Exploring the Effectiveness of the Learning Cycle Model in Enhancing Mathematics Learning for Students
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of implementing the Learning Cycle model in mathematics learning..
Methodology: This type of research is pre-experimental research with The One Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The sampling technique in this study is by Multistage Sampling. The research instruments used are learning outcome tests, student activity observation sheets, and student response questionnaires. The data analysis used is descriptive analysis and inferential analysis..
Main Findings: 25 students or 89.29% achieved individual completeness and 3 students or 10.71% did not achieve individual completeness. This means that classical completeness was achieved with a normalized gain value of 0.70 in the high category. Based on this, the application of the Learning Cycle model is effective in learning mathematics for students.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers a new perspective by showing that the application of the Learning Cycle model significantly improves students' conceptual understanding and mathematical problem-solving skills compared to conventional learning approaches.
References
S. Marsidin, “Strengthening Pancasila student profiles in independent learning curriculum in elementary school,” Int. J. Humanit. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 6, 2022.
R. Michel-Villarreal, E. Vilalta-Perdomo, D. E. Salinas-Navarro, R. Thierry-Aguilera, and F. S. Gerardou, “Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 9, p. 856, 2023.
Z. Yu, M. Gao, and L. Wang, “The effect of educational games on learning outcomes, student motivation, engagement and satisfaction,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 522–546, 2021.
H. Baber, “Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19,” J. Educ. e-learning Res., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 285–292, 2020.
N. Almusharraf and S. Khahro, “Students satisfaction with online learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 246–267, 2020.
S. Sachdeva and P.-O. Eggen, “Learners’ critical thinking about learning mathematics,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 16, no. 3, p. em0644, 2021.
B. H. Majeed, L. F. Jawad, and H. AlRikabi, “Tactical thinking and its relationship with solving mathematical problems among mathematics department students,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 247–262, 2021.
R. AlAli, Y. Wardat, and M. Al-Qahtani, “SWOM strategy and influence of its using on developing mathematical thinking skills and on metacognitive thinking among gifted tenth-grade students,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, p. em2238, 2023.
C. Cresswell and C. P. Speelman, “Does mathematics training lead to better logical thinking and reasoning? A cross-sectional assessment from students to professors,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 7, p. e0236153, 2020.
S. Syafril, N. R. Aini, A. Pahrudin, and N. E. Yaumas, “Spirit of mathematics critical thinking skills (CTS),” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2020, p. 12069.
R. E. Anggraeni, “The analysis of the development of the 5E-STEAM learning model to improve critical thinking skills in natural science lesson,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 12050.
A. Setyaningsih, N. Kholik, A. A. Azis, T. Yusnanto, and A. Sadikin, “The Effect Of Learning Environment And Students Independent Learning On Students Learning Outcomes,” Mudir J. Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 142–147, 2023.
H. Husni, “The effect of inquiry-based learning on religious subjects learning activities: An experimental study in high schools,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2020.
T. F. Silalahi and A. F. Hutauruk, “The application of cooperative learning model during online learning in the pandemic period,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Institute-Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1683–1691, 2020.
L. Wang and K.-J. Yoon, “Knowledge distillation and student-teacher learning for visual intelligence: A review and new outlooks,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 3048–3068, 2021.
H. Mahmudah and F. Rasyid, “Engaging Students in Cooperative Learning Model of Reading Course Through Numbered Head Together,” ETERNAL (English Teach. Journal), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 53–67, 2022.
Y. Sudargini and A. Purwanto, “The effect of teachers pedagogic competency on the learning outcomes of students,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Res., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2020.
S. Nahar, “Improving Students’ Collaboration Thinking Skill under the Implementation of the Quantum Teaching Model.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 451–464, 2022.
J. K. Matitaputty and J. Sopacua, “The Effectiveness of the Learning Cycle 5E Learning Model in an Effort to Improve Learning Outcomes of History,” JIM J. Ilm. Mhs. Pendidik. Sej., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 740–747, 2023.
R. Marfilinda, R. Rossa, J. Jendriadi, and S. Apfani, “The effect of 7e learning cycle model toward students’ learning outcome of basic science concept,” J. Teach. Learn. Elem. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 77–87, 2020.
Z. Khairani, D. Nasution, and N. Bukit, “Analysis of science process skills using learning cycle 7E,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 12085.
H. Hikmawati, I. W. Suastra, and N. M. Pujani, “Ethnoscience-based science learning model to develop critical thinking ability and local cultural concern for junior high school students in Lombok,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 60–66, 2021.
R. Salyani, C. Nurmaliah, and M. Mahidin, “Application of the 5E learning cycle model to overcome misconception and increase student learning activities in learning chemical bonding,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2020, p. 12102.
W. R. Puspita and F. Fardillah, “The effectiveness of the learning cycle model (5e and 7e) in learning to build flat side sides viewed from student self-eficacy,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 12110.
M. Risal and A. P. Astutik, “The Effectiveness of Islamic Education Learning Based on Learning Cycle on Learning Outcomes in Junior High School,” Acad. Open, vol. 4, pp. 10–21070, 2021.
J. Maksimovic and J. Evtimov, “Positivism and post-positivism as the basis of quantitative research in pedagogy,” Res. Pedagog., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 208–218, 2023.
U. M. Mbanaso, L. Abrahams, and K. C. Okafor, “Research philosophy, design and methodology,” in Research Techniques for Computer Science, Information Systems and Cybersecurity, Springer, 2023, pp. 81–113.
O. S. Nelwan et al., “The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Servant Leadership on Employee Creativity: An Empirical Study of University in Manado,” Rev. Gestão Soc. e Ambient., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. e05243–e05243, 2024.
H. K. Mohajan, “Quantitative research: A successful investigation in natural and social sciences,” J. Econ. Dev. Environ. People, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 50–79, 2020.
C. Andrade, “The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples,” Indian J. Psychol. Med., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 86–88, 2021.
G. K. Mweshi and K. Sakyi, “Application of sampling methods for the research design,” Arch. Bus. Res., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 180–193, 2020, doi: 10.14738/abr.811.9042.
D. Hossan, Z. Dato’Mansor, and N. S. Jaharuddin, “Research population and sampling in quantitative study,” Int. J. Bus. Technopreneursh., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 209–222, 2023.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mardatillah Binti M, Abimbola Nurudeen Gbolahan Adeshina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
