SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

9

H-Index

Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education

an Open Access Journal

Comparing the Impact of Problem Solving vs. Problem Posing Approaches on Mathematics Achievement in Junior High School

Wirnayanti Wirnayanti
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar ROR
Indonesia
wrnynttiwirna@gmail.com
Jeffrey Craig
University of Arizona ROR
United States
Jeffrey Fourrie Malatjie
University of South Africa ROR
South Africa
Share

  • Purpose of the study: The purpose of this research is to describe students' mathematics learning outcomes using a problem solving approach, describe students' mathematics learning outcomes using a problem posing approach, and to find out differences in mathematics learning outcomes between those using the problem solving and problem posing approaches.

    Methodology: This research is a type of quasi-experimental research with the Nonequivalent Posttest-Only Control Group Design. The population in this research is all students of class VIII junior high school Muhammadiyah 1 Makassar in the 2018/2019 academic year and the sample from this research consists of 2 classes, where the two classes will receive different treatment, namely the first class uses the Problem Solving approach and the second class uses the Problem Posing approach, with a total of 25 students for the Problem Solving approach and also 25 students for the Problem Posing approach.

    Main Findings: The results of this research are that there are differences in the average results of learning mathematics through the Problem Solving approach and the Problem Posing approach. Where in the Problem Solving approach the average learning outcome value is 82.96 with a standard deviation of 4.78, and the average learning outcome in the Problem Posing approach is 87.88 with a standard deviation of 7.36.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides new insights into how problem solving and problem posing approaches affect the mathematics learning outcomes of grade VIII students.

  • How to cite

    Comparing the Impact of Problem Solving vs. Problem Posing Approaches on Mathematics Achievement in Junior High School. (2024). Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 2(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v2i2.1094

    More Citation Formats

  • 270
    Abstract views
    233
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and F. T. Aldila, “Students’ Perceptions in the Use of Web-Based Character Assessment: A View from Gender Perspective,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 362–383, 2021, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202117
    2. R. Fitriani, L. Anatri, O. S. Joint, and R. Risnita, “Scope of Learning Evaluation in Science Subject in Junior High School Students: A Systematic Review,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 8–16, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i1.307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i1.307
    3. Astalini, Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, F. P. Sinaga, M. Z. Azzahra, and E. Triani, “Identification the 2013 Curriculum Teacher ’ s Book to Determine the Character Values of Class X Students on Circular Motion Material,” J. Pendidik. Sains Indones., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 545–558, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i3.28567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i3.28567
    4. B. C. Putri, F. T. Aldila, and M. M. Matondang, “Hubungan Antara Karakter Motivasi Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 45–49, 2022, doi: 10.37251/isej.v3i2.252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v3i2.252
    5. K. B. Dinata, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Digital Mahasiswa,” Edukasi J. Pendidik., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 105, 2021, doi: 10.31571/edukasi.v19i1.2499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31571/edukasi.v19i1.2499
    6. D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and F. T. Aldila, “Gender and Perception: Implementation of Web-based Character Assessment in Science Learning,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jere.v6i1.37737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i1.37737
    7. H. Harizon et al., “Description of Teacher Responses to the Implementation of Student Process Skills Portfolio Assessment,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 128–134, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i3.731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i3.731
    8. Syaiful, Kamid, D. A. Kurniawan, and P. A. Rivani, “The impact of project-based learning on students’ achievement in mathematics,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 558–567, 2021, doi: 10.48081/kxbi5168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i4.37183
    9. W. A. Putri, R. Fitriani, E. F. Setya Rini, F. T. Aldila, and T. Ratnawati, “Pengaruh Motivasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 248–254, 2021, doi: 10.36987/jpms.v7i1.1942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7760
    10. F. P. Sinaga, Jurhana, Yusrita, and M. Hidayat, “ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN METODE MENGAJAR (METODE DEMONSTRASI, METODE EKSPERIMEN, METODE INQUIRY, DAN METODE DISCOVERY DI SMA NEGERI 11 KOTA JAMBI),” Relativ. J. Ris. Inov. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.29103/relativitas.v5i2.7830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/relativitas.v5i2.7830
    11. S. W. Oktavia, N. Septiani, F. Sinaga, and N. N. Qoidah, “ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP IN LEARNING INTEREST TO LEARNING OUTCOMES STATIC FLUID MATERIAL IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v7i1.26696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v7i1.26696
    12. R. A. Pratama and A. Saregar, “Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Scaffolding Untuk Melatih Pemahaman Konsep,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 84–97, 2019, doi: 10.24042/ijsme.v2i1.3975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v2i1.3975
    13. I. Purnamasari and W. Setiawan, “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi SPLDV Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Matematika (KAM),” J. Medives J. Math. Educ. IKIP Veteran Semarang, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 207–215, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v3i2.771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v3i2.771
    14. F. T. Aldila, E. F. S. Rini, S. W. Oktavia, N. N. Khaidah, F. P. Sinaga, and N. Sinaga, “The Relationship of Teacher Teaching Skills and Learning Interests of Physics Students of Senior High School,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 1, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24864
    15. M. Suryani, L. H. Jufri, and T. A. Putri, “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Berdasarkan Kemampuan Awal Matematika,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 119–130, 2020, doi: 10.31980/mosharafa.v9i1.605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i1.605
    16. N. Akben, “Effects of the problem-posing approach on students’ problem solving skills and metacognitive awareness in science education,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1143–1165, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7
    17. E. Wibowo and D. D. Pratiwi, “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Menggunakan Aplikasi Kvisoft Flipbook Maker Materi Himpunan,” Desimal J. Mat., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 147, 2018, doi: 10.24042/djm.v1i2.2279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i2.2279
    18. M. Agustin, Y. A. Pratama, W. Sopandi, and I. Rosidah, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Radec Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Mahasiswa PGSD,” J. Cakrawala Pendas, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 140–152, 2021, doi: 10.31949/jcp.v7i1.2672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v7i1.2672
    19. M. V. Situmorang, N. Purba, and B. T. Gultom, “Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Make A Match (MAM) dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar pada Materi Sistem Ekskresi,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 4041–4048, 2021, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1286
    20. D. Bukifan, L. Yuliati, and S. K. Handayanto, “Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Pada Materi Termodinamika Dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry for STEM Education,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1121–1127, 2020, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v5i8.13917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i8.13917
    21. P. R. Amnuel, F. P. Sinaga, and F. R. Winda, “DESCRIPTION OF STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY OF URBAN SCHOOL IN PHYSICS MATERIAL,” Edufisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 217–225, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.26531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.26531
    22. M. Rahmadiyah, H. Wisodo, and Parno, “Pengaruh Penerapan Diagram pada Pembelajaran STEM Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa,” JRPF (Jurnal Ris. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um058v6i1p37-46.
    23. J. P. Casquilho, F. P. Sinaga, N. Septiani, S. W. Oktavia, N. N. Qoidah, and E. F. S. Rini, “THE INFLUENCE OF CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY ON STUDENTS’ SCIENCE LEARNING OUTCOMES,” Edufisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 116–124, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.24865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.24865
    24. S. Wahyuni, E. Rahmadhani, and L. Mandasari, “Pelatihan Pembuatan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif dengan Menggunakan Powerpoint,” J. Abdidas, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 597–602, 2020, doi: 10.31004/abdidas.v1i6.131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/abdidas.v1i6.131
    25. H. N. Falach, “Perbandingan keefektifan pendekatan problem solving dan problem posing dalam pembelajaran matematika pada siswa SMP,” PYTHAGORAS J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 136–148, 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.10635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.10635
    26. A. Jabar, “Penerapan Pendekatan Problem Posing Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 81–88, 2015.
    27. W. N. Shanti and A. M. Abadi, “Keefektifan Pendekatan Problem Solving Dan Problem Posing Dengan Setting Kooperatif Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 121–134, 2015, doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v2i1.7155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i1.7155
    28. F. N. Hidayati, H. Akhsan, and ) Syuhendri, “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas X Pada Materi Elastisitas dan Hukum Hooke di SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya,” J. Inov. dan Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2016.
    29. O. Deke, A. A. L. Jewaru, and Y. U. Kaleka, “Engineering Design Process pada STEM melalui Authentic PBL dan Asesmen Formatif: Meninjau Desain Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Terkait Termodinamika,” BJSME Borneo J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 29–52, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/bjsme.v2i3.5948
    30. Ismiati, “Pembelajaran Biologi SMA Abad ke-21 Berbasis Potensi Lokal: Review Potensi di Kabupaten Nunukan-Kalimantan Utara,” J. Penelit. dan Pengkaj. Ilmu Pendidik. e-Saintika, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 234–247, 2020, doi: 10.36312/e-saintika.v4i2.218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v4i2.218
    31. S. Wanto et al., “Kupas Tuntas Penelitian Pengembangan Model Borg & Gall,” Wahana Dedik. J. PkM Ilmu Kependidikan, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 46–55, 2020, doi: 10.31851/dedikasi.v3i1.5340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31851/dedikasi.v3i1.5340