SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

9

H-Index

Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education

an Open Access Journal


Enhancing Creative Thinking in Circle Topics through the Realistic Mathematics Learning Approach

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to describe the influence of the Realistic Mathematics learning approach on Students' Creative Thinking Ability in Mathematics in terms of students' mathematics learning achievement, describe the influence of expository learning on students' creative thinking ability and describe the better influence of the 2 learning models applied by looking at the achievements achieved by students.

    Methodology: This research is a quantitative research and the method used in this research is quasi experiment. The research was conducted at Madrasah Tsanawiyah Al-Ittihadiyah (Mamiyai). The population was all students of class VIII and sampling using cluster random sampling where class VIII-5 as the experimental class and class VIII-1 as the control class.

    Main Findings: The realistic mathematics learning approach has a good effect on students' creative thinking skills. Expository learning has less effect on students' creative thinking skills. The effect of realistic mathematics learning is better than expository learning.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides a new contribution in understanding how a contextual approach can enhance students' creative thinking skills through the exploration of geometric concepts relevant to everyday life.

  • How to cite

    Enhancing Creative Thinking in Circle Topics through the Realistic Mathematics Learning Approach. (2024). Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 2(2), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v2i2.1148
  • 438
    Abstract views
    214
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. C. Pramana, D. Chamidah, S. Suyatno, F. Renadi, and S. Syaharuddin, “Strategies to Improved Education Quality in Indonesia: A Review.,” Turkish Online J. Qual. Inq., vol. 12, no. 3, 2021.
    2. W. Sabar, A. Rahim, and D. R. D. Hastuti, “Gender education in the practice of women’s agricultural laborers in Enrekang Regency,” JIPSINDO (Jurnal Pendidik. Ilmu Pengetah. Sos. Indones., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 154–163, 2022.
    3. M. A. Budiarto and U. H. Salsabila, “Optimizing Islamic Education Towards the Golden Era of Indonesia,” Tafkir Interdiscip. J. Islam. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v3i1.105
    4. J. W. Kusuma, R. Rochmad, I. Isnarto, and H. Hamidah, “Constructivism from philosophy to mathematics learning,” Int. J. Econ. Educ. Entrep., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 104–111, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53067/ije3.v1i2.16
    5. Y. Kartika, N. M. Hutapea, and K. Kartini, “Mathematical learning development using discovery learning model to improve mathematical understanding skills of students,” J. Educ. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 124–132, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.4.1.p.124-132
    6. S. Chairil Hikayat, Y. Hairun, and H. Suharna, “Design of realistic mathematics education approach to improve critical thinking skills,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2232–2244, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080606
    7. F. Jacob, S. John, and D. M. Gwany, “Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and students’ academic achievement: A theoretical overview,” J. Glob. Res. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 14–44, 2020.
    8. E. Hasanah, S. Suyatno, I. Maryani, M. I. Al Badar, Y. Fitria, and L. Patmasari, “Conceptual Model of differentiated-instruction (DI) Based on teachers’ experiences in Indonesia,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 10, p. 650, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100650
    9. R. Puspitasari and F. Mufit, “Conditions of learning physics and students’ understanding of the concept of motion during the covid-19 pandemic,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 12045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012045
    10. D. S. Pambudi, I. K. Budayasa, and A. Lukito, “The role of mathematical connections in mathematical problem solving,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 129–144, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.10985.129-144
    11. H. Retnawati, E. Apino, and A. Santoso, “High School Students’ Difficulties in Making Mathematical Connections when Solving Problems,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 255–277, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.14
    12. L. F. Jawad, “Mathematical connection skills and their relationship with productive thinking among secondary school students,” Period. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 421–430, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v10i1.2667
    13. Y. Zhao and J. Watterston, “The changes we need: Education post COVID-19,” J. Educ. Chang., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3
    14. T. Prasetyo, R. Rachmadtullah, A. Samsudin, and R. R. Aliyyah, “General Teachers’ Experience of the Brain’s Natural Learning Systems-Based Instructional Approach in Inclusive Classroom.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 95–116, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1436a
    15. D. Kem, “Personalised and adaptive learning: Emerging learning platforms in the era of digital and smart learning,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Hum. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 385–391, 2022.
    16. H. Yu, “Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, p. 1181712, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712
    17. A. H. Pratama and N. S. N. Dewi, “Demotivated Students during Online English Learning in Covid-19 Pandemic: Voices from Indonesian Students,” JELITA J. Educ. Lang. Innov. Appl. Linguist., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79–93, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/jelita.v1i2.4761
    18. R. Darmayanti et al., “Students’ Attitudes Towards Learning Mathematics:" Too Soft Attitudes-Very Difficult-Boring-In A Good Way",” Indones. J. Learn. Educ. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–50, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62385/ijles.v1i1.11
    19. G. Oliveira, J. Grenha Teixeira, A. Torres, and C. Morais, “An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1357–1376, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112
    20. W. Winarto, A. Syahid, and F. Saguni, “Effectiveness the use of audio visual media in teaching islamic religious education,” Int. J. Contemp. Islam. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 81–107, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24239/ijcied.Vol2.Iss1.14
    21. N. Afni, “Contextual teaching and learning (CTL) as a strategy to improve students mathematical literacy,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2020, p. 12043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012043
    22. N. Maryani and D. B. Widjajanti, “Mathematical literacy: How to improve it using contextual teaching and learning method?,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2020, p. 12044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012044
    23. M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and P. Drijvers, “Realistic mathematics education,” Encycl. Math. Educ., pp. 713–717, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170
    24. S. Papadakis, M. Kalogiannakis, and N. Zaranis, “Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Realistic Mathematical Education (RME) approach in kindergarten,” Adv. Mob. Learn. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.01.002
    25. N. Hakim, A. Apriyanto, M. Mardiati, and E. Sitepu, “Implementation of the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Approach in Geometry Learning in Secondary Schools,” Aksioma Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 17–30, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62872/rgn3w339
    26. P. Üredi and A. Doğanay, “Developing the skill of associating mathematics with real life through realistic mathematics education: An action research,” J. Theor. Educ. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 394–422, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1214339
    27. J. A. Alim, N. Hermita, M. L. Alim, T. T. Wijaya, and J. Pereira, “Developing a Math Textbook using realistic Mathematics Education Approach to increase elementary students’ learning motivation,” J. Prima Edukasia, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 193–201, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v9i2.39393
    28. D. W. Ekowati, F. Z. Azzahra, S. Y. Saputra, and B. I. Suwandayani, “Realistic mathematics education (RME) approach for primary school students’ reasoning ability,” Prem. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 524147, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v11i2.8397
    29. P. Yaniawati, R. Kariadinata, N. Sari, E. Pramiarsih, and M. Mariani, “Integration of e-learning for mathematics on resource-based learning: Increasing mathematical creative thinking and self-confidence,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 60–78, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i06.11915
    30. J. Delanoeije and M. Verbruggen, “Between-person and within-person effects of telework: a quasi-field experiment,” Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 795–808, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1774557
    31. M. Muspiha and M. Hatuwe, “Price and Location Analysis Of Housing Buying Decisions in The Buru Project Perumnas,” Sang Pencerah J. Ilm. Univ. Muhammadiyah But., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 148–158, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35326/pencerah.v9i1.3014
    32. A. Asmaulhusna and N. Nurhasanah, “Risk of Anchorized and Crab Processing Businesses in Fisherman in Tanjung Sebauk,” J. Bus. Manag. Account., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 227–238.
    33. A. Azis, S. Utami, L. Cronin, and A. H. Al Sanie, “The Influence of the School Environment on the Formation of Children’s Character,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v5i1.850