital-based LKPD on Ecosystem Material,” Edutechnium J. Educ. Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 66–76, 2023, doi: 10.71365/edujet.v1i2.29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71365/edujet.v1i2.29
    37. A. T. Syam and D. Furwana, “The 4-D Model on the Development of English Learning Materials for Islamic Education Learners,” Din. Ilmu, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 17–39, 2022, doi: 10.21093/di.v22i1.4235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v22i1.4235
    38. G. Guslinda, O. Kurniaman, L. N. Firdaus, and H. Hadriana, “Developing Local Wisdom-Based Teaching Materials on “Family Addressing Terms" for Elementary School Students: Validation Analysis Using the 4D Model,” Multidiscip. J. Sch. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1 (25), pp. 295–315, 2024, doi: 10.35765/mjse.2024.1325.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2024.1325.15
    39. L. Misqa, W. Oviana, Z. Hayati, and M. Jannah, “Improving Student Learning Outcomes in Mathematics Learning through a Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach in Elementary Schools,” J. Indones. Prim. Sch., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 19–26, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62945/jips.v1i2.34
    40. D. Harefa and Fatolosa Hulu, “Mathematics Learning Strategies That Support Pancasila Moral Education: Practical Approaches for Teachers,” Afore J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 51–60, 2024, doi: 10.57094/afore.v3i2.2299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57094/afore.v3i2.2299
    41. S. Samritin, S. R. Natsir, A. Manaf, and E. R. Sari, “The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Implementation in Mathematics Learning in Elementary School,” Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 81–88, 2023, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v13i1.16522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v13i1.16522
    42. E. Susanti, “Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills in Elemtary Students Through Realistic mathematics Education,” Sci. J. Inov. Pendidik. Mat. dan IPA, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 48–59, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.4344
    43. Meidawati and E. Kusdarini, “Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Pancasila Education Learning in Senior High Schools,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 508–515, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10202
    44. M. Mila and M. Zuhdi, “Curriculum Development and Educational Practices for Islamic Education: An Analysis of the Merdeka Curriculum at Integrated Islamic Junior High School in Indonesia,” BIIS Bull. Indones. Islam. Stud., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 719–737, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51214/biis.v4i2.1652
    45. U. Umar, M. B. Purwanto, and M. M. Al Firdaus, “Research and Development: As the Primary Alternative To Educational Research Design Frameworks,” JELL (Journal English Lang. Lit. STIBA-IEC Jakarta, vol. 8, no. 01, pp. 73–82, 2023, doi: 10.37110/jell.v8i01.172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v8i01.172
    46. H. Nopiyanti, I. Tabroni, U. Barroso, and A. Intes, “Product Development of Unique Clothing Learning Media to Stimulate Fine Motor Skills of 4-5 Years Old Children,” J. Comput. Sci. Adv., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 48–61, 2023, doi: 10.55849/jsca.v1i1.452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55849/jsca.v1i1.452
    47. A. Manggarrani, N. H. Marhaeni, and A. Triyono, “Design of Realistic Mathematics Education-Based Student Worksheets to Improve Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills,” EDUTREND J. Emerg. Issues Trends Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 121–128, 2024, doi: 10.59110/edutrend.340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59110/edutrend.340
    48. F. F. Putri, Y. Yerizon, and I. M. Arnawa, “Development of Learning Tools Based on Realistic Mathematics Education to Improve the Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability of Students in Class VII Middle School,” J. Soc. Res., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 3404–3410, 2023, doi: 10.55324/josr.v2i10.1436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i10.1436
    49. I. Aimmah and M. Amin, “Thiagarajan’s 4-D Learning Model: A Theoretical Study and Its Application in Learning Device Development,” J. Educ. Policy Anal., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://businessandfinanceanalyst.com
    50. T. A. Siagian, D. Armanto, and P. Siagian, “Development of learning device oriented problem based learning to improve student’s mathematical problem solving skill,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012056
    51. I. Mulyati, I. Astuti, and E. Ernawaty, “Development of Canva Application Assisted Learning Media in Class XII Advanced Study Materials with 4-D Models,” JTP - J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 322–329, 2022, doi: 10.21009/jtp.v24i3.30483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i3.30483
    52. E. Erdisna, M. Ridwan, and H. Syahputra, “Developing Digital Entrepreneurship Learning Model: 4-D Competencies-Based for Millennial Generation in Higher Education,” Utamax J. Ultim. Res. Trends Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 84–100, 2022, doi: 10.31849/utamax.v4i2.10081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v4i2.10081
    53. N. Elangovan and E. Sundaravel, “Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts,” MethodsX, vol. 8, no. July 2020, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326
    54. R. Lestari, R. C. I. Prahmana, M. S. F. Chong, and M. Shahrill, “Developing Realistic Mathematics Education-Based Worksheets for Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Infin. J., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 69–84, 2023, doi: 10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p69-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p69-84
    55. M. A. Talukder et al., “Machine learning-based network intrusion detection for big and imbalanced data using oversampling, stacking feature embedding and feature extraction,” J. Big Data, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–44, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40537-024-00886-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-00886-w
    56. F. Muttaqiean, R. Cahyaningati, and R. Meilan, “Implementation of Management Strategies to Improve Employee Performance at Rural Banks in East Java,” Wiga J. Penelit. Ilmu Ekon., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 257–271, 2023, doi: 10.30741/wiga.v13i2.1105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30741/wiga.v13i2.1105
    57. C. Amelia, A. Aprilianto, D. Supriatna, I. Rusydi, and N. E. Zahari, “The Principal’s Role as Education Supervisor in Improving Teacher Professionalism,” Nidhomul Haq J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 144–155, 2022, doi: 10.31538/ndh.v7i1.2075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v7i1.2075
    58. D. Suryana, A. Husna, and N. Mahyuddin, “CIPP Evaluation Model: Analysis of Education Implementation in PAUD Based on Government Policy on Implementation of Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 4386–4396, 2023, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i4.3722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i4.3722
    59. R. Purwitaningrum and R. C. I. Prahmana, “Developing instructional materials on mathematics logical thinking through the Indonesian realistic mathematics education approach,” Int. J. Educ. Learn., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2021, doi: 10.31763/ijele.v3i1.178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i1.178
    60. M. A. Fadillah, U. Usmeldi, F. Festiyed, L. Lufri, and M. Mawardi, “Assessment of Teaching Strategies, Utilization of Student Worksheets, and Student Engagement in Science Education,” Int. J. Educ. Inf. Technol. Others, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 198–207, 2025.
    61. R. O. Khastini, W. S. Rohmah, and A. N. Sahida, “The Effectiveness of the e-Student Worksheets to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Skills on Digestive System Concepts,” Int. J. Biol. Educ. Towar. Sustain. Dev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2023, doi: 10.53889/ijbetsd.v3i1.160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/ijbetsd.v3i1.160
    62. J. K. L. Dinglasan, D. R. C. Caraan, and D. A. Ching, “Effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Problem-Solving Skills of Students,” Int. J. Educ. Manag. Dev. Stud., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 64–87, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.53378/352980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352980
    63. I. N. Rohmah and A. Jupri, “The Effectiveness Of Mathematics Learning Through A Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Elementary Schools,” J. Cakrawala Pendas, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 500–511, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v10i3.9472
    64. M. O. Fokuo et al., “The use of visualization tools in teaching mathematics in college of education: A systematic review,” Online J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 2023, doi: 10.53022/oarjst.2023.9.1.0057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjst.2023.9.1.0057
    65. D. M. L. D. Rasteiro et al., “Integrals Applications: A STEAM Activity to Teach/Learn Mathematics in Higher Education,” in 2024 5th International Conference in Electronic Engineering, Information Technology & Education (EEITE), IEEE, May 2024, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/EEITE61750.2024.10654423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EEITE61750.2024.10654423